Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1911.07563 · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics

Measurement theory in classical mechanics

So Katagiri

Published Apr 14, 2020• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract We investigate measurement theory in classical mechanics in the formulation of classical mechanics by Koopman and von Neumann (KvN), which uses Hilbert space. We show a difference between classical and quantum mechanics in the “relative interpretation” of the state of the target of measurement and the state of the measurement device. We also derive the uncertainty relation in classical mechanics.

DOI
10.1093/ptep/ptaa065

Related papers

Unary Classical Mechanics

Peter Morgan

Classical mechanics is presented here in a unary operator form, constructed using the binary multiplication and Poisson bracket operations that are given in a phase space formalism, then a Gibbs equilibrium state over this unary operator algebra is introduced, which allows the construction of a Hilbert space as a representation space of a Heisenberg algebra, giving an operator algebraic variant of the Koopman--von Neumann approach. A classically natural approach to the Poisson bracket in a Koopman--von Neumann Hilbert space formalism gives a classical logic that is the same as quantum logic: in both cases the logic of projections on Hilbert space. In this form, the measurement theory for unary classical mechanics can be the same as and inform that for quantum mechanics, expanding classical mechanics to include noncommutative operators so that it is close to quantum mechanics, instead of attempting to squeeze quantum mechanics into a classical mechanics mold. The measurement problem as it appears in unary classical mechanics suggests a classical approach that can also be successfully applied to the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.

•Jan 2, 2019•1 citation

The History of Hilbert-Space Formulations of Classical Physics

Jacob A. Barandes

Hilbert-space techniques are widely used not only for quantum theory, but also for classical physics. Two important examples are the Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation and the method of ``classical'' wave functions. As this paper explains, these two approaches are conceptually distinct. In particular, the method of classical wave functions was not due to Bernard Koopman and John von Neumann, but was developed independently by a number of later researchers, perhaps first by Mario Schönberg, with key contributions from Angelo Loinger, Giacomo Della Riccia, Norbert Wiener, and E. C. George Sudarshan. The primary goals of this paper are to explain these two approaches, describe the relevant history in detail, and give credit where credit is due.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2607.17408•The European Physical Journal H•Jul 21, 2026•1 citation

Solutions of Koopman-von Neumann equations, their superpositions, and uncertainties

Mustafa Amin, Mark A. Walton

The so-called Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation brings classical mechanics to Hilbert space, but many techniques familiar from quantum mechanics remain missing. We use the gauge freedom of the KvN equation to derive separable solutions of the KvN equation, and by extension the classical Liouville equation. The canonical ensemble solution of statistical mechanics is shown to arise from separable solutions. We discuss the Hermiticity of the Liouvillian operator, and treat a case where its spectrum is discrete. Finally, we analyze an uncertainty relation between the so-called dynamical time and the Liouvillian, and argue that such a relation is natural and can be understood entirely within a classical framework.

quant-pharXiv:2512.11148•Dec 15, 2025•0 citations

Measurement of a quantum system with a classical apparatus using ensembles on configuration space*

Marcel Reginatto, Sebastian Ulbricht

Abstract Finding a physically consistent approach to modeling interactions between classical and quantum systems is a highly nontrivial task. While many proposals based on various mathematical formalisms have been made, most of these efforts run into difficulties of one sort or another. One of the first detailed descriptions was given by Sudarshan and his collaborators who, motivated by the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, proposed a Hilbert space formulation of classical–quantum interactions which made use of the Koopman–von Neumann description of classical systems. Here we use the approach of ensembles on configurations space to give a detailed account of a classical apparatus measuring the position of a quantum particle that is prepared in a superposition of two localized states. We show that the probability of the pointer of the classical apparatus is left in a state that corresponds to the probability of the quantum particle. A subsequent observation of the pointer leads to an update of its probability density. From this we can obtain information about the position of the quantum particle, leading to an update of its wave function. Since this formalism incorporates uncertainties and finite measurement precision, it is well suited for metrological applications. Furthermore, it resolves fundamental issues that appear in the case of a quantum description of the apparatus.

arXiv:2205.09632•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Sep 6, 2022•1 citation

THE (QUANTUM) MEASUREMENT PROBLEM IN CLASSICAL MECHANICS

Christian DE RONDE

In this work we analyze the deep link between the 20th Century positivist re-foundation of physics and the famous measurement problem of quantum mechanics. We attempt to show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta, but rather a direct consequence of the empirical-positivist understanding of physical theories when applied to the orthodox quantum formalism. In contraposition, we discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and 'measurement' which goes back to the works of Einstein, Heisenberg and Pauli. After presenting a critical analysis of Bohr's definitions of 'measurement' we continue to discuss the way in which several contemporary approaches to QM --such as decoherence, modal interpretations and QBism-- remain committed to Bohr's general methodology. Finally, in order to expose the many inconsistencies present within the (empirical-positivist) presuppositions responsible for creating the quantum measurement problem, we show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.

arXiv:2001.00241•WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Oct 1, 2023•14 citations

Classical and mixed classical-quantum systems from van Hove’s unitary representation of contact transformations

Marcel Reginatto, A. D. Bermúdez Manjarres, Sebastian Ulbricht

Abstract Descriptions of classical mechanics in Hilbert space go back to the work of Koopman and von Neumann in the 1930s. Decades later, van Hove derived a unitary representation of the group of contact transformations which recently has been used to develop a novel formulation of classical mechanics in Hilbert space. This formulation differs from the Koopman-von Neumann theory in many ways. Classical observables are represented by van Hove operators, which satisfy a commutation algebra isomorphic to the Poisson algebra of functions in phase space. Moreover, these operators are both observables and generators of transformations, which makes it unnecessary to introduce unobservable auxiliary operators as in the Koopman-von Neumann theory. In addition, for consistency with classical mechanics, a constraint must be imposed that fixes the phase of the wavefunction. The approach can be extended to hybrid mixed classical-quantum systems in Hilbert space. The formalism is applied to the measurement of a quantum two-level system (qubit) by a classical apparatus.

arXiv:2503.02480•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 1, 2025•0 citations
Abstract We investigate measurement theory in classical mechanics in the formulation of classical mechanics by Koopman and von Neumann (KvN), which uses Hilbert space. We show a difference between classical and quantum mechanics in the “relative interpretation” of the state of the target of measurement and the state of the measurement device. We also derive the uncertainty relation in classical mechanics.
Classical mechanics is presented here in a unary operator form, constructed using the binary multiplication and Poisson bracket operations that are given in a phase space formalism, then a Gibbs equilibrium state over this unary operator algebra is introduced, which allows the construction of a Hilbert space as a representation space of a Heisenberg algebra, giving an operator algebraic variant of the Koopman--von Neumann approach. A classically natural approach to the Poisson bracket in a Koopman--von Neumann Hilbert space formalism gives a classical logic that is the same as quantum logic: in both cases the logic of projections on Hilbert space. In this form, the measurement theory for unary classical mechanics can be the same as and inform that for quantum mechanics, expanding classical mechanics to include noncommutative operators so that it is close to quantum mechanics, instead of attempting to squeeze quantum mechanics into a classical mechanics mold. The measurement problem as it appears in unary classical mechanics suggests a classical approach that can also be successfully applied to the measurement problem of quantum mechanics.
Hilbert-space techniques are widely used not only for quantum theory, but also for classical physics. Two important examples are the Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation and the method of ``classical'' wave functions. As this paper explains, these two approaches are conceptually distinct. In particular, the method of classical wave functions was not due to Bernard Koopman and John von Neumann, but was developed independently by a number of later researchers, perhaps first by Mario Schönberg, with key contributions from Angelo Loinger, Giacomo Della Riccia, Norbert Wiener, and E. C. George Sudarshan. The primary goals of this paper are to explain these two approaches, describe the relevant history in detail, and give credit where credit is due.
The so-called Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation brings classical mechanics to Hilbert space, but many techniques familiar from quantum mechanics remain missing. We use the gauge freedom of the KvN equation to derive separable solutions of the KvN equation, and by extension the classical Liouville equation. The canonical ensemble solution of statistical mechanics is shown to arise from separable solutions. We discuss the Hermiticity of the Liouvillian operator, and treat a case where its spectrum is discrete. Finally, we analyze an uncertainty relation between the so-called dynamical time and the Liouvillian, and argue that such a relation is natural and can be understood entirely within a classical framework.
Abstract Finding a physically consistent approach to modeling interactions between classical and quantum systems is a highly nontrivial task. While many proposals based on various mathematical formalisms have been made, most of these efforts run into difficulties of one sort or another. One of the first detailed descriptions was given by Sudarshan and his collaborators who, motivated by the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, proposed a Hilbert space formulation of classical–quantum interactions which made use of the Koopman–von Neumann description of classical systems. Here we use the approach of ensembles on configurations space to give a detailed account of a classical apparatus measuring the position of a quantum particle that is prepared in a superposition of two localized states. We show that the probability of the pointer of the classical apparatus is left in a state that corresponds to the probability of the quantum particle. A subsequent observation of the pointer leads to an update of its probability density. From this we can obtain information about the position of the quantum particle, leading to an update of its wave function. Since this formalism incorporates uncertainties and finite measurement precision, it is well suited for metrological applications. Furthermore, it resolves fundamental issues that appear in the case of a quantum description of the apparatus.
In this work we analyze the deep link between the 20th Century positivist re-foundation of physics and the famous measurement problem of quantum mechanics. We attempt to show why this is not an "obvious" nor "self evident" problem for the theory of quanta, but rather a direct consequence of the empirical-positivist understanding of physical theories when applied to the orthodox quantum formalism. In contraposition, we discuss a representational realist account of both physical 'theories' and 'measurement' which goes back to the works of Einstein, Heisenberg and Pauli. After presenting a critical analysis of Bohr's definitions of 'measurement' we continue to discuss the way in which several contemporary approaches to QM --such as decoherence, modal interpretations and QBism-- remain committed to Bohr's general methodology. Finally, in order to expose the many inconsistencies present within the (empirical-positivist) presuppositions responsible for creating the quantum measurement problem, we show how through these same set of presuppositions it is easy to derive a completely analogous paradox for the case of classical mechanics.
Abstract Descriptions of classical mechanics in Hilbert space go back to the work of Koopman and von Neumann in the 1930s. Decades later, van Hove derived a unitary representation of the group of contact transformations which recently has been used to develop a novel formulation of classical mechanics in Hilbert space. This formulation differs from the Koopman-von Neumann theory in many ways. Classical observables are represented by van Hove operators, which satisfy a commutation algebra isomorphic to the Poisson algebra of functions in phase space. Moreover, these operators are both observables and generators of transformations, which makes it unnecessary to introduce unobservable auxiliary operators as in the Koopman-von Neumann theory. In addition, for consistency with classical mechanics, a constraint must be imposed that fixes the phase of the wavefunction. The approach can be extended to hybrid mixed classical-quantum systems in Hilbert space. The formalism is applied to the measurement of a quantum two-level system (qubit) by a classical apparatus.