© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

Terms Privacy Legal Notice

arXiv:1906.03725

Puzzling out the mass-superselection rule

Magdalena Zych, Daniel M. Greenberger

Published Jun 9, 2019• 0 citations

Abstract

Mass-superselection rule (MSR) states that in the non-relativistic quantum theory superpositions of states with different masses are unphysical. While MSR features even in textbooks, its validity, physical content and consequences remain debated. Its original derivation is known to be inconsistent, while a consistent approach does not yield a superselection rule. Yet, superpositions of masses do not seem to be present in Newtonian physics. Here we offer a resolution of the MSR puzzle. Crucial for the result is the understanding of two issues: how the notion of a mass parameter arises from the fundamentally dynamical relativistic notion of mass-energy, and what is the correct Newtonian limit of relativistic dynamics of composite particles. The result explains the physical content of the MSR without invoking any non-standard physics and clarifies the relation between MSR and a formalism describing relativistic composite particles, developed for studying relativistic effects in table top experiments.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1906.03725

Related papers

Limitations on the superposition principle: superselection rules in non-relativistic quantum mechanics

C. Cisneros, R. P. Martı́nez-y-Romero, H. N. Núñez‐Yépez +1 more

The superposition principle is a very basic ingredient of quantum theory. What may come as a surprise to many students, and even to many practitioners of the quantum craft, is tha superposition has limitations imposed by certain requirements of the theory. The discussion of such limitations arising from the so-called superselection rules is the main purpose of this paper. Some of their principal consequences are also discussed. The univalence, mass and particle number superselection rules of non-relativistic quantum mechanics are also derived using rather simple methods.

arXiv:quant-ph/9809059•European Journal of Physics•May 1, 1998•25 citations

Unstable particles in non-relativistic quantum mechanics?

H. Hernandez-Coronado, Luis Arturo Ureña-López, Hugo Aurelio Morales-Técotl +3 more

The Schroedinger equation is up-to-a-phase invariant under the Galilei group. This phase leads to the Bargmann's superselection rule, which forbids the existence of the superposition of states with different masses and implies that unstable particles cannot be described consistently in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper we claim that Bargmann's rule neglects physical effects and that a proper description of non-relativistic quantum mechanics requires to take into account this phase through the Extended Galilei group and the definition of its action on spacetime coordinates.

arXiv:1106.3757•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

On Galilei invariance in quantum mechanics and the Bargmann superselection rule

Giulini, D

We reinvestigate Bargmann's superselection rule for the overall mass of n particles in ordinary quantum mechanics with Galilei invariant interaction potential. We point out that in order for mass to define a superselection rule it should be considered as a dynamical variable. We present a minimal extension of the original dynamics in which mass it treated as dynamical variable. Here the classical symmetry group turns out to be given by an \\reals-extension of the Galilei group which formerly appeared only at the quantum level. There is now no obstruction to implement an action of the classical symmetry group on Hilbert space. We include some critical comments of a general nature on formal derivations of superselection rules without dynamical context.

•Aug 2, 1995•29 citations

States, Symmetries and Superselection

Domenico Giulini

The process of dynamical decoherence may cause apparent superselection rules, which are sometimes called `environmentally induced' or `soft'. A natural question is whether such dynamical processes are eventually also responsible for at least some of the superselection rules which are usually presented as fundamentally rooted in the kinematical structure of the theory (so called `hard' superselection rules). With this question in mind, I re-investigate two well known examples where superselection rules are usually argued to rigorously exist within the given mathematical framework. These are (1) the Bargmann superselection rule for the total mass in Galilei invariant quantum mechanics and (2) the charge superselection rule in quantum electrodynamics. I argue that, for various reasons, the kinematical arguments usually given are not physically convincing unless they are based on an underlying dynamical process.

arXiv:quant-ph/9906108•Jun 28, 1999•3 citations

Post-Newtonian Constraints on Semiclassical Gravity with Quantum Superpositions

Hollis Williams

Semiclassical gravity, in which a classical spacetime is sourced by the quantum expectation value of the stress-energy tensor, is a standard framework for describing the gravitational interaction of quantum matter. In the nonrelativistic limit this approach leads to the Schrödinger-Newton equation, which is often assumed to be consistent at least in the weak-field regime. In this work, we reexamine this assumption for spatial quantum superpositions of massive particles. We show that, when the quantum state is properly normalized, no modification of the Newtonian gravitational potential arises at leading order. However, at first post-Newtonian order the semiclassical coupling generically produces state-dependent contributions involving the mass density and the mass current of the superposition. These terms have a parametric scaling which is different from that of the corresponding relativistic corrections and which does not have Planck mass suppression. Our results therefore impose a strong post-Newtonian consistency constraint on deterministic semiclassical gravity, indicating that sourcing the metric solely by expectation values is insufficient to recover a consistent relativistic weak-field expansion.

gr-qcCross-listedarXiv:2512.18617•Dec 23, 2025

Comment on ‘Limitations on the superposition principle: superselection rules in non-relativistic quantum mechanics’

Namit Anand

This is a comment to the paper, Limitations on the superposition principle: superselection rules in non-relativistic quantum mechanics by C Cisneros et al 1998 Eur. J. Phys. 19 237. doi:10.1088/0143-0807/19/3/005. The proof that the authors construct for the limitation on the superposition of state vectors corresponding to different sectors of the Hilbert space, partitioned by a superoperator has a flaw as outlined below.

arXiv:1507.00544•European Journal of Physics•Jun 15, 2016•0 citations

Mass-superselection rule (MSR) states that in the non-relativistic quantum theory superpositions of states with different masses are unphysical. While MSR features even in textbooks, its validity, physical content and consequences remain debated. Its original derivation is known to be inconsistent, while a consistent approach does not yield a superselection rule. Yet, superpositions of masses do not seem to be present in Newtonian physics. Here we offer a resolution of the MSR puzzle. Crucial for the result is the understanding of two issues: how the notion of a mass parameter arises from the fundamentally dynamical relativistic notion of mass-energy, and what is the correct Newtonian limit of relativistic dynamics of composite particles. The result explains the physical content of the MSR without invoking any non-standard physics and clarifies the relation between MSR and a formalism describing relativistic composite particles, developed for studying relativistic effects in table top experiments.

The superposition principle is a very basic ingredient of quantum theory. What may come as a surprise to many students, and even to many practitioners of the quantum craft, is tha superposition has limitations imposed by certain requirements of the theory. The discussion of such limitations arising from the so-called superselection rules is the main purpose of this paper. Some of their principal consequences are also discussed. The univalence, mass and particle number superselection rules of non-relativistic quantum mechanics are also derived using rather simple methods.

The Schroedinger equation is up-to-a-phase invariant under the Galilei group. This phase leads to the Bargmann's superselection rule, which forbids the existence of the superposition of states with different masses and implies that unstable particles cannot be described consistently in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. In this paper we claim that Bargmann's rule neglects physical effects and that a proper description of non-relativistic quantum mechanics requires to take into account this phase through the Extended Galilei group and the definition of its action on spacetime coordinates.

We reinvestigate Bargmann's superselection rule for the overall mass of n particles in ordinary quantum mechanics with Galilei invariant interaction potential. We point out that in order for mass to define a superselection rule it should be considered as a dynamical variable. We present a minimal extension of the original dynamics in which mass it treated as dynamical variable. Here the classical symmetry group turns out to be given by an \\reals-extension of the Galilei group which formerly appeared only at the quantum level. There is now no obstruction to implement an action of the classical symmetry group on Hilbert space. We include some critical comments of a general nature on formal derivations of superselection rules without dynamical context.

The process of dynamical decoherence may cause apparent superselection rules, which are sometimes called `environmentally induced' or `soft'. A natural question is whether such dynamical processes are eventually also responsible for at least some of the superselection rules which are usually presented as fundamentally rooted in the kinematical structure of the theory (so called `hard' superselection rules). With this question in mind, I re-investigate two well known examples where superselection rules are usually argued to rigorously exist within the given mathematical framework. These are (1) the Bargmann superselection rule for the total mass in Galilei invariant quantum mechanics and (2) the charge superselection rule in quantum electrodynamics. I argue that, for various reasons, the kinematical arguments usually given are not physically convincing unless they are based on an underlying dynamical process.

Semiclassical gravity, in which a classical spacetime is sourced by the quantum expectation value of the stress-energy tensor, is a standard framework for describing the gravitational interaction of quantum matter. In the nonrelativistic limit this approach leads to the Schrödinger-Newton equation, which is often assumed to be consistent at least in the weak-field regime. In this work, we reexamine this assumption for spatial quantum superpositions of massive particles. We show that, when the quantum state is properly normalized, no modification of the Newtonian gravitational potential arises at leading order. However, at first post-Newtonian order the semiclassical coupling generically produces state-dependent contributions involving the mass density and the mass current of the superposition. These terms have a parametric scaling which is different from that of the corresponding relativistic corrections and which does not have Planck mass suppression. Our results therefore impose a strong post-Newtonian consistency constraint on deterministic semiclassical gravity, indicating that sourcing the metric solely by expectation values is insufficient to recover a consistent relativistic weak-field expansion.