Myths around quantum computation before full fault tolerance: What no-go theorems rule out and what they don't
Zoltán Zimborás, Bálint Koczor, Zoë Holmes, Elsi-Mari Borrelli, András Gilyén, Hsin-Yuan Huang, Zhenyu Cai, Antonio Acín, Leandro Aolita, Leonardo Banchi, Fernando G. S. L. Brandão, Daniel Cavalcanti, Toby S. Cubitt, Sergey N. Filippov, Guillermo García-Pérez, John Goold, Orsolya Kálmán, Elica S. Kyoseva, Matteo A. C. Rossi, Boris Sokolov, Ivano Tavernelli, Sabrina Maniscalco
In this perspective article, we revisit and critically evaluate prevailing viewpoints on the capabilities and limitations of near-term quantum computing and its potential transition toward fully fault-tolerant quantum computing. We examine theoretical no-go results and their implications, addressing misconceptions about the practicality of quantum error mitigation techniques and variational quantum algorithms. By emphasizing the nuances of error scaling, circuit depth, and algorithmic feasibility, we highlight viable near-term applications and synergies between error mitigation and early fault-tolerant architectures. Our discussion explores strategies for addressing current challenges, such as barren plateaus in variational circuits and the integration of quantum error mitigation and quantum error correction techniques. We aim to underscore the importance of continued innovation in hardware and algorithmic design to bridge the gap between theoretical potential and practical utility, paving the way for meaningful quantum advantage in the era of late noisy intermediate scale and early fault-tolerant quantum devices.
In this perspective article, we revisit and critically evaluate prevailing viewpoints on the capabilities and limitations of near-term quantum computing and its potential transition toward fully fault-tolerant quantum computing. We examine theoretical no-go results and their implications, addressing misconceptions about the practicality of quantum error mitigation techniques and variational quantum algorithms. By emphasizing the nuances of error scaling, circuit depth, and algorithmic feasibility, we highlight viable near-term applications and synergies between error mitigation and early fault-tolerant architectures. Our discussion explores strategies for addressing current challenges, such as barren plateaus in variational circuits and the integration of quantum error mitigation and quantum error correction techniques. We aim to underscore the importance of continued innovation in hardware and algorithmic design to bridge the gap between theoretical potential and practical utility, paving the way for meaningful quantum advantage in the era of late noisy intermediate scale and early fault-tolerant quantum devices.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have established themselves as a central computational paradigm in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. By coupling parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) with classical optimization, they operate effectively under strict hardware limitations. However, as quantum architectures transition toward early fault-tolerant (EFT) and ultimate fault-tolerant (FT) regimes, the foundational principles and long-term viability of VQAs require systematic reassessment. This review offers an insightful analysis of VQAs and their progression toward the fault-tolerant regime. We deconstruct the core algorithmic framework by examining ansatz design and classical optimization strategies, including cost function formulation, gradient computation, and optimizer selection. Concurrently, we evaluate critical training bottlenecks, notably barren plateaus (BPs), alongside established mitigation strategies. The discussion then explores the EFT phase, detailing how the integration of quantum error mitigation and partial error correction can sustain algorithmic performance. Addressing the FT phase, we analyze the inherent challenges confronting current hybrid VQA models. Furthermore, we synthesize recent VQA applications across diverse domains, including many-body physics, quantum chemistry, machine learning, and mathematical optimization. Ultimately, this review outlines a theoretical roadmap for adapting quantum algorithms to future hardware generations, elucidating how variational principles can be systematically refined to maintain their relevance and efficiency within an error-corrected computational environment.
Quantum computing has transitioned from a theoretical curiosity to an emerging technological paradigm with demonstrable computational advantages in specific problem domains. This paper presents a comprehensive review of current advances in quantum computing hardware, software, and near-term applications within the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. We examine the architectural evolution of leading quantum platforms, including superconducting, trapped-ion, and photonic systems, analyzing their qubit counts, gate fidelities, and coherence times. The paper evaluates key quantum algorithms Shor's factoring algorithm [1], Grover's search algorithm [2], the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) [3], and the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) [4] in the context of their practical applicability to real-world problems. We further discuss the milestone of quantum computational advantage demonstrated by Google's Sycamore processor [5] and IBM's ambitious hardware roadmap toward fault-tolerant quantum computing [6]. Our analysis reveals that while universal fault-tolerant quantum computing remains a long-term objective, NISQ-era devices are already yielding valuable results in quantum chemistry simulation, combinatorial optimization, and quantum machine learning. We conclude by identifying the critical challenges—error correction, scalability, and algorithm design that must be addressed to realize the full potential of quantum computing.
Quantum computing is entering a transitional regime between noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) processing and early fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC), in which increasingly capable hardware is beginning to support repeated syndrome measurements, partial error correction, and logical-qubit operations, while residual physical and logical errors remain non-negligible. In this regime, error suppression, error mitigation, and quantum error correction are increasingly better viewed as complementary layers of a unified error-reduction strategy rather than as separate approaches, with each acting at a different stage of the quantum computation to improve simulation reliability. Thus, in this review, we provide a practical and forward-looking overview of the principal hardware error sources and the corresponding error suppression and mitigation methods for reducing their impact across the current NISQ-FTQC transition. We discuss hardware-aware circuit design, coherent-error suppression, readout mitigation, noise extrapolation, classical inference, and software-supported workflows, with particular emphasis on their implementation on actual quantum processors. We further examine how error mitigation techniques can be adapted to encoded and logical-qubit settings so that they can operate alongside quantum error correction to suppress residual logical errors and improve the accuracy of computation in the early fault-tolerant regime.
Variational quantum algorithms (VQAs) have established themselves as a central computational paradigm in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era. By coupling parameterized quantum circuits with classical optimization, they operate effectively under strict hardware limitations. However, as quantum architectures transition toward early fault-tolerant (EFT) and ultimate fault-tolerant (FT) regimes, the foundational principles and long-term viability of VQAs require systematic reassessment. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of VQAs and their progression toward the FT regime. We deconstruct the core algorithmic framework by examining ansatz design and classical optimization strategies, including cost function formulation, gradient computation, and optimizer selection. Concurrently, we evaluate critical training bottlenecks, notably barren plateaus (BPs), alongside established mitigation strategies. The discussion then explores the EFT phase, detailing how the integration of quantum error mitigation (QEM) and partial error correction can sustain algorithmic performance. Addressing the FT phase, we analyze the inherent challenges confronting current hybrid VQA models. Furthermore, we synthesize recent VQA applications across diverse domains, including many-body physics, quantum chemistry, machine learning, and mathematical optimization. Ultimately, this review outlines a theoretical roadmap for adapting quantum algorithms to future hardware generations, elucidating how variational principles can be systematically refined to maintain their relevance and efficiency within an error-corrected computational environment.
Quantum computing is entering a period in which progress will be shaped as much by advances in computer science as by improvements in hardware. The central thesis of this report is that early fault-tolerant quantum computing shifts many of the primary bottlenecks from device physics alone to computer-science-driven system design, integration, and evaluation. While large-scale, fully fault-tolerant quantum computers remain a long-term objective, near- and medium-term systems will support early fault-tolerant computation with small numbers of logical qubits and tight constraints on error rates, connectivity, latency, and classical control. How effectively such systems can be used will depend on advances across algorithms, error correction, software, and architecture. This report identifies key research challenges for computer scientists and organizes them around these four areas, each centered on a fundamental question.
In recent years, research in quantum computing has largely focused on two approaches: near-term intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computing and future fault-tolerant quantum computing (FTQC). A growing body of research into early fault-tolerant quantum computing (EFTQC) is exploring how to utilize quantum computers during the transition between these two eras. However, without agreed-upon characterizations of this transition, it is unclear how best to utilize EFTQC architectures. We argue for the perspective that this transition period will be characterized by a law of diminishing returns in quantum error correction (QEC), where the ability of the architecture to maintain quality operations at scale determines the point of diminishing returns. Two challenges emerge from this picture: how to model this phenomenon of diminishing return of QEC as the performance of devices is continually improving and how to design algorithms to make the most use of these devices. To address these challenges, we present models for the performance of EFTQC architectures, capturing the diminishing returns of QEC. We then use these models to elucidate the regimes in which algorithms suited to such architectures are advantageous. As a concrete example, we show that for the canonical task of phase estimation, in a regime of moderate scalability and using just over one million physical qubits, the “reach” of the quantum computer can be extended (compared to the standard approach) from 90-qubit instances to over 130-qubit instances using a simple early fault-tolerant quantum algorithm, which reduces the number of operations per circuit by a factor of 100 and increases the number of circuit repetitions by a factor of 10 000. This clarifies the role that such algorithms might play in the era of limited-scalability quantum computing. Published by the American Physical Society 2024