Position verification schemes are interactive protocols where entities prove their physical location to others; this enables interactive proofs for statements of the form "I am at a location $L$." Although secure position verification cannot be achieved with classical protocols (even with computational assumptions), they are feasible with quantum protocols.
In this paper we introduce the notion of zero-knowledge position verification, which generalizes position verification in two ways:
1. enabling entities to prove more sophisticated statements about their locations at different times (for example, "I was NOT near location $L$ at noon yesterday").
2. maintaining privacy for any other detail about their true location besides the statement they are proving.
We construct zero-knowledge position verification from standard position verification and post-quantum one-way functions. The central tool in our construction is a primitive we call position commitments, which allow entities to privately commit to their physical position in a particular moment, which is then revealed at some later time.
Position verification schemes are interactive protocols where entities prove their physical location to others; this enables interactive proofs for statements of the form "I am at a location L." Although secure position verification cannot be achieved with classical protocols (even with computational assumptions), they are feasible with quantum protocols.
In this paper we introduce the notion of zero-knowledge position verification, which generalizes position verification in two ways:
enabling entities to prove more sophisticated statements about their locations at different times (for example, "I was NOT near location L at noon yesterday").
maintaining privacy for any other detail about their true location besides the statement they are proving.
We construct zero-knowledge position verification from standard position verification and post-quantum one-way functions. The central tool in our construction is a primitive we call position commitments, which allow entities to privately commit to their physical position in a particular moment, which is then revealed at some later time.
While quantum position verification aims to certify a prover's location using quantum information, existing security definitions only guarantee that part of the successful adversarial party is in the claimed location. This leaves open the possibility that a distributed team of adversaries can jointly simulate a prover in a way that defeats the intended meaning of `being at a location' in position-based cryptography. We introduce stronger notions of position verification that we call quantum localization, which requires that there is a specified, unclonable state at the verified spacetime point-and that this state can be found nowhere else. We show that quantum localization leads naturally to a meaningful notion of trajectory verification, in which quantum information is verifiably tracked through space and time. We construct quantum localization and trajectory verification protocols using quantum anchor states, which generalize coset states from unclonable cryptography. The security of our schemes is proven in the classical oracle (i.e. ideal obfuscation) model, which can be heuristically instantiated in the plain model using post-quantum indistinguishability obfuscation. We also introduce and instantiate the concept of functionality localization, which guarantees that the adversary has the ability to compute a secret function at the verified spacetime point, and this function cannot be computed anywhere else. This raises the intriguing possibility of localizing computational capabilities in space and time. More broadly, we believe our notions of quantum localization and subsequent feasibility results provide stronger foundations for position-based cryptography. At a conceptual level, our results also explore the tight link between two fundamental notions in physics-location and information-thus serving as a natural foundation for cryptographic capabilities tied to physical spacetime.
Zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) enable the verification of a statement without revealing any information beyond its validity and constitute a fundamental primitive in cryptography and information theory. However, existing constructions rely on computational assumptions and are predominantly confined to bipartite settings, leaving their information-theoretic realization in bipartite or network scenarios largely unexplored. Here we develop a framework for zero-knowledge verification based on the indistinguishability of quantum states under operational constraints. Exploiting the fundamental limitations imposed by local operations, we show that a verifier is inherently restricted from extracting information about the underlying state while retaining the ability to verify correctness. We construct explicit protocols for multiparty quantum networks that achieve information-theoretic security, ensuring that no subset of collaborating parties can gain knowledge beyond the validity of the statement, independent of their joint computational power.
A Zero-Knowledge Proof basically is a protocol between two parties, the Prover and the Verifier, that allows the Prover to convince the Verifier about the truthness of a non trivial statement without revealing any additional information. Zero Knowledge Proofs have found a lot of practical applications covering most of the protocols concerning about data privacy and protocol verification. Examples of that are anonymous cash or electronic voting. The possibility to have real quantum computers with a reasonable size in a near future is forcing the cryptographic community to devise new methods to provide security that resist quantum attacks. Most of the zero-knowledge protocols used nowadays are based on computational problems like the discrete logarithm problem that can no longer be considered hard, since there are known efficient ways to solve them with quantum algorithms. Cryptographic research about the quantum security of zero knowledge proofs started nearly 20 years ago in a very theoretical approach, but not many papers on that topic appeared since then. The goal of this thesis is writing a survey including the main concepts about quantum secure zero-knowledge protocols, the state-of-the-art both from the theoretical and practical approaches, and an exploration of their potential application areas. The survey will be a good starting document for further students willing to do research in this topic.
This doctoral thesis explores quantum position verification (QPV)---a cryptographic task where one attempts to confirm someone’s geographical location. The core question that QPV aims to answer is: Are you truly at the location you claim to be? To achieve this, QPV combines two pillars of the fundamental laws of nature: (i) special relativity, which limits the speed at which information can travel to the speed of light in vacuum, and (ii) quantum mechanics, which governs the behavior of quantum particles in ways that defy intuition. QPV protocols rely on (i) timing communication between the entities involved in the protocol, and (ii) transmitting information encoded in quantum particles. However, quantum hackers may attempt to pretend to be at the claimed location while actually being elsewhere. This raises the critical question: Can one be certain that the claimed location is genuine and not forged by hackers? This thesis presents new advances toward a fundamental understanding of QPV, its security against powerful quantum hackers, and the feasibility of secure QPV protocols despite experimental challenges that, if exploited by hackers, can severely compromise their security. Furthermore, related to attacks on QPV protocols, this thesis analyzes quantum correlations that emerge in broader cryptographic primitives.
We discuss the question of how physical statements can be proven over digital communication channels between two parties (a "prover" and a "verifier") residing in two separate local systems. Examples include: (i) "a certain object in the prover's system has temperature X°C", (ii) "two certain objects in the prover's system are positioned at distance X", or (iii) "a certain object in the prover's system has been irreversibly altered or destroyed". As illustrated by these examples, our treatment goes beyond classical security sensors in considering more general physical statements. Another distinctive aspect is the underlying security model: We neither assume secret keys in the prover's system, nor do we suppose classical sensor hardware in his system which is tamper-resistant and trusted by the verifier. Without an established name, we call this new type of security protocol a "virtual proof of reality" or simply a "virtual proof" (VP). In order to illustrate our novel concept, we give example VPs based on temperature sensitive integrated circuits, disordered optical scattering media, and quantum systems. The corresponding protocols prove the temperature, relative position, or destruction/modification of certain physical objects in the prover's system to the verifier. These objects (so-called "witness objects") are prepared by the verifier and handed over to the prover prior to the VP. Furthermore, we verify the practical validity of our method for all our optical and circuit-based VPs in detailed proof-of-concept experiments. Our work touches upon, and partly extends, several established concepts in cryptography and security, including physical unclonable functions, quantum cryptography, interactive proof systems, and, most recently, physical zero-knowledge proofs. We also discuss potential advancements of our method, for example "public virtual proofs" that function without exchanging witness objects between the verifier and the prover.
Abstract Quantum position verification (QPV) enables multiple verifiers to certify a prover’s location using quantum communication and physical assumptions. With experimental demonstrations of QPV becoming increasingly feasible, enhancing the practicality and security of QPV protocols is more important than ever. In this work, we make three key contributions toward this goal. First, we introduce a robust QPV protocol in which the verifier’s state preparation is independent of channel loss, improving reliability in real-world conditions. Second, we refine existing security analysis techniques to bolster protocol resilience against experimental imperfections. Third, we identify and address some implicit assumptions present in existing security analyses, providing a framework to eliminate such assumptions. Additionally, as an example of QPV application beyond location verification, we illustrate how QPV can be leveraged for authenticating classical communication in quantum key distribution.