Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2504.17082

Surface-code Superconducting Quantum Processors: From Calibration To Logical Performance

Hany A. Ali

Published Apr 23, 2025• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Current quantum processors are fragile, noisy and fairly limited in both quantity and quality with tens of qubits and physical error rates of around 10^-3. To realize practical quantum applications, however, error rates need to be below 10^-15 across millions of qubits. To bridge this gap and fully harness the potential of quantum computers, quantum error correction (QEC) is essential. QEC codes are designed to protect quantum information by redundantly encoding it onto multiple physical qubits. This encoding allows for the detection and correction of local errors affecting individual qubits, e.g., through stabilizer measurements. Importantly, if the physical error rates are below a specific threshold, QEC codes can exponentially suppress logical error rates by increasing the number of physical qubits involved. This is essential for achieving fault-tolerant computations, which are key to unlocking the full potential of quantum computers. The work presented in this thesis focuses on the implementation and optimization of small-scale QEC experiments using the surface code and flux-tunable superconducting qubits (Transmons). It addresses several key challenges: enhancing two-qubit gate fidelity in Surface-4 (Chapter 2), implementing an error-detection code with Surface-7 (Chapter 3), automating the calibration and benchmarking of the building blocks in Surface-17 (Chapter 4), reducing leakage into higher excited states with leakage reduction units (Chapter 5), assessing and enhancing the performance of logical qubits (Chapters 7 and 8).

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2504.17082

Related papers

Quantum Error Correction: Surface And Topological Codes

N Raji

Quantum error correction (QEC) represents a critical enabler for fault-tolerant quantum computing, protecting fragile quantum states from decoherence and operational errors. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of leading quantum error correction schemes, focusing on surface codes and topological codes within the context of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era processors. We examine the theoretical foundations of stabilizer codes, compare surface code implementations with code distances ranging from d=3 to d=17, and analyze topological codes including toric codes and color codes. Our investigation encompasses syndrome extraction circuits, logical qubit encoding strategies, and threshold analysis for contemporary quantum hardware platforms. Performance metrics reveal that surface codes achieve error thresholds of approximately 1% with realistic noise models, while topological codes offer architectural advantages for specific qubit connectivity constraints. We discuss implementation challenges on current NISQ processors including IBM Quantum, Google Sycamore, and IonQ systems, addressing qubit overhead, gate fidelity requirements, and decoding algorithms. This analysis provides insights for selecting appropriate error correction schemes based on application requirements and hardware capabilities.

•Mar 12, 2026•0 citations

Scaling and logic in the colour code on a superconducting quantum processor

Nathan Lacroix, Alexandre Bourassa, Francisco J. H. Heras +97 more

Quantum error correction [1–4] is essential for bridging the gap between the error rates of physical devices and the extremely low error rates required for quantum algorithms. Recent error-correction demonstrations on superconducting processors [5–8] have focused primarily on the surface code [9], which offers a high error threshold but poses limitations for logical operations. The color code [10] enables more efficient logic, but it requires more complex stabilizer measurements and decoding. Measuring these stabilizers in planar architectures like superconducting qubits is challenging, and realizations of color codes [11–19] have not addressed performance scaling with code size on any platform. Here, we present a comprehensive demonstration of the color code on a superconducting processor [8]. Scaling the code distance from three to five suppresses logical errors by a factor of Λ 3/5 = 1.56(4). Simulations indicate this performance is below the threshold of the color code, and the color code may become more efficient than the surface code following modest device improvements. We test transversal Clifford gates with logical randomized benchmarking [20] and inject magic states [21], a key resource for universal computation, achieving fidelities exceeding 99 % with post-selection. Finally, we teleport logical states between color codes using lattice surgery [22]. This work establishes the color code as a compelling research direction to realize fault-tolerant quantum computation on superconducting processors in the near future.

arXiv:2412.14256•Nature•May 26, 2025•51 citations

Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive quantum error correction

Zijun Chen, Kevin J. Satzinger, Juan Atalaya +88 more

Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in the $10^{-15}$ regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10^{-3}$. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges. Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round by more than $100\times$ when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum computing.

•Feb 11, 2021•8 citations

Optimizing Superconducting Three-Qubit Gates for Surface-Code Error Correction

Stephan Tasler, Josias Old, Lukas Heunisch +4 more

Quantum error correction (QEC) is one of the crucial building blocks for developing quantum computers that have significant potential for reaching a quantum advantage in applications. Prominent candidates for QEC are stabilizer codes for which periodic readout of stabilizer operators is typically implemented via successive two-qubit entangling gates, and is repeated many times during a computation. To improve QEC performance, it is thus beneficial to make the stabilizer readout faster and less prone to fault-tolerance-breaking errors. Here we design a 3-qubit CZZ gate for superconducting transmon qubits that maps the parity of two data qubits onto one measurement qubit in a single step. We find that the gate can be executed in a duration of $35\,$ns with a fidelity of F$=99.96 \, \%$. To optimize the gate, we use an error model obtained from the microscopic gate simulation to systematically suppress Pauli errors that are particularly harmful to the QEC protocol. Using this error model, we investigate the implementation of this 3-qubit gate in a surface code syndrome readout schedule. We find that for the rotated surface code, the implementation of CZZ gates increases the error threshold by nearly 50\% to $\approx 1.2\,\%$ and decreases the logical error rate, in the experimental relevant regime, by up to one order of magnitude, compared to the standard CZ readout protocol. We also show that for the unrotated surface code, strictly fault-tolerant readout schedules can be found. This opens a new perspective for below-threshold surface-code error correction, where it can be advantageous to use multi-qubit gates instead of two-qubit gates to obtain a better QEC performance.

arXiv:2506.09028•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold

Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Rajeev Acharya, Dmitry A. Abanin +97 more

Quantum error correction [1, 2, 3, 4] provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. Here, we present two below-threshold surface code memories on our newest generation of superconducting processors, Willow: a distance-7 code, and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder. The logical error rate of our larger quantum memory is suppressed by a factor of $$\varLambda \mathrm{=2.14}\pm 0.02$$ when increasing the code distance by two, culminating in a 101-qubit distance-7 code with 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle of error correction. This logical memory is also beyond break-even, exceeding its best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of $$2.4\pm 0.3$$ . Our system maintains below-threshold performance when decoding in real time, achieving an average decoder latency of 63 μs at distance-5 up to a million cycles, with a cycle time of 1.1 μs. We also run repetition codes up to distance-29 and find that logical performance is limited by rare correlated error events occurring approximately once every hour, or $$3$$ $$\times $$ $${10}^{9}$$ cycles. Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.

arXiv:2408.13687•Nature•Dec 9, 2024•778 citations

Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit

Google Quantum AI, Rajeev Acharya, I. L. Aleǐner +97 more

Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.

arXiv:2207.06431•Nature•Feb 22, 2023•1,104 citations
Current quantum processors are fragile, noisy and fairly limited in both quantity and quality with tens of qubits and physical error rates of around 10^-3. To realize practical quantum applications, however, error rates need to be below 10^-15 across millions of qubits. To bridge this gap and fully harness the potential of quantum computers, quantum error correction (QEC) is essential. QEC codes are designed to protect quantum information by redundantly encoding it onto multiple physical qubits. This encoding allows for the detection and correction of local errors affecting individual qubits, e.g., through stabilizer measurements. Importantly, if the physical error rates are below a specific threshold, QEC codes can exponentially suppress logical error rates by increasing the number of physical qubits involved. This is essential for achieving fault-tolerant computations, which are key to unlocking the full potential of quantum computers. The work presented in this thesis focuses on the implementation and optimization of small-scale QEC experiments using the surface code and flux-tunable superconducting qubits (Transmons). It addresses several key challenges: enhancing two-qubit gate fidelity in Surface-4 (Chapter 2), implementing an error-detection code with Surface-7 (Chapter 3), automating the calibration and benchmarking of the building blocks in Surface-17 (Chapter 4), reducing leakage into higher excited states with leakage reduction units (Chapter 5), assessing and enhancing the performance of logical qubits (Chapters 7 and 8).
Quantum error correction (QEC) represents a critical enabler for fault-tolerant quantum computing, protecting fragile quantum states from decoherence and operational errors. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of leading quantum error correction schemes, focusing on surface codes and topological codes within the context of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era processors. We examine the theoretical foundations of stabilizer codes, compare surface code implementations with code distances ranging from d=3 to d=17, and analyze topological codes including toric codes and color codes. Our investigation encompasses syndrome extraction circuits, logical qubit encoding strategies, and threshold analysis for contemporary quantum hardware platforms. Performance metrics reveal that surface codes achieve error thresholds of approximately 1% with realistic noise models, while topological codes offer architectural advantages for specific qubit connectivity constraints. We discuss implementation challenges on current NISQ processors including IBM Quantum, Google Sycamore, and IonQ systems, addressing qubit overhead, gate fidelity requirements, and decoding algorithms. This analysis provides insights for selecting appropriate error correction schemes based on application requirements and hardware capabilities.
Quantum error correction [1–4] is essential for bridging the gap between the error rates of physical devices and the extremely low error rates required for quantum algorithms. Recent error-correction demonstrations on superconducting processors [5–8] have focused primarily on the surface code [9], which offers a high error threshold but poses limitations for logical operations. The color code [10] enables more efficient logic, but it requires more complex stabilizer measurements and decoding. Measuring these stabilizers in planar architectures like superconducting qubits is challenging, and realizations of color codes [11–19] have not addressed performance scaling with code size on any platform. Here, we present a comprehensive demonstration of the color code on a superconducting processor [8]. Scaling the code distance from three to five suppresses logical errors by a factor of Λ 3/5 = 1.56(4). Simulations indicate this performance is below the threshold of the color code, and the color code may become more efficient than the surface code following modest device improvements. We test transversal Clifford gates with logical randomized benchmarking [20] and inject magic states [21], a key resource for universal computation, achieving fidelities exceeding 99 % with post-selection. Finally, we teleport logical states between color codes using lattice surgery [22]. This work establishes the color code as a compelling research direction to realize fault-tolerant quantum computation on superconducting processors in the near future.
Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in the 10−1510^{-15}10−15 regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10−310^{-3}10−3. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges. Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round by more than 100×100\times100× when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum computing.
Quantum error correction (QEC) is one of the crucial building blocks for developing quantum computers that have significant potential for reaching a quantum advantage in applications. Prominent candidates for QEC are stabilizer codes for which periodic readout of stabilizer operators is typically implemented via successive two-qubit entangling gates, and is repeated many times during a computation. To improve QEC performance, it is thus beneficial to make the stabilizer readout faster and less prone to fault-tolerance-breaking errors. Here we design a 3-qubit CZZ gate for superconducting transmon qubits that maps the parity of two data qubits onto one measurement qubit in a single step. We find that the gate can be executed in a duration of 35 35\,35ns with a fidelity of F=99.96 %=99.96 \, \%=99.96%. To optimize the gate, we use an error model obtained from the microscopic gate simulation to systematically suppress Pauli errors that are particularly harmful to the QEC protocol. Using this error model, we investigate the implementation of this 3-qubit gate in a surface code syndrome readout schedule. We find that for the rotated surface code, the implementation of CZZ gates increases the error threshold by nearly 50\% to ≈1.2 %\approx 1.2\,\%≈1.2% and decreases the logical error rate, in the experimental relevant regime, by up to one order of magnitude, compared to the standard CZ readout protocol. We also show that for the unrotated surface code, strictly fault-tolerant readout schedules can be found. This opens a new perspective for below-threshold surface-code error correction, where it can be advantageous to use multi-qubit gates instead of two-qubit gates to obtain a better QEC performance.
Quantum error correction [1, 2, 3, 4] provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. Here, we present two below-threshold surface code memories on our newest generation of superconducting processors, Willow: a distance-7 code, and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder. The logical error rate of our larger quantum memory is suppressed by a factor of Λ=2.14±0.02\varLambda \mathrm{=2.14}\pm 0.02Λ=2.14±0.02 when increasing the code distance by two, culminating in a 101-qubit distance-7 code with 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle of error correction. This logical memory is also beyond break-even, exceeding its best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of 2.4±0.32.4\pm 0.32.4±0.3 . Our system maintains below-threshold performance when decoding in real time, achieving an average decoder latency of 63 μs at distance-5 up to a million cycles, with a cycle time of 1.1 μs. We also run repetition codes up to distance-29 and find that logical performance is limited by rare correlated error events occurring approximately once every hour, or 333 ×\times × 109{10}^{9}109 cycles. Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.
Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.