We give a brief overview on interacting symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases. In particular, we will focus on various cases where the classification of non-interacting fermionic systems breaks down in the presence of interactions. The examples include topological (and trivial) superconductors in one, two and three spatial dimensions, protected by various symmetries such as time-reversal, spin parity, and reflection symmetries. Common to these examples is the ‘collapse’ of the non-interacting classification, where an integer classification (‘’) at non-interacting level reduces to or in the presence of interactions. We make use of these examples to illustrate various approaches to interacting SPT phases.
We give a brief overview on interacting symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases. In particular, we will focus on various cases where the classification of non-interacting fermionic systems breaks down in the presence of interactions. The examples include topological (and trivial) superconductors in one, two and three spatial dimensions, protected by various symmetries such as time-reversal, spin parity, and reflection symmetries. Common to these examples is the ‘collapse’ of the non-interacting classification, where an integer classification (‘ ’) at non-interacting level reduces to or in the presence of interactions. We make use of these examples to illustrate various approaches to interacting SPT phases.
Symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases are gapped quantum phases with a certain symmetry, which can all be smoothly connected to the same trivial product state if we break the symmetry. For noninteracting fermion systems with time reversal ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{T}$), charge conjugation ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{C}$), and/or
U(1) ($\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}$) symmetries, the total symmetry group can depend on the relations between those symmetry operations, such as $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{T}\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}{\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{T}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}=\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}$ or $\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{T}\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}{\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{T}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}=\ensuremath{-}\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}$. As a result, the SPT phases of those fermion systems with different symmetry groups have different classifications. In this paper, we use Kitaev's K-theory approach to classify the gapped free-fermion phases for those possible symmetry groups. In particular, we can view the
U(1) as a spin rotation. We find that superconductors with the
Sz spin-rotation symmetry are classified by
Z in even dimensions, while superconductors with the time reversal plus the
Sz spin-rotation symmetries are classified by
Z in odd dimensions. We show that all 10 classes of gapped free-fermion phases can be realized by electron systems with certain symmetries. We also point out that, to properly describe the symmetry of a fermionic system, we need to specify its full symmetry group that includes the fermion number parity transformation ${(\ensuremath{-})}^{\stackrel{\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}{N}}$. The full symmetry group is actually a projective symmetry group.
Strong interactions can give rise to new fermionic symmetry-protected topological phases which have no analogs in free fermion systems. As an example, we have systematically studied a spinless fermion model with
U(1) charge conservation and time-reversal symmetry on a three-leg ladder using density-matrix renormalization group. In the noninteracting limit, there are no topological phases. Turning on interactions, we found two gapped phases. One is trivial and is adiabatically connected to a band insulator, while another one is a nontrivial symmetry-protected topological phase resulting from strong interactions.
Strong interactions can give rise to new fermionic symmetry protected topological phases which have no analogs in free fermion systems. As an example, we have systematically studied a spinless fermion model with U(1) charge conservation and time reversal symmetry on a three-leg ladder using density-matrix renormalization group. In the non-interacting limit, there are no topological phases. Turning on interactions, we found two gapped phases. One is trivial and is adiabatically connected to a band insulator, while another one is a nontrivial symmetry protected topological phase resulting from strong interactions.
In free fermion systems with given symmetry and dimension, the possible topological phases are labeled by elements of only three types of Abelian groups, 0, Z2, or Z. For example, noninteracting one-dimensional fermionic superconducting phases with S(z) spin rotation and time-reversal symmetries are classified by Z. We show that with weak interactions, this classification reduces to Z4. Using group cohomology, one can additionally show that there are only four distinct phases for such one-dimensional superconductors even with strong interactions. Comparing their projective representations, we find that all these four symmetry-protected topological phases can be realized with free fermions. Further, we show that one-dimensional fermionic superconducting phases with Z(n) discrete S(z) spin rotation and time-reversal symmetries are classified by Z4 when n is even and Z2 when n is odd; again, all these strongly interacting topological phases can be realized by noninteracting fermions. Our approach can be applied to systems with other symmetries to see which one-dimensional topological phases can be realized with free fermions.