Abstract In 1921, Otto Stern conceived the idea for an experiment that would decide between a classical and a quantum description of atomic behavior, as epitomized by the Bohr–Sommerfeld–Debye model of the atom. This model entailed not only the quantization of the magnitude of the orbital electronic angular momentum but also of the projection of the angular momentum on an external magnetic field – the so‐called space quantization. Stern recognized that space quantization would have observable consequences: namely, that the magnetic dipole moment due to the orbital angular momentum would be space quantized as well, taking two opposite values for atoms whose only unpaired electron has just one quantum of orbital angular momentum. When acted upon by a suitable inhomogeneous magnetic field, a beam of such atoms would be split into two beams consisting of deflected atoms with opposite projections of the orbital angular momentum on the magnetic field. In contradistinction, if atoms behaved classically, the atomic beam would only broaden along the field gradient and have maximum intensity at zero deflection, i. e., where there would be a minimum or no intensity for a beam split due to space quantization. Stern anticipated that, although simple in principle, the experiment would be difficult to carry out – and invited Walther Gerlach to team up with him. Gerlach's realism and experimental skills together with his sometimes stubborn determination to make things work proved invaluable for the success of the Stern–Gerlach experiment (SGE). After a long struggle, Gerlach finally saw, on 8 February 1922, the splitting of a beam of silver atoms in a magnetic field. The absence of the concept of electron spin confused and confounded the interpretation of the SGE, as the silver atoms were, in fact, in a 2S state, with zero orbital and spin angular momentum. However, a key quantum feature whose existence the SGE was designed to test – namely space quantization of electronic angular momentum – was robust enough to transpire independent of whether the electronic angular momentum was orbital or due to spin. The SGE entails other key aspects of quantum mechanics such as quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, and entanglement. Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.”
Abstract In 1921, Otto Stern conceived the idea for an experiment that would decide between a classical and a quantum description of atomic behavior, as epitomized by the Bohr–Sommerfeld–Debye model of the atom. This model entailed not only the quantization of the magnitude of the orbital electronic angular momentum but also of the projection of the angular momentum on an external magnetic field – the so‐called space quantization. Stern recognized that space quantization would have observable consequences: namely, that the magnetic dipole moment due to the orbital angular momentum would be space quantized as well, taking two opposite values for atoms whose only unpaired electron has just one quantum of orbital angular momentum. When acted upon by a suitable inhomogeneous magnetic field, a beam of such atoms would be split into two beams consisting of deflected atoms with opposite projections of the orbital angular momentum on the magnetic field. In contradistinction, if atoms behaved classically, the atomic beam would only broaden along the field gradient and have maximum intensity at zero deflection, i. e., where there would be a minimum or no intensity for a beam split due to space quantization. Stern anticipated that, although simple in principle, the experiment would be difficult to carry out – and invited Walther Gerlach to team up with him. Gerlach's realism and experimental skills together with his sometimes stubborn determination to make things work proved invaluable for the success of the Stern–Gerlach experiment (SGE). After a long struggle, Gerlach finally saw, on 8 February 1922, the splitting of a beam of silver atoms in a magnetic field. The absence of the concept of electron spin confused and confounded the interpretation of the SGE, as the silver atoms were, in fact, in a 2S state, with zero orbital and spin angular momentum. However, a key quantum feature whose existence the SGE was designed to test – namely space quantization of electronic angular momentum – was robust enough to transpire independent of whether the electronic angular momentum was orbital or due to spin. The SGE entails other key aspects of quantum mechanics such as quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, and entanglement. Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.”
ABSTRACT The bulk of experiments and observations that lined the path to quantum mechanics amounted to a backlog of data in need of explanation. A notable exception was the Stern–Gerlach experiment (SGE) designed to test the predictions of the old quantum theory as embodied by the 1913–1916 Bohr–Sommerfeld–Debye atom model. After its initial triumphs, such as the explanation of the astrophysically observed spectrum of , this model was frowned upon in some quarters, mainly because of its ad hoc nature. Otto Stern (1888–1969)—and his close colleague and friend, Max von Laue (1879–1960)—even took a vow: “If this nonsense of Bohr should, in the end, prove to be right, we will quit physics.” Stern would go further yet and, in 1920, devise an experiment—the SGE—to disprove Bohr's model. However, contrary to Stern's expectations, the SGE ruled unequivocally in favor of the model and its amendments. Wolfgang Pauli (1900–1958) quipped: “That should convert even the non‐believer Stern.” And it did: Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted in 1961: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.” Ironically, the SGE would epitomize quantum mechanics as we know it: whether quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, or entanglement—in addition to the quantization of angular momentum and its spatial projections—the SGE has it all. It now seems that the SGE may even impact future studies of the relationship of quantum theory to other pillars of physics, most notably, general relativity. The descendants of the SGE include transformative techniques for the study of the quantum properties of nuclear, atomic, molecular, and condensed‐matter systems, with magnetic resonance imaging being among the most widely used. Key Points Edward Pickering; Williamina Fleming; Pickering series; Bohr‐Sommerfeld‐Debye model of the atom; Otto Stern; Stern‐Gerlach experiment; Bohr magneton; Old Quantum Theory; Spin; nuclear magneton; magnetic dipole moment of the proton; matter‐wave duality; Quantum Mechanics.
The bulk of experiments and observations that lined the path to quantum mechanics amounted to a backlog of data in need of explanation. A notable exception was the Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE) designed to test the predictions of the Old Quantum Theory as embodied by the 1913-1916 Bohr-Sommerfeld-Debye atom model. After its initial triumphs, such as the explanation of the astrophysically observed spectrum of He+, this model was frowned upon in some quarters, mainly because of its ad hoc nature. Otto Stern (1888-1969) – and his close colleague and friend, Max von Laue (1879-1960) – even took a vow: “If this nonsense of Bohr should, in the end, prove to be right, we will quit physics.” Stern would go further yet and, in 1920, devise an experiment – the SGE – to disprove Bohr’s model. However, contrary to Stern’s expectations, the SGE ruled unequivocally in favor of the model and its amendments. Wolfgang Pauli (1900-1958) quipped: “That should convert even the non-believer Stern.” And it did: Confronted with the outcome of the SGE, Stern noted in 1961: “I still have objections to the idea of beauty of quantum mechanics. But she is correct.” Ironically, the SGE would epitomize quantum mechanics as we know it: whether quantum measurement, state preparation, coherence, or entanglement – apart from the quantization of angular momentum and its spatial projections – the SGE has it all. The descendants of the SGE include transformative techniques for the study of the quantum properties of nuclear, atomic, molecular, and condensed-matter systems, with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) being among the most widely used.
Thus far we have concentrated on the postulates, on their ramifications, and on the means and methods by which they are applied. Connections with classical physics have been featured, and primary notions other than those of Chapter 5 have not been needed. We deviate from this path in the present chapter, introducing a new and extremely important concept; it is based on one of the most significant and fruitful experiments of the quantal era. This experiment was performed by O. Stern and W. Gerlach (1921) and subsequently interpreted by G. Uhlenbeck and S. Goudsmit (1925). The experiment and its elucidation led to the new concept of “intrinsic spin” (in particular to spin “½”), a development that was one of the major turning points in modern physics. The consequences have been monumental, and include primary theoretical developments; the interpretation of data related to, and an understanding of, empirical rules concerning a wide variety of physical systems (e.g., the periodic table of the elements/atomic structure); and the generation of new experimental techniques and of innovative measurements. Our study of intrinsic spin and its correlative, two-state systems, introduces the reader to one of the most profound topics in quantum theory. The Stern–Gerlach experiment and its interpretation The experiment of Stern and Gerlach was designed to test the “spatial quantization” of neutral atoms, i.e., to determine whether the (orbital) angular momentum was quantized. The basic ideas are as follows. Associated with the atom's orbital angular momentum would be a magnetic moment, as in the Bohr model of hydrogen.
Spin and helicityTraditionally, in textbooks on quantum mechanics, spin is introduced via an idealized Stern-Gerlach experiment in which a non-relativistic beam of silver atoms passes through an inhomogeneous magnetic field.Each atom is treated as a single valence electron of charge -e in an s-state.The subsequent splitting of the beam into two indicates the two-valuedness of Sz, which is related to the value 1/2 for s, and the magnitude of the splitting shows that the magnetic moment /l is related to s by e /l = -~s, me the proportionality factor (the gyromagnetic ratio) being twice as big as the factor that classically gives the magnetic moment due to the orbital angular momentum of a point charge.Historically, however, it seems that the early Stern-Gerlach experiments, begun in 1922, had no influence at all upon the discovery of spin, simply because they were too imprecise.Rather, the concept of spin appeared after a long and tedious battle to understand the splitting patterns and separations in line spectra.Several people had for various reasons discussed classical models of rotating charge distributions but Kronig, in 1924, was the first to show that an electron with spin 1/2 would explain the pattern of what we would today call L • S splitting, as well as anomalies in the Zeeman effect.He realized, though, that the gyromagnetic ratio ( -ejmc) needed for the latter would give L • S splittings twice as big as those observed.It is said that Pauli expressed his negative reaction to Kronig's idea with such vehemence that Kronig never published his work (Mehra and Rechenberg, 1982).Soon thereafter, in 1925, the same idea occurred to Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1925), who proceeded to a detailed analysis of the splittings, concluding at first that everything worked beautifully, but then becoming aware, as a consequence of a comment by Heisenberg, of the factor-of-2 inconsistency mentioned above.
A thorough motion investigation and analysis was conducted again for the original Stern-Gerlach Experiment(SGE). The analysis is still based on the assumption that the atom passing the SG apparatus is a micromagnet due to the spin of its electron, the atoms in the source beam are with an orientation distribution of its angular momentum vectors, while the spin micromagnet is in the precession induced by an inhomogeneous magnetic field. It is the precession that keeps the silver beam with narrower orientation distribution of its angular momentum vectors after passing through the inhomogeneous magnetic field. The motion relativity was introduced in the SGE between the SG apparatus and the silver source beam, which interpreted all the detection phenomena in the multi-stage SGE. The research provided a new and convincing interpretation to the SGE with full satisfaction based on the classical physics without any mysterious or counter intuitive concepts introduced compared to quantum physics.
In 1932 Pauli and Bohr declared that electromagnetic fields cannot be used to separate electrons according to their spin. A Stern–Gerlach magnet can split atomic beams into beams with different polarizations, but the Lorentz force blurs the splitting for charged particles such as electrons. Brillouin suggested that electrons could be separated by applying magnetic gradients along the electron beam, but Pauli disagreed. He wrote in 1958: "It is impossible to observe the spin of the electron, separated fully from its orbital momentum, by means of experiments based on the concept of classical particle trajectories."