Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

On Galilei invariance in quantum mechanics and the Bargmann superselection rule

Giulini, D

Published Aug 2, 1995• 29 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We reinvestigate Bargmann's superselection rule for the overall mass of n particles in ordinary quantum mechanics with Galilei invariant interaction potential. We point out that in order for mass to define a superselection rule it should be considered as a dynamical variable. We present a minimal extension of the original dynamics in which mass it treated as dynamical variable. Here the classical symmetry group turns out to be given by an \\reals-extension of the Galilei group which formerly appeared only at the quantum level. There is now no obstruction to implement an action of the classical symmetry group on Hilbert space. We include some critical comments of a general nature on formal derivations of superselection rules without dynamical context.

Related papers

Unstable particles in non-relativistic quantum mechanics?

H. Hernandez-Coronado, Luis Arturo Ureña-López, Hugo Aurelio Morales-Técotl +3 more

The Schroedinger equation is up-to-a-phase invariant under the Galilei group. This phase leads to the Bargmann's superselection rule, which forbids the existence of the superposition of states with different masses and implies that unstable particles cannot be described consistently in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper we claim that Bargmann's rule neglects physical effects and that a proper description of non-relativistic quantum mechanics requires to take into account this phase through the Extended Galilei group and the definition of its action on spacetime coordinates.

arXiv:1106.3757•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

States, Symmetries and Superselection

Domenico Giulini

The process of dynamical decoherence may cause apparent superselection rules, which are sometimes called `environmentally induced' or `soft'. A natural question is whether such dynamical processes are eventually also responsible for at least some of the superselection rules which are usually presented as fundamentally rooted in the kinematical structure of the theory (so called `hard' superselection rules). With this question in mind, I re-investigate two well known examples where superselection rules are usually argued to rigorously exist within the given mathematical framework. These are (1) the Bargmann superselection rule for the total mass in Galilei invariant quantum mechanics and (2) the charge superselection rule in quantum electrodynamics. I argue that, for various reasons, the kinematical arguments usually given are not physically convincing unless they are based on an underlying dynamical process.

arXiv:quant-ph/9906108•Jun 28, 1999•3 citations

Galilei Group and Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics

Jean-Marc Lévy-Leblond

This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up-to-a-factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero-mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero-mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two-particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1963•241 citations

Galilean quantum kinematics

Jorge Krause

The Galilean symmetry of a free particle in one-dimensional space is examined under the scope of non-Abelian quantum kinematics. Within the Hilbert space that carries the regular ray representation of the Galilei group the Schrödinger operator appears as one of the three fundamental invariants of the extended kinematic algebra. By means of a superselection rule the physical Hilbert subspaces of the system are identified, in which a complementary ray representation of the Galilean transformation produces the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, and the Feynman space-time propagator. The quantization approach used in this paper is purely group theoretic and relativistic.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1988•12 citations

Puzzling out the mass-superselection rule

Magdalena Zych, Daniel M. Greenberger

Mass-superselection rule (MSR) states that in the non-relativistic quantum theory superpositions of states with different masses are unphysical. While MSR features even in textbooks, its validity, physical content and consequences remain debated. Its original derivation is known to be inconsistent, while a consistent approach does not yield a superselection rule. Yet, superpositions of masses do not seem to be present in Newtonian physics. Here we offer a resolution of the MSR puzzle. Crucial for the result is the understanding of two issues: how the notion of a mass parameter arises from the fundamentally dynamical relativistic notion of mass-energy, and what is the correct Newtonian limit of relativistic dynamics of composite particles. The result explains the physical content of the MSR without invoking any non-standard physics and clarifies the relation between MSR and a formalism describing relativistic composite particles, developed for studying relativistic effects in table top experiments.

arXiv:1906.03725•Jun 9, 2019•0 citations

REPRESENTATION OF SYMMETRY TRANSFORMATIONS IN QUANTUM MECHANICS

U. Uhlhorn

A generalization of Wigner's representation theorem is presented that may be applied when superselection rules (of a specified character) must be taken into account. At the same time some gaps in existing proofs of Wigner's theorem are eliminated. The connection between Wigner,s theorem and the so called fundamental theorem of projective geometry is pointed out, and a new, short proof of the latter theorem (valid for an arbitrary field of numbers) is presented. The equivalent possibilities of characterizing symmetry transformations as mappings leaving invariant the logical structure of quantum mechanics, as isometric linear or conjugated linear transformations connecting two complex Hilbert spaces, or as mappings leaving invariant the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics (or equivalently the structure of the equations of motion) are discussed and lead to an invariant (coordinate free) characterization of reversal of the direction of motion (time inversion). An analogue of Wigner's theorem for symmetry transformations in the recently discussed quaternion quantum mechanics is proved in an appendix, and it is pointed out how quaternion quantum mechanics, as well as ordinary complex quantum mechanics, may be consistently represented in the framework of real quantum mechanics, which in this sense appears as a super theory. The symmetry transformationsmore » of classical mechanics are discussed in relation to their quantum mechanical analogues in another appendix. They are intimately connected with the canonical formalism. (auth)« less

Arkiv Fysik•Jan 1, 1963•155 citations
We reinvestigate Bargmann's superselection rule for the overall mass of n particles in ordinary quantum mechanics with Galilei invariant interaction potential. We point out that in order for mass to define a superselection rule it should be considered as a dynamical variable. We present a minimal extension of the original dynamics in which mass it treated as dynamical variable. Here the classical symmetry group turns out to be given by an \reals-extension of the Galilei group which formerly appeared only at the quantum level. There is now no obstruction to implement an action of the classical symmetry group on Hilbert space. We include some critical comments of a general nature on formal derivations of superselection rules without dynamical context.
The Schroedinger equation is up-to-a-phase invariant under the Galilei group. This phase leads to the Bargmann's superselection rule, which forbids the existence of the superposition of states with different masses and implies that unstable particles cannot be described consistently in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper we claim that Bargmann's rule neglects physical effects and that a proper description of non-relativistic quantum mechanics requires to take into account this phase through the Extended Galilei group and the definition of its action on spacetime coordinates.
The process of dynamical decoherence may cause apparent superselection rules, which are sometimes called `environmentally induced' or `soft'. A natural question is whether such dynamical processes are eventually also responsible for at least some of the superselection rules which are usually presented as fundamentally rooted in the kinematical structure of the theory (so called `hard' superselection rules). With this question in mind, I re-investigate two well known examples where superselection rules are usually argued to rigorously exist within the given mathematical framework. These are (1) the Bargmann superselection rule for the total mass in Galilei invariant quantum mechanics and (2) the charge superselection rule in quantum electrodynamics. I argue that, for various reasons, the kinematical arguments usually given are not physically convincing unless they are based on an underlying dynamical process.
This paper is devoted to the study of the Galilei group and its representations. The Galilei group presents a certain number of essential differences with respect to the Poincaré group. As Bargmann showed, its physical representations, here explicitly constructed, are not true representations but only up-to-a-factor ones. Consequently, in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, the mass has a very special role, and in fact, gives rise to a superselection rule which prevents the existence of unstable particles. The internal energy of a nonrelativistic system is known to be an arbitrary parameter; this is shown to come also from Galilean invariance, because of a nontrivial concept of equivalence between physical representations. On the contrary, the behavior of an elementary system with respect to rotations, is very similar to the relativistic case. We show here, in particular, how the number of polarization states reduces to two for the zero-mass case (though in fact there are no physical zero-mass systems in nonrelativistic mechanics). Finally, we study the two-particle system, where the orbital angular momenta quite naturally introduce themselves through the decomposition of the tensor product of two physical representations.
The Galilean symmetry of a free particle in one-dimensional space is examined under the scope of non-Abelian quantum kinematics. Within the Hilbert space that carries the regular ray representation of the Galilei group the Schrödinger operator appears as one of the three fundamental invariants of the extended kinematic algebra. By means of a superselection rule the physical Hilbert subspaces of the system are identified, in which a complementary ray representation of the Galilean transformation produces the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, and the Feynman space-time propagator. The quantization approach used in this paper is purely group theoretic and relativistic.
Mass-superselection rule (MSR) states that in the non-relativistic quantum theory superpositions of states with different masses are unphysical. While MSR features even in textbooks, its validity, physical content and consequences remain debated. Its original derivation is known to be inconsistent, while a consistent approach does not yield a superselection rule. Yet, superpositions of masses do not seem to be present in Newtonian physics. Here we offer a resolution of the MSR puzzle. Crucial for the result is the understanding of two issues: how the notion of a mass parameter arises from the fundamentally dynamical relativistic notion of mass-energy, and what is the correct Newtonian limit of relativistic dynamics of composite particles. The result explains the physical content of the MSR without invoking any non-standard physics and clarifies the relation between MSR and a formalism describing relativistic composite particles, developed for studying relativistic effects in table top experiments.
A generalization of Wigner's representation theorem is presented that may be applied when superselection rules (of a specified character) must be taken into account. At the same time some gaps in existing proofs of Wigner's theorem are eliminated. The connection between Wigner,s theorem and the so called fundamental theorem of projective geometry is pointed out, and a new, short proof of the latter theorem (valid for an arbitrary field of numbers) is presented. The equivalent possibilities of characterizing symmetry transformations as mappings leaving invariant the logical structure of quantum mechanics, as isometric linear or conjugated linear transformations connecting two complex Hilbert spaces, or as mappings leaving invariant the algebraic structure of quantum mechanics (or equivalently the structure of the equations of motion) are discussed and lead to an invariant (coordinate free) characterization of reversal of the direction of motion (time inversion). An analogue of Wigner's theorem for symmetry transformations in the recently discussed quaternion quantum mechanics is proved in an appendix, and it is pointed out how quaternion quantum mechanics, as well as ordinary complex quantum mechanics, may be consistently represented in the framework of real quantum mechanics, which in this sense appears as a super theory. The symmetry transformationsmore » of classical mechanics are discussed in relation to their quantum mechanical analogues in another appendix. They are intimately connected with the canonical formalism. (auth)« less