Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantum theory and spacetime

Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker, Thomas Görnitz, Holger Lyre

Published Jan 12, 2007• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/1-4020-5235-9_4

Related papers

Emergence of Quantum Theory and Minkowski Spacetime

Si-xue Qin

The state-of-the-art physics consists of two irreconcilable branches, i.e., the quantum theory and the general relativity, which work well in their own territories, independently. However, what are quantum and spacetime after all? The key question was never addressed, satisfactorily. In this work, we describe a possibility to reformulate the quantum theory in the Minkowski spacetime from the viewpoint of classic physics in the Euclidean spacetime, i.e., classic mechanics and stochastic process theory. We show that quantum theory and Minkowski spacetime may connect with each other and emerge from a single fundamental entity.

arXiv:2205.05829•May 12, 2022•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics and the Nature of Spacetime

The frontiers collection•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Spacetime and the Nature of Quantum Objects

Vesselin Petkov

The frontiers collection•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

The empirical laws for Majorana fields in a curved spacetime

Hideyasu Yamashita

This article is a sequel to our previous paper (arXiv:2511.12311), where we considered the conceptual problem on the empirical laws for the Klein\textendash Gordon quantum field theory in curved spacetime (QFTCS), and we will consider the similar problems for the Majorana field on curved spacetime here. A ``law'' in theoretical physics is said to be observable or empirical only if it can be verified/falsified by some experimental procedure. The notion of empiricality/observability becomes far more unclear in QFTCS, than in QFT in Minkowski (flat) spacetime (QFTM), mainly because QFTCS lacks the notion of vacuum. This could potentially undermine the status of QFTCS as a physical (not only mathematical) theory. We consider this problem for the Majorana field in curved spacetime, and examine some examples of the empirical laws.

gr-qcCross-listedarXiv:2602.16907•Feb 20, 2026

The Dynamics of Quantum Gravity: The Missing Piece in the Spacetime Emergentist Account

Álvaro Mozota Frauca

Quantum gravity suggests that spacetime may not be fundamental, and it has been argued that we can understand a theory without a fundamental spacetime if we are able to claim that spacetime 'emerges' from some non-spatiotemporal entities. In this sense, strategies like functionalism have been deployed to claim that this emergence is possible and plausible, both in principle and in practice for current approaches to quantum gravity. In this article I argue that this analysis is incomplete, as it tends to overlook the way the dynamics of these theories is 'quantum' in a way that differs from standard quantum theory. The challenge for the emergentist (and for the quantum gravity theorist) is to give an interpretation not only to the kinematical and classical aspects of these theories, but to the dynamical and quantum ones, and to show how the spacetime roles can be fulfilled, if possible at all. Therefore, I argue that some current approaches to quantum gravity seem to fail to provide meaningful theories, that spacetime functionalism is of no help, and that the position of the spacetime emergentists is weakened, as they lack any example of a successful reduction of spacetime to some truly quantum non-spatiotemporal stuff.

arXiv:2606.31559•Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A•Jun 30, 2026•0 citations

and Quantum Spacetime in Physics

Giovanni Amelino-camelia A, Robert Brandenberger, Chong‐Sun Chu +9 more

•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations
The state-of-the-art physics consists of two irreconcilable branches, i.e., the quantum theory and the general relativity, which work well in their own territories, independently. However, what are quantum and spacetime after all? The key question was never addressed, satisfactorily. In this work, we describe a possibility to reformulate the quantum theory in the Minkowski spacetime from the viewpoint of classic physics in the Euclidean spacetime, i.e., classic mechanics and stochastic process theory. We show that quantum theory and Minkowski spacetime may connect with each other and emerge from a single fundamental entity.
This article is a sequel to our previous paper (arXiv:2511.12311), where we considered the conceptual problem on the empirical laws for the Klein\textendash Gordon quantum field theory in curved spacetime (QFTCS), and we will consider the similar problems for the Majorana field on curved spacetime here. A ``law'' in theoretical physics is said to be observable or empirical only if it can be verified/falsified by some experimental procedure. The notion of empiricality/observability becomes far more unclear in QFTCS, than in QFT in Minkowski (flat) spacetime (QFTM), mainly because QFTCS lacks the notion of vacuum. This could potentially undermine the status of QFTCS as a physical (not only mathematical) theory. We consider this problem for the Majorana field in curved spacetime, and examine some examples of the empirical laws.
Quantum gravity suggests that spacetime may not be fundamental, and it has been argued that we can understand a theory without a fundamental spacetime if we are able to claim that spacetime 'emerges' from some non-spatiotemporal entities. In this sense, strategies like functionalism have been deployed to claim that this emergence is possible and plausible, both in principle and in practice for current approaches to quantum gravity. In this article I argue that this analysis is incomplete, as it tends to overlook the way the dynamics of these theories is 'quantum' in a way that differs from standard quantum theory. The challenge for the emergentist (and for the quantum gravity theorist) is to give an interpretation not only to the kinematical and classical aspects of these theories, but to the dynamical and quantum ones, and to show how the spacetime roles can be fulfilled, if possible at all. Therefore, I argue that some current approaches to quantum gravity seem to fail to provide meaningful theories, that spacetime functionalism is of no help, and that the position of the spacetime emergentists is weakened, as they lack any example of a successful reduction of spacetime to some truly quantum non-spatiotemporal stuff.