Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical review. B, Condensed matter

Reply to “Comment on ‘Lagrange-multiplier method in correlated-electron systems: Exact diagonalization study’ ”

Takashi Yanagisawa

Published May 15, 1999• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

We reply to the preceding Comment by Sten. We discuss a role of the Lagrange multipliers using an exact diagonalization.Received 12 November 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12692©1999 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevb.59.12692

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘Electronic structure of spin- 12 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic systems: Ba2Cu(PO4)2 and Sr2Cu(PO4)2 ’ ”

S. Salunke, M. A. H. Ahsan, R. Nath +2 more

In the following we respond to the comments by Rosner et al. [Phys. Rev. B 79, 127101 (2009)].Received 16 October 2008DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.127102©2009 American Physical Society

Physical Review B•Mar 6, 2009•2 citations

Comment on “Investigation of the Correlation Potential from Kohn-Sham Perturbation Theory”

Yann‐Michel Niquet, Martin Fuchs, Xavier Gonze

A Comment on the Letter by . The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 21 October 2002DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.219301©2003 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 29, 2003•13 citations

Comment on “A New Class of Exactly Solvable Interacting Fermion Models in One Dimension”

Andrei A. Zvyagin

A Comment on the Letter by H. J. Schulz and B. Sriram Shastry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1924 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 10 March 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2409©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Mar 15, 1999•6 citations

Reply to ``Comment on `Weakly bound states of the He-He-Ca triatomic system' ''

Qingdong Gou, Yong Li

There are three points in the preceding Comment. We agree with the first point, and we point out that the second and third points are due to a misunderstanding.Received 10 June 2012DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.016502©2012 American Physical Society

Physical Review A•Jul 25, 2012•2 citations

Comment on “Extremely Correlated Fermi Liquids”

Konrad Matho

A Comment on the Letter by B.Sriram Shastry, Phys Rev. Lett. 107, 056403 (2011). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 12 October 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.029701© 2012 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jan 10, 2012•2 citations

Comment on “Dissipative Quantum Dynamics with a Lindblad Functional”

G. W. Ford, Robert F. O’Connell

A Comment on the Letter by S. Gao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3101 (1997). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 10 July 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3376©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Apr 19, 1999•30 citations
We reply to the preceding Comment by Sten. We discuss a role of the Lagrange multipliers using an exact diagonalization.Received 12 November 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.12692©1999 American Physical Society