Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2512.11148

Solutions of Koopman-von Neumann equations, their superpositions, and uncertainties

Mustafa Amin, Mark A. Walton

quant-phmath-phphysics.class-phSubmitted Dec 11, 2025• Announced Dec 15, 2025• 0 citations• Revised Oct 3, 2026 (v2)
v1 · Dec 11, 2025v2 · Oct 3, 2026
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The so-called Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation brings classical mechanics to Hilbert space, but many techniques familiar from quantum mechanics remain missing. We use the gauge freedom of the KvN equation to derive separable solutions of the KvN equation, and by extension the classical Liouville equation. The canonical ensemble solution of statistical mechanics is shown to arise from separable solutions. We discuss the Hermiticity of the Liouvillian operator, and treat a case where its spectrum is discrete. Finally, we analyze an uncertainty relation between the so-called dynamical time and the Liouvillian, and argue that such a relation is natural and can be understood entirely within a classical framework.

Comments
17 pages, 2 figures

Related papers

Koopman von Neumann mechanics, Koopman operator, Curl Forces and Jacobi Last Multiplier

Partha Guha

The Koopman–von Neumann (KvN) formulation recasts deterministic classical mechanics in a Hilbert-space operator framework analogous to quantum mechanics. In this approach, the Liouville equation is expressed as a Schrödinger-type evolution equation generated by a Hermitian operator, yielding unitary propagation for phase-space-volume-preserving dynamics. We first clarify the relationship among the Koopman, Perron–Frobenius, and Liouville operators through an explicit example. Wilczek's construction shows that the KvN formalism is not only restricted to canonical Hamiltonian mechanics but this can be generalized any first-order classical dynamical system. Wilczek shows how a general autonomous first-order system can be generated by a Hermitian temporal-evolution operator after the introduction of auxiliary conjugate variables. We develop the KvN description of systems driven by Hamiltonian curl forces–position-dependent, non-conservative forces that are non-dissipative and preserve phase-space volume. Finally, we extend the KvN formalism to non-Hamiltonian systems using the Jacobi Last Multiplier and examine its connection to the Boltzmann H-theorem.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Oct 28, 2026•0 citations

Deconjugation of canonical variables and the Koopman-von Neumann theory

Amin, Mustafa, Mark A. Walton

The Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) theory is one where the dynamical momentum is not canonically conjugate to position, i.e., position and momentum are deconjugated. From this point of view, we show that the KvN theory arises from quantum mechanics, extracting classical equations of motion from quantum ones. However, preserving the canonical structure of the theory requires introducing ``auxiliary'' canonical conjugates to position and momentum. We show that using the KvN formulation to study the interaction between quantum and classical systems forces the auxiliary variables to take on a physical role. While giving rise to classical behaviour, the KvN theory might be more than classical.

arXiv:2210.00603•Oct 2, 2022•0 citations

Uncertainty and Wigner negativity in Hilbert-space classical mechanics

Mustafa Amin

Classical mechanics, in the Koopman-von Neumann formulation, is described in Hilbert space. It is shown here that classical canonical transformations are generated by Hermitian operators that are in general noncommutative. This naturally brings about uncertainty relations inherent in classical mechanics, for example between position and the generator of space translations, between momentum and the generator of momentum translations, and between dynamical time and the Liouvillian, to name a few. Further, it is shown that the Wigner representation produces a quasi-probability distribution that can take on negative values. Thus, two of the hallmark features of quantum mechanics are reproduced, and become apparent, in a Hilbert-space formulation of classical mechanics.

quant-pharXiv:2602.10341•Feb 12, 2026•0 citations

From Koopman–von Neumann theory to quantum theory

U. Klein

Koopman and von Neumann (KvN) extended the Liouville equation by introducing a phase space function $$S^{(K)}(q,p,t)$$ whose physical meaning is unknown. We show that a different S(q, p, t), with well-defined physical meaning, may be introduced without destroying the attractive “quantum-like” mathematical features of the KvN theory. This new S(q, p, t) is the classical action expressed in phase space coordinates. It defines a mapping between observables and operators which preserves the Lie bracket structure. The new evolution equation reduces to Schrödinger’s equation if functions on phase space are reduced to functions on configuration space. This new kind of “quantization” does not only establish a correspondence between observables and operators, but provides in addition a derivation of quantum operators and evolution equations from corresponding classical entities. It is performed by replacing $$\frac{\partial }{\partial p}$$ by 0 and p by $$\frac{\hbar }{\imath } \frac{\partial }{\partial q}$$ , thus providing an explanation for the common quantization rules.

arXiv:1705.07427•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•May 31, 2017•25 citations

Measurement theory in classical mechanics

So Katagiri

Abstract We investigate measurement theory in classical mechanics in the formulation of classical mechanics by Koopman and von Neumann (KvN), which uses Hilbert space. We show a difference between classical and quantum mechanics in the “relative interpretation” of the state of the target of measurement and the state of the measurement device. We also derive the uncertainty relation in classical mechanics.

arXiv:1911.07563•Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics•Apr 14, 2020•8 citations

The History of Hilbert-Space Formulations of Classical Physics

Jacob A. Barandes

Hilbert-space techniques are widely used not only for quantum theory, but also for classical physics. Two important examples are the Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation and the method of ``classical'' wave functions. As this paper explains, these two approaches are conceptually distinct. In particular, the method of classical wave functions was not due to Bernard Koopman and John von Neumann, but was developed independently by a number of later researchers, perhaps first by Mario Schönberg, with key contributions from Angelo Loinger, Giacomo Della Riccia, Norbert Wiener, and E. C. George Sudarshan. The primary goals of this paper are to explain these two approaches, describe the relevant history in detail, and give credit where credit is due.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2607.17408•The European Physical Journal H•Jul 21, 2026•1 citation
The so-called Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation brings classical mechanics to Hilbert space, but many techniques familiar from quantum mechanics remain missing. We use the gauge freedom of the KvN equation to derive separable solutions of the KvN equation, and by extension the classical Liouville equation. The canonical ensemble solution of statistical mechanics is shown to arise from separable solutions. We discuss the Hermiticity of the Liouvillian operator, and treat a case where its spectrum is discrete. Finally, we analyze an uncertainty relation between the so-called dynamical time and the Liouvillian, and argue that such a relation is natural and can be understood entirely within a classical framework.
The Koopman–von Neumann (KvN) formulation recasts deterministic classical mechanics in a Hilbert-space operator framework analogous to quantum mechanics. In this approach, the Liouville equation is expressed as a Schrödinger-type evolution equation generated by a Hermitian operator, yielding unitary propagation for phase-space-volume-preserving dynamics. We first clarify the relationship among the Koopman, Perron–Frobenius, and Liouville operators through an explicit example. Wilczek's construction shows that the KvN formalism is not only restricted to canonical Hamiltonian mechanics but this can be generalized any first-order classical dynamical system. Wilczek shows how a general autonomous first-order system can be generated by a Hermitian temporal-evolution operator after the introduction of auxiliary conjugate variables. We develop the KvN description of systems driven by Hamiltonian curl forces–position-dependent, non-conservative forces that are non-dissipative and preserve phase-space volume. Finally, we extend the KvN formalism to non-Hamiltonian systems using the Jacobi Last Multiplier and examine its connection to the Boltzmann H-theorem.
The Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) theory is one where the dynamical momentum is not canonically conjugate to position, i.e., position and momentum are deconjugated. From this point of view, we show that the KvN theory arises from quantum mechanics, extracting classical equations of motion from quantum ones. However, preserving the canonical structure of the theory requires introducing ``auxiliary'' canonical conjugates to position and momentum. We show that using the KvN formulation to study the interaction between quantum and classical systems forces the auxiliary variables to take on a physical role. While giving rise to classical behaviour, the KvN theory might be more than classical.
Classical mechanics, in the Koopman-von Neumann formulation, is described in Hilbert space. It is shown here that classical canonical transformations are generated by Hermitian operators that are in general noncommutative. This naturally brings about uncertainty relations inherent in classical mechanics, for example between position and the generator of space translations, between momentum and the generator of momentum translations, and between dynamical time and the Liouvillian, to name a few. Further, it is shown that the Wigner representation produces a quasi-probability distribution that can take on negative values. Thus, two of the hallmark features of quantum mechanics are reproduced, and become apparent, in a Hilbert-space formulation of classical mechanics.
Koopman and von Neumann (KvN) extended the Liouville equation by introducing a phase space function S(K)(q,p,t)S^{(K)}(q,p,t)S(K)(q,p,t) whose physical meaning is unknown. We show that a different S(q, p, t), with well-defined physical meaning, may be introduced without destroying the attractive “quantum-like” mathematical features of the KvN theory. This new S(q, p, t) is the classical action expressed in phase space coordinates. It defines a mapping between observables and operators which preserves the Lie bracket structure. The new evolution equation reduces to Schrödinger’s equation if functions on phase space are reduced to functions on configuration space. This new kind of “quantization” does not only establish a correspondence between observables and operators, but provides in addition a derivation of quantum operators and evolution equations from corresponding classical entities. It is performed by replacing ∂∂p\frac{\partial }{\partial p}∂p∂​ by 0 and p by ℏı∂∂q\frac{\hbar }{\imath } \frac{\partial }{\partial q}ℏ​∂q∂​ , thus providing an explanation for the common quantization rules.
Hilbert-space techniques are widely used not only for quantum theory, but also for classical physics. Two important examples are the Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation and the method of ``classical'' wave functions. As this paper explains, these two approaches are conceptually distinct. In particular, the method of classical wave functions was not due to Bernard Koopman and John von Neumann, but was developed independently by a number of later researchers, perhaps first by Mario Schönberg, with key contributions from Angelo Loinger, Giacomo Della Riccia, Norbert Wiener, and E. C. George Sudarshan. The primary goals of this paper are to explain these two approaches, describe the relevant history in detail, and give credit where credit is due.