Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1212.4897 · International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics

ON RELATION BETWEEN GEOMETRIC MOMENTUM AND ANNIHILATION OPERATORS ON A TWO-DIMENSIONAL SPHERE

Q. H. LIU, Y. SHEN, D. M. XUN, X. WANG

Published Mar 4, 2013• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

With a recently introduced geometric momentum that depends on the extrinsic curvature and offers a proper description of momentum on two-dimensional sphere, we show that the annihilation operators whose eigenstates are coherent states on the sphere take the expected form αx + iβp, where α and β are two operators that depend on the angular momentum and x and p are the position and the geometric momentum, respectively. Since the geometric momentum is manifestly a consequence of embedding the two-dimensional sphere in the three-dimensional flat space, the coherent states reflects some aspects beyond the intrinsic geometry of the surfaces.

DOI
10.1142/s0219887813200077

Related papers

Geometric Momentum and a Probe of Embedding Effects

Quanhui Liu

As a manifold is embedded into a higher dimensional Euclidean space, quantum mechanics gives various embedding quantities. In the present study, two embedding quantities for a two-dimensional curved surface in the three-dimensional flat space, the geometric momentum and the geometric potential, are derived in a unified manner. For a particle moving on a two-dimensional sphere or a free rotation of a spherical top, the projections of both the geometric momentum \(\mathbf{p}\) and the angular momentum \(\mathbf{L}\) onto a certain Cartesian axis form a complete set of commuting observables as \([p_{i},L_{i}]=0\) (\(i=1,2,3\)), thus constituting a dynamical \((p_{i},L_{i})\) representation for the states on the two-dimensional spherical surface. The geometric momentum distribution of the states represented by spherical harmonics is successfully obtained, and this distribution for a homonuclear diatomic molecule seems within the resolution power of present momentum spectrometers and can be measured to probe the embedding effect.

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Sep 17, 2013•26 citations

Momentum spectrometry of spherical harmonics and a probe of geometric embedding effect

Q. H. Liu

As a submanifold is embedded into higher dimensional flat space, quantum mechanics gives various embedding quantities, e.g., the geometric momentum and geometric potential, etc. For a particle moving on a two-dimensional sphere or a free rotation of a spherical top, the projections of the geometric momentum p and the angular momentum L onto a certain Cartesian axis form a complete set of commuting observables as [p_{i},L_{i}]=0 (i=1,2,3). We have therefore a (p_{i},L_{i}) representation for the states on the two-dimensional spherical surface. The geometric momentum distribution of the ground states for a freely rotating rigid rotor seems within the resolution power of present momentum spectrometer and can be measured to probe the embedding effect.

arXiv:1209.2209•Sep 11, 2012•1 citation

Geometric momentum: The proper momentum for a free particle on a two-dimensional sphere

Quanhui Liu, Liang-Hui Tang, D. M. Xun

In Dirac's canonical quantization theory on systems with second-class constraints, the commutators between the position, momentum, and Hamiltonian form a set of algebraic relations that are fundamental in construction of both the quantum momentum and the Hamiltonian. For a free particle on a two-dimensional sphere or a spherical top, results show that the well-known canonical momentum ${p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ breaks one of the relations, while three components of the momentum expressed in the three-dimensional Cartesian system of axes as ${p}_{i}$ $(i=1,2,3)$ are satisfactory all around. This momentum is not only geometrically invariant but also self-adjoint, and we call it geometric momentum. The nontrivial commutators between ${p}_{i}$ generate three components of the orbital angular momentum; thus the geometric momentum is fundamental to the angular one. We note that there are five different forms of the geometric momentum proposed in the current literature, but only one of them turns out to be meaningful.

arXiv:1109.5223•Physical Review A•Oct 3, 2011•56 citations

Symmetric Surface Momentum and Centripetal Force for a Particle on a Curved Surface

M. S. Shikakhwa

Abstract The Hermitian surface momentum operator for a particle confined to a 2D curved surface spanned by orthogonal coordinates and embedded in 3D space is expressed as a symmetric expression in derivatives with respect to the surface coordinates and so is manifestly along the surface. This is an alternative form to the one reported in the literature and usually named geometric momentum, which has a term proportional to the mean curvature along the direction normal to the surface, and so “apparently” not along the surface. The symmetric form of the momentum is the sum of two symmetric Hermitian operators along the two orthogonal directions defined by the surface coordinates. The centripetal force operator for a particle on the surface of a cylinder and a sphere is calculated by taking the time derivative of the momentum and is seen to be a symmetrization of the well-known classical expressions.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Sep 1, 2018•3 citations

The Cartesian momentum and the kinetic operators on curved surfaces

Quanhui Liu, 湖南大学理论物理研究所，长沙 410082

For describing particles moving on the two dimensional curved surfaces, we can use either the intrinsic local coordinates or the Cartesian coordinates. The representation of the momentum operators differs from each other in these two kinds of coordinates, the former ones depend on the intrinsic geometrical quantities, but the latter case depend on a geometrical invariant, namely the mean curvature. Taking the operator-ordering problem into consideration, the kinetic operator for the former case can be expressed in a possibly unique way, while that for latter case can be expressed in two different ways.

Acta Physica Sinica•Jan 1, 2008•1 citation

Quantum mechanics on a sphere and coherent states

K. Kowalski, Jakub Rembieliński

The coherent states for a particle on a sphere are introduced. These states are labelled by points of the classical phase space, i.e. the position on the sphere and the angular momentum of a particle. As with the coherent states for a particle on a circle discussed in Kowalski et al ( 1996 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29 4149 ), we deal with a deformation of the classical phase space related to quantum fluctuations. The expectation values of the position and the angular momentum in the coherent states are regarded as the best possible approximation of the classical phase space. The correctness of the introduced coherent states is illustrated by an example of the rotator.

arXiv:quant-ph/9912094•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Aug 16, 2000•55 citations
With a recently introduced geometric momentum that depends on the extrinsic curvature and offers a proper description of momentum on two-dimensional sphere, we show that the annihilation operators whose eigenstates are coherent states on the sphere take the expected form αx + iβp, where α and β are two operators that depend on the angular momentum and x and p are the position and the geometric momentum, respectively. Since the geometric momentum is manifestly a consequence of embedding the two-dimensional sphere in the three-dimensional flat space, the coherent states reflects some aspects beyond the intrinsic geometry of the surfaces.
As a manifold is embedded into a higher dimensional Euclidean space, quantum mechanics gives various embedding quantities. In the present study, two embedding quantities for a two-dimensional curved surface in the three-dimensional flat space, the geometric momentum and the geometric potential, are derived in a unified manner. For a particle moving on a two-dimensional sphere or a free rotation of a spherical top, the projections of both the geometric momentum p\mathbf{p}p and the angular momentum L\mathbf{L}L onto a certain Cartesian axis form a complete set of commuting observables as [pi,Li]=0[p_{i},L_{i}]=0[pi​,Li​]=0 (i=1,2,3i=1,2,3i=1,2,3), thus constituting a dynamical (pi,Li)(p_{i},L_{i})(pi​,Li​) representation for the states on the two-dimensional spherical surface. The geometric momentum distribution of the states represented by spherical harmonics is successfully obtained, and this distribution for a homonuclear diatomic molecule seems within the resolution power of present momentum spectrometers and can be measured to probe the embedding effect.
As a submanifold is embedded into higher dimensional flat space, quantum mechanics gives various embedding quantities, e.g., the geometric momentum and geometric potential, etc. For a particle moving on a two-dimensional sphere or a free rotation of a spherical top, the projections of the geometric momentum p and the angular momentum L onto a certain Cartesian axis form a complete set of commuting observables as [p_{i},L_{i}]=0 (i=1,2,3). We have therefore a (p_{i},L_{i}) representation for the states on the two-dimensional spherical surface. The geometric momentum distribution of the ground states for a freely rotating rigid rotor seems within the resolution power of present momentum spectrometer and can be measured to probe the embedding effect.
In Dirac's canonical quantization theory on systems with second-class constraints, the commutators between the position, momentum, and Hamiltonian form a set of algebraic relations that are fundamental in construction of both the quantum momentum and the Hamiltonian. For a free particle on a two-dimensional sphere or a spherical top, results show that the well-known canonical momentum ${p}_{\ensuremath{\theta}}$ breaks one of the relations, while three components of the momentum expressed in the three-dimensional Cartesian system of axes as pi{p}_{i}pi​ (i=1,2,3)(i=1,2,3)(i=1,2,3) are satisfactory all around. This momentum is not only geometrically invariant but also self-adjoint, and we call it geometric momentum. The nontrivial commutators between pi{p}_{i}pi​ generate three components of the orbital angular momentum; thus the geometric momentum is fundamental to the angular one. We note that there are five different forms of the geometric momentum proposed in the current literature, but only one of them turns out to be meaningful.
Abstract The Hermitian surface momentum operator for a particle confined to a 2D curved surface spanned by orthogonal coordinates and embedded in 3D space is expressed as a symmetric expression in derivatives with respect to the surface coordinates and so is manifestly along the surface. This is an alternative form to the one reported in the literature and usually named geometric momentum, which has a term proportional to the mean curvature along the direction normal to the surface, and so “apparently” not along the surface. The symmetric form of the momentum is the sum of two symmetric Hermitian operators along the two orthogonal directions defined by the surface coordinates. The centripetal force operator for a particle on the surface of a cylinder and a sphere is calculated by taking the time derivative of the momentum and is seen to be a symmetrization of the well-known classical expressions.
For describing particles moving on the two dimensional curved surfaces, we can use either the intrinsic local coordinates or the Cartesian coordinates. The representation of the momentum operators differs from each other in these two kinds of coordinates, the former ones depend on the intrinsic geometrical quantities, but the latter case depend on a geometrical invariant, namely the mean curvature. Taking the operator-ordering problem into consideration, the kinetic operator for the former case can be expressed in a possibly unique way, while that for latter case can be expressed in two different ways.
The coherent states for a particle on a sphere are introduced. These states are labelled by points of the classical phase space, i.e. the position on the sphere and the angular momentum of a particle. As with the coherent states for a particle on a circle discussed in Kowalski et al ( 1996 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 29 4149 ), we deal with a deformation of the classical phase space related to quantum fluctuations. The expectation values of the position and the angular momentum in the coherent states are regarded as the best possible approximation of the classical phase space. The correctness of the introduced coherent states is illustrated by an example of the rotator.