Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1312.7738

$PT$-symmetric quantum mechanics is a Hermitian quantum mechanics

Sungwook Lee

Published Dec 30, 2013• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The author discusses a different kind of Hermitian quantum mechanics, called $J$-Hermitian quantum mechanics. He shows that $PT$-symmetric quantum mechanics is indeed $J$-Hermitian quantum mechanics, and that time evolution (in the Krein space of states) is unitary if and only if Hamiltonian is $J$-Hermitian (or equivalently $PT$-symmetric). An issue with unitarity comes up when time evolution is considered in the Hilbert space of states rather than in the Krein space of states. The author offers possible scenarios with this issue.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1312.7738

Related papers

Can PT-Symmetric Quantum Mechanics be a Viable Alternative Quantum Theory?

Sungwook Lee, Lawrence R. Mead

Update: A time-independent $n\times n$ PT-symmetric (and symmetric) Hamiltonian is diagonalizable since it has all distinct real eigenvalues and the resulting diagonal matrix is a real symmetric matrix. The diagonalization results an isometry so there shouldn't be any issue with unitarity and unfortunately this very elementary mathematical fact somehow did not draw the authors' attention. However, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is not out of trouble. For time-dependent PT-symmetric (and symmetric) Hamiltonians (even $2\times 2$ ones) the authors observed that there is a violation of unitarity. Moreover, the first named author showed in his recent article arXiv:1312.7738 that PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is indeed a certain kind of Hermitian quantum mechanics and that in order for time-evolution to be unitary with respect to $J$-inner product (one that gives rise to a Hilbert space structure on the space of state functions), the potential energy operator $V(x)$ must be real. This means that those complex PT-symmetric Hamiltonians that have been studied by physicists are unfortunately unphysical. The first named author discussed in a subsequent article arXiv:1401.5149 that while finite-state PT-symmetric quantum mechanics with time-independent Hamiltonians is not physically any different from Hermitian quantum mechanics, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics exhibits a distinctive symmetry from that of Hermitian quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1303.6339•Mar 25, 2013•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics Based on Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians (Recent Trends in Exponential Asymptotics)

Carl M. Bender

A physical theory of quantum mechanics can be based on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but instead satisfies the physical condition of space-time reflection symmetry ( $P\mathcal{T}$ symmetry).Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct that might explain experimental data.One would think that a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian would give a quantum theory that violates unitarity.However, if $P\mathcal{T}$ symmetry is not broken, it is possible to use a physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite.This construction is general and works for any $P\mathcal{T}$ -symmetric Hamiltonian.The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution.This formulation does not conflict with the requirements of conventional quantum mechanics.There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mechanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.

•Apr 1, 2005•0 citations

Must a Hamiltonian be Hermitian?

Carl M. Bender, Brody, D C, Jones, H F

It is possible to extend conventional quantum mechanics described by Hermitian Hamiltonians into the complex domain. A consistent physical theory of quantum mechanics can be built on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but satisfies the less restrictive and more physical condition of space-time reflection symmetry (PT symmetry). Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct to explain experimental data. One might think that a quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian would violate unitarity. However, if PT symmetry is not spontaneously broken, it is possible to use a previously unnoticed physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite. This construction is general and works for any PT-symmetric Hamiltonian. The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. This formulation does not conflict with conventional quantum mechanics; rather, it is a complex generalization of it. There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mchanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.

•Mar 2, 2003•235 citations

Must a Hamiltonian be Hermitian?

Carl M. Bender, Dorje C. Brody, Hugh F. Jones

A consistent physical theory of quantum mechanics can be built on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but instead satisfies the physical condition of space–time reflection symmetry (𝒫𝒯 symmetry). Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct that might explain experimental data. One would think that a quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian violates unitarity. However, if 𝒫𝒯 symmetry is not broken, it is possible to use a previously unnoticed physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite. This construction is general and works for any 𝒫𝒯-symmetric Hamiltonian. The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. This formulation does not conflict with the requirements of conventional quantum mechanics. There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mechanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.

arXiv:hep-th/0303005•American Journal of Physics•Oct 13, 2003•378 citations

PT-symmetric quantum theory

Carl M. Bender

The average quantum physicist on the street would say that a quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian must be Dirac Hermitian (invariant under combined matrix transposition and complex conjugation) in order to guarantee that the energy eigenvalues are real and that time evolution is unitary. However, the Hamiltonian H = p 2 + ix 3 , which is obviously not Dirac Hermitian, has a positive real discrete spectrum and generates unitary time evolution, and thus it defines a fully consistent and physical quantum theory. Evidently, the axiom of Dirac Hermiticity is too restrictive. While H = p 2 + ix 3 is not Dirac Hermitian, it is PT symmetric; that is, invariant under combined parity P (space reflection) and time reversal T . The quantum mechanics defined by a PT -symmetric Hamiltonian is a complex generalization of ordinary quantum mechanics. When quantum mechanics is extended into the complex domain, new kinds of theories having strange and remarkable properties emerge. In the past few years, some of these properties have been verified in laboratory experiments. A particularly interesting PT-symmetric Hamiltonian is H = p 2 − x 4 , which contains an upside-down potential. This potential is discussed in detail, and it is explained in intuitive as well as in rigorous terms why the energy levels of this potential are real, positive, and discrete. Applications of PT -symmetry in quantum field theory are also discussed.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jul 30, 2015•80 citations

PT symmetry as a necessary and sufficient condition for unitary time evolution

Philip D. Mannheim

While Hermiticity of a time-independent Hamiltonian leads to unitary time evolution, in and of itself, the requirement of Hermiticity is only sufficient for unitary time evolution. In this paper, we provide conditions that are both necessary and sufficient. We show that PT symmetry of a time-independent Hamiltonian, or equivalently, reality of the secular equation that determines its eigenvalues, is both necessary and sufficient for unitary time evolution. For any PT-symmetric Hamiltonian H, there always exists an operator V that relates H to its Hermitian adjoint according to VHV(-1)=H(†). When the energy spectrum of H is complete, Hilbert space norms <ψ(1)|V|ψ(2)> constructed with this V are always preserved in time. With the energy eigenvalues of a real secular equation being either real or appearing in complex conjugate pairs, we thus establish the unitarity of time evolution in both cases. We also establish the unitarity of time evolution for Hamiltonians whose energy spectra are not complete. We show that when the energy eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian are real and complete, the operator V is a positive Hermitian operator, which has an associated square root operator that can be used to bring the Hamiltonian to a Hermitian form. We show that systems with PT-symmetric Hamiltonians obey causality. We note that Hermitian theories are ordinarily associated with a path integral quantization prescription in which the path integral measure is real, while in contrast, non-Hermitian but PT-symmetric theories are ordinarily associated with path integrals in which the measure needs to be complex, but in which the Euclidean time continuation of the path integral is nonetheless real. Just as the second-order Klein-Gordon theory is stabilized against transitions to negative frequencies because its Hamiltonian is positive-definite, through PT symmetry, the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck theory can equally be stabilized.

arXiv:0912.2635•Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences•Mar 18, 2013•55 citations
PTPTPT-symmetric quantum mechanics is a Hermitian quantum mechanics
The author discusses a different kind of Hermitian quantum mechanics, called JJJ-Hermitian quantum mechanics. He shows that PTPTPT-symmetric quantum mechanics is indeed JJJ-Hermitian quantum mechanics, and that time evolution (in the Krein space of states) is unitary if and only if Hamiltonian is JJJ-Hermitian (or equivalently PTPTPT-symmetric). An issue with unitarity comes up when time evolution is considered in the Hilbert space of states rather than in the Krein space of states. The author offers possible scenarios with this issue.
Update: A time-independent n×nn\times nn×n PT-symmetric (and symmetric) Hamiltonian is diagonalizable since it has all distinct real eigenvalues and the resulting diagonal matrix is a real symmetric matrix. The diagonalization results an isometry so there shouldn't be any issue with unitarity and unfortunately this very elementary mathematical fact somehow did not draw the authors' attention. However, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is not out of trouble. For time-dependent PT-symmetric (and symmetric) Hamiltonians (even 2×22\times 22×2 ones) the authors observed that there is a violation of unitarity. Moreover, the first named author showed in his recent article arXiv:1312.7738 that PT-symmetric quantum mechanics is indeed a certain kind of Hermitian quantum mechanics and that in order for time-evolution to be unitary with respect to JJJ-inner product (one that gives rise to a Hilbert space structure on the space of state functions), the potential energy operator V(x)V(x)V(x) must be real. This means that those complex PT-symmetric Hamiltonians that have been studied by physicists are unfortunately unphysical. The first named author discussed in a subsequent article arXiv:1401.5149 that while finite-state PT-symmetric quantum mechanics with time-independent Hamiltonians is not physically any different from Hermitian quantum mechanics, PT-symmetric quantum mechanics exhibits a distinctive symmetry from that of Hermitian quantum mechanics.
A physical theory of quantum mechanics can be based on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but instead satisfies the physical condition of space-time reflection symmetry ( PTP\mathcal{T}PT symmetry).Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct that might explain experimental data.One would think that a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian would give a quantum theory that violates unitarity.However, if PTP\mathcal{T}PT symmetry is not broken, it is possible to use a physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite.This construction is general and works for any PTP\mathcal{T}PT -symmetric Hamiltonian.The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution.This formulation does not conflict with the requirements of conventional quantum mechanics.There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mechanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.
It is possible to extend conventional quantum mechanics described by Hermitian Hamiltonians into the complex domain. A consistent physical theory of quantum mechanics can be built on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but satisfies the less restrictive and more physical condition of space-time reflection symmetry (PT symmetry). Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct to explain experimental data. One might think that a quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian would violate unitarity. However, if PT symmetry is not spontaneously broken, it is possible to use a previously unnoticed physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite. This construction is general and works for any PT-symmetric Hamiltonian. The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. This formulation does not conflict with conventional quantum mechanics; rather, it is a complex generalization of it. There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mchanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.
A consistent physical theory of quantum mechanics can be built on a complex Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian but instead satisfies the physical condition of space–time reflection symmetry (𝒫𝒯 symmetry). Thus, there are infinitely many new Hamiltonians that one can construct that might explain experimental data. One would think that a quantum theory based on a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian violates unitarity. However, if 𝒫𝒯 symmetry is not broken, it is possible to use a previously unnoticed physical symmetry of the Hamiltonian to construct an inner product whose associated norm is positive definite. This construction is general and works for any 𝒫𝒯-symmetric Hamiltonian. The dynamics is governed by unitary time evolution. This formulation does not conflict with the requirements of conventional quantum mechanics. There are many possible observable and experimental consequences of extending quantum mechanics into the complex domain, both in particle physics and in solid state physics.
The average quantum physicist on the street would say that a quantum-mechanical Hamiltonian must be Dirac Hermitian (invariant under combined matrix transposition and complex conjugation) in order to guarantee that the energy eigenvalues are real and that time evolution is unitary. However, the Hamiltonian H = p 2 + ix 3 , which is obviously not Dirac Hermitian, has a positive real discrete spectrum and generates unitary time evolution, and thus it defines a fully consistent and physical quantum theory. Evidently, the axiom of Dirac Hermiticity is too restrictive. While H = p 2 + ix 3 is not Dirac Hermitian, it is PT symmetric; that is, invariant under combined parity P (space reflection) and time reversal T . The quantum mechanics defined by a PT -symmetric Hamiltonian is a complex generalization of ordinary quantum mechanics. When quantum mechanics is extended into the complex domain, new kinds of theories having strange and remarkable properties emerge. In the past few years, some of these properties have been verified in laboratory experiments. A particularly interesting PT-symmetric Hamiltonian is H = p 2 − x 4 , which contains an upside-down potential. This potential is discussed in detail, and it is explained in intuitive as well as in rigorous terms why the energy levels of this potential are real, positive, and discrete. Applications of PT -symmetry in quantum field theory are also discussed.
While Hermiticity of a time-independent Hamiltonian leads to unitary time evolution, in and of itself, the requirement of Hermiticity is only sufficient for unitary time evolution. In this paper, we provide conditions that are both necessary and sufficient. We show that PT symmetry of a time-independent Hamiltonian, or equivalently, reality of the secular equation that determines its eigenvalues, is both necessary and sufficient for unitary time evolution. For any PT-symmetric Hamiltonian H, there always exists an operator V that relates H to its Hermitian adjoint according to VHV(-1)=H(†). When the energy spectrum of H is complete, Hilbert space norms <ψ(1)|V|ψ(2)> constructed with this V are always preserved in time. With the energy eigenvalues of a real secular equation being either real or appearing in complex conjugate pairs, we thus establish the unitarity of time evolution in both cases. We also establish the unitarity of time evolution for Hamiltonians whose energy spectra are not complete. We show that when the energy eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian are real and complete, the operator V is a positive Hermitian operator, which has an associated square root operator that can be used to bring the Hamiltonian to a Hermitian form. We show that systems with PT-symmetric Hamiltonians obey causality. We note that Hermitian theories are ordinarily associated with a path integral quantization prescription in which the path integral measure is real, while in contrast, non-Hermitian but PT-symmetric theories are ordinarily associated with path integrals in which the measure needs to be complex, but in which the Euclidean time continuation of the path integral is nonetheless real. Just as the second-order Klein-Gordon theory is stabilized against transitions to negative frequencies because its Hamiltonian is positive-definite, through PT symmetry, the fourth-order derivative Pais-Uhlenbeck theory can equally be stabilized.