Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2210.00603

Deconjugation of canonical variables and the Koopman-von Neumann theory

Amin, Mustafa, Mark A. Walton

Published Oct 2, 2022• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) theory is one where the dynamical momentum is not canonically conjugate to position, i.e., position and momentum are deconjugated. From this point of view, we show that the KvN theory arises from quantum mechanics, extracting classical equations of motion from quantum ones. However, preserving the canonical structure of the theory requires introducing ``auxiliary'' canonical conjugates to position and momentum. We show that using the KvN formulation to study the interaction between quantum and classical systems forces the auxiliary variables to take on a physical role. While giving rise to classical behaviour, the KvN theory might be more than classical.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2210.00603

Related papers

Quantization & the Koopman-von Neumann Formulation

Fritiof Wallentin

In a previous work by the author it was shown that the Koopman-von Neumann formulation of classical mechanics (KvN) exhibits quantum interference. As such it was there claimed that KvN ought to be considered as a proper quantum mechanical theory in a similar sense as ordinary non-relativistic quantum mechanics (OQM) is. In this article this claim is made manifest by showing that KvN and OQM can be taken as merely inequivalent representations resulting from one and the same quantization scheme. Of course, as the typical notion of quantization necessitates the canonical commutation relations (CCR) to hold, which they do not in KvN, the concept needs to be properly revised. To justify such a revision the typical reasons for necessitation the CCR, reductionism and quantization as 'turning brackets to commutators', are examined and found insufficient.

•Nov 28, 2022•0 citations

Introduction to Koopman-von Neumann Mechanics

Daniel Piasecki

This work is to consolidate current literature on Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) Mechanics into a simple and easy to understand text. KvN Mechanics is a branch of Classical Mechanics that has been recast into the mathematical language of Quantum Mechanics. KvN Mechanics utilizes a Hilbert phase space with operators to calculate the expectation values of observables of interest (expectation values such as position, momentum, etc.) It is an important tool in statistical physics and guide to illuminate the mysterious relationship between Quantum and Classical Physics. A lot of important applications of KvN Mechanics have been developed in the last decade.

arXiv:2112.05619•Dec 10, 2021•0 citations

Solutions of Koopman-von Neumann equations, their superpositions, and uncertainties

Mustafa Amin, Mark A. Walton

The so-called Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation brings classical mechanics to Hilbert space, but many techniques familiar from quantum mechanics remain missing. We use the gauge freedom of the KvN equation to derive separable solutions of the KvN equation, and by extension the classical Liouville equation. The canonical ensemble solution of statistical mechanics is shown to arise from separable solutions. We discuss the Hermiticity of the Liouvillian operator, and treat a case where its spectrum is discrete. Finally, we analyze an uncertainty relation between the so-called dynamical time and the Liouvillian, and argue that such a relation is natural and can be understood entirely within a classical framework.

quant-pharXiv:2512.11148•Dec 15, 2025•0 citations

From Koopman–von Neumann theory to quantum theory

U. Klein

Koopman and von Neumann (KvN) extended the Liouville equation by introducing a phase space function $$S^{(K)}(q,p,t)$$ whose physical meaning is unknown. We show that a different S(q, p, t), with well-defined physical meaning, may be introduced without destroying the attractive “quantum-like” mathematical features of the KvN theory. This new S(q, p, t) is the classical action expressed in phase space coordinates. It defines a mapping between observables and operators which preserves the Lie bracket structure. The new evolution equation reduces to Schrödinger’s equation if functions on phase space are reduced to functions on configuration space. This new kind of “quantization” does not only establish a correspondence between observables and operators, but provides in addition a derivation of quantum operators and evolution equations from corresponding classical entities. It is performed by replacing $$\frac{\partial }{\partial p}$$ by 0 and p by $$\frac{\hbar }{\imath } \frac{\partial }{\partial q}$$ , thus providing an explanation for the common quantization rules.

arXiv:1705.07427•Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations•May 31, 2017•25 citations

Koopman von Neumann mechanics, Koopman operator, Curl Forces and Jacobi Last Multiplier

Partha Guha

The Koopman–von Neumann (KvN) formulation recasts deterministic classical mechanics in a Hilbert-space operator framework analogous to quantum mechanics. In this approach, the Liouville equation is expressed as a Schrödinger-type evolution equation generated by a Hermitian operator, yielding unitary propagation for phase-space-volume-preserving dynamics. We first clarify the relationship among the Koopman, Perron–Frobenius, and Liouville operators through an explicit example. Wilczek's construction shows that the KvN formalism is not only restricted to canonical Hamiltonian mechanics but this can be generalized any first-order classical dynamical system. Wilczek shows how a general autonomous first-order system can be generated by a Hermitian temporal-evolution operator after the introduction of auxiliary conjugate variables. We develop the KvN description of systems driven by Hamiltonian curl forces–position-dependent, non-conservative forces that are non-dissipative and preserve phase-space volume. Finally, we extend the KvN formalism to non-Hamiltonian systems using the Jacobi Last Multiplier and examine its connection to the Boltzmann H-theorem.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Oct 28, 2026•0 citations

On Quantization, Contextuality & the Koopman-von Neumann Formulation

Fritiof Wallentin

A new perspective on quantization is presented in this article, where the Koopman-von Neumann formulation (KvN) and ordinary non-relativistic quantum mechanics (OQM) are viewed as unitarily inequivalent representations of the same underlying structure. This approach to quantization is based on the idea that contextuality, rather than ℏ, is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics. The novel view is motivated by the limitations of traditional approaches to quantization together with previous research demonstrating contextuality in KvN. In this representation theoretic approach, both KvN and OQM are considered valid quantum theories separated by a superselection rule.

•Feb 8, 2023•1 citation
The Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) theory is one where the dynamical momentum is not canonically conjugate to position, i.e., position and momentum are deconjugated. From this point of view, we show that the KvN theory arises from quantum mechanics, extracting classical equations of motion from quantum ones. However, preserving the canonical structure of the theory requires introducing ``auxiliary'' canonical conjugates to position and momentum. We show that using the KvN formulation to study the interaction between quantum and classical systems forces the auxiliary variables to take on a physical role. While giving rise to classical behaviour, the KvN theory might be more than classical.
In a previous work by the author it was shown that the Koopman-von Neumann formulation of classical mechanics (KvN) exhibits quantum interference. As such it was there claimed that KvN ought to be considered as a proper quantum mechanical theory in a similar sense as ordinary non-relativistic quantum mechanics (OQM) is. In this article this claim is made manifest by showing that KvN and OQM can be taken as merely inequivalent representations resulting from one and the same quantization scheme. Of course, as the typical notion of quantization necessitates the canonical commutation relations (CCR) to hold, which they do not in KvN, the concept needs to be properly revised. To justify such a revision the typical reasons for necessitation the CCR, reductionism and quantization as 'turning brackets to commutators', are examined and found insufficient.
This work is to consolidate current literature on Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) Mechanics into a simple and easy to understand text. KvN Mechanics is a branch of Classical Mechanics that has been recast into the mathematical language of Quantum Mechanics. KvN Mechanics utilizes a Hilbert phase space with operators to calculate the expectation values of observables of interest (expectation values such as position, momentum, etc.) It is an important tool in statistical physics and guide to illuminate the mysterious relationship between Quantum and Classical Physics. A lot of important applications of KvN Mechanics have been developed in the last decade.
The so-called Koopman-von Neumann (KvN) formulation brings classical mechanics to Hilbert space, but many techniques familiar from quantum mechanics remain missing. We use the gauge freedom of the KvN equation to derive separable solutions of the KvN equation, and by extension the classical Liouville equation. The canonical ensemble solution of statistical mechanics is shown to arise from separable solutions. We discuss the Hermiticity of the Liouvillian operator, and treat a case where its spectrum is discrete. Finally, we analyze an uncertainty relation between the so-called dynamical time and the Liouvillian, and argue that such a relation is natural and can be understood entirely within a classical framework.
Koopman and von Neumann (KvN) extended the Liouville equation by introducing a phase space function S(K)(q,p,t)S^{(K)}(q,p,t)S(K)(q,p,t) whose physical meaning is unknown. We show that a different S(q, p, t), with well-defined physical meaning, may be introduced without destroying the attractive “quantum-like” mathematical features of the KvN theory. This new S(q, p, t) is the classical action expressed in phase space coordinates. It defines a mapping between observables and operators which preserves the Lie bracket structure. The new evolution equation reduces to Schrödinger’s equation if functions on phase space are reduced to functions on configuration space. This new kind of “quantization” does not only establish a correspondence between observables and operators, but provides in addition a derivation of quantum operators and evolution equations from corresponding classical entities. It is performed by replacing ∂∂p\frac{\partial }{\partial p}∂p∂​ by 0 and p by ℏı∂∂q\frac{\hbar }{\imath } \frac{\partial }{\partial q}ℏ​∂q∂​ , thus providing an explanation for the common quantization rules.
The Koopman–von Neumann (KvN) formulation recasts deterministic classical mechanics in a Hilbert-space operator framework analogous to quantum mechanics. In this approach, the Liouville equation is expressed as a Schrödinger-type evolution equation generated by a Hermitian operator, yielding unitary propagation for phase-space-volume-preserving dynamics. We first clarify the relationship among the Koopman, Perron–Frobenius, and Liouville operators through an explicit example. Wilczek's construction shows that the KvN formalism is not only restricted to canonical Hamiltonian mechanics but this can be generalized any first-order classical dynamical system. Wilczek shows how a general autonomous first-order system can be generated by a Hermitian temporal-evolution operator after the introduction of auxiliary conjugate variables. We develop the KvN description of systems driven by Hamiltonian curl forces–position-dependent, non-conservative forces that are non-dissipative and preserve phase-space volume. Finally, we extend the KvN formalism to non-Hamiltonian systems using the Jacobi Last Multiplier and examine its connection to the Boltzmann H-theorem.
A new perspective on quantization is presented in this article, where the Koopman-von Neumann formulation (KvN) and ordinary non-relativistic quantum mechanics (OQM) are viewed as unitarily inequivalent representations of the same underlying structure. This approach to quantization is based on the idea that contextuality, rather than ℏ, is a fundamental aspect of quantum mechanics. The novel view is motivated by the limitations of traditional approaches to quantization together with previous research demonstrating contextuality in KvN. In this representation theoretic approach, both KvN and OQM are considered valid quantum theories separated by a superselection rule.