Abstract The effects of noise are one of the most important factors to consider when it comes to quantum computing in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum computing (NISQ) era that we are currently in. Therefore, it is important not only to gain more knowledge about the noise sources appearing in current quantum computing hardware in order to suppress and mitigate their contributions, but also to evaluate whether a given quantum algorithm can achieve reasonable results on a given hardware. To accomplish this, we need noise models that can describe the real hardware with sufficient accuracy. Here, we present a noise model that has been evaluated on superconducting hardware platforms and could be adapted to other common architectures such as trapped-ion or neutral atom devices. We then benchmark our model by simulating a 20-qubit superconducting quantum computer, and compare the accuracy of our model to similar approaches from the literature and demonstrate an improvement in the overall prediction accuracy.
Abstract The effects of noise are one of the most important factors to consider when it comes to quantum computing in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum computing (NISQ) era that we are currently in. Therefore, it is important not only to gain more knowledge about the noise sources appearing in current quantum computing hardware in order to suppress and mitigate their contributions, but also to evaluate whether a given quantum algorithm can achieve reasonable results on a given hardware. To accomplish this, we need noise models that can describe the real hardware with sufficient accuracy. Here, we present a noise model that has been evaluated on superconducting hardware platforms and could be adapted to other common architectures such as trapped-ion or neutral atom devices. We then benchmark our model by simulating a 20-qubit superconducting quantum computer, and compare the accuracy of our model to similar approaches from the literature and demonstrate an improvement in the overall prediction accuracy.
Context: The main obstacle of quantum computing on its way to scalability is the noisy nature of current hardware. Various types of errors lead to incorrect computational results,and measures such as quantum error mitigation are needed to counteract these errors. Many error mitigation techniques require a thorough understanding of the noise and its impact on computations. Therefore, accurate noise models are indispensable to facilitate meaningful quantum computing in the near future. They also enable realistic simulations of quantum devices. Since these devices are currently limited and quantum computing is expensive, researchers typically rely on simulations for testing their algorithms.Objective: In this thesis, we aim to construct a realistic noise model for quantum computing and optimise its model parameters. The model construction should build on the underlying physical processes, and the number of parameters should scale well with the system size. We also address the evaluation and comparison of different noise models by benchmarks using quantum circuits specific to real-world applications. Finally, we aim to develop useful graphical representations of noise models based on the existing quantum circuit model.Method: We present a benchmarking framework for quantum computing noise models and evaluate it based on benchmarking quality attributes from the literature. Moreover, we construct a quantum computing noise model and develop a training procedure for its parameters. We analyse the parameters of the trained noise model and the impact ofdifferent types of errors on computations. We benchmark the noise model with the above approach and compare it to a noise model provided by IBM’s software development kit Qiskit. Finally, we develop an extension of the quantum circuit model to represent noise channels.Result: The benchmarks performed in this thesis show that our noise model predicts noisy hardware behaviour of IBM’s ibmq_manila quantum device equally well as the Qiskit model, if not better, based on quantum circuits commonly used for variational quantum algorithms. Within the trained noise model, readout error has the most detrimental impact on computations. Our benchmarking approach satisfies relevant quality criteria by choosing suitable quantum circuits and objective functions to compare model predictionsto hardware data. Moreover, the quantum circuit model can be extended meaningfully by noise channels.Conclusion: Our benchmarking approach is suitable for evaluating and comparing quantum computing noise models. In future work, volumetric benchmarks should be performed for various noise models and application contexts. The parameter optimisation based on learning with training circuits yields accurate noise models and shows the importance of mitigating measurement error. Different optimisation algorithms and quantum circuits should be explored, and more types of noise should be incorporated into the noise model.
In recent years, Quantum Computing (QC) has progressed to the point where small working prototypes are available for use. Termed Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers, these prototypes are too small for large benchmarks or even for Quantum Error Correction, but they do have sufficient resources to run small benchmarks, particularly if compiled with optimizations to make use of scarce qubits and limited operation counts and coherence times. QC has not yet, however, settled on a particular preferred device implementation technology, and indeed different NISQ prototypes implement qubits with very different physical approaches and therefore widely-varying device and machine characteristics. Our work performs a full-stack, benchmark-driven hardware-software analysis of QC systems. We evaluate QC architectural possibilities, software-visible gates, and software optimizations to tackle fundamental design questions about gate set choices, communication topology, the factors affecting benchmark performance and compiler optimizations. In order to answer key cross-technology and cross-platform design questions, our work has built the first top-to-bottom toolflow to target different qubit device technologies, including superconducting and trapped ion qubits which are the current QC front-runners. We use our toolflow, TriQ, to conduct {\em real-system} measurements on 7 running QC prototypes from 3 different groups, IBM, Rigetti, and University of Maryland. From these real-system experiences at QC's hardware-software interface, we make observations about native and software-visible gates for different QC technologies, communication topologies, and the value of noise-aware compilation even on lower-noise platforms. This is the largest cross-platform real-system QC study performed thus far; its results have the potential to inform both QC device and compiler design going forward.
Quantum computing is at the cusp of showing relevance for real-world problems. However, currently available devices are small in scale, and hardware demonstrations have shown limited applicability to scientific and commercial problems of interest. In this work, we investigate a set of application-specific noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) algorithms varying in size from 4-80 qubits, and use these benchmarks to evaluate trade-offs in the design of trapped ion quantum computing architectures. We have developed a tool-chain consisting of architecture specific compilation and simulation tools and used these tools to target five different candidate trapped ion quantum computing architectures. Using our tool-chain, we can estimate metrics such as application run-times and overhead. Additionally, we use our tools to determine the critical operations of an architecture and to study the sensitivity to architectural constraints in particular implementations. Our tools are designed to be flexible, allowing us to study a broad range of benchmarks, hardware architectures, physical constraints, and operation timing.
Abstract Quantum computers are expected to be highly beneficial for chemistry simulations, promising significant improvements in accuracy and speed. The most prominent algorithm for chemistry simulations on NISQ devices is the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE). It is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm which calculates the ground state energy of a Hamiltonian based on parametrized quantum circuits, while a classical optimizer is used to find optimal parameter values. However, quantum hardware is affected by noise, and it needs to be understood to which extent it can degrade the performance of the VQE algorithm. In this paper, we study the impact of noise on the example of the hydrogen molecule. First, we compare the VQE performance for a set of various optimizers, from which we find NFT to be the most suitable one. Next, we quantify the effect of different noise sources by systematically increasing their strength. The noise intensity is varied around values common to superconducting devices of IBM Q, and curve fitting is used to model the relationship between the obtained energy values and the noise magnitude. Since the amount of noise in a circuit highly depends on its architecture, we perform our studies for different ansatzes, including both hardware-efficient and chemistry-inspired ones. Finally, we compare our results from noisy simulations with experiments on different IBM hardware devices.
Abstract Complex quantum networks are not only hard to establish, but also difficult to simulate due to the exponentially growing state space and noise-induced imperfections. In this work, we propose an alternative approach that leverages quantum computers and noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices as simulators for quantum networks, including noisy devices, channels, and protocols. Rather than treating noise as an undesired feature to be mitigated, we show how imperfections in quantum hardware can be exploited to simulate real-world communication devices under realistic conditions beyond classical simulation capabilities. Our approach allows NISQ devices with modest noise to simulate more imperfect devices, enabling large-scale, detailed quantum network simulations with exact error models. It also improves over direct implementation and benchmarking of real networks, as waiting times, locality, and memory restrictions do not apply. This framework offers flexibility, scalability, and precision, showing that NISQ devices can serve as natural testbeds for complex quantum networks.
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) is a promising quantum algorithm for applications in chemistry within the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. The ability for a quantum computer to simulate electronic structures with high accuracy would have a profound impact on material and biochemical science with potential applications e.g., to the development of new drugs. However, considering the variety of quantum hardware architectures, it is still uncertain which hardware concept is most suited to execute the VQE for e.g., the simulation of molecules. Aspects to consider here are the required connectivity of the quantum circuit used, the size and the depth and thus the susceptibility to noise effects. Besides theo-retical considerations, empirical studies using available quantum hardware may help to clarify the question of which hardware technology might be better suited for a certain given application and algorithm. Going one step into this direction, within this work, we present results using the VQE for the simulation of the hydrogen molecule, comparing superconducting and ion trap quantum computers. The experiments are carried out with a standardized setup of ansatz and optimizer, selected to reduce the number of required iterations. The findings are analyzed considering different quantum processor types, calibration data as well as the depth and gate counts of the circuits required for the different hardware concepts after transpilation.