Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Bulletin of the American Physical Society

The photon shuttle

Florian Marquardt, Georg Heinrich, Jack Harris

Published Mar 16, 2010• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

SDQC: Distributed Quantum Computing Architecture Utilizing Entangled Ion Qubit Shuttling

Seunghyun Baek, Seok-Hyung Lee, Dongmoon Min +1 more

We propose Shuttling-based Distributed Quantum Computing (SDQC), a hybrid architecture that combines the strengths of physical qubit shuttling and distributed quantum computing to enable scalable trapped-ion quantum computing. SDQC performs non-local quantum operations by distributing entangled ion qubits via deterministic shuttling, combining the high-fidelity and deterministic operations of shuttling-based architectures with the parallelism and pipelining advantages of distributed quantum computing. We present (1) a practical architecture incorporating quantum error correction (QEC), (2) pipelining strategies to exploit parallelism in entanglement distribution and measurement, and (3) a performance evaluation in terms of logical error rate and clock speed. For a 256-bit elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem (ECDLP) instance, which requires 2,871 logical qubits at code distance 13, SDQC achieves a logical error rate which is $1.20^{+0.94}_{-0.45}\times10^{-8}$ of Photonic DQC error rate and $3.79^{+5.09}_{-2.84}\times10^{-3}$ of Quantum Charge-Coupled Device (QCCD) error rate, while providing 2.82 times faster logical clock speed than QCCD.

quant-pharXiv:2512.02890•Dec 3, 2025•0 citations

Surfing Photons

Russell Ruthen

Scientific American•Aug 1, 1989•5 citations

Photon locking

Edward T. Sleva, Isaac M. Xavier, A. H. Zewail

World Scientific series in 20th century chemistry•Sep 1, 1994•0 citations

Low-Loss Quantum Buses for Photons

Rachel J. Berkowitz

Researchers demonstrate a way to shuttle photons between modules of a quantum processor that can detect and correct communication losses.

Physics•Aug 5, 2021•0 citations

Photon sorter

Noriaki Horiuchi

Nature Photonics•Aug 31, 2016•1 citation

An Optical-Driven Quantum Shuttle: Modeling, Dynamics and Controllability

Leisheng Jin, Lei Ying, Xiaohong Yan

In this paper, we investigate dynamic properties and controllability of a cavity optomechanical system mechanically connected to a single-electron quantum shuttle, which includes three coupled modes, i.e., optical, mechanical, and electrical modes. Based on quantum description and quantum Langevin framework, the dynamics of these three modes under conditions of weak and strong optical driving are investigated via comprehensive bifurcation analysis. In the weak-driving regime, there is a transition point, where the amplitudes of mechanical and optical modes abruptly jump and the electrical mode decays to a static state. In the strong-driving regime, the three modes exhibit more complicated dynamics, where transitions of period 1–period 2 and periodic–chaotic state are observed. However, the electrical mode shows a different dynamical behavior. Finally, current analysis of the quantum shuttle is presented and discussed. The optical-driven quantum shuttle can be realized in experiments and has potential to serve as a new paradigm for exploring photon-based quantum information processing/transacting and quantum sensing.

IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics•Dec 29, 2017•4 citations
We propose Shuttling-based Distributed Quantum Computing (SDQC), a hybrid architecture that combines the strengths of physical qubit shuttling and distributed quantum computing to enable scalable trapped-ion quantum computing. SDQC performs non-local quantum operations by distributing entangled ion qubits via deterministic shuttling, combining the high-fidelity and deterministic operations of shuttling-based architectures with the parallelism and pipelining advantages of distributed quantum computing. We present (1) a practical architecture incorporating quantum error correction (QEC), (2) pipelining strategies to exploit parallelism in entanglement distribution and measurement, and (3) a performance evaluation in terms of logical error rate and clock speed. For a 256-bit elliptic-curve discrete logarithm problem (ECDLP) instance, which requires 2,871 logical qubits at code distance 13, SDQC achieves a logical error rate which is 1.20−0.45+0.94×10−81.20^{+0.94}_{-0.45}\times10^{-8}1.20−0.45+0.94​×10−8 of Photonic DQC error rate and 3.79−2.84+5.09×10−33.79^{+5.09}_{-2.84}\times10^{-3}3.79−2.84+5.09​×10−3 of Quantum Charge-Coupled Device (QCCD) error rate, while providing 2.82 times faster logical clock speed than QCCD.
In this paper, we investigate dynamic properties and controllability of a cavity optomechanical system mechanically connected to a single-electron quantum shuttle, which includes three coupled modes, i.e., optical, mechanical, and electrical modes. Based on quantum description and quantum Langevin framework, the dynamics of these three modes under conditions of weak and strong optical driving are investigated via comprehensive bifurcation analysis. In the weak-driving regime, there is a transition point, where the amplitudes of mechanical and optical modes abruptly jump and the electrical mode decays to a static state. In the strong-driving regime, the three modes exhibit more complicated dynamics, where transitions of period 1–period 2 and periodic–chaotic state are observed. However, the electrical mode shows a different dynamical behavior. Finally, current analysis of the quantum shuttle is presented and discussed. The optical-driven quantum shuttle can be realized in experiments and has potential to serve as a new paradigm for exploring photon-based quantum information processing/transacting and quantum sensing.