Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9805076 · Applied Physics B

Full observation of single-atom dynamics in cavity QED

Hideo Mabuchi, J. Ye, Harry J. Kimble

Published Jun 1, 1999• 130 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s003400050751

Related papers

Dynamics of single-atom, single-photon trapping in cavity QED

T. W. Lynn, Christina J. Hood, Andrew C. Doherty +2 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Light–matter interaction in free space

Gerd Leuchs, Markus Sondermann

We review recent experimental advances in the field of efficient coupling of single atoms and light in free space. Furthermore, a comparison of efficient free space coupling and strong coupling in cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) is given. Free space coupling does not allow for observing oscillatory exchange between the light field and the atom which is the characteristic feature of strong coupling in cavity QED. Like cavity QED, free space QED does, however, offer full switching of the light field, a 180° phase shift conditional on the presence of a single atom as well as 100% absorption probability of a single photon by a single atom. Furthermore, free space cavity QED comprises the interaction with a continuum of modes.

Journal of Modern Optics•Sep 1, 2012•39 citations

Feedback cooling of atomic motion in cavity QED

D. Steck, Kurt A. Jacobs, Hideo Mabuchi +2 more

We consider the problem of controlling the motion of an atom trapped in an optical cavity using continuous feedback. In order to realize such a scheme experimentally, one must be able to perform state estimation of the atomic motion in real time. While in theory this estimate may be provided by a stochastic master equation describing the full dynamics of the observed system, integrating this equation in real time is impractical. Here we derive an approximate estimation equation for this purpose, and use it as a drive in a feedback algorithm designed to cool the motion of the atom. We examine the effectiveness of such a procedure using full simulations of the cavity QED system, including the quantized motion of the atom in one dimension.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509039•Physical Review A•Jul 31, 2006•54 citations

SINGLE-ATOM MOTION IN OPTICAL CAVITY QED

Gerhard Rempe, T. FISCHER, Peter Maunz +2 more

Laser Spectroscopy•Jun 1, 2002•0 citations

Quantum dynamics in spatially resolved two-atom cavity QED

Andreas Neuzner, Matthias Körber, Olivier Morin +2 more

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Jun 10, 2015•0 citations

Trapping of single atoms with single photons in cavity QED

Andrew C. Doherty, T. W. Lynn, Christina J. Hood +1 more

Two recent experiments have reported the trapping of individual atoms inside optical resonators by the mechanical forces associated with single photons [Hood et al., Science 287, 1447 (2000); Pinkse et al., Nature (London) 404, 365 (2000)]. Here we analyze the trapping dynamics in these settings, focusing on two points of interest. First, we investigate the extent to which light-induced forces in these experiments are distinct from their free-space counterparts, and whether or not there are qualitatively different effects of optical forces at the single-photon level within the setting of cavity QED. Second, we explore the quantitative features of the resulting atomic motion, and how these dynamics are mapped onto experimentally observable variations of the intracavity field. Toward these ends, we present results from extensive numerical simulations of the relevant forces and their fluctuations, as well as a detailed derivation of our numerical simulation method, based on the full quantum-mechanical master equation. Not surprisingly, qualitatively distinct atomic dynamics arise as the coupling and dissipative rates are varied. For the experiment of Hood et al., we show that atomic motion is largely conservative and is predominantly in radial orbits transverse to the cavity axis. A comparison with the free-space theory demonstrates that the fluctuations of the dipole force are suppressed by an order of magnitude. This effect is based upon the Jaynes-Cummings eigenstates of the atom-cavity system and represents distinct physics for optical forces at the single-photon level within the context of cavity QED. By contrast, even in a regime of strong coupling in the experiment of Pinkse et al., there are only small quantitative distinctions between the potentials and heating rates in the free-space theory and the quantum theory, so it is not clear that a description of this experiment as a novel single-quantum trapping effect is necessary. The atomic motion is strongly diffusive, leading to an average localization time comparable to the time for an atom to transit freely through the cavity, and to a reduction in the ability to infer aspects of the atomic motion from the intracavity photon number.

arXiv:quant-ph/0006015•Physical Review A•Nov 27, 2000•83 citations
We review recent experimental advances in the field of efficient coupling of single atoms and light in free space. Furthermore, a comparison of efficient free space coupling and strong coupling in cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) is given. Free space coupling does not allow for observing oscillatory exchange between the light field and the atom which is the characteristic feature of strong coupling in cavity QED. Like cavity QED, free space QED does, however, offer full switching of the light field, a 180° phase shift conditional on the presence of a single atom as well as 100% absorption probability of a single photon by a single atom. Furthermore, free space cavity QED comprises the interaction with a continuum of modes.
We consider the problem of controlling the motion of an atom trapped in an optical cavity using continuous feedback. In order to realize such a scheme experimentally, one must be able to perform state estimation of the atomic motion in real time. While in theory this estimate may be provided by a stochastic master equation describing the full dynamics of the observed system, integrating this equation in real time is impractical. Here we derive an approximate estimation equation for this purpose, and use it as a drive in a feedback algorithm designed to cool the motion of the atom. We examine the effectiveness of such a procedure using full simulations of the cavity QED system, including the quantized motion of the atom in one dimension.
Two recent experiments have reported the trapping of individual atoms inside optical resonators by the mechanical forces associated with single photons [Hood et al., Science 287, 1447 (2000); Pinkse et al., Nature (London) 404, 365 (2000)]. Here we analyze the trapping dynamics in these settings, focusing on two points of interest. First, we investigate the extent to which light-induced forces in these experiments are distinct from their free-space counterparts, and whether or not there are qualitatively different effects of optical forces at the single-photon level within the setting of cavity QED. Second, we explore the quantitative features of the resulting atomic motion, and how these dynamics are mapped onto experimentally observable variations of the intracavity field. Toward these ends, we present results from extensive numerical simulations of the relevant forces and their fluctuations, as well as a detailed derivation of our numerical simulation method, based on the full quantum-mechanical master equation. Not surprisingly, qualitatively distinct atomic dynamics arise as the coupling and dissipative rates are varied. For the experiment of Hood et al., we show that atomic motion is largely conservative and is predominantly in radial orbits transverse to the cavity axis. A comparison with the free-space theory demonstrates that the fluctuations of the dipole force are suppressed by an order of magnitude. This effect is based upon the Jaynes-Cummings eigenstates of the atom-cavity system and represents distinct physics for optical forces at the single-photon level within the context of cavity QED. By contrast, even in a regime of strong coupling in the experiment of Pinkse et al., there are only small quantitative distinctions between the potentials and heating rates in the free-space theory and the quantum theory, so it is not clear that a description of this experiment as a novel single-quantum trapping effect is necessary. The atomic motion is strongly diffusive, leading to an average localization time comparable to the time for an atom to transit freely through the cavity, and to a reduction in the ability to infer aspects of the atomic motion from the intracavity photon number.