Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2102.06132 · Nature

Exponential suppression of bit or phase errors with cyclic error correction

Google Quantum AI, Zijun Chen, Kevin J. Satzinger, Juan Atalaya, Alexander N. Korotkov, A. Dunsworth, D. Sank, Chris Quintana, Matt McEwen, R. Barends, Paul V. Klimov, Sabrina Hong, Cody Jones, A. G. Petukhov, Dvir Kafri, Sean Demura, Brian Burkett, Craig Gidney, Austin G. Fowler, Alexandru Paler, Harald Putterman, I. L. Aleǐner, Frank Arute, Kunal Arya, Ryan Babbush, Joseph C. Bardin, Andreas Bengtsson, Alexandre Bourassa, Michael Broughton, Bob B. Buckley, David A. Buell, Nicholas Bushnell, Benjamin Chiaro, Roberto Collins, William Courtney, Alan R. Derk, Daniel Eppens, Catherine Erickson, Edward Farhi, Brooks Foxen, Marissa Giustina, Alex Greene, Jonathan A. Gross, Matthew P. Harrigan, Sean David Harrington, Jeremy Hilton, Alan Ho, Trent Huang, William J. Huggins, L. B. Ioffe, Sergei V. Isakov, Evan R. Jeffrey, Jiang Zhang, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Seon Kim, Alexei Kitaev, Fedor Kostritsa, David Landhuis, Pavel Laptev, Erik A. Lucero, Orion Martin, Jarrod R. McClean, Trevor McCourt, Xiao Mi, Kevin C. Miao, Masoud Mohseni, Shirin Montazeri, Wojciech Mruczkiewicz, J. Mutus, Ofer Naaman, M. Neeley, Charles Neill, Michael Newman, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, Thomas E. O’Brien, Alex Opremcak, Eric P. Ostby, Bálint Pató, Nicholas Redd, P. Roushan, Nicholas C. Rubin, Vladimir A. Shvarts, Doug Strain, Marco Szalay, Matthew D. Trevithick, Benjamin Villalonga, T. White, Z. Jamie Yao, P. Yeh, Juhwan Yoo, Adam Zalcman, Hartmut Neven, Sergio Boixo, Vadim Smelyanskiy, Yu Chen, A. Megrant, J. Kelly

Published Jul 14, 2021• 385 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract Realizing the potential of quantum computing requires sufficiently low logical error rates 1 . Many applications call for error rates as low as 10 −15 (refs. 2–9 ), but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10 −3 (refs. 10–14 ). Quantum error correction 15–17 promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits in such a way that errors can be detected and corrected. Errors on the encoded logical qubit state can be exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold and stable over the course of a computation. Here we implement one-dimensional repetition codes embedded in a two-dimensional grid of superconducting qubits that demonstrate exponential suppression of bit-flip or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round more than 100-fold when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analysing error correlations with high precision, allowing us to characterize error locality while performing quantum error correction. Finally, we perform error detection with a small logical qubit using the 2D surface code on the same device 18,19 and show that the results from both one- and two-dimensional codes agree with numerical simulations that use a simple depolarizing error model. These experimental demonstrations provide a foundation for building a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computer with superconducting qubits.

DOI
10.1038/s41586-021-03588-y

Related papers

Exponential suppression of bit or phase flip errors with repetitive quantum error correction

Zijun Chen, Kevin J. Satzinger, Juan Atalaya +88 more

Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in the $10^{-15}$ regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near $10^{-3}$. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges. Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round by more than $100\times$ when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum computing.

•Feb 11, 2021•8 citations

Suppressing quantum errors by scaling a surface code logical qubit

Google Quantum AI, Rajeev Acharya, I. L. Aleǐner +97 more

Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.

arXiv:2207.06431•Nature•Feb 22, 2023•1,104 citations

Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold

Google Quantum AI and Collaborators, Rajeev Acharya, Dmitry A. Abanin +97 more

Quantum error correction [1, 2, 3, 4] provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. Here, we present two below-threshold surface code memories on our newest generation of superconducting processors, Willow: a distance-7 code, and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder. The logical error rate of our larger quantum memory is suppressed by a factor of $$\varLambda \mathrm{=2.14}\pm 0.02$$ when increasing the code distance by two, culminating in a 101-qubit distance-7 code with 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle of error correction. This logical memory is also beyond break-even, exceeding its best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of $$2.4\pm 0.3$$ . Our system maintains below-threshold performance when decoding in real time, achieving an average decoder latency of 63 μs at distance-5 up to a million cycles, with a cycle time of 1.1 μs. We also run repetition codes up to distance-29 and find that logical performance is limited by rare correlated error events occurring approximately once every hour, or $$3$$ $$\times $$ $${10}^{9}$$ cycles. Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.

arXiv:2408.13687•Nature•Dec 9, 2024•778 citations

Qubit Error Correction in Quantum Computing Simulations: Do Larger Repetition Codes Reduce Logical Errors?

Sanjeev Tamilselvan, Tanuj Ranjith

Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.

•Jun 12, 2026•0 citations

Qubit Error Correction in Quantum Computing Simulations: Do Larger Repetition Codes Reduce Logical Errors?

Sanjeev Tamilselvan, Tanuj Ranjith

Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.

•Mar 31, 2026•0 citations

Toward Scalable Quantum Computing with Superconducting Circuits

Michael Kerschbaum

Quantum computing holds the promise of solving problems that are intractable for classical computers, with applications ranging from optimization and materials simulation to cryptography. It achieves this by leveraging the exponentially scaling dimensionality of the space encoding quantum information and by executing algorithms on quantum registers in superposition states – a feature often referred to as quantum parallelism. However, while encoding information in computational units capable of exploring a continuous set of quantum states enables exponential scaling of computational power with system size, quantum systems are also more susceptible to errors than their classical counterparts. These errors take the form of both control errors, where miscalibration of the control pulses causes coherent errors on the qubit states, as well as incoherent errors due to energy relaxation and dephasing. Scaling quantum systems to run useful algorithms involving hundreds or thousands of logical qubits will require quantum error correction. In this approach, quantum information is redundantly encoded across an entangled state of many physical qubits. This has enabled experimental demonstrations across various platforms – including ion traps, superconducting circuits, and neutral atoms – showing that encoded quantum states can be preserved beyond the coherence times of the constituting physical qubits. However, quantum state preservation is only one component needed for scalable quantum computing. To execute algorithms, it is also necessary to implement quantum gates on and between encoded qubits, in a way that maintains fault tolerance by preserving the ability to correct errors as they occur during the computation. In the first part of this thesis, we demonstrate the implementation of an error-corrected quantum operation that entangles two logical qubits. This is achieved by performing lattice surgery on a distance-three surface code qubit, resulting in a logical Bell state encoded in distance-three repetition codes, which enable the correction of single bit-flip errors. We further introduce techniques to benchmark and characterize the performance of logical operations, including applying the protocol to arbitrary logical input states and performing logical quantum process tomography. Together, these results constitute one of the first realizations of error-corrected lattice surgery in superconducting circuits. While quantum error correction can correct errors provided they occur with sufficiently low frequency, it may fail when many qubits experience errors simultaneously. In the second part of this thesis, we therefore shift focus to a specific error mechanism known to cause correlated errors in superconducting circuits – quasiparticle-induced decoherence. In this case, various forms of energy deposition on the quantum device can break Cooper pairs into quasiparticles, which may subsequently diffuse to the tunnel junction and interact with the qubit state, thereby causing decoherence. In this thesis, we investigate the impact of quasiparticle tunneling on qubit performance, with a focus on infrared-induced quasiparticles. We compare the sensitivity of niobium-based qubits to those made from tantalum – a material that has gained interest in recent years following demonstrations of qubits with improved coherence times based on this material. Using a thermal radiator source, we show that the performance of tantalum qubits may be limited by infrared-induced quasiparticles in typical superconducting circuit experimental setups. By employing both ambient and in-line infrared filters, we investigate the effectiveness of different filtering strategies and develop best practices for engineering cryogenic environments for superconducting quantum processors. The results presented in this thesis contribute to the advancement of quantum computing based on superconducting circuits by implementing and characterizing quantum error-corrected operations, and by investigating quasiparticles as a source of decoherence, along with strategies to improve infrared filtering and signal conditioning in cryogenic environments for future fault-tolerant quantum computing.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
Abstract Realizing the potential of quantum computing requires sufficiently low logical error rates 1 . Many applications call for error rates as low as 10 −15 (refs. 2–9 ), but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10 −3 (refs. 10–14 ). Quantum error correction 15–17 promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits in such a way that errors can be detected and corrected. Errors on the encoded logical qubit state can be exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold and stable over the course of a computation. Here we implement one-dimensional repetition codes embedded in a two-dimensional grid of superconducting qubits that demonstrate exponential suppression of bit-flip or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round more than 100-fold when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analysing error correlations with high precision, allowing us to characterize error locality while performing quantum error correction. Finally, we perform error detection with a small logical qubit using the 2D surface code on the same device 18,19 and show that the results from both one- and two-dimensional codes agree with numerical simulations that use a simple depolarizing error model. These experimental demonstrations provide a foundation for building a scalable fault-tolerant quantum computer with superconducting qubits.
Realizing the potential of quantum computing will require achieving sufficiently low logical error rates. Many applications call for error rates in the 10−1510^{-15}10−15 regime, but state-of-the-art quantum platforms typically have physical error rates near 10−310^{-3}10−3. Quantum error correction (QEC) promises to bridge this divide by distributing quantum logical information across many physical qubits so that errors can be detected and corrected. Logical errors are then exponentially suppressed as the number of physical qubits grows, provided that the physical error rates are below a certain threshold. QEC also requires that the errors are local and that performance is maintained over many rounds of error correction, two major outstanding experimental challenges. Here, we implement 1D repetition codes embedded in a 2D grid of superconducting qubits which demonstrate exponential suppression of bit or phase-flip errors, reducing logical error per round by more than 100×100\times100× when increasing the number of qubits from 5 to 21. Crucially, this error suppression is stable over 50 rounds of error correction. We also introduce a method for analyzing error correlations with high precision, and characterize the locality of errors in a device performing QEC for the first time. Finally, we perform error detection using a small 2D surface code logical qubit on the same device, and show that the results from both 1D and 2D codes agree with numerical simulations using a simple depolarizing error model. These findings demonstrate that superconducting qubits are on a viable path towards fault tolerant quantum computing.
Abstract Practical quantum computing will require error rates well below those achievable with physical qubits. Quantum error correction 1,2 offers a path to algorithmically relevant error rates by encoding logical qubits within many physical qubits, for which increasing the number of physical qubits enhances protection against physical errors. However, introducing more qubits also increases the number of error sources, so the density of errors must be sufficiently low for logical performance to improve with increasing code size. Here we report the measurement of logical qubit performance scaling across several code sizes, and demonstrate that our system of superconducting qubits has sufficient performance to overcome the additional errors from increasing qubit number. We find that our distance-5 surface code logical qubit modestly outperforms an ensemble of distance-3 logical qubits on average, in terms of both logical error probability over 25 cycles and logical error per cycle ((2.914 ± 0.016)% compared to (3.028 ± 0.023)%). To investigate damaging, low-probability error sources, we run a distance-25 repetition code and observe a 1.7 × 10 −6 logical error per cycle floor set by a single high-energy event (1.6 × 10 −7 excluding this event). We accurately model our experiment, extracting error budgets that highlight the biggest challenges for future systems. These results mark an experimental demonstration in which quantum error correction begins to improve performance with increasing qubit number, illuminating the path to reaching the logical error rates required for computation.
Quantum error correction [1, 2, 3, 4] provides a path to reach practical quantum computing by combining multiple physical qubits into a logical qubit, where the logical error rate is suppressed exponentially as more qubits are added. However, this exponential suppression only occurs if the physical error rate is below a critical threshold. Here, we present two below-threshold surface code memories on our newest generation of superconducting processors, Willow: a distance-7 code, and a distance-5 code integrated with a real-time decoder. The logical error rate of our larger quantum memory is suppressed by a factor of Λ=2.14±0.02\varLambda \mathrm{=2.14}\pm 0.02Λ=2.14±0.02 when increasing the code distance by two, culminating in a 101-qubit distance-7 code with 0.143% ± 0.003% error per cycle of error correction. This logical memory is also beyond break-even, exceeding its best physical qubit’s lifetime by a factor of 2.4±0.32.4\pm 0.32.4±0.3 . Our system maintains below-threshold performance when decoding in real time, achieving an average decoder latency of 63 μs at distance-5 up to a million cycles, with a cycle time of 1.1 μs. We also run repetition codes up to distance-29 and find that logical performance is limited by rare correlated error events occurring approximately once every hour, or 333 ×\times × 109{10}^{9}109 cycles. Our results present device performance that, if scaled, could realize the operational requirements of large scale fault-tolerant quantum algorithms.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.
Abstract Quantum computers are powerful tools for certain computational problems, but their fragile quantum states are easily disrupted by environmental noise, causing errors that degrade computational accuracy. Quantum error correction (QEC) addresses this challenge by encoding one logical qubit across multiple physical qubits, so that individual errors can be identified and reversed through redundancy. We used Qiskit Aer, a free open-source quantum circuit simulator, to test the repetition code, one of the simplest QEC methods, under three types of noise: bit-flip, phase-flip, and depolarizing. We compared an unprotected single-qubit baseline (n = 1) to 3-qubit (n = 3) and 5-qubit (n = 5) repetition codes, sweeping the physical error rate p from 0 to 0.15 with 4,000 simulation shots per data point. We hypothesized that larger codes would achieve higher logical success probabilities at all tested noise levels, with n = 5 outperforming n = 3, which would outperform the unprotected baseline. Our results confirmed this scaling trend across all three noise types. At p = 0.10 under bit-flip noise, the baseline achieved 0.713 logical success, while n = 3 reached 0.791 and n = 5 reached 0.843. At low noise (p = 0.02), the n = 5 code approached 0.994 logical success. Simulation results closely matched exact theoretical predictions derived from the binomial failure probability formula, validating our experimental implementation. These findings confirm that even the simplest QEC methods provide meaningful error reduction and that larger codes offer greater protection, demonstrating a foundational principle of quantum error correction using only free simulation tools.
Quantum computing holds the promise of solving problems that are intractable for classical computers, with applications ranging from optimization and materials simulation to cryptography. It achieves this by leveraging the exponentially scaling dimensionality of the space encoding quantum information and by executing algorithms on quantum registers in superposition states – a feature often referred to as quantum parallelism. However, while encoding information in computational units capable of exploring a continuous set of quantum states enables exponential scaling of computational power with system size, quantum systems are also more susceptible to errors than their classical counterparts. These errors take the form of both control errors, where miscalibration of the control pulses causes coherent errors on the qubit states, as well as incoherent errors due to energy relaxation and dephasing. Scaling quantum systems to run useful algorithms involving hundreds or thousands of logical qubits will require quantum error correction. In this approach, quantum information is redundantly encoded across an entangled state of many physical qubits. This has enabled experimental demonstrations across various platforms – including ion traps, superconducting circuits, and neutral atoms – showing that encoded quantum states can be preserved beyond the coherence times of the constituting physical qubits. However, quantum state preservation is only one component needed for scalable quantum computing. To execute algorithms, it is also necessary to implement quantum gates on and between encoded qubits, in a way that maintains fault tolerance by preserving the ability to correct errors as they occur during the computation. In the first part of this thesis, we demonstrate the implementation of an error-corrected quantum operation that entangles two logical qubits. This is achieved by performing lattice surgery on a distance-three surface code qubit, resulting in a logical Bell state encoded in distance-three repetition codes, which enable the correction of single bit-flip errors. We further introduce techniques to benchmark and characterize the performance of logical operations, including applying the protocol to arbitrary logical input states and performing logical quantum process tomography. Together, these results constitute one of the first realizations of error-corrected lattice surgery in superconducting circuits. While quantum error correction can correct errors provided they occur with sufficiently low frequency, it may fail when many qubits experience errors simultaneously. In the second part of this thesis, we therefore shift focus to a specific error mechanism known to cause correlated errors in superconducting circuits – quasiparticle-induced decoherence. In this case, various forms of energy deposition on the quantum device can break Cooper pairs into quasiparticles, which may subsequently diffuse to the tunnel junction and interact with the qubit state, thereby causing decoherence. In this thesis, we investigate the impact of quasiparticle tunneling on qubit performance, with a focus on infrared-induced quasiparticles. We compare the sensitivity of niobium-based qubits to those made from tantalum – a material that has gained interest in recent years following demonstrations of qubits with improved coherence times based on this material. Using a thermal radiator source, we show that the performance of tantalum qubits may be limited by infrared-induced quasiparticles in typical superconducting circuit experimental setups. By employing both ambient and in-line infrared filters, we investigate the effectiveness of different filtering strategies and develop best practices for engineering cryogenic environments for superconducting quantum processors. The results presented in this thesis contribute to the advancement of quantum computing based on superconducting circuits by implementing and characterizing quantum error-corrected operations, and by investigating quasiparticles as a source of decoherence, along with strategies to improve infrared filtering and signal conditioning in cryogenic environments for future fault-tolerant quantum computing.