Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2204.00418 · International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Cauchy’s Logico-Linguistic Slip, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and a Semantic Dilemma Concerning “Quantum Gravity”

Abhishek Majhi

Published Mar 1, 2022• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10773-022-05051-8

Related papers

Beyond Heisenberg: Is the Uncertainty Principle Merely the Low-Energy Shadow of Quantum Gravity?

Ijaz Durrani

•Aug 6, 2026•0 citations

The action uncertainty principle and quantum gravity

Michael B. Mensky

Physics Letters A•Feb 1, 1992•6 citations

Quantum Mechanics as a Semantic Problem

Hans Herlof Grelland

The frontiers collection•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Cauchy's Logico-Linguistic Slip and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

Abhishek Majhi

If Cauchy would have been more careful about his own language, then he could have written down the ``Heisenberg'' uncertainty principle a century earlier than Heisenberg. Such logico-linguistic self-criticism can provide new insights to physicists in the pursuit of truth and reality.

•Nov 1, 2021•0 citations

The Linguistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Shiro Ishikawa

About twenty years ago, we proposed the mathematical formulation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and further, we concluded that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and EPR-paradox are not contradictory. This is true, however we now think that we should have argued about it under a certain firm interpretation of quantum mechanics. Recently we proposed the linguistic quantum interpretation (called quantum and classical measurement theory), which was characterized as a kind of metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only extend quantum theory to classical systems but also yield the quantum mechanical world view (i.e., the philosophy of quantum mechanics, in other words, quantum philosophy). In fact, we can consider that traditional philosophies have progressed toward quantum philosophy. In this paper, we first review the linguistic quantum interpretation, and further, clarify the relation between EPR-paradox and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. That is, the linguistic interpretation says that EPR-paradox is closely related to the fact that syllogism does not generally hold in quantum physics. This fact should be compared to the non-locality of Bell's inequality.

arXiv:1204.3892•Apr 17, 2012•14 citations

Semantic incompleteness of quantum physics

Claudio Garola

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•May 1, 1992•17 citations
About twenty years ago, we proposed the mathematical formulation of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, and further, we concluded that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and EPR-paradox are not contradictory. This is true, however we now think that we should have argued about it under a certain firm interpretation of quantum mechanics. Recently we proposed the linguistic quantum interpretation (called quantum and classical measurement theory), which was characterized as a kind of metaphysical and linguistic turn of the Copenhagen interpretation. This turn from physics to language does not only extend quantum theory to classical systems but also yield the quantum mechanical world view (i.e., the philosophy of quantum mechanics, in other words, quantum philosophy). In fact, we can consider that traditional philosophies have progressed toward quantum philosophy. In this paper, we first review the linguistic quantum interpretation, and further, clarify the relation between EPR-paradox and Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. That is, the linguistic interpretation says that EPR-paradox is closely related to the fact that syllogism does not generally hold in quantum physics. This fact should be compared to the non-locality of Bell's inequality.