Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1908.03276 · European Journal of Physics

The Pauli and Lévy-Leblond equations, and the spin current density

James M Wilkes

Published Feb 10, 2020• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract We review the literature on the Pauli equation and its current density, discussing the progression from the original phenomenological version of Pauli to its derivation by Lévy-Leblond from a linearization of the Schrödinger equation. It was established conclusively by Lévy-Leblond’s work that the spin of a spin-1/2 particle such as an electron is non-relativistic in nature, contrary to what was often stated following Dirac’s derivation of a relativistic wave equation, and his subsequent demonstration that Pauli’s spin interaction term appeared in the non-relativistic limit. In this limit, the Gordon decomposition of the associated probability current density was found to contain a spin-dependent term. Such a term does not follow, however, from the usual derivation of the current density from the Pauli equation, although various physically motivated but otherwise ad hoc explanations were put forward to account for it. We comment on the only exception to these of which we are aware implying the spin term in the current was in fact non-relativistic in nature. However, the earlier work of Lévy-Leblond had already shown, with no additional assumptions, that this term was a prominent feature of the current density derived from his equation. Hence, just as with the spin itself, the spin current was non-relativistic, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. We present a somewhat simplified derivation of the Lévy-Leblond equation and its current density, commenting on possibilities for experimental work that might indicate measurable consequences of the spin term in the current density. The presentation is at a level of quantum mechanics, electromagnetic theory, and mathematical methods typical of courses taken by first-year graduate students in physics, assuming some familiarity with Pauli spin matrices and the Dirac equation. Calculations are presented in detail, making the material suitable for use by teachers as supplementary problems for assignments, and development of theoretical concepts peculiar to the Pauli equation and its probability current density.

DOI
10.1088/1361-6404/ab7495

Related papers

The non-relativistic nature of spin in quantum mechanics: a historical and pedagogical perspective

Marco Giliberti, Luisa Lovisetti

Abstract Conventional methods for teaching spin at a university level generally follow four main approaches. The first introduces spin into the Schrödinger equation artificially, leaving its physical meaning unclear. The second connects spin to the representation of the rotation group, which clarifies its nature but requires knowledge of group theory. The third approach derives from field theory, separating angular momentum into orbital and intrinsic parts, the latter corresponding to spin; however, this cannot be done within quantum mechanics alone. The fourth derives electron spin from Dirac’s 1928 relativistic equation, which, though correct, has led to the misconception that spin is a purely relativistic effect. A detailed analysis of Dirac’s 1928 papers shows that the concept of spin arises from the need to construct an equation linear in both energy and momentum to preserve Born’s probabilistic interpretation. This linearization of the Klein–Gordon equation reveals that spin is conceptually independent of relativity. Historical and pedagogical perspectives can together clarify conceptual difficulties and promote a deeper understanding of fundamental ideas in physics. Drawing on selected passages from Dirac’s original work, the present discussion offers broader conceptual and cultural considerations that introduce the notion of spin with limited mathematical requirements and can be applied independently of the didactic approach adopted.

•Aug 27, 2026•0 citations

Spin-spin effects from non-relativistic limit of Dirac-Pauli-Maxwell Lagrangian

Radmehr Fathi, Nima Khosravi

It is natural to expect that the electromagnetic spin-spin interaction has roots in a more fundamental theory: quantum electrodynamics in this case. To show this, we take the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac-Maxwell Lagrangian, using the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation and derive the Breit interaction by an alternative approach. By adding the Pauli term (i.e., a higher-order interaction between spin and the electromagnetic field), we calculate the correction terms to electromagnetic spin-spin interactions in the non-relativistic limit. Finally, we study some of the physical effects of these terms regarding spin-spin interactions and spin-spin entanglements. Accordingly, we provide theoretical estimates that are not yet accessible with current experiments.

quant-pharXiv:2608.28904•Sep 1, 2026•0 citations

The Spinning Electron

John Lekner

The notion introduced by Ohanian that spin is a wave property is implemented, both in Dirac and in Schrödinger quantum mechanics. We find that half-integer spin is the consequence of azimuthal dependence in two of the four spinor components, relativistically and non-relativistically. In both cases the spinor components are free particle wavepackets; the total wavefunction is an eigenstate of the total angular momentum in the direction of net particle motion. In the non-relativistic case we make use of the Lévy-Leblond result that four coupled non-relativistic wave equations, equivalent to the Pauli-Schrödinger equation, represent particles of half-integer spin, with g-factor 2. An example of an exact Gaussian solution of the non-relativistic equations is illustrated.

Substantia•May 24, 2022•0 citations

Electron spin and probability current density in quantum mechanics

William Hodge, S. V. Migirditch, W. C. Kerr

This paper analyzes how the existence of electron spin changes the equation for the probability current density in the quantum-mechanical continuity equation. A spinful electron moving in a potential energy field experiences the spin-orbit interaction, and that additional term in the time-dependent Schrödinger equation places an additional spin-dependent term in the probability current density. Further, making an analogy with classical magnetostatics hints that there may be an additional magnetization current contribution. This contribution seems not to be derivable from a non-relativistic time-dependent Schrödinger equation, but there is a procedure described in the quantum mechanics textbook by Landau and Lifschitz to obtain it. We utilize and extend their procedure to obtain this magnetization term, which also gives a second derivation of the spin-orbit term. We conclude with an evaluation of these terms for the ground state of the hydrogen atom with spin-orbit interaction. The magnetization contribution is generally the larger one, except very near an atomic nucleus.

American Journal of Physics•Jun 24, 2014•20 citations

On the linear forms of the Schrodinger equation

Yazid Kasri, Y. Gr, L. Chétouani

Generalizing the linearisation procedure used by Dirac and later by L\'evy-Leblond, we derive the first-order non-relativistic wave equations for particles of spin 1 and spin 3/2 starting from the Schrodinger equation.

•Aug 17, 2016•1 citation

Relativistic Equations. An Introduction

Ana Marı́a Cetto, Luis de la Peña

Chapter 19 introduces relativistic quantum mechanics, with the aim of providing the student with a basic knowledge of the subject and a link to more advanced courses in relativistic quantum theory. It begins by showing that when the Schrödinger equation is modified to make it consistent with special relativity, the result is the Klein–Gordon equation, which gives better qualitative agreement with experiment. Introducing the electron spin into the Schrödinger equation leads to the Pauli equation, which gives rise to important spin effects. By considering both special relativity and spin, one obtains the Dirac and the van der Waerden equations. The main properties and implications of Dirac’s equation are discussed, including the electron’s zitterbewegung. The solution of Dirac’s equation for the free particle is presented in detail, the hydrogen-like atom is shown to be exactly solvable, and the particle in an external electromagnetic field is included as a complementary material.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Dec 18, 2025•0 citations
Abstract We review the literature on the Pauli equation and its current density, discussing the progression from the original phenomenological version of Pauli to its derivation by Lévy-Leblond from a linearization of the Schrödinger equation. It was established conclusively by Lévy-Leblond’s work that the spin of a spin-1/2 particle such as an electron is non-relativistic in nature, contrary to what was often stated following Dirac’s derivation of a relativistic wave equation, and his subsequent demonstration that Pauli’s spin interaction term appeared in the non-relativistic limit. In this limit, the Gordon decomposition of the associated probability current density was found to contain a spin-dependent term. Such a term does not follow, however, from the usual derivation of the current density from the Pauli equation, although various physically motivated but otherwise ad hoc explanations were put forward to account for it. We comment on the only exception to these of which we are aware implying the spin term in the current was in fact non-relativistic in nature. However, the earlier work of Lévy-Leblond had already shown, with no additional assumptions, that this term was a prominent feature of the current density derived from his equation. Hence, just as with the spin itself, the spin current was non-relativistic, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. We present a somewhat simplified derivation of the Lévy-Leblond equation and its current density, commenting on possibilities for experimental work that might indicate measurable consequences of the spin term in the current density. The presentation is at a level of quantum mechanics, electromagnetic theory, and mathematical methods typical of courses taken by first-year graduate students in physics, assuming some familiarity with Pauli spin matrices and the Dirac equation. Calculations are presented in detail, making the material suitable for use by teachers as supplementary problems for assignments, and development of theoretical concepts peculiar to the Pauli equation and its probability current density.
Abstract Conventional methods for teaching spin at a university level generally follow four main approaches. The first introduces spin into the Schrödinger equation artificially, leaving its physical meaning unclear. The second connects spin to the representation of the rotation group, which clarifies its nature but requires knowledge of group theory. The third approach derives from field theory, separating angular momentum into orbital and intrinsic parts, the latter corresponding to spin; however, this cannot be done within quantum mechanics alone. The fourth derives electron spin from Dirac’s 1928 relativistic equation, which, though correct, has led to the misconception that spin is a purely relativistic effect. A detailed analysis of Dirac’s 1928 papers shows that the concept of spin arises from the need to construct an equation linear in both energy and momentum to preserve Born’s probabilistic interpretation. This linearization of the Klein–Gordon equation reveals that spin is conceptually independent of relativity. Historical and pedagogical perspectives can together clarify conceptual difficulties and promote a deeper understanding of fundamental ideas in physics. Drawing on selected passages from Dirac’s original work, the present discussion offers broader conceptual and cultural considerations that introduce the notion of spin with limited mathematical requirements and can be applied independently of the didactic approach adopted.
It is natural to expect that the electromagnetic spin-spin interaction has roots in a more fundamental theory: quantum electrodynamics in this case. To show this, we take the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac-Maxwell Lagrangian, using the Foldy-Wouthuysen transformation and derive the Breit interaction by an alternative approach. By adding the Pauli term (i.e., a higher-order interaction between spin and the electromagnetic field), we calculate the correction terms to electromagnetic spin-spin interactions in the non-relativistic limit. Finally, we study some of the physical effects of these terms regarding spin-spin interactions and spin-spin entanglements. Accordingly, we provide theoretical estimates that are not yet accessible with current experiments.
The notion introduced by Ohanian that spin is a wave property is implemented, both in Dirac and in Schrödinger quantum mechanics. We find that half-integer spin is the consequence of azimuthal dependence in two of the four spinor components, relativistically and non-relativistically. In both cases the spinor components are free particle wavepackets; the total wavefunction is an eigenstate of the total angular momentum in the direction of net particle motion. In the non-relativistic case we make use of the Lévy-Leblond result that four coupled non-relativistic wave equations, equivalent to the Pauli-Schrödinger equation, represent particles of half-integer spin, with g-factor 2. An example of an exact Gaussian solution of the non-relativistic equations is illustrated.
This paper analyzes how the existence of electron spin changes the equation for the probability current density in the quantum-mechanical continuity equation. A spinful electron moving in a potential energy field experiences the spin-orbit interaction, and that additional term in the time-dependent Schrödinger equation places an additional spin-dependent term in the probability current density. Further, making an analogy with classical magnetostatics hints that there may be an additional magnetization current contribution. This contribution seems not to be derivable from a non-relativistic time-dependent Schrödinger equation, but there is a procedure described in the quantum mechanics textbook by Landau and Lifschitz to obtain it. We utilize and extend their procedure to obtain this magnetization term, which also gives a second derivation of the spin-orbit term. We conclude with an evaluation of these terms for the ground state of the hydrogen atom with spin-orbit interaction. The magnetization contribution is generally the larger one, except very near an atomic nucleus.
Chapter 19 introduces relativistic quantum mechanics, with the aim of providing the student with a basic knowledge of the subject and a link to more advanced courses in relativistic quantum theory. It begins by showing that when the Schrödinger equation is modified to make it consistent with special relativity, the result is the Klein–Gordon equation, which gives better qualitative agreement with experiment. Introducing the electron spin into the Schrödinger equation leads to the Pauli equation, which gives rise to important spin effects. By considering both special relativity and spin, one obtains the Dirac and the van der Waerden equations. The main properties and implications of Dirac’s equation are discussed, including the electron’s zitterbewegung. The solution of Dirac’s equation for the free particle is presented in detail, the hydrogen-like atom is shown to be exactly solvable, and the particle in an external electromagnetic field is included as a complementary material.