Quantum uncertainty emerged from two strikingly different routes to quantum mechanics. Heisenberg's matrix mechanics replaced the classical description of atomic orbits by relations among observable transition quantities and led, in 1927, to the uncertainty relation and its influential measurement-based interpretation. Schrödinger's wave mechanics grew instead from the Bose--Einstein and de Broglie developments and restored a continuous space-time description through matter waves. The two formalisms were soon shown to be closely related, but neither historical route by itself settles the ontological question of whether particles may possess underlying trajectories.
After reviewing these developments, including Einstein's criticism of a simple observability doctrine and Mott's wave-mechanical account of straight cloud-chamber tracks, we distinguish precise quantum uncertainty relations from the stronger claim that quantum mechanics excludes definite microscopic histories. We then compare Feynman paths, Bohmian trajectories, Nelson's stochastic mechanics, and finite-speed persistent Goldstein--Kac dynamics. The Kac process has continuous, piecewise differentiable finite-speed paths; its diffusion limit approaches Wiener kinematics, while analytic continuation of its two-sector dynamics is related to Dirac evolution. These examples show that quantum uncertainty relations constrain observable statistics without, by themselves, uniquely determining an underlying path geometry.
Comments
26 pages, no figures; only a short subsection on Decoherent Histories and Trajectories has been added
Quantum uncertainty emerged from two strikingly different routes to quantum mechanics. Heisenberg's matrix mechanics replaced the classical description of atomic orbits by relations among observable transition quantities and led, in 1927, to the uncertainty relation and its influential measurement-based interpretation. Schrödinger's wave mechanics grew instead from the Bose--Einstein and de Broglie developments and restored a continuous space-time description through matter waves. The two formalisms were soon shown to be closely related, but neither historical route by itself settles the ontological question of whether particles may possess underlying trajectories.
After reviewing these developments, including Einstein's criticism of a simple observability doctrine and Mott's wave-mechanical account of straight cloud-chamber tracks, we distinguish precise quantum uncertainty relations from the stronger claim that quantum mechanics excludes definite microscopic histories. We then compare Feynman paths, Bohmian trajectories, Nelson's stochastic mechanics, and finite-speed persistent Goldstein--Kac dynamics. The Kac process has continuous, piecewise differentiable finite-speed paths; its diffusion limit approaches Wiener kinematics, while analytic continuation of its two-sector dynamics is related to Dirac evolution. These examples show that quantum uncertainty relations constrain observable statistics without, by themselves, uniquely determining an underlying path geometry.
Maintaining the position that the wave function ψ provides a complete description of state, the traditional formalism of quantum mechanics is augmented by introducing continuous trajectories for particles which are sample paths of a stochastic process determined (including the underlying probability space) by ψ. In the resulting formalism, problems relating to measurements and objective reality are solved as in Bohmian mechanics (without sharing its weak points). The pitfalls of Nelson's stochastic mechanics are also avoided.
A history of the discovery of `new' quantum mechanics and the paradoxes of its probabilistic interpretation are briefly reviewed from the modern point of view of quantum probability and information. Modern quantum theory, which has been developed during the last 20 years for the treatment of quantum open systems including quantum noise, decoherence, quantum diffusions and spontaneous jumps occurring under continuous in time observation, is not yet a part of the standard curriculum of quantum physics. It is argued that the conventional formalism of quantum mechanics is insufficient for the description of quantum events, such as spontaneous decays say, and the new experimental phenomena related to individual quantum measurements, but they have all received an adequate mathematical treatment in quantum stochastics of open systems. Moreover, the only reasonable probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics put forward by Max Born was, in fact, in irreconcilable contradiction with traditional mechanical reality and causality. This led to numerous quantum paradoxes, some of them due to the great inventors of quantum theory such as Einstein and Schrödinger. They are reconsidered in this paper from the modern point of view of quantum stochastics and information. The development of quantum measurement theory, initiated by von Neumann, indicated a possibility for resolution of this interpretational crisis by divorcing the algebra of the dynamical generators and the algebra of the actual observables, or Bell's be ables. It is shown that within this approach quantum causality can be rehabilitated in the form of a superselection rule for compatibility of the actual histories with the potential future. This rule, together with the self-compatibility of the measurements ensuring the consistency of the histories, is called the nondemolition, or causality principle in modern quantum theory. The application of this rule in the form of dynamical commutation relations leads to the derivation of the von Neumann projection postulate, and also to the more general reductions, instantaneous, spontaneous, and even continuous in time. This gives a dynamical solution, in the form of the quantum stochastic filtering equations, of the notorious measurement problem which was tackled unsuccessfully by many famous physicists starting with Schrödinger and Bohr. It has been recently proved that the quantum stochastic model for the continuous in time measurements is equivalent to a Dirac type boundary-value problem for the secondary quantized input `offer waves from future' in one extra dimension, and to a reduction of the algebra of the consistent histories of past events to an Abelian subalgebra for the `trajectories of the output particles'. This supports the corpuscular-wave duality in the form of the thesis that everything in the future are quantized waves, while everything in the past are trajectories of the recorded particles.
In the first two chapters we have examined the basic principles – superposition (p. 18), complementarity (p. 19), quantization (p. 44), statistical algorithm (p. 57), and correspondence (p. 72) (see also Subsec. 2.3.4) – and the basic entities, observables and states, of quantum mechanics, as well as the main differences with respect to classical mechanics. While what we have discussed so far is rather a static picture of observables and states, in this chapter we shall deal with quantum dynamics, i.e. with the time evolution of quantum-mechanical systems. Historically, after Bohr had provided a quantized description of the atom (see Subsec. 1.5.4), Einstein showed the quantized nature of photons (see Subsec. 1.2.1), and de Broglie hypothized the wave-like nature of matter (see Subsec. 1.5.5), the first building block of quantum mechanics was provided by the commutation relations, proposed by Heisenberg in 1925, whose consequence is represented by the uncertainty relation (see Subsec. 2.2.7 and Sec. 2.3). This was the subject of the previous chapters. The dynamical part of the theory was proposed by Schrödinger in 1926, and is known as the Schrödinger equation. It is also known as wave mechanics (see Subsec. 1.5.7). In this chapter we shall show that Heisenberg's and Schrödinger's formulations are only two different aspects of the same theory. We shall also come back to this point in Sec. 8.1.1. Here, first we shall derive the fundamental equation which rules quantum dynamics (Sec. 3.1), and, in Sec. 3.2, we shall summarize the main properties of the Schrödinger equation.
de Broglie-Bohm theory (dBBT), treating quantum particles as point objects moving along well defined (Bohmian) trajectories, offers an appealing solution of the measurement problem in quantum mechanics; it has, however, problems relating to spin, relativity and lack of proper integration with the Hilbert space based framework. In this work, we present a consistent formalism which has the traditional state-observable framework integrated with the desirable features of dBBT. We adopt ensemble interpretation for the Schrodinger wave function ψ. Given a Schrodinger wave function ψ, we use its value ψ0 at some fixed time (say, t=0) to define the probability measure ∣ψ0∣2dx on the system configuration space M (=Rn). On the resulting probability space M0, we introduce a stochastic process ξ(t) corresponding to the Heisenberg position operator XH(t) such that, in the Heisenberg state ∣ψh⟩ corresponding to ψ0, the expectation value of XH(t) equals that of ξ(t) in M0. This condition leads to the de Broglie-Bohm guidance equation for the sample paths of the process ξ(t) which are, therefore, Bohmian trajectories supposedly representing time-evolutions of individual members of the ψ0-ensemble. Stochastic processes and Bohmian trajectories corresponding to observables with discrete eigenvalues (in particular spin) are treated by extending the configuration space to the spectral space of the commutative algebra obtained by adding appropriate discrete observables to the position observables. Pauli's equation is treated as an example. A straightforward derivation of von Neumann's projection rule employing the Schrodinger-Bohm evolution of individual systems along their Bohmian trajectories is given. Some comments on the potential application of the formalism developed here to quantum mechanics of the universe are included.
Analysis of the initial stages of the logical process followed by Louis de Broglie in establishing the electron phase wave equation in his 1924 thesis, which triggered the development of Wave Mechanics when Erwin Schrödinger formalized this concept with his vectorial wave equation. This development was soon followed by Quantum Mechanics, when Schrödinger proved that the Matrix Mechanics independently developed by Werner Heisenberg was equivalent to Wave Mechanics, with both theories leaving room for some degree of uncertainty as to the physical localization of the moving electron. This is what led Heisenberg to also formalize the Uncertainty Principle to take this situation into account. This principle was soon regarded as a fundamental axiomatic principle that seemed to make further exploration of the subatomic level of magnitude appear impossible to most researchers. We will analyze in this article the reason why the phase-wave velocity established by de Broglie generated this uncertainty in the localization of the moving electron in light of the current state of knowledge on the behavior of the electron in motion, in view of establishing the relevance of maintaining the Uncertainty Principle in the study of the subatomic level of magnitude.
Trajectory-based approaches to quantum mechanics include the de Broglie–Bohm interpretation and Nelson's stochastic interpretation. It is shown that the usual route to establishing the validity of such interpretations, via a decomposition of the Schrödinger equation into a continuity equation and a modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation, fails for some quantum states. A very simple example is provided by a quantum particle in a box, described by a wavefunction that is initially uniform over the interior of the box. For this example, there is no corresponding continuity or modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation, and the space-time dependence of the wavefunction has a known fractal structure. Examples with finite average energies are also constructed.