Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)

Scalable Optimal Layout Synthesis for NISQ Quantum Processors

Wan-Hsuan Lin, Jason Kimko, Daniel Bochen Tan, Nikolaj Bjørner, Jason Cong

Published Jul 9, 2023• 36 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Due to its effect on the success rate of a quantum circuit, quantum layout synthesis is a crucial step for circuit compilation. As such, having a layout synthesis tool that provides high solution quality is important to maximize circuit performance and fidelity for NISQ application. Previous heuristic approaches have been shown to be far from optimal when evaluated on known-optimal benchmarks. Alternatively, exact layout synthesis tools can generate optimal results with the aid of constraint solvers but generally suffer from scalability issues because of inefficient encodings and slow optimization methods. In this paper, we propose a scalable optimal layout synthesis tool that improves upon previous works, through a more succinct problem formulation as well as better encoding techniques. Additionally, we implement a depth and SWAP count optimization feature that performs iterative refinement under a fixed time budget. Experimental results show that for depth optimization, our tool can achieve a 692× speedup over the state-of-the-art optimal layout synthesis, and for SWAP optimization, we can obtain a 6,957× speedup on average. Compared to a leading heuristic-based synthesizer, for depth optimization, we can solve circuits consisting of 54 program qubits and 1726 gates within 11 hours with an 18× depth reduction and by 12× SWAP count reduction on average.

DOI
10.1109/dac56929.2023.10247760

Related papers

Optimal Layout Synthesis for Deep Quantum Circuits on NISQ Processors with 100+ Qubits

Irfansha Shaik, Jaco van de Pol

Layout synthesis is mapping a quantum circuit to a quantum processor. SWAP gate insertions are needed for scheduling 2-qubit gates only on connected physical qubits. With the ever-increasing number of qubits in NISQ processors, scalable layout synthesis is of utmost importance. With large optimality gaps observed in heuristic approaches, scalable exact methods are needed. While recent exact and near-optimal approaches scale to moderate circuits, large deep circuits are still out of scope. In this work, we propose a SAT encoding based on parallel plans that apply 1 SWAP and a group of CNOTs at each time step. Using domain-specific information, we maintain optimality in parallel plans while scaling to large and deep circuits. From our results, we show the scalability of our approach which significantly outperforms leading exact and near-optimal approaches (up to 100x). For the first time, we can optimally map several 8, 14, and 16 qubit circuits onto 54, 80, and 127 qubit platforms with up to 17 SWAPs. While adding optimal SWAPs, we also report near-optimal depth in our mapped circuits.

arXiv:2403.11598•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2024•7 citations

Optimal layout synthesis for quantum computing

Daniel Bochen Tan, Jason Cong

Recent years have witnessed the fast development of quantum computing. Researchers around the world are eager to run larger and larger quantum algorithms that promise speedups impossible to any classical algorithm. However, the available quantum computers are still volatile and error-prone. Thus, layout synthesis, which transforms quantum programs to meet these hardware limitations, is a crucial step in the realization of quantum computing. In this paper, we present two synthesizers, one optimal and one approximate but nearly optimal. Although a few optimal approaches to this problem have been published, our optimal synthesizer explores a larger solution space, thus is optimal in a stronger sense. In addition, it reduces time and space complexity exponentially compared to some leading optimal approaches. The key to this success is a more efficient spacetime-based variable encoding of the layout synthesis problem as a mathematical programming problem. By slightly changing our formulation, we arrive at an approximate synthesizer that is even more efficient and outperforms some leading heuristic approaches, in terms of additional gate cost, by up to 100%, and also fidelity by up to 10x on a comprehensive set of benchmark programs and architectures. For a specific family of quantum programs named QAOA, which is deemed to be a promising application for near-term quantum computers, we further adjust the approximate synthesizer by taking commutation into consideration, achieving up to 75% reduction in depth and up to 65% reduction in additional cost compared to the tool used in a leading QAOA study.

arXiv:2007.15671•Nov 2, 2020•126 citations

Depth-Optimal Quantum Layout Synthesis as SAT

Anna Blume Jakobsen, Clausen, Anders B., Jaco van de Pol +1 more

Quantum circuits consist of gates applied to qubits. Current quantum hardware platforms impose connectivity restrictions on binary CX gates. Hence, Layout Synthesis is an important step to transpile quantum circuits before they can be executed. Since CX gates are noisy, it is important to reduce the CX count or CX depth of the mapped circuits. We provide a new and efficient encoding of Quantum-circuit Layout Synthesis in SAT. Previous SAT encodings focused on gate count and CX-gate count. Our encoding instead guarantees that we find mapped circuits with minimal circuit depth or minimal CX-gate depth. We use incremental SAT solving and parallel plans for an efficient encoding. This results in speedups of more than 10-100x compared to OLSQ2, which guarantees depth-optimality. But minimizing depth still takes more time than minimizing gate count with Q-Synth. We correlate the noise reduction achieved by simulating circuits after (CX)-count and (CX)-depth reduction. We find that minimizing for CX-count correlates better with reducing noise than minimizing for CX-depth. However, taking into account both CX-count and CX-depth provides the best noise reduction.

arXiv:2506.06752•Leibniz international proceedings in informatics•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

SMT-Based Layout Synthesis Approaches for Quantum Circuits

Zi-Hao Guo, Ting-Chi Wang

The physical qubits in current quantum computers do not all interact with each other. Therefore, in executing a quantum algorithm on an actual quantum computer, layout synthesis is a crucial step that ensures that the synthesized circuit of the quantum algorithm can run smoothly on the quantum computer. In this paper, we focus on a layout synthesis problem for quantum circuits and improve a prior work, TB-OLSQ, which adopts a transition-based satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) formulation. We present how to modify TB-OLSQ to obtain an accelerated version for runtime reduction. In addition, we extend the accelerated version by considering gate absorption for better solution quality. Our experimental results show that compared with TB-OLSQ, the accelerated version achieves 121X speedup for a set of SWAP-free circuits and 6X speedup for the other set of circuits with no increase in SWAP gates. In addition, the accelerated version with gate absorption helps reduce the number of SWAP gates by 38.9% for the circuits requiring SWAP gates, while it is also 3X faster.

International Symposium on Physical Design•Mar 12, 2024•5 citations

Optimal Layout Synthesis for Quantum Circuits as Classical Planning

Irfansha Shaik, Jaco van de Pol

In Layout Synthesis, the logical qubits of a quantum circuit are mapped to the physical qubits of a given quantum hardware platform, taking into account the connectivity of physical qubits. This involves inserting SWAP gates before an operation is applied on distant qubits. Optimal Layout Synthesis is crucial for practical Quantum Computing on current error-prone hardware: Minimizing the number of SWAP gates directly mitigates the error rates when running quantum circuits. In recent years, several approaches have been proposed for minimizing the required SWAP insertions. The proposed exact approaches can only scale to a small number of qubits. In this paper, we provide two encodings for Optimal Layout Synthesis as a classical planning problem. We use optimal classical planners to synthesize the optimal layout for a standard set of benchmarks. Our results show the scalability of our approach compared to previous leading approaches. We can optimally map circuits with 9 qubits onto a 14 qubit platform, which could not be handled before by exact methods.

•Oct 28, 2023•14 citations

Assessing Quantum Layout Synthesis Tools via Known Optimal-SWAP Cost Benchmarks

Shuohao Ping, Wan-Hsuan Lin, Daniel Bochen Tan +1 more

Quantum layout synthesis (QLS) is a critical step in quantum program compilation for superconducting quantum computers, involving the insertion of SWAP gates to satisfy hardware connectivity constraints. While previous works have introduced SWAP-free benchmarks with known-optimal depths for evaluating QLS tools, these benchmarks overlook SWAP count-a key performance metric. Real-world applications often require SWAP gates, making SWAP-free benchmarks insufficient for fully assessing QLS tool performance. To address this limitation, we introduce QUBIKOS, a benchmark set with provableoptimal SWAP counts and non-trivial circuit structures. For the first time, we are able to quantify the optimality gaps of SWAP gate usages of the leading QLS algorithms, which are surprisingly large: LightSabre from IBM delivers the best performance with an optimality gap of $63 x$, followed by ML-QLS with an optimality gap of 117 x. Similarly, QMAP and $\mathrm{t} \mid$ ket $\rangle$ exhibit significantly larger gaps of 250 x and 330 x, respectively. This highlights the need for further advancements in QLS methodologies. Beyond evaluation, QUBIKOS offers valuable insights for guiding the development of future QLS tools, as demonstrated through an analysis of a suboptimal case in LightSABRE. This underscores QUBIKOS’s utility as both an evaluation framework and a tool for advancing QLS research.

arXiv:2502.08839•ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)•Jun 22, 2025•0 citations
Due to its effect on the success rate of a quantum circuit, quantum layout synthesis is a crucial step for circuit compilation. As such, having a layout synthesis tool that provides high solution quality is important to maximize circuit performance and fidelity for NISQ application. Previous heuristic approaches have been shown to be far from optimal when evaluated on known-optimal benchmarks. Alternatively, exact layout synthesis tools can generate optimal results with the aid of constraint solvers but generally suffer from scalability issues because of inefficient encodings and slow optimization methods. In this paper, we propose a scalable optimal layout synthesis tool that improves upon previous works, through a more succinct problem formulation as well as better encoding techniques. Additionally, we implement a depth and SWAP count optimization feature that performs iterative refinement under a fixed time budget. Experimental results show that for depth optimization, our tool can achieve a 692× speedup over the state-of-the-art optimal layout synthesis, and for SWAP optimization, we can obtain a 6,957× speedup on average. Compared to a leading heuristic-based synthesizer, for depth optimization, we can solve circuits consisting of 54 program qubits and 1726 gates within 11 hours with an 18× depth reduction and by 12× SWAP count reduction on average.
Layout synthesis is mapping a quantum circuit to a quantum processor. SWAP gate insertions are needed for scheduling 2-qubit gates only on connected physical qubits. With the ever-increasing number of qubits in NISQ processors, scalable layout synthesis is of utmost importance. With large optimality gaps observed in heuristic approaches, scalable exact methods are needed. While recent exact and near-optimal approaches scale to moderate circuits, large deep circuits are still out of scope. In this work, we propose a SAT encoding based on parallel plans that apply 1 SWAP and a group of CNOTs at each time step. Using domain-specific information, we maintain optimality in parallel plans while scaling to large and deep circuits. From our results, we show the scalability of our approach which significantly outperforms leading exact and near-optimal approaches (up to 100x). For the first time, we can optimally map several 8, 14, and 16 qubit circuits onto 54, 80, and 127 qubit platforms with up to 17 SWAPs. While adding optimal SWAPs, we also report near-optimal depth in our mapped circuits.
Recent years have witnessed the fast development of quantum computing. Researchers around the world are eager to run larger and larger quantum algorithms that promise speedups impossible to any classical algorithm. However, the available quantum computers are still volatile and error-prone. Thus, layout synthesis, which transforms quantum programs to meet these hardware limitations, is a crucial step in the realization of quantum computing. In this paper, we present two synthesizers, one optimal and one approximate but nearly optimal. Although a few optimal approaches to this problem have been published, our optimal synthesizer explores a larger solution space, thus is optimal in a stronger sense. In addition, it reduces time and space complexity exponentially compared to some leading optimal approaches. The key to this success is a more efficient spacetime-based variable encoding of the layout synthesis problem as a mathematical programming problem. By slightly changing our formulation, we arrive at an approximate synthesizer that is even more efficient and outperforms some leading heuristic approaches, in terms of additional gate cost, by up to 100%, and also fidelity by up to 10x on a comprehensive set of benchmark programs and architectures. For a specific family of quantum programs named QAOA, which is deemed to be a promising application for near-term quantum computers, we further adjust the approximate synthesizer by taking commutation into consideration, achieving up to 75% reduction in depth and up to 65% reduction in additional cost compared to the tool used in a leading QAOA study.
Quantum circuits consist of gates applied to qubits. Current quantum hardware platforms impose connectivity restrictions on binary CX gates. Hence, Layout Synthesis is an important step to transpile quantum circuits before they can be executed. Since CX gates are noisy, it is important to reduce the CX count or CX depth of the mapped circuits. We provide a new and efficient encoding of Quantum-circuit Layout Synthesis in SAT. Previous SAT encodings focused on gate count and CX-gate count. Our encoding instead guarantees that we find mapped circuits with minimal circuit depth or minimal CX-gate depth. We use incremental SAT solving and parallel plans for an efficient encoding. This results in speedups of more than 10-100x compared to OLSQ2, which guarantees depth-optimality. But minimizing depth still takes more time than minimizing gate count with Q-Synth. We correlate the noise reduction achieved by simulating circuits after (CX)-count and (CX)-depth reduction. We find that minimizing for CX-count correlates better with reducing noise than minimizing for CX-depth. However, taking into account both CX-count and CX-depth provides the best noise reduction.
The physical qubits in current quantum computers do not all interact with each other. Therefore, in executing a quantum algorithm on an actual quantum computer, layout synthesis is a crucial step that ensures that the synthesized circuit of the quantum algorithm can run smoothly on the quantum computer. In this paper, we focus on a layout synthesis problem for quantum circuits and improve a prior work, TB-OLSQ, which adopts a transition-based satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) formulation. We present how to modify TB-OLSQ to obtain an accelerated version for runtime reduction. In addition, we extend the accelerated version by considering gate absorption for better solution quality. Our experimental results show that compared with TB-OLSQ, the accelerated version achieves 121X speedup for a set of SWAP-free circuits and 6X speedup for the other set of circuits with no increase in SWAP gates. In addition, the accelerated version with gate absorption helps reduce the number of SWAP gates by 38.9% for the circuits requiring SWAP gates, while it is also 3X faster.
In Layout Synthesis, the logical qubits of a quantum circuit are mapped to the physical qubits of a given quantum hardware platform, taking into account the connectivity of physical qubits. This involves inserting SWAP gates before an operation is applied on distant qubits. Optimal Layout Synthesis is crucial for practical Quantum Computing on current error-prone hardware: Minimizing the number of SWAP gates directly mitigates the error rates when running quantum circuits. In recent years, several approaches have been proposed for minimizing the required SWAP insertions. The proposed exact approaches can only scale to a small number of qubits. In this paper, we provide two encodings for Optimal Layout Synthesis as a classical planning problem. We use optimal classical planners to synthesize the optimal layout for a standard set of benchmarks. Our results show the scalability of our approach compared to previous leading approaches. We can optimally map circuits with 9 qubits onto a 14 qubit platform, which could not be handled before by exact methods.
Quantum layout synthesis (QLS) is a critical step in quantum program compilation for superconducting quantum computers, involving the insertion of SWAP gates to satisfy hardware connectivity constraints. While previous works have introduced SWAP-free benchmarks with known-optimal depths for evaluating QLS tools, these benchmarks overlook SWAP count-a key performance metric. Real-world applications often require SWAP gates, making SWAP-free benchmarks insufficient for fully assessing QLS tool performance. To address this limitation, we introduce QUBIKOS, a benchmark set with provableoptimal SWAP counts and non-trivial circuit structures. For the first time, we are able to quantify the optimality gaps of SWAP gate usages of the leading QLS algorithms, which are surprisingly large: LightSabre from IBM delivers the best performance with an optimality gap of 63x63 x63x, followed by ML-QLS with an optimality gap of 117 x. Similarly, QMAP and t∣\mathrm{t} \midt∣ ket ⟩\rangle⟩ exhibit significantly larger gaps of 250 x and 330 x, respectively. This highlights the need for further advancements in QLS methodologies. Beyond evaluation, QUBIKOS offers valuable insights for guiding the development of future QLS tools, as demonstrated through an analysis of a suboptimal case in LightSABRE. This underscores QUBIKOS’s utility as both an evaluation framework and a tool for advancing QLS research.