Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1108.3804 · Foundations of Physics

From Bargmann’s Superselection Rule to Quantum Newtonian Spacetime

H. Hernández-Coronado

Published Jul 19, 2012• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-012-9673-5

Related papers

On Galilei Invariance in Quantum Mechanics and the Bargmann Superselection Rule

Domenico Giulini

arXiv:quant-ph/9508002•Annals of Physics•Jul 1, 1996•44 citations

Unstable particles in non-relativistic quantum mechanics?

H. Hernandez-Coronado, Luis Arturo Ureña-López, Hugo Aurelio Morales-Técotl +3 more

The Schroedinger equation is up-to-a-phase invariant under the Galilei group. This phase leads to the Bargmann's superselection rule, which forbids the existence of the superposition of states with different masses and implies that unstable particles cannot be described consistently in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper we claim that Bargmann's rule neglects physical effects and that a proper description of non-relativistic quantum mechanics requires to take into account this phase through the Extended Galilei group and the definition of its action on spacetime coordinates.

arXiv:1106.3757•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Quantum theory and spacetime

Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, Thomas Görnitz, Holger Lyre

Springer eBooks•Jan 12, 2007•5 citations

On Galilei invariance in quantum mechanics and the Bargmann superselection rule

Giulini, D

We reinvestigate Bargmann's superselection rule for the overall mass of n particles in ordinary quantum mechanics with Galilei invariant interaction potential. We point out that in order for mass to define a superselection rule it should be considered as a dynamical variable. We present a minimal extension of the original dynamics in which mass it treated as dynamical variable. Here the classical symmetry group turns out to be given by an \\reals-extension of the Galilei group which formerly appeared only at the quantum level. There is now no obstruction to implement an action of the classical symmetry group on Hilbert space. We include some critical comments of a general nature on formal derivations of superselection rules without dynamical context.

•Aug 2, 1995•29 citations

Puzzling out the mass-superselection rule

Magdalena Zych, Daniel M. Greenberger

Mass-superselection rule (MSR) states that in the non-relativistic quantum theory superpositions of states with different masses are unphysical. While MSR features even in textbooks, its validity, physical content and consequences remain debated. Its original derivation is known to be inconsistent, while a consistent approach does not yield a superselection rule. Yet, superpositions of masses do not seem to be present in Newtonian physics. Here we offer a resolution of the MSR puzzle. Crucial for the result is the understanding of two issues: how the notion of a mass parameter arises from the fundamentally dynamical relativistic notion of mass-energy, and what is the correct Newtonian limit of relativistic dynamics of composite particles. The result explains the physical content of the MSR without invoking any non-standard physics and clarifies the relation between MSR and a formalism describing relativistic composite particles, developed for studying relativistic effects in table top experiments.

arXiv:1906.03725•Jun 9, 2019•0 citations

The spacetime approach to quantum mechanics

James B. Hartle

arXiv:gr-qc/9210004•Vistas in Astronomy•Jan 1, 1993•43 citations
The Schroedinger equation is up-to-a-phase invariant under the Galilei group. This phase leads to the Bargmann's superselection rule, which forbids the existence of the superposition of states with different masses and implies that unstable particles cannot be described consistently in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper we claim that Bargmann's rule neglects physical effects and that a proper description of non-relativistic quantum mechanics requires to take into account this phase through the Extended Galilei group and the definition of its action on spacetime coordinates.
We reinvestigate Bargmann's superselection rule for the overall mass of n particles in ordinary quantum mechanics with Galilei invariant interaction potential. We point out that in order for mass to define a superselection rule it should be considered as a dynamical variable. We present a minimal extension of the original dynamics in which mass it treated as dynamical variable. Here the classical symmetry group turns out to be given by an \\reals-extension of the Galilei group which formerly appeared only at the quantum level. There is now no obstruction to implement an action of the classical symmetry group on Hilbert space. We include some critical comments of a general nature on formal derivations of superselection rules without dynamical context.
Mass-superselection rule (MSR) states that in the non-relativistic quantum theory superpositions of states with different masses are unphysical. While MSR features even in textbooks, its validity, physical content and consequences remain debated. Its original derivation is known to be inconsistent, while a consistent approach does not yield a superselection rule. Yet, superpositions of masses do not seem to be present in Newtonian physics. Here we offer a resolution of the MSR puzzle. Crucial for the result is the understanding of two issues: how the notion of a mass parameter arises from the fundamentally dynamical relativistic notion of mass-energy, and what is the correct Newtonian limit of relativistic dynamics of composite particles. The result explains the physical content of the MSR without invoking any non-standard physics and clarifies the relation between MSR and a formalism describing relativistic composite particles, developed for studying relativistic effects in table top experiments.