Running quantum programs is fraught with challenges on on today's noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Many of these challenges originate from the error characteristics that stem from rapid decoherence and noise during measurement, qubit connections, crosstalk, the qubits themselves, and transformations of qubit state via gates. Not only are qubits not “created equal”, but their noise level also changes over time. IBM is said to calibrate their quantum systems once per day and reports noise levels (errors) at the time of such calibration. This information is subsequently used to map circuits to higher quality qubits and connections up to the next calibration point. This work provides evidence that there is room for improvement over this daily calibration cycle. It contributes a technique to measure noise levels (errors) related to qubits immediately before executing one or more sensitive circuits and shows that just-in-time noise measurements can benefit late physical qubit mappings. With this just-in-time recalibrated transpilation, the fidelity of results is improved over IBM's default mappings, which only uses their daily calibrations. The framework assess two major sources of noise, namely readout errors (measurement errors) and two-qubit gate/connection errors. Experiments indicate that the accuracy of circuit results improves by 3-304% on average and up to 400% with on-the-fly circuit mappings based on error measurements just prior to application execution.
Running quantum programs is fraught with challenges on on today's noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) devices. Many of these challenges originate from the error characteristics that stem from rapid decoherence and noise during measurement, qubit connections, crosstalk, the qubits themselves, and transformations of qubit state via gates. Not only are qubits not “created equal”, but their noise level also changes over time. IBM is said to calibrate their quantum systems once per day and reports noise levels (errors) at the time of such calibration. This information is subsequently used to map circuits to higher quality qubits and connections up to the next calibration point. This work provides evidence that there is room for improvement over this daily calibration cycle. It contributes a technique to measure noise levels (errors) related to qubits immediately before executing one or more sensitive circuits and shows that just-in-time noise measurements can benefit late physical qubit mappings. With this just-in-time recalibrated transpilation, the fidelity of results is improved over IBM's default mappings, which only uses their daily calibrations. The framework assess two major sources of noise, namely readout errors (measurement errors) and two-qubit gate/connection errors. Experiments indicate that the accuracy of circuit results improves by 3-304% on average and up to 400% with on-the-fly circuit mappings based on error measurements just prior to application execution.
Reliably executing quantum algorithms on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is challenging, as they are severely constrained and prone to errors. Efficient quantum circuit compilation techniques are therefore crucial for overcoming their limitations and dealing with their high error rates. These techniques consider the quantum hardware restrictions, such as the limited qubit connectivity, and perform some transformations to the original circuit that can be executed on a given quantum processor. Certain compilation methods use error information based on calibration data to further improve the success probability or the fidelity of the circuit to be run. However, it is uncertain to what extent incorporating calibration information in the compilation process can enhance the circuit performance. For instance, considering the most recent error data provided by vendors after calibrating the processor might not be functional enough as quantum systems are subject to drift, making the latest calibration data obsolete within minutes. In this paper, we explore how different usage of calibration data impacts the circuit fidelity, by using several compilation techniques and quantum processors (IBM Perth and Brisbane). To this aim, we implemented a framework that incorporates some of the state-of-the-art noise-aware and non-noise-aware compilation techniques and allows the user to perform fair comparisons under similar processor conditions. Our experiments yield valuable insights into the effects of noise-aware methodologies and the employment of calibration data. The main finding is that pre-processing historical calibration data can improve fidelity when real-time calibration data is not available due to factors such as cloud service latency and waiting queues between compilation and execution on the quantum backend.
Abstract Quantum computing has recently emerged as a novel paradigm for solving problems otherwise intractable on classical computers, yet the practical progress of quantum computers is severely impacted by noise, decoherence, and imperfect gate operations in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices. Specific to IBM Quantum hardware, imperfections due to readout error, gate errors, and device drift, which depends on time, resolves limits for the accuracy of outputs from our algorithms. The mitigation strategies currently used, for example, Measurement Error Mitigation (MEM), Zero Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), and Clifford Data Regression (CDR), offer improvement over raw, unmitigated outputs, but they are static and not dynamic; the reduction of noise in within an NISQ device is temporal and can vary in patterns that are non-zero. In addition to this, using the conventional methods provides inconsistent and suboptimal results.This study will provide enhanced reliability with respect to performing quantum computation on IBM Quantum hardware with a unique mitigation framework that is adaptive and computationally efficient for a high-fidelity output. The problem taken on here is the failure of existing error mitigation strategies to provide adaptive noise compensation, as they assume a statically-distributed error, despite the performance-related characteristics already being documented in regards to calibration drift and variation over time.To achieve this, we propose a Hybrid Adaptive Error Mitigation (HAEM) approach that includes baseline measurement error mitigation and an additional correction layer that utilizes realtime calibration information, along with lightweight machine learning models. The approach can be broken down into three steps: (i) perform standard measurement error mitigation to reduce classical readout noise, (ii) execute compact calibration circuits, such as Bell states, GHZ states and Clifford benchmarks to capture then current error profile of the device, and (iii) use a lightweight machine learning model (having been trained on historical and newest calibration data) to dynamically change the mitigation weights applied for the target quantum algorithm. All implementation is done using Qiskit Runtime to ensure low-latency execution, and we completed experiments on both Qiskit Aer noisy simulators and IBM Quantum devices.Initial results suggest HAEM improved the outputs of quantum algorithms' fidelity compared to the unmitigated runs and the baseline measurement error mitigation (MEM) runs. On the noisy simulators, HAEM increased fidelity from a raw performance of 0.65 to 0.87, nearly a 34% improvement. In fairer hardware-like scenarios, fidelity-on-average was persistently 12% better than MEM, with nearly equal time duration for the additional adaptive measurements. The adaptive aspect of HAEM consistently supported subsequent calibration cycles of the device and was effective to continue providing fidelity improvements despite the static mitigation performance degrading.To sum up, the proposed HAEM framework is a modern and viable alternative for error mitigation which brings together the benefits of baseline approaches with corrections that are driven by fixed-function error-corrective, adaptive learning. As both learning-based and standard baseline approaches can only achieve fixed levels of performance, HAEM, through its use of noise mitigation both at execution time and through correlating it with standard data, provides a route towards reliable quantum computations on current IBM hardware. HAEM also presents a contribution to the NISQ error-resilient landscape, and however it is intended that it will continue to improve future applications of hybrid workflows of quantum and classical computation where error mitigation and resilience is important.
Current advancements in technology have focused the attention of the quantum computing community toward exploring the potential of near-term devices whose computing power surpasses that of classical computers in practical applications. An unresolved central question revolves around whether the inherent noise in these devices can be overcome or whether any potential quantum advantage would be limited. There is no doubt that crosstalk is one of the main sources of noise in noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) systems, and it poses a fundamental challenge to hardware designs. Crosstalk between parallel instructions can corrupt quantum states and cause incorrect program execution. In this study, we present a necessary analysis of the crosstalk error effect on NISQ devices. Our approach is extremely straightforward and practical to estimate the crosstalk error of various multi-qubit devices. In particular, we combine the randomized benchmarking (RB) and simultaneous randomized benchmarking (SRB) protocol to estimate the crosstalk error from the correlation controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate. We demonstrate this protocol experimentally on 5-, 7-, \& 16-qubit devices. Our results demonstrate the crosstalk error model of three different IBM quantum devices over the experimental week and compare the error variation against the machine, number of qubits, quantum volume, processor, and topology. We then confirm the improvement in the circuit fidelity on different benchmarks by up to 3.06x via inserting an instruction barrier, as compared with an IBM quantum noisy device which offers near-optimal crosstalk mitigation in practice. Finally, we discuss the current system limitation, its tradeoff on fidelity and depth, noise beyond the NISQ system, and mitigation opportunities to ensure that the quantum operation can perform its quantum magic undisturbed.
Today’s Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computers support only limited sets of available quantum gates and restricted connectivity. Therefore, quantum algorithms must be transpiled in order to become executable on a given NISQ computer; transpilation is a complex and computationally heavy process. Moreover, NISQ computers are affected by noise that changes over time, and periodic calibration provides relevant error rates that should be considered during transpilation. Variational algorithms, which form one main class of computations on NISQ platforms, produce a number of similar yet not identical quantum "ansatz" circuits. In this work, we present a transpilation methodology optimized for variational algorithms under potentially changing error rates. We divide transpilation into three steps: (1) noise-unaware and computationally heavy pre-transpilation; (2) fast noise-aware matching; and (3) fast decomposition followed by heuristic optimization. For a complete run of a variational algorithm under constant error rates, only step (3) needs to be executed for each new ansatz circuit. Step (2) is required only if the error rates reported by calibration have changed significantly since the beginning of the computation. The most expensive Step (1) is executed only once for the whole run. This distribution is helpful for incremental, calibration-aware transpilation when the variational algorithm adapts its own execution to changing error rates. Experimental results on IBM’s quantum computer show the low latency and robust results obtained by calibration-aware transpilation.
Transpilation, particularly noise-aware optimization, is widely regarded as essential for maximizing the performance of quantum circuits on superconducting quantum computers. The common wisdom is that each circuit should be transpiled using up-to-date noise calibration data to optimize fidelity. In this work, we revisit the necessity of frequent noise-adaptive transpilation, conducting an in-depth empirical study across five IBM 127-qubit quantum computers and 16 diverse quantum algorithms. Our findings reveal novel and interesting insights: (1) noise-aware transpilation leads to a heavy concentration of workloads on a small subset of qubits, which increases output error variability; (2) using random mapping can mitigate this effect while maintaining comparable average fidelity; and (3) circuits compiled once with calibration data can be reliably reused across multiple calibration cycles and time periods without significant loss in fidelity. These results suggest that the classical overhead associated with daily, per-circuit noise-aware transpilation may not be justified. We propose lightweight alternatives that reduce this overhead without sacrificing fidelity – offering a path to more efficient and scalable quantum workflows.
Abstract The practical utility of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) processors depends critically on their performance under demanding computational loads. We investigated the impact of circuit depth on the 127-qubit superconducting processor ibm_brisbane by executing stress-test circuits utilizing all available qubits. These circuits consisted of repeated layers combining random single-qubit rotations and linear chains of Controlled-Z entangling gates. We systematically increased the ideal circuit depth from 1 up to 30 layers, resulting in transpiled circuits ranging from approximately 550 to over 15,000 gates (optimization level 2). Using the qiskit-ibm-runtime Sampler primitive with 4096 shots and default error mitigation, we successfully obtained results for ideal depths up to 22 (transpiled depth ~ 11.7k gates), beyond which platform usage limits prevented execution. Our central finding is the immediate onset of noise saturation: the output distribution reached maximum sample entropy (12.0 bits) and exhibited near-zero average single-qubit Z magnetization even at the shallowest depth tested (ideal depth 1, transpiled depth ~ 550). These noise-dominated characteristics persisted despite significant increases in transpiled circuit depth. This demonstrates that for these specific full-width, complex random circuits, noise overwhelms the computation almost instantaneously on this device under default settings, highlighting the profound challenge of achieving computational fidelity for deep, wide algorithms in the NISQ era without advanced error handling.