We propose SPICE-Q, a SPICE-inspired design-technology co-optimization framework for superconducting quantum processors. Rather than replacing tools such as HFSS, Qiskit Metal, pyEPR, SQcircuit, SQuADDS, scqubits, or QuTiP, SPICE-Q aims to connect them through a unified, traceable data chain spanning process rules, layout, electromagnetic simulation, energy-participation-ratio and circuit quantization, Hamiltonian extraction, noise analysis, cryogenic test, and manufacturing feedback. The central mapping is from process and PDK constraints to layout geometry, electromagnetic modes, equivalent circuit parameters, effective Hamiltonians, and finally metrics such as frequency, coupling, anharmonicity, decoherence, readout performance, and yield. This flow must capture Josephson-junction variability, transmon frequency allocation, resonator and Purcell constraints, coupler crosstalk, microwave routing, 3D interconnects, material/interface loss, package modes, and wafer-scale process statistics. By introducing standardized model interfaces, statistical parameter models, model cards, version governance, and closed-loop calibration from cryogenic and fabrication data, SPICE-Q frames superconducting quantum-chip design as an engineering workflow rather than a collection of isolated simulations. We argue that scalable and fault-tolerant quantum processors will require such a continuous model chain from device physics and electromagnetic fields to quantum dynamics, noise, manufacturability, and system-level yield.
We propose SPICE-Q, a SPICE-inspired design-technology co-optimization framework for superconducting quantum processors. Rather than replacing tools such as HFSS, Qiskit Metal, pyEPR, SQcircuit, SQuADDS, scqubits, or QuTiP, SPICE-Q aims to connect them through a unified, traceable data chain spanning process rules, layout, electromagnetic simulation, energy-participation-ratio and circuit quantization, Hamiltonian extraction, noise analysis, cryogenic test, and manufacturing feedback. The central mapping is from process and PDK constraints to layout geometry, electromagnetic modes, equivalent circuit parameters, effective Hamiltonians, and finally metrics such as frequency, coupling, anharmonicity, decoherence, readout performance, and yield. This flow must capture Josephson-junction variability, transmon frequency allocation, resonator and Purcell constraints, coupler crosstalk, microwave routing, 3D interconnects, material/interface loss, package modes, and wafer-scale process statistics. By introducing standardized model interfaces, statistical parameter models, model cards, version governance, and closed-loop calibration from cryogenic and fabrication data, SPICE-Q frames superconducting quantum-chip design as an engineering workflow rather than a collection of isolated simulations. We argue that scalable and fault-tolerant quantum processors will require such a continuous model chain from device physics and electromagnetic fields to quantum dynamics, noise, manufacturability, and system-level yield.
Quantum Electronic Design Automation (Q-EDA) is emerging as quantum chips move from laboratory prototypes to scalable engineering systems. This paper argues that superconducting quantum chip design is approaching a "SPICE moment" similar to early classical EDA, where growing qubit scale, control complexity, frequency planning, packaging, process variation, and cryogenic measurement feedback require a shift from experience-based design to model-driven engineering. We propose a Quantum Chip Paradigm Framework that treats Q-EDA not only as software, but as part of the quantum chip development paradigm. Unlike classical HDL-first design, quantum chip design must begin with physical structures such as Josephson junctions, resonators, couplers, readout elements, control lines, and packaging environments. The framework emphasizes PCell-based modeling, SPICE-Q simulation, Quantum PDKs, and design-technology-measurement co-optimization. We further outline a hierarchical Q-EDA system spanning physical structures, qubit PCells, logical qubits, quantum arithmetic, functional quantum IP, and Quantum SoC systems. The key goal is to turn physical models, layout rules, simulation results, fabrication data, and measurement feedback into reusable and auditable engineering objects for large-scale quantum processors and fault-tolerant quantum computing.
This paper proposes a fabless quantum-chip design and production architecture for superconducting quantum computing, centered on the SPICE-Q multiphysics simulation framework. The proposed ecosystem connects process-certified quantum PDKs, parameterized device cells, traceable model cards, SPICE-Q physical modeling languages, unified Q-EDA flows, foundry sign-off rules, cryogenic test feedback, and reusable quantum IP. In this model, design firms do not merely outsource fabrication; they prepare verified tape-outs under standardized process constraints and calibrated physical models. Its economic value lies in reducing repetitive device debugging, process exploration, and low-level layout effort, while its feasibility depends on PDK maturity, foundry yield, cryogenic test throughput, model-prediction accuracy, data-feedback mechanisms, and IP licensing boundaries. We argue that superconducting quantum chips can move from the current largely vertically integrated development model toward a fabless-foundry ecosystem only when hardware design is supported by standardized, verifiable, and reusable software and process interfaces. The required pillars are certified PDKs, PCell-based parameterized design, SPICE-Q cross-physics simulation, end-to-end Q-EDA automation, and a tradable quantum-IP market. By adapting lessons from the classical semiconductor industry to quantum hardware, this framework defines a path toward scalable, manufacturable, and commercially reusable superconducting quantum-chip design.
This work presents a comprehensive analytical and simulation-based study of superconducting quantum chip architectures, spanning both 2D planar and 3D-integrated designs. We first design and simulate a planar quantum chip layout using Qiskit Metal, which is imported into Ansys HFSS (High Frequency Structure Simulator) to construct a 3D model and perform electromagnetic simulations. A detailed analysis using Driven Modal, Eigenmode, Magnetostatic, and Q3D Capacitance Extraction solvers ensures our simulations accurately reflect physical behavior. The results are validated against analytical models from microwave engineering. pyEPR (Python Energy Participation Ratio) is used to extract key quantum metrics, including eigenfrequencies, quality factors, decoherence times, anharmonicity, cross-Kerr interactions, and participation ratios. Building on this planar design, we extend our study to a 3D-integrated flip-chip architecture featuring two superconducting qubits fabricated on separate high-resistivity silicon substrates. Using HFSS and analytical modeling, we show that detuned qubits maintain stable eigenfrequencies, quality factors, decoherence times, anharmonicity, and cross-Kerr interactions over varying substrate separation values. However, the introduction of dielectric loss tangents reduces quality factors which degrades coherence times and introduces an additional dephasing. These findings highlight the potential of 3D quantum integration, given minimal material imperfections.The planar and 3D designs together form a cohesive investigation into next-generation quantum hardware, with the 2D layout currently taped-out and under fabrication.
This work presents a conceptual architecture and technological roadmap for a scalable superconducting quantum computing platform based on modular design principles. Rather than introducing a new qubit technology, the proposal focuses on addressing critical engineering bottlenecks that currently limit the large-scale deployment of quantum processors, including wiring complexity, electromagnetic crosstalk, fabrication yield, and latency in error-correction feedback loops.The proposed framework introduces a modular hybrid architecture (“Quantum Mesh”), where medium-scale quantum chiplets containing 25–50 superconducting transmon qubits are interconnected through advanced 3D packaging and cryogenic infrastructure. This approach aims to improve manufacturing yield, reduce wiring density, and enable rack-level integration of quantum processing units while maintaining high gate fidelities and manageable thermal loads.A second central element of the proposal is the integration of a high-fidelity digital twin environment capable of simulating qubit dynamics, noise sources, control latency, and thermal constraints at nanosecond resolution. This predictive framework is intended to support hardware iteration cycles prior to fabrication, potentially accelerating design optimization and system validation.The document outlines a three-year development pathway targeting 100–200 physical qubits and several logical qubits using surface code error correction, followed by a longer-term scaling strategy toward quantum fabrics exceeding one thousand qubits. By combining modular quantum chiplets, partial cryogenic electronics, and predictive digital twin modeling, the proposed architecture explores a plausible industrial pathway toward large-scale quantum computing systems.
Quantum computing is advancing rapidly, with superconducting quantum computing (SQC) emerging as one of the most promising platforms for scalable quantum information processing. In contrast to fabrication-focused approaches prevalent in current literature, this work presents a fully simulation-based design and tuning methodology for a small-scale superconducting quantum chip - addressing practical limitations posed by fabrication resource constraints - and consequently excludes physical chip fabrication or real-time performance evaluation (e.g., fidelity and error rate measurements). A meticulous, step-by-step electromagnetic simulation was conducted on the chip, designed using Qiskit Metal and Ansys Electronics, with qubit parameters tuned and verified using the Lumped Oscillator Model (LOM) and Energy Participation Ratio (EPR) methods. The design achieves good parameter convergence with relative tuning error rates (Δ%) below 0.05% after 15 adaptive passes and approximately 50,000 solved mesh elements, yielding an Energy Participation Ratio (EPR) of 91.8 % for the chip substrate (Silicon). Furthermore, the study includes a theoretical comparison between two fundamental qubit-qubit coupling schemes. A key contribution of this work lies in systematically analyzing how geometric variations in qubit design affect critical quantum parameters such as qubit frequencies, anharmonicities, coupling strengths, and dispersive shifts - thereby offering a comprehen-sive, simulation-driven framework for early-stage quantum chip prototyping.
Superconducting quantum computing is advancing toward the thousand- and even million-qubit regime, making wafer-scale fabrication an essential pathway for achieving large-scale, cost-effective quantum processors. This manufacturing paradigm imposes new requirements on quantum-chip electronic design automation (Q-EDA): design tools must not only generate layouts (GDSII files) that satisfy quantum-circuit physical constraints but also ensure that the design data can be seamlessly converted into a complete set of manufacturing files executable by a wafer foundry, thereby enabling reliable translation from design intent to physical chip. This paper focuses on this critical data-conversion pipeline and presents a systematic treatment of the Q-EDA technology stack for wafer-scale fabrication. Starting from GDSII as the single authoritative data source, we analyze the key stages including process-design-kit (PDK)-based design rule checking (DRC), layout-versus-schematic (LVS) verification, design for manufacturability (DFM) optimization, wafer layout planning, and mask data preparation (MDP). We describe the concrete architecture of a Q-EDA system, present nine quantum-specific DRC rules together with their physical underpinnings and a multi-layer process stack model, and benchmark the manufacturing data-flow coverage of mainstream Q-EDA tools. Finally, we discuss the core challenges and future directions in this field.