While quantum position verification aims to certify a prover's location using quantum information, existing security definitions only guarantee that part of the successful adversarial party is in the claimed location. This leaves open the possibility that a distributed team of adversaries can jointly simulate a prover in a way that defeats the intended meaning of `being at a location' in position-based cryptography. We introduce stronger notions of position verification that we call quantum localization, which requires that there is a specified, unclonable state at the verified spacetime point-and that this state can be found nowhere else. We show that quantum localization leads naturally to a meaningful notion of trajectory verification, in which quantum information is verifiably tracked through space and time. We construct quantum localization and trajectory verification protocols using quantum anchor states, which generalize coset states from unclonable cryptography. The security of our schemes is proven in the classical oracle (i.e. ideal obfuscation) model, which can be heuristically instantiated in the plain model using post-quantum indistinguishability obfuscation. We also introduce and instantiate the concept of functionality localization, which guarantees that the adversary has the ability to compute a secret function at the verified spacetime point, and this function cannot be computed anywhere else. This raises the intriguing possibility of localizing computational capabilities in space and time. More broadly, we believe our notions of quantum localization and subsequent feasibility results provide stronger foundations for position-based cryptography. At a conceptual level, our results also explore the tight link between two fundamental notions in physics-location and information-thus serving as a natural foundation for cryptographic capabilities tied to physical spacetime.
While quantum position verification aims to certify a prover's location using quantum information, existing security definitions only guarantee that part of the successful adversarial party is in the claimed location. This leaves open the possibility that a distributed team of adversaries can jointly simulate a prover in a way that defeats the intended meaning of `being at a location' in position-based cryptography. We introduce stronger notions of position verification that we call quantum localization, which requires that there is a specified, unclonable state at the verified spacetime point-and that this state can be found nowhere else. We show that quantum localization leads naturally to a meaningful notion of trajectory verification, in which quantum information is verifiably tracked through space and time. We construct quantum localization and trajectory verification protocols using quantum anchor states, which generalize coset states from unclonable cryptography. The security of our schemes is proven in the classical oracle (i.e. ideal obfuscation) model, which can be heuristically instantiated in the plain model using post-quantum indistinguishability obfuscation. We also introduce and instantiate the concept of functionality localization, which guarantees that the adversary has the ability to compute a secret function at the verified spacetime point, and this function cannot be computed anywhere else. This raises the intriguing possibility of localizing computational capabilities in space and time. More broadly, we believe our notions of quantum localization and subsequent feasibility results provide stronger foundations for position-based cryptography. At a conceptual level, our results also explore the tight link between two fundamental notions in physics-location and information-thus serving as a natural foundation for cryptographic capabilities tied to physical spacetime.
A spacetime seal, a cryptographic guarantee that a digital event has occurred at an approved location and time, can augment a digital signature with location attestation for legal, financial, and regulatory use cases. In adversarial settings any purely classical realization of such a seal can be spoofed. Quantum position verification (QPV) offers a physics-based solution, exploiting the no-cloning theorem and the no-signaling principle to certify a party's spacetime coordinates. While the feasibility of QPV has been recently shown via entanglement- and coherent light-based protocols, achieving loss tolerance for these schemes substantially increases implementation complexity at metropolitan scales. Here, we introduce and experimentally demonstrate a loss-tolerant QPV (LT-QPV) protocol whose security is independent of channel loss. We prove finite-size security against quantum polynomial-time entangled adversaries in the quantum random oracle model instantiated with cryptographically secure hash functions. Implemented entirely with commercial off-the-shelf components, our system certifies position within 22 minutes of net data collection time against a restricted adversary, with a clear path to real-time certification (<1s) with upgraded hardware. Our architecture, requiring only a single quantum verifier node alongside classical infrastructure, is naturally compatible with metropolitan-area quantum networks, establishing the foundations for scalable, physics-backed spacetime certification as a deployable service.
The goal of position-based cryptography is for an honest party to use her spatio-temporal position as her only credential in a cryptographic protocol. In particular, Position-Verification aims at verifying that a certain party, called the prover, holds a given position in spacetime. Such a protocol typically goes as follows: a set of verifiers will coordinate and send some challenge to the prover, and it is expected that only someone sitting in the supposed position of the prover can successfully pass the challenge. Two papers established that information theoretic security is not possible for Position-Based Quantum Cryptography (PBQC) protocols: neither in the classical [1], nor in the quantum [2] regime. More precisely, it is always possible for a coalition of adversaries to convince the verifiers, even if none of the adversary sits in the spatiotemporal region where the prover is supposed to be. At the same time, the best known attack strategies require the adversaries to share very entangled states: the attacks described in [2] are based on Vaidman’s protocol for nonlocal computation [3] and consist in the cheaters teleporting some quantum state back and forth, with a total cost in terms of required EPR pairs that scales double exponentially in n, the number of qubits involved in the PBQC protocol. Later, new generic attacks based on port-based teleportation[4] were proposed and require only exponential entanglement to succeed [5]. Finally, it is also know that a linear amount of entanglement is not su cient to break the PBQC protocol [5], [6]. A major open question in the field is to bridge the gap between lower and upper bounds: does there exist a protocol that requires exponentially many EPR pairs to break, or are all PBQC protocols insecure against a coalition of adversaries that shares polynomially many EPR pairs? While we do not settle this question in the present paper, we make some progress towards it by exhibiting new attack strategies with polynomial complexity against a large family of practical protocols. These attacks rely on teleportation gates and their precise complexity can be quantified with the notion of Cli↵ord hierarchy [7] of a quantum gate. We then introduce a new family of protocols, that generalizes a construction by Lau and Lo [8], which appears to be immune against these polynomialcomplexity attacks. Another main challenge is to determine whether there exist some PBQC protocol resistant to channel imperfections, either losses or noise, between the verifiers and
Position verification schemes are interactive protocols where entities prove their physical location to others; this enables interactive proofs for statements of the form "I am at a location L." Although secure position verification cannot be achieved with classical protocols (even with computational assumptions), they are feasible with quantum protocols.
In this paper we introduce the notion of zero-knowledge position verification, which generalizes position verification in two ways:
1. enabling entities to prove more sophisticated statements about their locations at different times (for example, "I was NOT near location L at noon yesterday").
2. maintaining privacy for any other detail about their true location besides the statement they are proving.
We construct zero-knowledge position verification from standard position verification and post-quantum one-way functions. The central tool in our construction is a primitive we call position commitments, which allow entities to privately commit to their physical position in a particular moment, which is then revealed at some later time.
In this work, we study position-based cryptography in the quantum setting. The aim is to use the geographical position of a party as its only credential. On the negative side, we show that if adversaries are allowed to share an arbitrarily large entangled quantum state, the task of secure position-verification is impossible. To this end, we prove the following very general result. Assume that Alice and Bob hold respectively subsystems A and B of a (possibly) unknown quantum state ∣ψ⟩∈HA⊗HB. Their goal is to calculate and share a new state ∣φ⟩=U∣ψ⟩, where U is a fixed unitary operation. The question that we ask is how many rounds of mutual communication are needed. It is easy to achieve such a task using two rounds of classical communication, whereas, in general, it is impossible with no communication at all. Surprisingly, in case Alice and Bob share enough entanglement to start with and we allow an arbitrarily small failure probability, we show that the same task can be done using a single round of classical communication in which Alice and Bob exchange two classical messages. Actually, we prove that a relaxed version of the task can be done with no communication at all, where the task is to compute instead a state ∣φ′⟩ that coincides with ∣φ⟩=U∣ψ⟩ up to local operations on A and on B, which are determined by classical information held by Alice and Bob. The one-round scheme for the original task then follows as a simple corollary. We also show that these results generalize to more players. As a consequence, we show a generic attack that breaks any position-verification scheme. On the positive side, we show that if adversaries do not share any entangled quantum state but can compute arbitrary quantum operations, secure position-verification is achievable. Jointly, these results suggest the interesting question whether secure position-verification is possible in case of a bounded amount of entanglement. Our positive result can be interpreted as resolving this question in the simplest case, where the bound is set to zero. In models where secure position-verification is achievable, it has a number of interesting applications. For example, it enables secure communication over an insecure channel without having any preshared key, with the guarantee that only a party at a specific location can learn the content of the conversation. More generally, we show that in settings where secure position-verification is achievable, other position-based cryptographic schemes are possible as well, such as secure position-based authentication and position-based key agreement.
Secure position verification certifies that a remote prover occupies a claimed location, a task that is provably impossible with classical resources alone against colluding adversaries. Most existing quantum position verification schemes require transmitting quantum states between verifiers and provers, and the resulting photon loss makes long-distance verification impractical. Classical verifier position verification (CVPV) schemes with classical verifier-prover communication exist, but rely on complex quantum processes that generate certifiable randomness, placing them outside the reach of near-term hardware. Here we introduce a general compiler that maps any complete-support non-local game with the required quantum advantage into a multi-prover CVPV protocol. This addresses both limitations, with entirely classical verifier-prover communication and all quantum resources confined to shared entanglement and local measurements on the prover devices. Instantiating with the CHSH game enables near-term implementation on existing experimental platforms. We prove finite-size security in the quantum random oracle model for both simultaneous verification of multiple provers and verification of a single prover with multiple prover devices. Notably, security in the multi-prover setting is governed not by the certified randomness of the joint provers' outputs, but by certified blind local randomness that depends critically on the spatial arrangement of provers and verifiers.
Position verification is an emerging field of quantum cryptography. Its goal is to verify whether a distant communicating party is telling the truth about where they are. However, the problem is usually formulated in a way that the position is the only credential of that party, which cannot guarantee uniqueness. In this study, the authors show how a practically secure position verification algorithm – assuming it exists – might be used to track (i.e. repeatedly verify the position) of some unique key or cipher text. To achieve this, they rely on pre‐prepared position verification data called trackers. They also propose three algorithms that implement their general tracking scheme and examine some questions related to their security. These implementations include shuffling trackers into valuable data and hiding their memory address through a random permutation; using CNOT operations to entangle valuable data and trackers; and using random qubit strings from which either trackers or secret keys can be produced at will. These methods may be used to track a diplomatic package or reveal the location of a malicious party during a denial of service attack.