Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1106.5873

Gate Fidelities, Quantum Broadcasting, and Assessing Experimental Realization

Hyang‐Tag Lim, Young-Sik Ra, Yong‐Su Kim, Yoon-Ho Kim, Joonwoo Bae

Published Jun 29, 2011• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We relate gate fidelities of experimentally realized quantum operations to the broadcasting property of their ideal operations, and show that the more parties a given quantum operation can broadcast to, the higher gate fidelities of its experimental realization are in general. This is shown by establishing the correspondence between two operational quantities, quantum state shareability and quantum broadcasting. This suggests that, to assess an experimental realization using gate fidelities, the worst case of realization such as noisy operations should be taken into account and then compared to obtained gate fidelities. In addition, based on the correspondence, we also translate results in quantum state shareability to their counterparts in quantum operations.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1106.5873

Related papers

Efficient assessment of process fidelity

Sean Greenaway, Frédéric Sauvage, Kiran E. Khosla +1 more

The accurate implementation of quantum gates is essential for the realization of quantum algorithms and digital quantum simulations. This accuracy may be increased on noisy hardware through the variational optimization of gates, however the experimental realization of such a protocol is impeded by the large effort required to estimate the fidelity of an implemented gate. With a hierarchy of approximations we find a faithful approximation to the quantum process fidelity that can be estimated experimentally with reduced effort. Its practical use is demonstrated with the optimization of a three-qubit quantum gate on a commercially available quantum processor.

arXiv:2102.08101•Physical Review Research•Jul 7, 2021•15 citations

Sharpening Worst-Case Error Assessment for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing: Fidelity and Its Deviation

Kyoungho Cho, Ilkwon Sohn, Yongsoo Hwang +1 more

Gate fidelity -- an average fidelity over all possible input states -- is the workhorse metric for benchmarking quantum gates or circuits, yet fault-tolerant quantum computing ultimately depends on the worst-case behavior, typically quantifiable by so-called the diamond distance. In the low-error regime, the coherent errors can inflate the worst-case error even when the reported gate fidelity is high, making the gate fidelity alone an unreliable proxy for fault-tolerance readiness. To capture the missing information, we introduce a companion observable -- what we dub the fidelity deviation -- that quantifies how strongly the state-dependent fidelities fluctuate across input states. Adopting such fluctuations in assessing the fault-tolerance is physically natural because some input directions are nearly unaffected while others form narrow "valleys" that dominate adversarial circuit behavior. For coherent (unitary) gate errors on two or more qubits, we show that the gate fidelity together with the fidelity deviation constrains the relevant spectral moments of the error unitary, enabling an explicit and tight certificate of the worst-case error. Both quantities are estimated directly from the same randomized input-measurement experiment, without full process tomography. We show that the fidelity and its deviation can provide an economical, operationally meaningful, and accurate standard for assessing the fault tolerance of the engineered quantum gates and circuits.

quant-pharXiv:2603.07495•Mar 10, 2026•0 citations

Complementary Classical Fidelities as an Efficient Criterion for the Evaluation of Experimentally Realized Quantum Operations

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

It is shown that a good estimate of the fidelity of an experimentally realized quantum process can be obtained by measuring the outputs for only two complementary sets of input states. The number of measurements required to test a quantum network operation is therefore only twice as high as the number of measurements required to test a corresponding classical system.

arXiv:quant-ph/0409083•Physical Review Letters•Apr 29, 2005•98 citations

Efficient tests for experimental quantum gates

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Realistic quantum gates operate at non-vanishing noise levels. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the performance of each device according to some experimentally observable criteria of device performance. In this presentation, the characteristic properties of quantum operations are discussed and efficient measurement strategies are proposed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0411011•Nov 2, 2004•0 citations

Dispensing of quantum information beyond no-broadcasting theorem—is it possible to broadcast anything genuinely quantum?

Teiko Heinosaari, Anna Jenčová, Martin Plávala

Abstract No-broadcasting theorem is one of the most fundamental results in quantum information theory; it guarantees that the simplest attacks on any quantum protocol, based on eavesdropping and copying of quantum information, are impossible. Due to the fundamental importance of the no-broadcasting theorem, it is essential to understand the exact boundaries of this limitation. We generalize the standard definition of broadcasting by restricting the set of states which we want to broadcast and restricting the sets of measurements which we use to test the broadcasting. We show that in some of the investigated cases broadcasting is equivalent to commutativity, while in other cases commutativity is not necessary.

arXiv:2208.10341•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Feb 15, 2023•4 citations

Bounding the average gate fidelity of composite channels using the unitarity

Arnaud Carignan-Dugas, Joel J. Wallman, Joseph Emerson

Abstract There is currently a significant need for robust and efficient methods for characterizing quantum devices. While there has been significant progress in this direction, there remains a crucial need to precisely determine the strength and type of errors on individual gate operations, in order to assess and improve control as well as reliably bound the total error in a quantum circuit given some partial information about the errors on the components. In this work, we first provide an optimal bound on the total fidelity of a circuit in terms of component fidelities, which can be efficiently experimentally estimated via randomized benchmarking (RB). We then derive a tighter bound that applies under additional information about the coherence of the error, namely, the unitarity, which can also be estimated via a related experimental protocol. This improved bound smoothly interpolates between the worst-case quadratic and best-case linear scaling for composite error channels. As an application we show how our analysis substantially improves the achievable precision on estimates of the infidelities of individual gates under interleaved RB, enabling greater precision for current experimental methods to assess and tune-up control over quantum gate operations.

arXiv:1610.05296•New Journal of Physics•Apr 10, 2019•44 citations
We relate gate fidelities of experimentally realized quantum operations to the broadcasting property of their ideal operations, and show that the more parties a given quantum operation can broadcast to, the higher gate fidelities of its experimental realization are in general. This is shown by establishing the correspondence between two operational quantities, quantum state shareability and quantum broadcasting. This suggests that, to assess an experimental realization using gate fidelities, the worst case of realization such as noisy operations should be taken into account and then compared to obtained gate fidelities. In addition, based on the correspondence, we also translate results in quantum state shareability to their counterparts in quantum operations.
The accurate implementation of quantum gates is essential for the realization of quantum algorithms and digital quantum simulations. This accuracy may be increased on noisy hardware through the variational optimization of gates, however the experimental realization of such a protocol is impeded by the large effort required to estimate the fidelity of an implemented gate. With a hierarchy of approximations we find a faithful approximation to the quantum process fidelity that can be estimated experimentally with reduced effort. Its practical use is demonstrated with the optimization of a three-qubit quantum gate on a commercially available quantum processor.
Gate fidelity -- an average fidelity over all possible input states -- is the workhorse metric for benchmarking quantum gates or circuits, yet fault-tolerant quantum computing ultimately depends on the worst-case behavior, typically quantifiable by so-called the diamond distance. In the low-error regime, the coherent errors can inflate the worst-case error even when the reported gate fidelity is high, making the gate fidelity alone an unreliable proxy for fault-tolerance readiness. To capture the missing information, we introduce a companion observable -- what we dub the fidelity deviation -- that quantifies how strongly the state-dependent fidelities fluctuate across input states. Adopting such fluctuations in assessing the fault-tolerance is physically natural because some input directions are nearly unaffected while others form narrow "valleys" that dominate adversarial circuit behavior. For coherent (unitary) gate errors on two or more qubits, we show that the gate fidelity together with the fidelity deviation constrains the relevant spectral moments of the error unitary, enabling an explicit and tight certificate of the worst-case error. Both quantities are estimated directly from the same randomized input-measurement experiment, without full process tomography. We show that the fidelity and its deviation can provide an economical, operationally meaningful, and accurate standard for assessing the fault tolerance of the engineered quantum gates and circuits.
Abstract No-broadcasting theorem is one of the most fundamental results in quantum information theory; it guarantees that the simplest attacks on any quantum protocol, based on eavesdropping and copying of quantum information, are impossible. Due to the fundamental importance of the no-broadcasting theorem, it is essential to understand the exact boundaries of this limitation. We generalize the standard definition of broadcasting by restricting the set of states which we want to broadcast and restricting the sets of measurements which we use to test the broadcasting. We show that in some of the investigated cases broadcasting is equivalent to commutativity, while in other cases commutativity is not necessary.
Abstract There is currently a significant need for robust and efficient methods for characterizing quantum devices. While there has been significant progress in this direction, there remains a crucial need to precisely determine the strength and type of errors on individual gate operations, in order to assess and improve control as well as reliably bound the total error in a quantum circuit given some partial information about the errors on the components. In this work, we first provide an optimal bound on the total fidelity of a circuit in terms of component fidelities, which can be efficiently experimentally estimated via randomized benchmarking (RB). We then derive a tighter bound that applies under additional information about the coherence of the error, namely, the unitarity, which can also be estimated via a related experimental protocol. This improved bound smoothly interpolates between the worst-case quadratic and best-case linear scaling for composite error channels. As an application we show how our analysis substantially improves the achievable precision on estimates of the infidelities of individual gates under interleaved RB, enabling greater precision for current experimental methods to assess and tune-up control over quantum gate operations.