Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On the linear forms of the Schrodinger equation

Yazid Kasri, Y. Gr, L. Chétouani

Published Aug 17, 2016• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

Generalizing the linearisation procedure used by Dirac and later by L'evy-Leblond, we derive the first-order non-relativistic wave equations for particles of spin 1 and spin 3/2 starting from the Schrodinger equation.

Related papers

From Galilean-invariant to relativistic wave equations

E. Elizalde, J. A. Lobo

Through an imaginary change of coordinates in the Galilei algebra in 4 space dimensions and making use of an original idea of Dirac and L\'evy-Leblond, we are able to obtain the relativistic equations of Dirac and of Bargmann and Wigner starting with the (Galilean-invariant) Schr\"odinger equation.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Aug 15, 1980•0 citations

Case of an Electron

Lukong Cornelius Fai

It is not possible to use the Schrödinger equation to describe the motion of a particle with relativistic effects since it is not invariant relative to the Lorentz transformation. However, the attempt to generalize quantum mechanics in the relativistic domain on the basis of the one particle theory is somehow difficult. So we find the appropriate equations on the basis of the relativistic invariance. To obtain the non-relativistic equations, we take the limit as the speed of light tends to infinity. This obviously recovers the Schrödinger equation. Under this heading, we extend the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in the description of particles with speeds comparable with that of light. This extension should be consistent with the Lorentz transformation [ 12 ]. The characteristic feature of the relativistic wave equations is the spin which provides a useful gauge in the applicability of particular equations that describe particular kinds of particles. We have two types of relativistic equations, i.e., the equation with spin-zero due to Schrödinger and spin-half due to Dirac that describes the electron.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2022•0 citations

Non-Relativistic Limit of the Dirac Equation

Muhammad Adeel Ajaib

We show that the first order form of the Schrodinger equation proposed in [1] can be obtained from the Dirac equation in the non-relativistic limit. We also show that the Pauli Hamiltonian is obtained from this equation by requiring local gauge invariance. In addition, we study the problem of a spin up particle incident on a finite potential barrier and show that the known quantum mechanical results are obtained. Finally, we consider the symmetric potential well and show that the quantum mechanical expression for the quantized energy levels of a particle is obtained with periodic boundary conditions. Based on these conclusions, we propose that the equation introduced in [1] is the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation and more appropriately describes spin 1/2 particles in the non-relativistic limit.

arXiv:1511.07901•Nov 24, 2015•5 citations

The Pauli and Lévy-Leblond equations, and the spin current density

James M Wilkes

Abstract We review the literature on the Pauli equation and its current density, discussing the progression from the original phenomenological version of Pauli to its derivation by Lévy-Leblond from a linearization of the Schrödinger equation. It was established conclusively by Lévy-Leblond’s work that the spin of a spin-1/2 particle such as an electron is non-relativistic in nature, contrary to what was often stated following Dirac’s derivation of a relativistic wave equation, and his subsequent demonstration that Pauli’s spin interaction term appeared in the non-relativistic limit. In this limit, the Gordon decomposition of the associated probability current density was found to contain a spin-dependent term. Such a term does not follow, however, from the usual derivation of the current density from the Pauli equation, although various physically motivated but otherwise ad hoc explanations were put forward to account for it. We comment on the only exception to these of which we are aware implying the spin term in the current was in fact non-relativistic in nature. However, the earlier work of Lévy-Leblond had already shown, with no additional assumptions, that this term was a prominent feature of the current density derived from his equation. Hence, just as with the spin itself, the spin current was non-relativistic, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. We present a somewhat simplified derivation of the Lévy-Leblond equation and its current density, commenting on possibilities for experimental work that might indicate measurable consequences of the spin term in the current density. The presentation is at a level of quantum mechanics, electromagnetic theory, and mathematical methods typical of courses taken by first-year graduate students in physics, assuming some familiarity with Pauli spin matrices and the Dirac equation. Calculations are presented in detail, making the material suitable for use by teachers as supplementary problems for assignments, and development of theoretical concepts peculiar to the Pauli equation and its probability current density.

arXiv:1908.03276•European Journal of Physics•Feb 10, 2020•20 citations

On the Construction of Relativistic Quantum Wave Equation and General Solution of the Second Order Differential Equation

Bagis, Nikolaos D.

Using the elementary axioms of special relativity and quantum mechanics we construct a wave equation which generalizes the Schrodinger equation. We also solve the general second and some higher order differential equations.

arXiv:2310.17823•Oct 27, 2023•0 citations

Sur une linéarisation de l'équation de Schrödinger et le spin de l'électron

G. Jeverdan

Jeverdan G. Sur une linéarisation de l'équation de Schrödinger et le spin de l'électron. In: Bulletin de la Classe des sciences, tome 66, 1980. pp. 487-498.

Bulletin de la Classe des sciences•Jan 1, 1980•0 citations
It is not possible to use the Schrödinger equation to describe the motion of a particle with relativistic effects since it is not invariant relative to the Lorentz transformation. However, the attempt to generalize quantum mechanics in the relativistic domain on the basis of the one particle theory is somehow difficult. So we find the appropriate equations on the basis of the relativistic invariance. To obtain the non-relativistic equations, we take the limit as the speed of light tends to infinity. This obviously recovers the Schrödinger equation. Under this heading, we extend the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in the description of particles with speeds comparable with that of light. This extension should be consistent with the Lorentz transformation [ 12 ]. The characteristic feature of the relativistic wave equations is the spin which provides a useful gauge in the applicability of particular equations that describe particular kinds of particles. We have two types of relativistic equations, i.e., the equation with spin-zero due to Schrödinger and spin-half due to Dirac that describes the electron.
We show that the first order form of the Schrodinger equation proposed in [1] can be obtained from the Dirac equation in the non-relativistic limit. We also show that the Pauli Hamiltonian is obtained from this equation by requiring local gauge invariance. In addition, we study the problem of a spin up particle incident on a finite potential barrier and show that the known quantum mechanical results are obtained. Finally, we consider the symmetric potential well and show that the quantum mechanical expression for the quantized energy levels of a particle is obtained with periodic boundary conditions. Based on these conclusions, we propose that the equation introduced in [1] is the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation and more appropriately describes spin 1/2 particles in the non-relativistic limit.
Abstract We review the literature on the Pauli equation and its current density, discussing the progression from the original phenomenological version of Pauli to its derivation by Lévy-Leblond from a linearization of the Schrödinger equation. It was established conclusively by Lévy-Leblond’s work that the spin of a spin-1/2 particle such as an electron is non-relativistic in nature, contrary to what was often stated following Dirac’s derivation of a relativistic wave equation, and his subsequent demonstration that Pauli’s spin interaction term appeared in the non-relativistic limit. In this limit, the Gordon decomposition of the associated probability current density was found to contain a spin-dependent term. Such a term does not follow, however, from the usual derivation of the current density from the Pauli equation, although various physically motivated but otherwise ad hoc explanations were put forward to account for it. We comment on the only exception to these of which we are aware implying the spin term in the current was in fact non-relativistic in nature. However, the earlier work of Lévy-Leblond had already shown, with no additional assumptions, that this term was a prominent feature of the current density derived from his equation. Hence, just as with the spin itself, the spin current was non-relativistic, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. We present a somewhat simplified derivation of the Lévy-Leblond equation and its current density, commenting on possibilities for experimental work that might indicate measurable consequences of the spin term in the current density. The presentation is at a level of quantum mechanics, electromagnetic theory, and mathematical methods typical of courses taken by first-year graduate students in physics, assuming some familiarity with Pauli spin matrices and the Dirac equation. Calculations are presented in detail, making the material suitable for use by teachers as supplementary problems for assignments, and development of theoretical concepts peculiar to the Pauli equation and its probability current density.