Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0701058

A Matrix Factorization of Extended Hamiltonian Leads to $N$-Particle Pauli Equation

I.S. Reed, Todd A. Brun

Published Jan 11, 2007• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper the Levy-Leblond procedure for linearizing the Schrödinger equation to obtain the Pauli equation for one particle is generalized to obtain an $N$-particle equation with spin. This is achieved by using the more universal matrix factorization, $G\tilde{G} = |G| I = (-K)^l I$. Here the square matrix $G$ is linear in the total energy E and all momenta, $\tilde G$ is the matrix adjoint of $G$, $I$ is the identity matrix, $|G|$ is the determinant of $G$, $l$ is a positive integer and $K=H-E$ is Lanczos' extended Hamiltonian where $H$ is the classical Hamiltonian of the electro-mechanical system. $K$ is identically zero for all such systems, so that matrix $G$ is singular. As a consequence there always exists a vector function $\underlineθ$ with the property $G\underlineθ=0$. This factorization to obtain the matrix $G$ and vector function $\underlineθ$ is illustrated first for a one-dimensional particle in a simple potential well. This same technique, when applied to the classical nonrelativistic Hamiltonian for $N$ interacting particles in an electromagnetic field, is shown to yield for N=1 the Pauli wave equation with spin and its generalization to $N$ particles. Finally this nonrelativistic generalization of the Pauli equation is used to treat the simple Zeeman effect of a hydrogen-like atom as a two-particle problem with spin.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0701058

Related papers

The Pauli and Lévy-Leblond equations, and the spin current density

James M Wilkes

Abstract We review the literature on the Pauli equation and its current density, discussing the progression from the original phenomenological version of Pauli to its derivation by Lévy-Leblond from a linearization of the Schrödinger equation. It was established conclusively by Lévy-Leblond’s work that the spin of a spin-1/2 particle such as an electron is non-relativistic in nature, contrary to what was often stated following Dirac’s derivation of a relativistic wave equation, and his subsequent demonstration that Pauli’s spin interaction term appeared in the non-relativistic limit. In this limit, the Gordon decomposition of the associated probability current density was found to contain a spin-dependent term. Such a term does not follow, however, from the usual derivation of the current density from the Pauli equation, although various physically motivated but otherwise ad hoc explanations were put forward to account for it. We comment on the only exception to these of which we are aware implying the spin term in the current was in fact non-relativistic in nature. However, the earlier work of Lévy-Leblond had already shown, with no additional assumptions, that this term was a prominent feature of the current density derived from his equation. Hence, just as with the spin itself, the spin current was non-relativistic, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. We present a somewhat simplified derivation of the Lévy-Leblond equation and its current density, commenting on possibilities for experimental work that might indicate measurable consequences of the spin term in the current density. The presentation is at a level of quantum mechanics, electromagnetic theory, and mathematical methods typical of courses taken by first-year graduate students in physics, assuming some familiarity with Pauli spin matrices and the Dirac equation. Calculations are presented in detail, making the material suitable for use by teachers as supplementary problems for assignments, and development of theoretical concepts peculiar to the Pauli equation and its probability current density.

arXiv:1908.03276•European Journal of Physics•Feb 10, 2020•20 citations

Dirac Equation

Lukong Cornelius Fai

We re-examine the square of the Hamiltonian, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Η https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math16_1.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> , in Equation 15.7 and also the Dirac approach in finding the relativistic Hamiltonian. The classical Hamiltonian for the free particle should be the positive square root of Equation 15.7 which is not a linear function of the momenta. Applying this to the problem, say for example in Equation 15.10, we have the resultant wave equation that is asymmetrical with respect to space and time derivatives and so the necessity to linearize the equation in the momentum operators. So for Equation 15.10, it is impossible to include the Pauli spin matrices without destroying the invariance of the theory since the spin matrices transform the components of a three-dimensional rather than a four-dimensional vector. In addition, the function, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math16_2.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> , has one component rather than two components like spinors and so the Schrödinger relativistic equation represents a particle with no spin. So for a potential to be added in Equation 15.10, the Lorentz-transformation properties of such an addition should be guaranteed by matrix algebra which is the requirement for the Hamiltonian https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Η ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math16_3.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> to be linear in the momentum operators and guarantees relativistic invariance. This matrix algebra which permits the linearization of the Hamiltonian in the momentum operator was introduced by Dirac with the help of the Pauli matrices.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2022•0 citations

On the linear forms of the Schrodinger equation

Yazid Kasri, Y. Gr, L. Chétouani

Generalizing the linearisation procedure used by Dirac and later by L\'evy-Leblond, we derive the first-order non-relativistic wave equations for particles of spin 1 and spin 3/2 starting from the Schrodinger equation.

•Aug 17, 2016•1 citation

The Spinning Electron

John Lekner

The notion introduced by Ohanian that spin is a wave property is implemented, both in Dirac and in Schrödinger quantum mechanics. We find that half-integer spin is the consequence of azimuthal dependence in two of the four spinor components, relativistically and non-relativistically. In both cases the spinor components are free particle wavepackets; the total wavefunction is an eigenstate of the total angular momentum in the direction of net particle motion. In the non-relativistic case we make use of the Lévy-Leblond result that four coupled non-relativistic wave equations, equivalent to the Pauli-Schrödinger equation, represent particles of half-integer spin, with g-factor 2. An example of an exact Gaussian solution of the non-relativistic equations is illustrated.

Substantia•May 24, 2022•0 citations

Spin ½: the Pauli theory

Peter Holland

Introduction The claim that it is impossible to construct a realistic physical model of quantum matter is often presented as definitively and finally proved in the case of systems with spin ½, or internal angular momentum of magnitude ħ/2, which exhibit a characteristic ‘nonclassical two-valuedness’. Nevertheless, the extension of the causal interpretation to embrace nonrelativistic spin ½ systems was successfully carried through in the 1950s (Bohm, Schiller & Tiomno, 1955; Bohm & Schiller, 1955; Takabayasi, 1955; Takabayasi & Vigier, 1957) and developed more recently (Dewdney, Holland & Kyprianidis, 1986, 1987a, b; Dewdney, Holland, Kyprianidis & Vigier, 1988). The idea is to assume that the spinor wave represents a new type of physical field propagating in spacetime that exerts an influence on a corpuscle moving within it. The additional information conveyed by the spinor beyond that contained in the spinless Schrödinger wave implies that the state of the particle is not exhausted by specifying its position and momentum, but that it is endowed with further properties such as an internal angular momentum. The equation governing the dynamics of the spinor wavefunction is the Pauli equation: where the Hamiltonian operator is given by Here e, m and μ are respectively the charge, mass and magnetic moment of the particle, A 0 and A are the electromagnetic potentials, B = ∇ × A is the magnetic field, V is any other external scalar potential, and σ is a vector whose components are the 2 × 2 Pauli matrices. The Hamiltonian (9.1.2) istherefore a 2 × 2 matrix operator and the wavefunction ψ( x , t ) has two complex components.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 13, 1993•0 citations

Obtaining Hydrogen energy wave functions using the Runge-Lenz vector

Chun-Khiang Chua

The Pauli method of quantizing the Hydrogen system using the Runge-Lenz vector is ingenious. It is well known that the energy spectrum is identical with the one obtained from the Schrödinger equation and the consistency contributed significantly to the development of Quantum Mechanics in the early days. Since the Runge-Lenz vector is a vector and it commutes with the Hamiltonian, it is natural to use it to connect energy eigenstate $|n,l,m\rangle$ with other degenerate states $|n, l\pm 1,m'\rangle$. Recursive relations can be obtained and the wave functions of the whole spectrum can be obtained easily. Note that the recursive relations are consistent with those used in factorizing the Schrödinger equation. Nevertheless, the present analysis provide a better reasoning originated from the conserved vector, the Runge-Lenz vector. As in the Pauli analysis, group theory or symmetry plays a prominent role in the present analysis, while the rest of the derivations are mostly elementary.

arXiv:1805.01610•May 4, 2018•0 citations
A Matrix Factorization of Extended Hamiltonian Leads to NNN-Particle Pauli Equation
In this paper the Levy-Leblond procedure for linearizing the Schrödinger equation to obtain the Pauli equation for one particle is generalized to obtain an NNN-particle equation with spin. This is achieved by using the more universal matrix factorization, GG~=∣G∣I=(−K)lIG\tilde{G} = |G| I = (-K)^l IGG~=∣G∣I=(−K)lI. Here the square matrix GGG is linear in the total energy E and all momenta, G~\tilde GG~ is the matrix adjoint of GGG, III is the identity matrix, ∣G∣|G|∣G∣ is the determinant of GGG, lll is a positive integer and K=H−EK=H-EK=H−E is Lanczos' extended Hamiltonian where HHH is the classical Hamiltonian of the electro-mechanical system. KKK is identically zero for all such systems, so that matrix GGG is singular. As a consequence there always exists a vector function θ‾\underlineθθ​ with the property Gθ‾=0G\underlineθ=0Gθ​=0. This factorization to obtain the matrix GGG and vector function θ‾\underlineθθ​ is illustrated first for a one-dimensional particle in a simple potential well. This same technique, when applied to the classical nonrelativistic Hamiltonian for NNN interacting particles in an electromagnetic field, is shown to yield for N=1 the Pauli wave equation with spin and its generalization to NNN particles. Finally this nonrelativistic generalization of the Pauli equation is used to treat the simple Zeeman effect of a hydrogen-like atom as a two-particle problem with spin.
Abstract We review the literature on the Pauli equation and its current density, discussing the progression from the original phenomenological version of Pauli to its derivation by Lévy-Leblond from a linearization of the Schrödinger equation. It was established conclusively by Lévy-Leblond’s work that the spin of a spin-1/2 particle such as an electron is non-relativistic in nature, contrary to what was often stated following Dirac’s derivation of a relativistic wave equation, and his subsequent demonstration that Pauli’s spin interaction term appeared in the non-relativistic limit. In this limit, the Gordon decomposition of the associated probability current density was found to contain a spin-dependent term. Such a term does not follow, however, from the usual derivation of the current density from the Pauli equation, although various physically motivated but otherwise ad hoc explanations were put forward to account for it. We comment on the only exception to these of which we are aware implying the spin term in the current was in fact non-relativistic in nature. However, the earlier work of Lévy-Leblond had already shown, with no additional assumptions, that this term was a prominent feature of the current density derived from his equation. Hence, just as with the spin itself, the spin current was non-relativistic, claims to the contrary notwithstanding. We present a somewhat simplified derivation of the Lévy-Leblond equation and its current density, commenting on possibilities for experimental work that might indicate measurable consequences of the spin term in the current density. The presentation is at a level of quantum mechanics, electromagnetic theory, and mathematical methods typical of courses taken by first-year graduate students in physics, assuming some familiarity with Pauli spin matrices and the Dirac equation. Calculations are presented in detail, making the material suitable for use by teachers as supplementary problems for assignments, and development of theoretical concepts peculiar to the Pauli equation and its probability current density.
We re-examine the square of the Hamiltonian, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Η https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math16_1.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> , in Equation 15.7 and also the Dirac approach in finding the relativistic Hamiltonian. The classical Hamiltonian for the free particle should be the positive square root of Equation 15.7 which is not a linear function of the momenta. Applying this to the problem, say for example in Equation 15.10, we have the resultant wave equation that is asymmetrical with respect to space and time derivatives and so the necessity to linearize the equation in the momentum operators. So for Equation 15.10, it is impossible to include the Pauli spin matrices without destroying the invariance of the theory since the spin matrices transform the components of a three-dimensional rather than a four-dimensional vector. In addition, the function, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Ψ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math16_2.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> , has one component rather than two components like spinors and so the Schrödinger relativistic equation represents a particle with no spin. So for a potential to be added in Equation 15.10, the Lorentz-transformation properties of such an addition should be guaranteed by matrix algebra which is the requirement for the Hamiltonian https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> Η ^ https://s3-euw1-ap-pe-df-pch-content-public-p.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/9781003273073/d236e21f-f9f6-4e42-b186-ef1c50f0a68b/content/math16_3.tif" xmlns:xlink=" https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink "/> to be linear in the momentum operators and guarantees relativistic invariance. This matrix algebra which permits the linearization of the Hamiltonian in the momentum operator was introduced by Dirac with the help of the Pauli matrices.
The notion introduced by Ohanian that spin is a wave property is implemented, both in Dirac and in Schrödinger quantum mechanics. We find that half-integer spin is the consequence of azimuthal dependence in two of the four spinor components, relativistically and non-relativistically. In both cases the spinor components are free particle wavepackets; the total wavefunction is an eigenstate of the total angular momentum in the direction of net particle motion. In the non-relativistic case we make use of the Lévy-Leblond result that four coupled non-relativistic wave equations, equivalent to the Pauli-Schrödinger equation, represent particles of half-integer spin, with g-factor 2. An example of an exact Gaussian solution of the non-relativistic equations is illustrated.
Introduction The claim that it is impossible to construct a realistic physical model of quantum matter is often presented as definitively and finally proved in the case of systems with spin ½, or internal angular momentum of magnitude ħ/2, which exhibit a characteristic ‘nonclassical two-valuedness’. Nevertheless, the extension of the causal interpretation to embrace nonrelativistic spin ½ systems was successfully carried through in the 1950s (Bohm, Schiller & Tiomno, 1955; Bohm & Schiller, 1955; Takabayasi, 1955; Takabayasi & Vigier, 1957) and developed more recently (Dewdney, Holland & Kyprianidis, 1986, 1987a, b; Dewdney, Holland, Kyprianidis & Vigier, 1988). The idea is to assume that the spinor wave represents a new type of physical field propagating in spacetime that exerts an influence on a corpuscle moving within it. The additional information conveyed by the spinor beyond that contained in the spinless Schrödinger wave implies that the state of the particle is not exhausted by specifying its position and momentum, but that it is endowed with further properties such as an internal angular momentum. The equation governing the dynamics of the spinor wavefunction is the Pauli equation: where the Hamiltonian operator is given by Here e, m and μ are respectively the charge, mass and magnetic moment of the particle, A 0 and A are the electromagnetic potentials, B = ∇ × A is the magnetic field, V is any other external scalar potential, and σ is a vector whose components are the 2 × 2 Pauli matrices. The Hamiltonian (9.1.2) istherefore a 2 × 2 matrix operator and the wavefunction ψ( x , t ) has two complex components.
The Pauli method of quantizing the Hydrogen system using the Runge-Lenz vector is ingenious. It is well known that the energy spectrum is identical with the one obtained from the Schrödinger equation and the consistency contributed significantly to the development of Quantum Mechanics in the early days. Since the Runge-Lenz vector is a vector and it commutes with the Hamiltonian, it is natural to use it to connect energy eigenstate ∣n,l,m⟩|n,l,m\rangle∣n,l,m⟩ with other degenerate states ∣n,l±1,m′⟩|n, l\pm 1,m'\rangle∣n,l±1,m′⟩. Recursive relations can be obtained and the wave functions of the whole spectrum can be obtained easily. Note that the recursive relations are consistent with those used in factorizing the Schrödinger equation. Nevertheless, the present analysis provide a better reasoning originated from the conserved vector, the Runge-Lenz vector. As in the Pauli analysis, group theory or symmetry plays a prominent role in the present analysis, while the rest of the derivations are mostly elementary.