The space quantization induced by a Stern-Gerlach experiment is normally explained by invoking the ``collapse of the wave function.'' This is a rather mysterious idea; it would be better to explain the Stern-Gerlach results without using it. We re-analyze the Stern-Gerlach experiment using path integrals. We find if we model explicitly the finite width of the beam, coherent interference within the beam itself provides the space quantization -- without need to invoke the collapse. If we insist on employing only wave functions with the space and spin parts kept forcibly disentangled, we recreate the need to invoke the collapse. The collapse-free approach makes more specific predictions about the shape and position of the scattered beams; if the interaction region has finite length, these may be testable. Pending experimental disambiguation, the chief arguments in favor of the collapse-free approach are that it is simpler and less mysterious, has no adjustable parameters, and requires the invocation of no new forces.
The space quantization induced by a Stern-Gerlach experiment is normally explained by invoking the ``collapse of the wave function.'' This is a rather mysterious idea; it would be better to explain the Stern-Gerlach results without using it. We re-analyze the Stern-Gerlach experiment using path integrals. We find if we model explicitly the finite width of the beam, coherent interference within the beam itself provides the space quantization -- without need to invoke the collapse. If we insist on employing only wave functions with the space and spin parts kept forcibly disentangled, we recreate the need to invoke the collapse. The collapse-free approach makes more specific predictions about the shape and position of the scattered beams; if the interaction region has finite length, these may be testable. Pending experimental disambiguation, the chief arguments in favor of the collapse-free approach are that it is simpler and less mysterious, has no adjustable parameters, and requires the invocation of no new forces.
The Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE) has been known for decades, but a complete theory that explains all facets of it remains enigmatic. In its classic realization, each spin state of an atom follows a unique path or trajectory in an SGE. The enigmatic part is the final output of SGE. Feynman envisaged the outcome to be an entangled state, a superposition of $|\text{spin}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\text{state}\ensuremath{\rangle}\ensuremath{\bigotimes}|\text{corresponding}\phantom{\rule{4.pt}{0ex}}\text{path}\ensuremath{\rangle}$. Later works described the final state of SGE as a mixed state, a weighted average of states belonging to separate beams or trajectories. Notably, Schwinger, Englert, and Scully compared the difficulty of obtaining a coherent output (a pure state) to ``putting together Humpty Dumpty'' again. Yet recent experiments using Bose-Einstein condensates indicate the emerging beams are partly coherent, favoring Feynman's description. In this work, we revisit SGE using a recent version of the quantum master equation. We show that both outcomes are probable depending on the time of flight and the timescale of the environmental fluctuations. We predict the output is initially coherent and grows gradually into a mixed state. Moreover, we also estimate how the magnetic-field gradient helps broaden the beam waist. Moreover, our treatment implies that the wave function of an atom passing through a Stern-Gerlach device does not undergo an instantaneous collapse; rather, a gradual decay of coherences results in a mixed state, resulting in an irreversible process.
In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, path integrals are normally derived from the Schroedinger equation. This assumes the two formalisms are equivalent. Since time plays a very different role in the Schroedinger equation and in path integrals, this may not be the case. We here derive path integrals directly by imposing two requirements: correct behavior in the classical limit and the most complete practicable symmetry between time and space. With these requirements, the path integral formalism predicts quantum fluctuations over the time dimension analogous to the quantum fluctuations seen over the three space dimensions. For constant potentials there is no effect. But the coupling between rapidly varying electromagnetic fields and the quantum fluctuations in time should be detectable. We consider a variation on the Stern-Gerlach experiment in which a particle with a non-zero electric dipole moment is sent through a rapidly varying electric field, oriented parallel to the particle's trajectory. The Schroedinger equation predicts changes to the precession frequency of the wave function about the trajectory but no physical splitting of the beam. With the approach here, path integrals predict the changes to the precession frequency and in addition that the beam will be split in velocity and time.
Abstract In 1921, Otto Stern conceived the idea for an experiment that would decide between a classical and a quantum description of atomic behavior, as epitomized by the Bohr–Sommerfeld–Debye model of the atom. This model entailed not only the quantization of the magnitude of the orbital electronic angular momentum but also of the projection of the angular momentum on an external magnetic field – the so‐called space quantization. Stern recognized that space quantization would have observable consequences: namely, that the magnetic dipole moment due to the orbital angular momentum would be space quantized as well, taking two opposite values for atoms whose only unpaired electron has just one quantum of orbital angular momentum. When acted upon by a suitable inhomogeneous magnetic field, a beam of such atoms would be split into two beams consisting of deflected atoms with opposite projections of the orbital angular momentum on the magnetic field. In contradistinction, if atoms behaved classically, the atomic beam would only broaden along the field gradient and have maximum intensity at zero deflection, i. e., where there would be a minimum or no intensity for a beam split due to space quantization. Stern anticipated that, although simple in principle, the experiment would be difficult to carry out – and invited Walther Gerlach to team up with him. Gerlach's realism and experimental skills together with his sometimes stubborn determination to make things work proved invaluable for the success of the Stern–Gerlach experiment (SGE). After a long struggle, Gerlach finally saw, on 8 February 1922, the splitting of a beam of silver atoms in a magnetic field. The absence of the concept of electron spin confused and confounded the interpretation of the SGE, as the silver atoms were, in fact, in a 2S state, with zero orbital and spin angular momentum. However, a key quantum feature whose existence the SGE was designed to test – namely space quantization of electronic angular momentum – was robust enough to transpire independent of whether the electronic angular momentum was orbital or due to spin. The SGE entails other key aspects of quantum mechanics such as quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, and entanglement. Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.”
The Stern-Gerlach experiment is the fundamental experiment in order to exhibit the quantization of spin and understand the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. However, although the Stern-Gerlach experiment plays an essential role in the teaching of quantum mechanics, no complete analysis of this experiment using Pauli spinors is presented in the pedagogical literature. This paper presents such an analysis and develops implications for the theory of quantum measurement. We first propose an analytic expression of both the wave function and the probability density in the Stern-Gerlach experiment. Our explicit solution is obtained via a complete integration of the Pauli equation over time and space. The probability density evolution describes a slipping of the wave packet into two separate packets due to the measurement device, but it cannot account for impacts. We therefore calculate the de Broglie-Bohm trajectories, which not only explain impacts naturally, but also accounts for the spin quantization following the magnetic field gradient. It is then possible to propose a clear explanation of measurement effects in the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
Most textbooks introduce the concept of spin by presenting the Stern-Gerlach experiment with the aid of Newtonian atomic trajectories. However, to understand how both spatial and spin degrees of freedom evolve over time and how the latter influence experimental outcomes, it is essential to employ a quantum approach. In this paper, we offer two simple methods, the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula and the direct integration of the Schrödinger equation in an interaction picture, to determine the corresponding evolution operator. We not only provide an interpretation of the individual terms within this operator but also establish connections with semiclassical calculations, when feasible. Moreover, we compute the wave function and touch upon the concept of position-spin entanglement to illustrate how a full quantum description of the Stern-Gerlach experiment can open doors to topics like quantum measurement and nonlocality.
In the context of the measurement problem, we propose to model the interaction between a quantum particle and an "apparatus" through a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian term. We simulate the time evolution of a normalized quantum state split into two spin components (via a Stern-Gerlach experiment) and that undergoes a wave-function collapse driven by a non-Hermitian Hatano-Nelson Hamiltonian. We further analyze how the strength and other parameters of the non-Hermitian perturbation influence the time-to-collapse of the wave function obtained under a Schrödinger-type evolution. We finally discuss a thought experiment where manipulation of the apparatus could challenge standard quantum mechanics predictions.