Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive quantum error correction

Zijun Chen, Kevin J. Satzinger, Juan Atalaya, Alexander N. Korotkov, A. Dunsworth, D. Sank, Chris Quintana, Matt McEwen, R. Barends, Paul V. Klimov, Sabrina Hong, Cody Jones, A. G. Petukhov, Dvir Kafri, Sean Demura, Brian Burkett, Craig Gidney, Austin G. Fowler, Harald Putterman, I. L. Aleǐner, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Babbush, Joseph C. Bardin, Andreas Bengtsson, Alexandre Bourassa, Michael Broughton, Bob B. Buckley, David A. Buell, Nicholas Bushnell, Benjamin Chiaro, Roberto Collins, William Courtney, Alan R. Derk, Daniel Eppens, Catherine Erickson, Edward Farhi, Brooks Foxen, Marissa Giustina, Jonathan A. Gross, Matthew P. Harrigan, Sean David Harrington, Jeremy Hilton, Alan Ho, Trent Huang, William J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, Sergei V. Isakov, Evan R. Jeffrey, Jiang Zhang, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Seon Kim, Fedor Kostritsa, David Landhuis, Pavel Laptev, Erik A. Lucero, Orion Martin, Jarrod R. McClean, Trevor McCourt, Xiao Mi, Kevin C. Miao, Masoud Mohseni, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, J. Mutus, Ofer Naaman, M. Neeley, Charles Neill, Michael Newman, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Thomas E. O’Brien, Alex Opremcak, Eric P. Ostby, Bálint Pató, Nicholas Redd, P. Roushan, Nicholas C. Rubin, Vladimir A. Shvarts, Doug Strain, Marco Szalay, Matthew D. Trevithick, Benjamin Villalonga, T. White, Z. Jamie Yao, P. Yeh, Adam Zalcman, Hartmut Neven, Sergio Boixo, Vadim Smelyanskiy, Yu Chen, A. Megrant, J. Kelly

Published Feb 11, 2021• 8 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in the $10^{-15}$ regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10^{-3}$. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges. Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round by more than $100\times$ when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum computing.

Related papers

Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction

Google Quantum AI, Zijun Chen, Kevin J. Satzinger +94 more

Abstract Realizing the potential of quantum computing requires sufficiently low logical error rates 1 . Many applications call for error rates as low as 10 −15 (refs. 2–9 ), but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10 −3 (refs. 10–14 ). Quantum error correction 15–17 promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits in such a way that errors can be detected and corrected. Errors on the encoded logical qubit state can be exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold and stable over the course of a computation. Here we implement one-dimensional repetition codes embedded in a two-dimensional grid of superconducting qubits that demonstrate exponential suppression of bit-flip or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round more than 100-fold when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analysing error correlations with high precision, allowing us to characterize error locality while performing quantum error correction. Finally, we perform error detection with a small logical qubit using the 2D surface code on the same device 18,19 and show that the results from both one- and two-dimensional codes agree with numerical simulations that use a simple depolarizing error model. These experimental demonstrations provide a foundation for building a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computer with superconducting qubits.

arXiv:2102.06132•Nature•Jul 14, 2021•385 citations

Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold

Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Rajeev Acharya, Dmitry A. Abanin +97 more

Quantum error correction [1, 2, 3, 4] provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. Here, we present two below-threshold surface code memories on our newest generation of superconducting processors, Willow: a distance-7 code, and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder. The logical error rate of our larger quantum memory is suppressed by a factor of $$\varLambda \mathrm{=2.14}\pm 0.02$$ when increasing the code distance by two, culminating in a 101-qubit distance-7 code with 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle of error correction. This logical memory is also beyond break-even, exceeding its best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of $$2.4\pm 0.3$$ . Our system maintains below-threshold performance when decoding in real time, achieving an average decoder latency of 63 μs at distance-5 up to a million cycles, with a cycle time of 1.1 μs. We also run repetition codes up to distance-29 and find that logical performance is limited by rare correlated error events occurring approximately once every hour, or $$3$$ $$\times $$ $${10}^{9}$$ cycles. Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.

arXiv:2408.13687•Nature•Dec 9, 2024•778 citations

Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit

Google Quantum AI, Rajeev Acharya, I. L. Aleǐner +97 more

Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.

arXiv:2207.06431•Nature•Feb 22, 2023•1,104 citations

Qubit Error Correction in Quantum Computing Simulations: Do Larger Repetition Codes Reduce Logical Errors?

Sanjeev Tamilselvan, Tanuj Ranjith

Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.

•Mar 31, 2026•0 citations

Error Correction in a Distributed Quantum Computer

E. M. Ainley, A. Agrawal, T. Araki +12 more

Building fault-tolerant quantum computers with large numbers of logical qubits requires both scalable hardware architectures and error-correcting codes that make efficient use of physical qubits. Photonic interconnects address both of these challenges by allowing the physical qubits to be distributed across multiple processors while providing the non-local connectivity necessary to implement resource-efficient codes such as high-rate quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes. A key requirement for realising this architecture is the ability to perform stabiliser measurements between remote processors, which has not previously been demonstrated experimentally. Here we report the first experimental demonstration of distributed quantum error detection and correction. We generate entanglement between network qubits in two separate trapped-ion processors and use it to perform remote syndrome measurements on data qubits. We first realise a distributed [[2, 1, 1]] repetition code, detecting phase-flip errors on a logical qubit encoded across the two modules in real time and suppressing logical errors. We then combine these mid-circuit syndrome measurements with real-time feedforward to actively correct arbitrary single-qubit Pauli errors on a distributed Bell state. These results provide an experimental foundation for quantum error correction (QEC) across modular quantum architectures.

quant-pharXiv:2609.13065•Sep 14, 2026•0 citations

Qubit Error Correction in Quantum Computing Simulations: Do Larger Repetition Codes Reduce Logical Errors?

Sanjeev Tamilselvan, Tanuj Ranjith

Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.

•Jun 12, 2026•0 citations
Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in the 10−1510^{-15}10−15 regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10−310^{-3}10−3. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges. Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round by more than 100×100\times100× when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum computing.
Abstract Realizing the potential of quantum computing requires sufficiently low logical error rates 1 . Many applications call for error rates as low as 10 −15 (refs. 2–9 ), but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10 −3 (refs. 10–14 ). Quantum error correction 15–17 promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits in such a way that errors can be detected and corrected. Errors on the encoded logical qubit state can be exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold and stable over the course of a computation. Here we implement one-dimensional repetition codes embedded in a two-dimensional grid of superconducting qubits that demonstrate exponential suppression of bit-flip or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round more than 100-fold when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analysing error correlations with high precision, allowing us to characterize error locality while performing quantum error correction. Finally, we perform error detection with a small logical qubit using the 2D surface code on the same device 18,19 and show that the results from both one- and two-dimensional codes agree with numerical simulations that use a simple depolarizing error model. These experimental demonstrations provide a foundation for building a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computer with superconducting qubits.
Quantum error correction [1, 2, 3, 4] provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. Here, we present two below-threshold surface code memories on our newest generation of superconducting processors, Willow: a distance-7 code, and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder. The logical error rate of our larger quantum memory is suppressed by a factor of Λ=2.14±0.02\varLambda \mathrm{=2.14}\pm 0.02Λ=2.14±0.02 when increasing the code distance by two, culminating in a 101-qubit distance-7 code with 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle of error correction. This logical memory is also beyond break-even, exceeding its best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of 2.4±0.32.4\pm 0.32.4±0.3 . Our system maintains below-threshold performance when decoding in real time, achieving an average decoder latency of 63 μs at distance-5 up to a million cycles, with a cycle time of 1.1 μs. We also run repetition codes up to distance-29 and find that logical performance is limited by rare correlated error events occurring approximately once every hour, or 333 ×\times × 109{10}^{9}109 cycles. Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.
Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.
Building fault-tolerant quantum computers with large numbers of logical qubits requires both scalable hardware architectures and error-correcting codes that make efficient use of physical qubits. Photonic interconnects address both of these challenges by allowing the physical qubits to be distributed across multiple processors while providing the non-local connectivity necessary to implement resource-efficient codes such as high-rate quantum low-density parity-check (qLDPC) codes. A key requirement for realising this architecture is the ability to perform stabiliser measurements between remote processors, which has not previously been demonstrated experimentally. Here we report the first experimental demonstration of distributed quantum error detection and correction. We generate entanglement between network qubits in two separate trapped-ion processors and use it to perform remote syndrome measurements on data qubits. We first realise a distributed [[2, 1, 1]] repetition code, detecting phase-flip errors on a logical qubit encoded across the two modules in real time and suppressing logical errors. We then combine these mid-circuit syndrome measurements with real-time feedforward to actively correct arbitrary single-qubit Pauli errors on a distributed Bell state. These results provide an experimental foundation for quantum error correction (QEC) across modular quantum architectures.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.