Abstract The Hermitian surface momentum operator for a particle confined to a 2D curved surface spanned by orthogonal coordinates and embedded in 3D space is expressed as a symmetric expression in derivatives with respect to the surface coordinates and so is manifestly along the surface. This is an alternative form to the one reported in the literature and usually named geometric momentum, which has a term proportional to the mean curvature along the direction normal to the surface, and so “apparently” not along the surface. The symmetric form of the momentum is the sum of two symmetric Hermitian operators along the two orthogonal directions defined by the surface coordinates. The centripetal force operator for a particle on the surface of a cylinder and a sphere is calculated by taking the time derivative of the momentum and is seen to be a symmetrization of the well-known classical expressions.
Abstract The Hermitian surface momentum operator for a particle confined to a 2D curved surface spanned by orthogonal coordinates and embedded in 3D space is expressed as a symmetric expression in derivatives with respect to the surface coordinates and so is manifestly along the surface. This is an alternative form to the one reported in the literature and usually named geometric momentum, which has a term proportional to the mean curvature along the direction normal to the surface, and so “apparently” not along the surface. The symmetric form of the momentum is the sum of two symmetric Hermitian operators along the two orthogonal directions defined by the surface coordinates. The centripetal force operator for a particle on the surface of a cylinder and a sphere is calculated by taking the time derivative of the momentum and is seen to be a symmetrization of the well-known classical expressions.
For describing particles moving on the two dimensional curved surfaces, we can use either the intrinsic local coordinates or the Cartesian coordinates. The representation of the momentum operators differs from each other in these two kinds of coordinates, the former ones depend on the intrinsic geometrical quantities, but the latter case depend on a geometrical invariant, namely the mean curvature. Taking the operator-ordering problem into consideration, the kinetic operator for the former case can be expressed in a possibly unique way, while that for latter case can be expressed in two different ways.
Abstract The Hamiltonian for a spin zero particle that is confined to a 1D curve embedded in the 3D space is constructed. Confinement is achieved by starting with the particle living in a small tube surrounding the curve, and assuming an infinitely strong normal force that squeezes the thickness of the tube to zero, eventually pinning the particle to the curve. We follow the new approach that we applied to confine a particle to a surface, in that we start with an expression for the 3D momentum operators whose components along and normal to the curve directions are separately Hermitian. The kinetic energy operator expressed in terms of the momentum operator in the normal direction is then a Hermitian operator in this case. When this operator is dropped and the thickness of the tube surrounding the curve is set to zero, one automatically gets the Hermitian curve Hamiltonian that contains the geometric potential term as expected. It is demonstrated that the origin of this potential lies in the ordering or symmetrization of the original 3D momentum operators in order to render them Hermitian. The Hermitian momentum operator for the particle as it is confined to the curve is also constructed and is seen to be similar to what is known as the geometric momentum of a particle confined to a surface in that it has a term proportional to the curvature that is along the normal to the curve. The force operator of the particle on the curve is also derived, and is shown to reduce, for a curve with a constant curvature and torsion, to a -apparently- single component normal to the curve that is a symmetrization of the classical expression plus a quantum term. All the above quantities are then derived for the specific case of a particle confined to a cylindrical helix embedded in 3D space.
We derive the Schrödinger equation of a particle constrained to move on a rotating curved surface S. Using the thin-layer quantization scheme to confine the particle on S, and with a proper choice of gauge transformation for the wave function, we obtain the well-known geometric potential V g and an additive Coriolis-induced geometric potential in the co-rotational curvilinear coordinates. This novel effective potential, which is included in the surface Schrödinger equation and is coupled with the mean curvature of S, contains an imaginary part in the general case which gives rise to a non-Hermitian surface Hamiltonian. We find that the non-Hermitian term vanishes when S is a minimal surface or a revolution surface which is axially symmetric around the rolling axis.
A geometric potential VC depending on the mean and Gaussian curvatures of a surface Σ arises when confining a particle initially in a three-dimensional space Ω onto Σ when the particle Hamiltonian HΩ is taken proportional to the Laplacian L on Ω. In this work rather than assume HΩ∝L, momenta Pη Hermitian over Ω are constructed and used to derive an alternate Hamiltonian Hη. The procedure leading to VC, when performed with Hη, is shown to yield VC=0. To obtain a measure of the difference between the two approaches, numerical results are presented for a toroidal model.
In classical mechanics, a nonrelativistic particle constrained on an N − 1 curved hypersurface embedded in N flat space experiences the centripetal force only. In quantum mechanics, the situation is totally different for the presence of the geometric potential. We demonstrate that the motion of the quantum particle is ”driven” by not only the centripetal force, but also a curvature induced force proportional to the Laplacian of the mean curvature, which is fundamental in the interface physics, causing curvature driven interface evolution.
The geometric momentum was originally introduced for defining the momentum of particle constrained on a hypersurface, but it is in fact not necessarily defined on a curved surface only. If a coordinate system contains a family of hypersurfaces and a normal vector on hypersurface used as a unit vector, the geometric momentum can be defined on the family of hypersurfaces and can be used to determine a complete set of commuting observables. For instance, the spherical polar coordinate system is such a kind of coordinate, in which for a given value of radial position, the spherical surface is a hypersurface. It is well-known that any vector in the space can be decomposed into components along each axis of the spherical polar coordinates, but the geometric momentum has a different decomposition, for it requires a projection of the momentum on the hypersurface, and then needs to decompose the projection into the Cartesian coordinates of the original space where the whole spherical coordinates are defined. Explicitly, with a relation-iħ▽= p Σ + p n where-iħ▽ can be usual momentum operator in Cartesian coordinates, and p Σ is the momentum component on the hypersurface which turns out to be the geometric momentum, and p n is the momentum component along the radial direction, we have a nontrivial definition of radial momentum as p n ≡-iħ▽- p Σ. Once-iħ▽ and p Σ are measurable, p n is then indirectly measurable. The three-dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator can be described in both the Cartesian and the spherical polar coordinates, whose quantum states thus can be examined in terms of both momentum and geometric momentum distributions. The distributions of the radial momentum are explicitly given for some states. The radial momentum operator that was introduced by Dirac has clear physical significance, in contrast to widely spreading belief that it is not measurable due to its non-self-adjoint.