Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2408.13687 · Nature

Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold

Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Rajeev Acharya, Dmitry A. Abanin, Laleh Aghababaie Beni, I. L. Aleǐner, Trond I. Andersen, M. Ansmann, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Abraham T. Asfaw, Nikita Astrakhantsev, Juan Atalaya, Ryan Babbush, Dave Bacon, Brian Ballard, Joseph C. Bardin, Johannes Bausch, Andreas Bengtsson, Alexander Bilmes, Sam Blackwell, Sergio Boixo, Gina Bortoli, Alexandre Bourassa, Jenna Bovaird, Leon Brill, Michael Broughton, David A. Browne, Brett Buchea, Bob B. Buckley, David A. Buell, Tim Burger, Brian Burkett, Nicholas Bushnell, Anthony Cabrera, Juan Campero, Hung-Shen Chang, Yu Chen, Zijun Chen, B. Chiaro, Desmond Chik, Charina Chou, Jahan Claes, Agnetta Y. Cleland, J. G. Cogan, Roberto Collins, Paul W. Conner, William Courtney, Alexander L. Crook, Ben Curtin, Sayan Das, Alex Davies, Laura De Lorenzo, Dripto M. Debroy, Sean Demura, Michel Devoret, Agustín Di Paolo, Paul Donohoe, Ilya Drozdov, A. Dunsworth, Clint Earle, Thomas Edlich, Alec Eickbusch, Aviv Moshe Elbag, Mahmoud Elzouka, Catherine Erickson, Lara Faoro, Edward Farhi, Vinicius S. Ferreira, Leslie Flores Burgos, Ebrahim Forati, Austin G. Fowler, Brooks Foxen, Suhas Ganjam, Gonzalo Garcia, Robert Gasca, Élie Genois, William Giang, Craig Gidney, Dar Gilboa, Raja Gosula, Alejandro Grajales Dau, Dietrich Graumann, Alex Greene, Jonathan A. Gross, Steve Habegger, John A. Hall, Michael C. Hamilton, Monica A. Hansen, Matthew P. Harrigan, Sean David Harrington, Francisco J. H. Heras, Stephen Heslin, Paula Heu, Oscar Higgott, Gordon Hill, Jeremy Hilton, George Holland, Sabrina Hong, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Ashley Huff

Published Dec 9, 2024• 778 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum error correction [1, 2, 3, 4] provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. Here, we present two below-threshold surface code memories on our newest generation of superconducting processors, Willow: a distance-7 code, and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder. The logical error rate of our larger quantum memory is suppressed by a factor of $$\varLambda \mathrm{=2.14}\pm 0.02$$ when increasing the code distance by two, culminating in a 101-qubit distance-7 code with 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle of error correction. This logical memory is also beyond break-even, exceeding its best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of $$2.4\pm 0.3$$ . Our system maintains below-threshold performance when decoding in real time, achieving an average decoder latency of 63 μs at distance-5 up to a million cycles, with a cycle time of 1.1 μs. We also run repetition codes up to distance-29 and find that logical performance is limited by rare correlated error events occurring approximately once every hour, or $$3$$ $$\times $$ $${10}^{9}$$ cycles. Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.

DOI
10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y

Related papers

Quantum error correction well below the color code threshold

Ali Lavasani, Adam P. Reed, Joan M. Dreiling +20 more

Quantum error correction enables scalable fault-tolerant quantum computation by suppressing logical errors exponentially with code distance once physical error rates fall below a critical threshold. Here we demonstrate below-threshold operation of triangular color codes with distances $d=3,5,$ and $7$ on Quantinuum's Helios trapped-ion quantum processor. Leveraging both circuit- and hardware- level leakage reduction schemes, we achieve logical error rates as low as $5_{-2}^{+4}\times 10^{-6}$, and demonstrate error suppression by over an order of magnitude, $Λ=12_{-2}^{+3}$, with each successive increase in code distance. Moreover, we demonstrate below threshold scaling of error rates for Clifford two-qubit randomized benchmarking circuits when encoded in $d=3,5$ color codes, achieving logical error rate of $7^{+3}_{-3}\times 10^{-5}$ per logical two-qubit Clifford at distance $5$ with a suppression factor of $Λ=9_{-3}^{+8}$. We compare logical performance for existing near-optimal algorithmic decoders, and both convolutional neural network and transformer-based neural network decoders capable of real-time decoding an order of magnitude faster than the syndrome extraction rate. These results approach the logical error rates required for megaquop-scale quantum computation and indicate that scaled trapped-ion processors could reach application-relevant performance with substantially smaller code blocks than indicated by previous results in other qubit modalities.

quant-pharXiv:2610.24077•Oct 20, 2026•0 citations

Demonstration of Logical Error Suppression in a Surface Code Memory on a Cloud-Accessible IBM Superconducting Processor

Shuwen Kan, Aaron Hoyt, Sean Garner +8 more

Quantum error correction can suppress logical errors exponentially with code distance when physical noise is below threshold. Realizing this on hardware requires tight coordination among quantum gates, mid-circuit measurements, and qubit coherence. Device variation, noise asymmetry, and correlations across space and time complicate the translation of these capabilities into logical error suppression. Here, we study rotated surface-code memory on an IBM Nighthawk r2 processor. Performance varies across tested processor placements, which we attribute to differences in qubit quality. We optimize the code by combining short readout, fused measurement and reset, and an XX echo on data qubits during ancilla readout. Compared with standard readout without reset or echo, the optimized syndrome extraction circuit reduces the median per-round logical error rate by factors of 3.8 in the X basis and 1.4 in the Z basis. In memory experiments of up to 150 rounds, the distance advantage weakens, alongside long-lived correlations that may reflect a persistent error component. Under our optimization recipe, increasing the protected distance from 3 to 6 while holding the other distance fixed reduces the per-round logical error rate from 0.53% to 0.24% in Z memory and from 0.52% to 0.22% in X memory. The corresponding error-suppression factors under maximum-likelihood decoding are 1.68 and 1.85. These results connect circuit compilation and optimization to surface-code memory performance and limitations, and motivate QPU and QEC circuit codesign for fault-tolerant quantum computing primitives on current cloud hardware.

quant-pharXiv:2610.23840•Oct 19, 2026•0 citations

Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit

Google Quantum AI, Rajeev Acharya, I. L. Aleǐner +97 more

Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.

arXiv:2207.06431•Nature•Feb 22, 2023•1,104 citations

High-threshold and low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory

Sergey B. Bravyi, Andrew W. Cross, Jay Gambetta +3 more

Abstract The accumulation of physical errors 1–3 prevents the execution of large-scale algorithms in current quantum computers. Quantum error correction 4 promises a solution by encoding k logical qubits onto a larger number n of physical qubits, such that the physical errors are suppressed enough to allow running a desired computation with tolerable fidelity. Quantum error correction becomes practically realizable once the physical error rate is below a threshold value that depends on the choice of quantum code, syndrome measurement circuit and decoding algorithm 5 . We present an end-to-end quantum error correction protocol that implements fault-tolerant memory on the basis of a family of low-density parity-check codes 6 . Our approach achieves an error threshold of 0.7% for the standard circuit-based noise model, on par with the surface code 7–10 that for 20 years was the leading code in terms of error threshold. The syndrome measurement cycle for a length- n code in our family requires n ancillary qubits and a depth-8 circuit with CNOT gates, qubit initializations and measurements. The required qubit connectivity is a degree-6 graph composed of two edge-disjoint planar subgraphs. In particular, we show that 12 logical qubits can be preserved for nearly 1 million syndrome cycles using 288 physical qubits in total, assuming the physical error rate of 0.1%, whereas the surface code would require nearly 3,000 physical qubits to achieve said performance. Our findings bring demonstrations of a low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory within the reach of near-term quantum processors.

arXiv:2308.07915•Nature•Mar 27, 2024•456 citations

Experimental Quantum Error Correction below the Surface Code Threshold via All-Microwave Leakage Suppression

Tan He, W. W. Lin, Rui Wang +97 more

Quantum error correction (QEC) enables practical quantum computing by encoding logical qubits in many physical qubits, which can exponentially suppress the logical error rate with increasing code size provided that the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. However, the leakage of quantum information from the computational subspace presents a critical challenge to the development of scalable QEC, which creates long-lived, correlated errors that spread across space and time. Here, we demonstrate a quantum memory operating below the threshold by implementing an all-microwave leakage suppression architecture on a distance-7 surface code. We achieve a logical error suppression factor of Λ=1.40(6), definitively reversing the above-threshold scaling (Λ<1) caused by unmitigated leakage. This scheme integrates a hardware-efficient leakage reduction unit for data qubits with a fast, unconditional reset for ancilla qubits, suppressing the average leakage population after 40 cycles by a factor of 72 to 6.4(5)×10^{-4}. Our results demonstrate the viability of all-microwave control architectures for suppressing critical errors at scale, paving the way for more advanced quantum error correction implementations.

Physical Review Letters•Dec 22, 2025•14 citations

Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive quantum error correction

Zijun Chen, Kevin J. Satzinger, Juan Atalaya +88 more

Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in the $10^{-15}$ regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10^{-3}$. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges. Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round by more than $100\times$ when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum computing.

•Feb 11, 2021•8 citations
Quantum error correction [1, 2, 3, 4] provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. Here, we present two below-threshold surface code memories on our newest generation of superconducting processors, Willow: a distance-7 code, and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder. The logical error rate of our larger quantum memory is suppressed by a factor of Λ=2.14±0.02\varLambda \mathrm{=2.14}\pm 0.02Λ=2.14±0.02 when increasing the code distance by two, culminating in a 101-qubit distance-7 code with 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle of error correction. This logical memory is also beyond break-even, exceeding its best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of 2.4±0.32.4\pm 0.32.4±0.3 . Our system maintains below-threshold performance when decoding in real time, achieving an average decoder latency of 63 μs at distance-5 up to a million cycles, with a cycle time of 1.1 μs. We also run repetition codes up to distance-29 and find that logical performance is limited by rare correlated error events occurring approximately once every hour, or 333 ×\times × 109{10}^{9}109 cycles. Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.
Quantum error correction enables scalable fault-tolerant quantum computation by suppressing logical errors exponentially with code distance once physical error rates fall below a critical threshold. Here we demonstrate below-threshold operation of triangular color codes with distances d=3,5,d=3,5,d=3,5, and 777 on Quantinuum's Helios trapped-ion quantum processor. Leveraging both circuit- and hardware- level leakage reduction schemes, we achieve logical error rates as low as 5−2+4×10−65_{-2}^{+4}\times 10^{-6}5−2+4​×10−6, and demonstrate error suppression by over an order of magnitude, Λ=12−2+3Λ=12_{-2}^{+3}Λ=12−2+3​, with each successive increase in code distance. Moreover, we demonstrate below threshold scaling of error rates for Clifford two-qubit randomized benchmarking circuits when encoded in d=3,5d=3,5d=3,5 color codes, achieving logical error rate of 7−3+3×10−57^{+3}_{-3}\times 10^{-5}7−3+3​×10−5 per logical two-qubit Clifford at distance 555 with a suppression factor of Λ=9−3+8Λ=9_{-3}^{+8}Λ=9−3+8​. We compare logical performance for existing near-optimal algorithmic decoders, and both convolutional neural network and transformer-based neural network decoders capable of real-time decoding an order of magnitude faster than the syndrome extraction rate. These results approach the logical error rates required for megaquop-scale quantum computation and indicate that scaled trapped-ion processors could reach application-relevant performance with substantially smaller code blocks than indicated by previous results in other qubit modalities.
Quantum error correction can suppress logical errors exponentially with code distance when physical noise is below threshold. Realizing this on hardware requires tight coordination among quantum gates, mid-circuit measurements, and qubit coherence. Device variation, noise asymmetry, and correlations across space and time complicate the translation of these capabilities into logical error suppression. Here, we study rotated surface-code memory on an IBM Nighthawk r2 processor. Performance varies across tested processor placements, which we attribute to differences in qubit quality. We optimize the code by combining short readout, fused measurement and reset, and an XX echo on data qubits during ancilla readout. Compared with standard readout without reset or echo, the optimized syndrome extraction circuit reduces the median per-round logical error rate by factors of 3.8 in the X basis and 1.4 in the Z basis. In memory experiments of up to 150 rounds, the distance advantage weakens, alongside long-lived correlations that may reflect a persistent error component. Under our optimization recipe, increasing the protected distance from 3 to 6 while holding the other distance fixed reduces the per-round logical error rate from 0.53% to 0.24% in Z memory and from 0.52% to 0.22% in X memory. The corresponding error-suppression factors under maximum-likelihood decoding are 1.68 and 1.85. These results connect circuit compilation and optimization to surface-code memory performance and limitations, and motivate QPU and QEC circuit codesign for fault-tolerant quantum computing primitives on current cloud hardware.
Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.
Abstract The accumulation of physical errors 1–3 prevents the execution of large-scale algorithms in current quantum computers. Quantum error correction 4 promises a solution by encoding k logical qubits onto a larger number n of physical qubits, such that the physical errors are suppressed enough to allow running a desired computation with tolerable fidelity. Quantum error correction becomes practically realizable once the physical error rate is below a threshold value that depends on the choice of quantum code, syndrome measurement circuit and decoding algorithm 5 . We present an end-to-end quantum error correction protocol that implements fault-tolerant memory on the basis of a family of low-density parity-check codes 6 . Our approach achieves an error threshold of 0.7% for the standard circuit-based noise model, on par with the surface code 7–10 that for 20 years was the leading code in terms of error threshold. The syndrome measurement cycle for a length- n code in our family requires n ancillary qubits and a depth-8 circuit with CNOT gates, qubit initializations and measurements. The required qubit connectivity is a degree-6 graph composed of two edge-disjoint planar subgraphs. In particular, we show that 12 logical qubits can be preserved for nearly 1 million syndrome cycles using 288 physical qubits in total, assuming the physical error rate of 0.1%, whereas the surface code would require nearly 3,000 physical qubits to achieve said performance. Our findings bring demonstrations of a low-overhead fault-tolerant quantum memory within the reach of near-term quantum processors.
Quantum error correction (QEC) enables practical quantum computing by encoding logical qubits in many physical qubits, which can exponentially suppress the logical error rate with increasing code size provided that the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. However, the leakage of quantum information from the computational subspace presents a critical challenge to the development of scalable QEC, which creates long-lived, correlated errors that spread across space and time. Here, we demonstrate a quantum memory operating below the threshold by implementing an all-microwave leakage suppression architecture on a distance-7 surface code. We achieve a logical error suppression factor of Λ=1.40(6), definitively reversing the above-threshold scaling (Λ<1) caused by unmitigated leakage. This scheme integrates a hardware-efficient leakage reduction unit for data qubits with a fast, unconditional reset for ancilla qubits, suppressing the average leakage population after 40 cycles by a factor of 72 to 6.4(5)×10^{-4}. Our results demonstrate the viability of all-microwave control architectures for suppressing critical errors at scale, paving the way for more advanced quantum error correction implementations.
Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in the 10−1510^{-15}10−15 regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10−310^{-3}10−3. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges. Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round by more than 100×100\times100× when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum computing.