Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0612204 · Physical Review A

Sequential attack with intensity modulation on the differential-phase-shift quantum-key-distribution protocol

Toyohiro Tsurumaru

Published Jun 18, 2007• 43 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the security of the differential-phase-shift quantum-key-distribution (DPSQKD) protocol by introducing an improved version of the so-called sequential attack, which was originally discussed by Waks et al. [Phys. Rev. A 73, 012344 (2006)]. Our attack differs from the original form of the sequential attack in that the attacker Eve modulates not only the phases but also the amplitude in the superposition of the single-photon states which she sends to the receiver. Concentrating especially on the ``discretized Gaussian'' intensity modulation, we show that our attack is more effective than the individual attack, which had been the best attack up to present. As a result of this, the recent experiment with communication distance of $100\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{km}$ reported by Diamanti et al. [Opt. Express 14, 13073 (2006)] turns out to be insecure. Moreover, it can be shown that in a practical experimental setup which is commonly used today, the communication distance achievable by the DPSQKD protocol is less than $95\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{km}$.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.75.062319

Related papers

Differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution with phase modulation to combat sequential attacks

Hiroki Kawahara, Toru Oka, Kyo Inoue

Phase-modulated differential-phase-shift (DPS) quantum key distribution (QKD) is presented for combating sequential attacks that most severely restrict the DPS-QKD system distance. Slow phase modulation imposed onto the DPS signal obstructs the optimum unambiguous state discrimination measurement conducted in the sequential attack and improves the QKD distance as a result. The condition with which the phase modulation does not degrade the DPS-QKD system performance is also described.

Physical Review A•Nov 10, 2011•5 citations

Analysis of the differential-phase-shift-keying protocol in the quantum-key-distribution system

Rongzhen Jiao, Feng Chen-Xu, Haiqiang Ma

The analysis is based on the error rate and the secure communication rate as functions of distance for three quantum-key-distribution (QKD) protocols: the Bennett–Brassard 1984, the Bennett–Brassard–Mermin 1992, and the coherent differential-phase-shift keying (DPSK) protocols. We consider the secure communication rate of the DPSK protocol against an arbitrary individual attack, including the most commonly considered intercept-resend and photon-number splitting attacks, and concluded that the simple and efficient differential-phase-shift-keying protocol allows for more than 200 km of secure communication distance with high communication rates.

Chinese Physics B•Mar 1, 2009•5 citations

Influence of sequential attacks on 1310 nm differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution

Feng Zhao

The characteristics of 1 310 nm differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution are discussed,the influence of sequential attacks with intensity modulation on which is also analyzed.It indicates that the 1 310 nm is suitable for high speed quantum key distribution over 10-50 km distance.Sequential attacks with intensity modulation will not change Bob′s detection probability and this behavior can be hided by the inherent error rate,so the decoy states technique can not beat it.Based on the L.J.Ma et al experimental data,we evaluated the security of it,and the result indicates that under the sequential attacks,the upper bound of key generation rate is 6.9 Kb/s at 50 km,so it turns out to be insecure.

Journal of Optoelectronics·laser•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Analysis of differential-phase-shift keying protocol for a two-way quantum-key-distribution system

Rongzhen Jiao, Feng Chen-Xu, 北京邮电大学理学院,北京 100876

The performance of a two-way quantum-key-distribution (QKD) system are analyzed using the differential-phase-shift keying (DPSK) protocol. The comparison is based on the secure communication rate as a function of distance for three QKD protocols: the Bennett-Brassard 1984, the Bennett-Brassard-Mermin 1992, and the coherent differential-phase-shift keying protocols. We discussed the security of DPSK protocol against any type of individual photon splitting attack and concluded that the simple and efficient DPSK protocol allows for more than 200km of secure communication distance with high communication rates.

Acta Physica Sinica•Jan 1, 2008•3 citations

Recent development of differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution

LI He-ping

Quantum-key-distribution(QKD) has been studied as an ultimate method for secure communications.Here we review the recent progress on differential-phase shift(DPS) QKD.The principle of the DPS-QKD protocol is explained,and the security against the Photon-number splitting(PNS) and the sequential attack strategy is discussed briefly.The current application in various field and the prospect of QKD is referred.

Jiguang zazhi•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Unconditional security of coherent-state-based differential phase shift quantum key distribution protocol with block-wise phase randomization

Kiyoshi Tamaki, Masato Koashi, Go Kato

We prove the unconditional security of coherent-state-based differential phase shift quantum key distribution protocol (DPSQKD) with block-wise phase randomization. Our proof is based on the conversion of DPSQKD to an equivalent entanglement-distillation protocol where the estimated phase error rate determines the amount of the privacy amplification. The generated final key has a contribution from events where the sender emits two or more photons, indicating the robustness of DPSQKD against photon-number-splitting attacks.

arXiv:1208.1995•Aug 9, 2012•8 citations
In this paper, we discuss the security of the differential-phase-shift quantum-key-distribution (DPSQKD) protocol by introducing an improved version of the so-called sequential attack, which was originally discussed by Waks et al. [Phys. Rev. A 73, 012344 (2006)]. Our attack differs from the original form of the sequential attack in that the attacker Eve modulates not only the phases but also the amplitude in the superposition of the single-photon states which she sends to the receiver. Concentrating especially on the ``discretized Gaussian'' intensity modulation, we show that our attack is more effective than the individual attack, which had been the best attack up to present. As a result of this, the recent experiment with communication distance of 100km100\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{km}100km reported by Diamanti et al. [Opt. Express 14, 13073 (2006)] turns out to be insecure. Moreover, it can be shown that in a practical experimental setup which is commonly used today, the communication distance achievable by the DPSQKD protocol is less than 95km95\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{km}95km.
The analysis is based on the error rate and the secure communication rate as functions of distance for three quantum-key-distribution (QKD) protocols: the Bennett–Brassard 1984, the Bennett–Brassard–Mermin 1992, and the coherent differential-phase-shift keying (DPSK) protocols. We consider the secure communication rate of the DPSK protocol against an arbitrary individual attack, including the most commonly considered intercept-resend and photon-number splitting attacks, and concluded that the simple and efficient differential-phase-shift-keying protocol allows for more than 200 km of secure communication distance with high communication rates.
The characteristics of 1 310 nm differential-phase-shift quantum key distribution are discussed,the influence of sequential attacks with intensity modulation on which is also analyzed.It indicates that the 1 310 nm is suitable for high speed quantum key distribution over 10-50 km distance.Sequential attacks with intensity modulation will not change Bob′s detection probability and this behavior can be hided by the inherent error rate,so the decoy states technique can not beat it.Based on the L.J.Ma et al experimental data,we evaluated the security of it,and the result indicates that under the sequential attacks,the upper bound of key generation rate is 6.9 Kb/s at 50 km,so it turns out to be insecure.
The performance of a two-way quantum-key-distribution (QKD) system are analyzed using the differential-phase-shift keying (DPSK) protocol. The comparison is based on the secure communication rate as a function of distance for three QKD protocols: the Bennett-Brassard 1984, the Bennett-Brassard-Mermin 1992, and the coherent differential-phase-shift keying protocols. We discussed the security of DPSK protocol against any type of individual photon splitting attack and concluded that the simple and efficient DPSK protocol allows for more than 200km of secure communication distance with high communication rates.
We prove the unconditional security of coherent-state-based differential phase shift quantum key distribution protocol (DPSQKD) with block-wise phase randomization. Our proof is based on the conversion of DPSQKD to an equivalent entanglement-distillation protocol where the estimated phase error rate determines the amount of the privacy amplification. The generated final key has a contribution from events where the sender emits two or more photons, indicating the robustness of DPSQKD against photon-number-splitting attacks.