Quantum circuit transformation (QCT), necessary for adapting any quantum circuit to the qubit connectivity constraints of the NISQ device, often introduces numerous additional SWAP gates into the original circuit, increasing the circuit depth and thus reducing the success rate of computation. To minimize the depth of QCT circuits, we propose a Swapping-Sweeping-and-Rewriting optimizer. This optimizer rearranges the circuit based on generalized gate commutation rules via a genetic algorithm, extracts subcircuits consisting of CNOT gates using a circuit sweeping technique, and rewrites each subcircuit with a functionally equivalent and depth-optimal circuit generated by an SAT solver. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared with existing post-QCT optimization approaches such as CBIR and Q-Synth, SSR achieves superior performance, improving circuit depth by up to 29.04% and 16.59% on average across all benchmark circuits, whereas the depth reduction of CBIR and Q-Synth are, respectively, 12.17% and 16.63% at most and 6.45% and -0.53% on average on the same benchmarks.
Quantum circuit transformation (QCT), necessary for adapting any quantum circuit to the qubit connectivity constraints of the NISQ device, often introduces numerous additional SWAP gates into the original circuit, increasing the circuit depth and thus reducing the success rate of computation. To minimize the depth of QCT circuits, we propose a Swapping-Sweeping-and-Rewriting optimizer. This optimizer rearranges the circuit based on generalized gate commutation rules via a genetic algorithm, extracts subcircuits consisting of CNOT gates using a circuit sweeping technique, and rewrites each subcircuit with a functionally equivalent and depth-optimal circuit generated by an SAT solver. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared with existing post-QCT optimization approaches such as CBIR and Q-Synth, SSR achieves superior performance, improving circuit depth by up to 29.04% and 16.59% on average across all benchmark circuits, whereas the depth reduction of CBIR and Q-Synth are, respectively, 12.17% and 16.63% at most and 6.45% and -0.53% on average on the same benchmarks.
Quantum computing faces challenges such as noise, short coherence time, and limited qubit connections. These challenges worsen as quantum circuits become more complex. One major issue is the increasing depth of quantum circuits. This research proposes an optimization framework targeting depth and gate count reduction in quantum circuits, specifically for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. The proposed approach combines unitary merging of single-qubit gates, CNOT cancellation, gate commuting, and rotation gate rewriting strategies. Consecutive gates acting on the same qubit, such asRx(θ1)⋅Rx(θ2), are algebraically merged into a single rotation, while pairs of redundant CNOT gates are eliminated based on gate identity relations. The technique is implemented using Qiskit and validated across five diverse circuits including complex, random, and multi-qubit configurations. Experimental results show an average depth reduction of 33.33% and gate count reduction of 32.14%, with runtime improvement of up to 25%. For instance, an input circuit with a depth of 7 and gate count of 11 was reduced to a depth of 2 and 4 gates. All optimized circuits preserve functional correctness with a fidelityF≥0.99. High-resolution circuit diagrams are presented to visually demonstrate improvements before and after optimization. Additionally, global phase shifts such aseiπ/4are preserved or analytically characterized where relevant. This work enhances the viability of quantum computations on near-term hardware and opens pathways for future AI-driven quantum optimizations.
Quantum circuit transformation (QCT, a.k.a. qubit mapping) is a critical step in quantum circuit compilation. Typically, QCT is achieved by finding an appropriate initial mapping and using SWAP gates to route the qubits such that all connectivity constraints are satisfied. The objective of QCT can be to minimise circuit size or depth. Most existing QCT algorithms prioritise minimising circuit size, potentially overlooking the impact of single-qubit gates on circuit depth. In this paper, we first point out that a single SWAP gate insertion can double the circuit depth, and then propose a simple and effective method that takes into account the impact of single-qubit gates on circuit depth. Our method can be combined with many existing QCT algorithms to optimise circuit depth. The Qiskit SABRE algorithm has been widely accepted as the state-of-the-art algorithm for optimising both circuit size and depth. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by embedding it in SABRE, showing that it can reduce circuit depth by up to 50% and 27% on average on, for instance, Google Sycamore and 117 real quantum circuits from MQTBench.
Quantum circuit optimization is essential for improving the performance of quantum algorithms, particularly on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices with limited qubit connectivity and high error rates. Pattern matching has proven to be an effective technique for identifying and optimizing subcircuits by replacing them with functionally equivalent, efficient versions, including reducing circuit depth and facilitating platform portability. However, existing approaches face challenges in handling large-scale circuits and numerous transformation rules, often leading to redundant matches and increased compilation time. In this study, we propose a novel framework for quantum circuit optimization based on pattern matching to enhance its efficiency. Observing redundancy in applying existing transformation rules, our method employs a pattern tree structure to organize these rules, reducing redundant operations during the execution of the pattern-matching algorithm and improving matching efficiency. We design and implement a compilation framework to demonstrate the practicality of the pattern tree approach. Experimental results show that pattern-tree-based pattern matching can reduce execution time by an average of 20% on a well-accepted benchmark set. Furthermore, we analyze how to build a pattern tree to maximize the optimization of compilation time. The evaluation results demonstrate that our approach has the potential to optimize compilation time by 90%.
Due to its effect on the success rate of a quantum circuit, quantum layout synthesis is a crucial step for circuit compilation. As such, having a layout synthesis tool that provides high solution quality is important to maximize circuit performance and fidelity for NISQ application. Previous heuristic approaches have been shown to be far from optimal when evaluated on known-optimal benchmarks. Alternatively, exact layout synthesis tools can generate optimal results with the aid of constraint solvers but generally suffer from scalability issues because of inefficient encodings and slow optimization methods. In this paper, we propose a scalable optimal layout synthesis tool that improves upon previous works, through a more succinct problem formulation as well as better encoding techniques. Additionally, we implement a depth and SWAP count optimization feature that performs iterative refinement under a fixed time budget. Experimental results show that for depth optimization, our tool can achieve a 692× speedup over the state-of-the-art optimal layout synthesis, and for SWAP optimization, we can obtain a 6,957× speedup on average. Compared to a leading heuristic-based synthesizer, for depth optimization, we can solve circuits consisting of 54 program qubits and 1726 gates within 11 hours with an 18× depth reduction and by 12× SWAP count reduction on average.
Optimizing a quantum circuit is hard because it requires exploring a vast space of functionally equivalent circuits, produced by applying local circuit rewrites such as gate cancellation and commutation. Each additional rewrite can exponentially expand the space of equivalent circuits, so existing optimizers can only explore a tiny fraction of this space and often produce suboptimal results. We present Quasar , a new quantum circuit optimizer that can generate a step-limited optimal circuit: given a bound on rewrite iterations, it returns the lowest-cost circuit reachable within that bound. To achieve this, Quasar constructs two complementary e-graphs for the quantum circuit’s graph and sequence representations. Quasar then infers an atomic rewrite set for application on both e-graphs, which improves optimization performance by orders of magnitude. Finally, Quasar employs a series of new optimization techniques to ensure both soundness and scalability of equality saturation on quantum circuits. Across standard benchmarks, Quasar achieves geometric-mean reductions of 20.2% in 2-qubit gate count, 33.5% in total gate count, and 24.2% in circuit depth, and a 21.4% fidelity improvement over unoptimized circuits, outperforming or matching state-of-the-art rewrite-based optimizers on 75%, 92%, 62%, and 80% of circuits, respectively.
Current superconducting quantum devices impose strict connectivity constraints on quantum circuit execution, necessitating circuit transformation before executing quantum circuits on physical hardware. Numerous quantum circuit transformation (QCT) algorithms have been proposed. To enable faithful evaluation of state-of-the-art QCT algorithms, this paper introduces (Qubit mapping Benchmark with Known Near-Optimality), a novel benchmark construction method for QCT. QKNOB circuits have built-in transformations with near-optimal (close to the theoretical optimum) SWAP count and depth overhead. QKNOB provides general and unbiased evaluation of QCT algorithms. Using QKNOB, we demonstrate that SABRE, the default Qiskit compiler, consistently achieves the best performance on the 53-qubit IBM Q Rochester and Google Sycamore devices for both SWAP count and depth objectives. Our results also reveal significant performance gaps relative to the near-optimal transformation costs of QKNOB. Our construction algorithm and benchmarks are open-source.