Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2003.01470 · Physical review. E

Structure of passive states and its implication in charging quantum batteries

Mir Alimuddin, Tamal Guha, Preeti Parashar

Published Aug 10, 2020• 25 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this article, in addition to the characterization of geometrical state spaces for the passive states, an operational approach has been introduced to distinguish them on their charging capabilities of a quantum battery. Unlike the thermal states, the structural instability of passive states assures the existence of a natural number n, for which n+1 copies of the state can charge a quantum battery while n copies cannot. This phenomenon can be presented in an n copy resource-theoretic approach, for which the free states are unable to charge the battery in n copies. Here we have exhibited the single copy scenario explicitly. We also show that general ordering of the passive states on the basis of their charging capabilities is not possible and even the macroscopic entities (viz. energy and entropy) are unable to order them precisely. Interestingly, for some of the passive states, the majorization criterion gives sufficient order to the charging and discharging capabilities. However, the charging capacity for the set of thermal states (for which charging is possible) is directly proportional to their temperature.

DOI
10.1103/physreve.102.022106

Related papers

Precision and Work Fluctuations in Gaussian Battery Charging

Nicolai Friis, Marcus Huber

One of the most fundamental tasks in quantum thermodynamics is extracting energy from one system and subsequently storing this energy in an appropriate battery. Both of these steps, work extraction and charging, can be viewed as cyclic Hamiltonian processes acting on individual quantum systems. Interestingly, so-called passive states exist, whose energy cannot be lowered by unitary operations, but it is safe to assume that the energy of any not fully charged battery may be increased unitarily. However, unitaries raising the average energy by the same amount may differ in qualities such as their precision, fluctuations, and charging power. Moreover, some unitaries may be extremely difficult to realize in practice. It is hence of crucial importance to understand the qualities that can be expected from practically implementable transformations. Here, we consider the limitations on charging batteries when restricting to the feasibly realizable family of Gaussian unitaries. We derive optimal protocols for general unitary operations as well as for the restriction to easier implementable Gaussian unitaries. We find that practical Gaussian battery charging, while performing significantly less well than is possible in principle, still offers asymptotically vanishing relative charge variances and fluctuations.

arXiv:1708.00749•Quantum•Apr 23, 2018•143 citations

Fluctuations in Extractable Work Bound the Charging Power of Quantum Batteries

Luis Pedro García-Pintos, Alioscia Hamma, Adolfo del Campo

We study the connection between the charging power of quantum batteries and the fluctuations of the extractable work. We prove that in order to have a nonzero rate of change of the extractable work, the state ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\mathcal{W}}$ of the battery cannot be an eigenstate of a ``free energy operator,'' defined by $\mathcal{F}\ensuremath{\equiv}{H}_{\mathcal{W}}+{\ensuremath{\beta}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\mathrm{log}({\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\mathcal{W}})$, where ${H}_{\mathcal{W}}$ is the Hamiltonian of the battery and $\ensuremath{\beta}$ is the inverse temperature of a reference thermal bath with respect to which the extractable work is calculated. We do so by proving that fluctuations in the free energy operator upper bound the charging power of a quantum battery. Our findings also suggest that quantum coherence in the battery enhances the charging process, which we illustrate on a toy model of a heat engine.

arXiv:1909.03558•Physical Review Letters•Jul 22, 2020•133 citations

The asymptotic emergence of the Second Law for a repeated charging process

Marcin Łobejko, Paweł Mazurek, Michał Horodecki

In one of its versions, the Second Law states: "It is impossible to construct an engine which will work in a complete cycle, and produces no effect except the raising of a weight and cooling of a heat reservoir." While the Second Law is considered as one of the most robust laws of Nature, it is still challenging how to interpret it in a fully quantum domain. Here we unpack the true meaning of the "cyclicity" and formulate the Second Law for a generic quantum battery via its asymptotic properties of a charging process rather than in terms of a single cycle. As a paradigm, we propose a machine consisting of a battery that repeatedly interacts with identically prepared systems. We then propose the Second Law in the form: The ergotropy of the battery may increase indefinitely if and only if systems are in a non-passive state. One of the most interesting features of this new formulation is the appearance of the passive states that naturally generalize the notion of the heat bath. In this paper, we provide a handful of results that supports this formulation for diagonal systems. Interestingly, our methodology meets a well-known theory of Markov chains, according to which we classify the general charging processes based on the passivity/non-passivity of charging systems. In particular, the adopted mathematics allows us to distinguish a subtle asymptotic difference between the indefinite increase of the battery's energy (induced by the maximally mixed states) and of ergotropy (induced by the non-passive states) in terms of the so-called null-recurrent versus transient Markov chains.

arXiv:2209.05339•Sep 12, 2022•0 citations

Energetic channels in finite many-body quantum charging

Dara Murphy, George Mihailescu, Anne Matthies +2 more

We examine how a finite many-body system can function as an effective charger for a single-qubit quantum battery, using the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model as a paradigmatic setting. As our figure of merit, we consider the battery ergotropy while explicitly resolving the energetic flows across the composite system. In the absence of intra-charger interactions, we show that the generation of non-zero ergotropy is controlled by the competition between collective coupling and spectral mismatch. We further demonstrate that even passive positive-temperature charger states can generate finite battery ergotropy, provided the charger is sufficiently large and sufficiently hot. Intra-charger interactions restructure the charger spectrum and qualitatively modify the available energetic pathways. While they can enhance the amount of energy accessible for charging, they can simultaneously divert energy into internal many-body and battery-charger interaction channels, producing an energetic impedance to direct charger-to-battery transfer. Consequently, battery ergotropy alone is insufficient to characterize an effective many-body charger: the useful work generated and its energetic provenance must be assessed together.

quant-pharXiv:2610.22034•Oct 16, 2026•0 citations

Super-Extensive Charging Power in the Absence of Global Operations

Anupam, Sheryl Mathew, Sibasish Ghosh

Quantum batteries have emerged as a platform for investigating whether quantum effects can accelerate energy storage beyond classical limits. Although a variety of charging schemes have reported signatures of quantum advantage, the fundamental physical requirements for achieving superextensive charging power remain insufficiently understood. Here, we show that, in addition to Hamiltonian locality, a key structural property, g-extensiveness, quantifying the distribution of interaction energy across lattice sites places a fundamental bound on charging performance in spin-lattice models. We prove that superextensive power scaling is possible only when the interaction-energy distribution becomes increasingly nonuniform, with the maximal local weight growing with system size. This criterion explains why many previously studied protocols fail to exhibit superextensive power, even when the Hamiltonians involve large participation numbers. We further demonstrate that this condition is realized in an experimentally relevant interacting model, where, despite fixed interaction order, the charging power scales superextensively. Our results establish g-extensiveness as a necessary resource for quantum advantage in direct-charging protocols and provide a systematic framework for identifying and engineering physically feasible quantum batteries capable of outperforming classical counterparts in charging power.

quant-pharXiv:2512.00788•Physical Review Letters•Dec 2, 2025•0 citations

Indefinite Causal Order in Quantum Batteries

Yuanbo Chen, Yoshihiko Hasegawa

Operations performing on quantum batteries are extended to scenarios where we no longer force the existence of definite causal order of occurrence between distinct processes. In contrast to standard theories, the so called indefinite causal order is found to have the capability of accomplishing tasks that are not possible without it. Specifically, we show how this novel class of resource comes into play in quantum batteries by first, combining two static unitary chargers into a coherently superposed one to fully charge an empty battery even if in the presence of battery's local Hamiltonian. Then we demonstrate for a non-unitary charging protocol, the indefinite causal order version charger yields a charged battery with higher energy over its classical counterpart under any conditions. We also have a finding that runs counter to our intuition which, roughly speaking, has the implication that a relatively less powerful charger guarantees a charged battery with higher energy. Finally, to reduce the cost imposed by a measurement-based protection scheme, indefinite causal order shows its potential to fulfill this goal.

arXiv:2105.12466•May 26, 2021•4 citations
In this article, in addition to the characterization of geometrical state spaces for the passive states, an operational approach has been introduced to distinguish them on their charging capabilities of a quantum battery. Unlike the thermal states, the structural instability of passive states assures the existence of a natural number n, for which n+1 copies of the state can charge a quantum battery while n copies cannot. This phenomenon can be presented in an n copy resource-theoretic approach, for which the free states are unable to charge the battery in n copies. Here we have exhibited the single copy scenario explicitly. We also show that general ordering of the passive states on the basis of their charging capabilities is not possible and even the macroscopic entities (viz. energy and entropy) are unable to order them precisely. Interestingly, for some of the passive states, the majorization criterion gives sufficient order to the charging and discharging capabilities. However, the charging capacity for the set of thermal states (for which charging is possible) is directly proportional to their temperature.
One of the most fundamental tasks in quantum thermodynamics is extracting energy from one system and subsequently storing this energy in an appropriate battery. Both of these steps, work extraction and charging, can be viewed as cyclic Hamiltonian processes acting on individual quantum systems. Interestingly, so-called passive states exist, whose energy cannot be lowered by unitary operations, but it is safe to assume that the energy of any not fully charged battery may be increased unitarily. However, unitaries raising the average energy by the same amount may differ in qualities such as their precision, fluctuations, and charging power. Moreover, some unitaries may be extremely difficult to realize in practice. It is hence of crucial importance to understand the qualities that can be expected from practically implementable transformations. Here, we consider the limitations on charging batteries when restricting to the feasibly realizable family of Gaussian unitaries. We derive optimal protocols for general unitary operations as well as for the restriction to easier implementable Gaussian unitaries. We find that practical Gaussian battery charging, while performing significantly less well than is possible in principle, still offers asymptotically vanishing relative charge variances and fluctuations.
We study the connection between the charging power of quantum batteries and the fluctuations of the extractable work. We prove that in order to have a nonzero rate of change of the extractable work, the state ${\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\mathcal{W}}$ of the battery cannot be an eigenstate of a ``free energy operator,'' defined by $\mathcal{F}\ensuremath{\equiv}{H}_{\mathcal{W}}+{\ensuremath{\beta}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\mathrm{log}({\ensuremath{\rho}}_{\mathcal{W}})$, where HW{H}_{\mathcal{W}}HW​ is the Hamiltonian of the battery and $\ensuremath{\beta}$ is the inverse temperature of a reference thermal bath with respect to which the extractable work is calculated. We do so by proving that fluctuations in the free energy operator upper bound the charging power of a quantum battery. Our findings also suggest that quantum coherence in the battery enhances the charging process, which we illustrate on a toy model of a heat engine.
In one of its versions, the Second Law states: "It is impossible to construct an engine which will work in a complete cycle, and produces no effect except the raising of a weight and cooling of a heat reservoir." While the Second Law is considered as one of the most robust laws of Nature, it is still challenging how to interpret it in a fully quantum domain. Here we unpack the true meaning of the "cyclicity" and formulate the Second Law for a generic quantum battery via its asymptotic properties of a charging process rather than in terms of a single cycle. As a paradigm, we propose a machine consisting of a battery that repeatedly interacts with identically prepared systems. We then propose the Second Law in the form: The ergotropy of the battery may increase indefinitely if and only if systems are in a non-passive state. One of the most interesting features of this new formulation is the appearance of the passive states that naturally generalize the notion of the heat bath. In this paper, we provide a handful of results that supports this formulation for diagonal systems. Interestingly, our methodology meets a well-known theory of Markov chains, according to which we classify the general charging processes based on the passivity/non-passivity of charging systems. In particular, the adopted mathematics allows us to distinguish a subtle asymptotic difference between the indefinite increase of the battery's energy (induced by the maximally mixed states) and of ergotropy (induced by the non-passive states) in terms of the so-called null-recurrent versus transient Markov chains.
We examine how a finite many-body system can function as an effective charger for a single-qubit quantum battery, using the Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model as a paradigmatic setting. As our figure of merit, we consider the battery ergotropy while explicitly resolving the energetic flows across the composite system. In the absence of intra-charger interactions, we show that the generation of non-zero ergotropy is controlled by the competition between collective coupling and spectral mismatch. We further demonstrate that even passive positive-temperature charger states can generate finite battery ergotropy, provided the charger is sufficiently large and sufficiently hot. Intra-charger interactions restructure the charger spectrum and qualitatively modify the available energetic pathways. While they can enhance the amount of energy accessible for charging, they can simultaneously divert energy into internal many-body and battery-charger interaction channels, producing an energetic impedance to direct charger-to-battery transfer. Consequently, battery ergotropy alone is insufficient to characterize an effective many-body charger: the useful work generated and its energetic provenance must be assessed together.
Quantum batteries have emerged as a platform for investigating whether quantum effects can accelerate energy storage beyond classical limits. Although a variety of charging schemes have reported signatures of quantum advantage, the fundamental physical requirements for achieving superextensive charging power remain insufficiently understood. Here, we show that, in addition to Hamiltonian locality, a key structural property, g-extensiveness, quantifying the distribution of interaction energy across lattice sites places a fundamental bound on charging performance in spin-lattice models. We prove that superextensive power scaling is possible only when the interaction-energy distribution becomes increasingly nonuniform, with the maximal local weight growing with system size. This criterion explains why many previously studied protocols fail to exhibit superextensive power, even when the Hamiltonians involve large participation numbers. We further demonstrate that this condition is realized in an experimentally relevant interacting model, where, despite fixed interaction order, the charging power scales superextensively. Our results establish g-extensiveness as a necessary resource for quantum advantage in direct-charging protocols and provide a systematic framework for identifying and engineering physically feasible quantum batteries capable of outperforming classical counterparts in charging power.
Operations performing on quantum batteries are extended to scenarios where we no longer force the existence of definite causal order of occurrence between distinct processes. In contrast to standard theories, the so called indefinite causal order is found to have the capability of accomplishing tasks that are not possible without it. Specifically, we show how this novel class of resource comes into play in quantum batteries by first, combining two static unitary chargers into a coherently superposed one to fully charge an empty battery even if in the presence of battery's local Hamiltonian. Then we demonstrate for a non-unitary charging protocol, the indefinite causal order version charger yields a charged battery with higher energy over its classical counterpart under any conditions. We also have a finding that runs counter to our intuition which, roughly speaking, has the implication that a relatively less powerful charger guarantees a charged battery with higher energy. Finally, to reduce the cost imposed by a measurement-based protection scheme, indefinite causal order shows its potential to fulfill this goal.