Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9506014 · Reports on Mathematical Physics

Quantum mechanics with event dynamics

Ph. Blanchard, Arkadiusz Jadczyk

Published Oct 1, 1995• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/0034-4877(96)83622-6

Related papers

Quantum Event Theory

Dick J. Hoekzema

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•1 citation

Equations of quantum theory in the space of randomly joint quantum events

Alexander Alexandrovich Biryukov

The dynamics of the system in the space of random joint events is considered. The symmetric difference of events is introduced in space based on the Kolmogorov axioms. To describe quantum effects in the dynamics of the system, an additional axiom is introduced for random joint events: “the symmetric sum of random events.” In the generated space of random joint events, an equation is constructed for the probability of a system transition between two events. It is shown that for pairwise joint events it is equivalent to the equation of quantum mechanics.

EPJ Web of Conferences•Jan 1, 2019•4 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Real Events

O. Penrose

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1992•2 citations

Dynamics of Quantum Causal Structures

Esteban Castro-Ruiz, Flaminia Giacomini, Časlav Brukner

A new theoretical framework describes the dynamics of causal structures in quantum mechanics and finds that a scenario where the order of events is definite cannot transform into one where the order of events is not well defined, and vice versa, if the dynamics is continuous and reversible.

arXiv:1710.03139•Physical Review X•Mar 21, 2018•49 citations

How quantum mechanics suggests new insights in metaphysics and natural theology.

Gennaro Auletta

This paper examines complementarity, a concept introduced by Niels Bohr for interpreting quantum mechanics (QM). I will explain that QM has three basic features: the event, the correlations, and the dynamics. These features stem from the nature of quantum information, which is a general paradigm (far more general than classical information) covering the emergence of any dynamic system. It can explain the arising of classically physical systems, but also the emergence of life. If these features of QM are so general, we may ask how philosophers may perceive them. Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Sanders Peirce took this path. Dynamics can be understood as a trade-off between local events and “non-local” quantum correlations, results that were partly anticipated by Peirce and Whitehead. Moreover, according to Peirce, the reason why the three features of QM are so general is that they are imago Dei; that is, they show a Trinitarian structure. I will also briefly consider some consequences for natural theology.

Antonianum•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Event-Based Quantum Theory

Geoffrey F. Chew

Springer eBooks•Dec 3, 2005•0 citations
The dynamics of the system in the space of random joint events is considered. The symmetric difference of events is introduced in space based on the Kolmogorov axioms. To describe quantum effects in the dynamics of the system, an additional axiom is introduced for random joint events: “the symmetric sum of random events.” In the generated space of random joint events, an equation is constructed for the probability of a system transition between two events. It is shown that for pairwise joint events it is equivalent to the equation of quantum mechanics.
This paper examines complementarity, a concept introduced by Niels Bohr for interpreting quantum mechanics (QM). I will explain that QM has three basic features: the event, the correlations, and the dynamics. These features stem from the nature of quantum information, which is a general paradigm (far more general than classical information) covering the emergence of any dynamic system. It can explain the arising of classically physical systems, but also the emergence of life. If these features of QM are so general, we may ask how philosophers may perceive them. Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Sanders Peirce took this path. Dynamics can be understood as a trade-off between local events and “non-local” quantum correlations, results that were partly anticipated by Peirce and Whitehead. Moreover, according to Peirce, the reason why the three features of QM are so general is that they are imago Dei; that is, they show a Trinitarian structure. I will also briefly consider some consequences for natural theology.