Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0205189

Outline for a formal general theory of physical measurements

Ioan Sturzu

Published May 31, 2002• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The paper gives the main lines of a general theory for physical measurements.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0205189

Related papers

Diagrammatics

Jan Dereziński, Christian Gérard

DiagrammaticsThe diagrammatic method is one of the most powerful tools of theoretical physics.It allows us to efficiently organize perturbative computations in statistical physics, quantum many-body theory and quantum field theory.The main feature of this method is a representation of individual terms of a perturbative expansion as diagrams (graphs).Diagrams consist of vertices representing terms in the perturbation, lines representing pairings between vertices and, possibly, external legs.There exist several kinds of diagrams.We will try to present them in a systematic way.In Sect.20.1 we present a diagrammatic formalism whose goal is to organize integration of polynomials with respect to a Gaussian measure.This formalism is used extensively in classical statistical physics.It also plays an important role in quantum physics, especially in the Euclidean approach, since many quantum quantities can be expressed in terms of Gaussian integrals over classical variables.We use the term "Gaussian integration" in a rather broad sense.Beside commuting "bosonic" variables, we also consider anti-commuting "fermionic" variables, where we use the Berezin integral with respect to a Gaussian weight.Even in the case of commuting variables, the "Gaussian integral" is not necessarily meant in the sense of measure theory.It denotes an algebraic operation performed on polynomials (or formal power series), which in the case of a positive definite covariance coincides with the usual integral with a Gaussian weight.However, we allow the covariance to be complex, or even negative definite, and do not insist that the operation have a measure theoretic meaning.We distinguish two kinds of spaces on which we perform the integrals: real and complex.As in many other places in our work, we treat these two cases in parallel.Of course, the difference between the real (i.e.neutral), and the complex (i.e.charged) formalism is mainly that of a different notation.In particular, charged lines need to be equipped with an arrow, whereas neutral lines need not.The terminology that we use is inspired by quantum field theory.Therefore, the variables that enter the integral are associated with "particles"; they are divided into "bosons" and "fermions", each subdivided into "neutral" and "charged" particles.In the main part of the chapter we describe the diagram formalism used in quantum many-body physics and quantum field theory.As a preparation, we include a brief Sect.20.2 devoted to the basic terminology of perturbation theory

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 4, 2022•0 citations

An Abstract Theory of Physical Measurements

Pedro Resende

arXiv:2102.01712•Foundations of Physics•Nov 3, 2021•3 citations

Introduction to Quantum Measurement Theory

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

This short chapter contains basics of the mathematical formalism for thequantum measurement theory. In this book we proceed mainly withthe von Neumann measurement theory in which observables are given byHermitian operators and the state update by projections. However, we alsomention the measurement formalism based on quantum instruments, sinceit gives the general framework for quantum measurements. This formalismis used only in Chapters 10 and 18. The latter chapter is devoted to quantum-likemodeling – the applications of the mathematical formalism and methodologyof quantum mechanics (QM) to cognition, psychology, and decision making.Surprisingly, in such applications even the simplest effects can’t be described bythe von Neumann theory. One should use quantum instruments (compare withquantum physics where the main body of theory can be presented solelywithin the von Neumann measurement theory).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 2024•1 citation

Classical Theory of Measurement: A Big Step Towards the Quantum Theory of Measurement

Willis E. Lamb, H. Fearn

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•3 citations

A note on macroscopic measurement

A. C. Biswas

An attempt has been made to understand the process of measurement in terms of Statistical Mechanics.

Bulletin de la Classe des sciences•Jan 1, 1967•0 citations

The Pauli–Jung Conjecture and Its Relatives: A Formally Augmented Outline

Harald Atmanspacher A

Abstract The dual-aspect monist conjecture launched by Pauli and Jung in the mid-20th century will be couched in somewhat formal terms to characterize it more concisely than by verbal description alone. After some background material situating the Pauli–Jung conjecture among other conceptual approaches to the mind–matter problem, the main body of this paper outlines its general framework of a basic psychophysically neutral reality with its derivative mental and physical aspects and the nature of the correlations that connect these aspects. Some related approaches are discussed to identify key similarities to and deviations from the Pauli–Jung framework that may be useful for cross-fertilization.

Open Philosophy•Jan 1, 2020•22 citations
DiagrammaticsThe diagrammatic method is one of the most powerful tools of theoretical physics.It allows us to efficiently organize perturbative computations in statistical physics, quantum many-body theory and quantum field theory.The main feature of this method is a representation of individual terms of a perturbative expansion as diagrams (graphs).Diagrams consist of vertices representing terms in the perturbation, lines representing pairings between vertices and, possibly, external legs.There exist several kinds of diagrams.We will try to present them in a systematic way.In Sect.20.1 we present a diagrammatic formalism whose goal is to organize integration of polynomials with respect to a Gaussian measure.This formalism is used extensively in classical statistical physics.It also plays an important role in quantum physics, especially in the Euclidean approach, since many quantum quantities can be expressed in terms of Gaussian integrals over classical variables.We use the term "Gaussian integration" in a rather broad sense.Beside commuting "bosonic" variables, we also consider anti-commuting "fermionic" variables, where we use the Berezin integral with respect to a Gaussian weight.Even in the case of commuting variables, the "Gaussian integral" is not necessarily meant in the sense of measure theory.It denotes an algebraic operation performed on polynomials (or formal power series), which in the case of a positive definite covariance coincides with the usual integral with a Gaussian weight.However, we allow the covariance to be complex, or even negative definite, and do not insist that the operation have a measure theoretic meaning.We distinguish two kinds of spaces on which we perform the integrals: real and complex.As in many other places in our work, we treat these two cases in parallel.Of course, the difference between the real (i.e.neutral), and the complex (i.e.charged) formalism is mainly that of a different notation.In particular, charged lines need to be equipped with an arrow, whereas neutral lines need not.The terminology that we use is inspired by quantum field theory.Therefore, the variables that enter the integral are associated with "particles"; they are divided into "bosons" and "fermions", each subdivided into "neutral" and "charged" particles.In the main part of the chapter we describe the diagram formalism used in quantum many-body physics and quantum field theory.As a preparation, we include a brief Sect.20.2 devoted to the basic terminology of perturbation theory
This short chapter contains basics of the mathematical formalism for thequantum measurement theory. In this book we proceed mainly withthe von Neumann measurement theory in which observables are given byHermitian operators and the state update by projections. However, we alsomention the measurement formalism based on quantum instruments, sinceit gives the general framework for quantum measurements. This formalismis used only in Chapters 10 and 18. The latter chapter is devoted to quantum-likemodeling – the applications of the mathematical formalism and methodologyof quantum mechanics (QM) to cognition, psychology, and decision making.Surprisingly, in such applications even the simplest effects can’t be described bythe von Neumann theory. One should use quantum instruments (compare withquantum physics where the main body of theory can be presented solelywithin the von Neumann measurement theory).
Abstract The dual-aspect monist conjecture launched by Pauli and Jung in the mid-20th century will be couched in somewhat formal terms to characterize it more concisely than by verbal description alone. After some background material situating the Pauli–Jung conjecture among other conceptual approaches to the mind–matter problem, the main body of this paper outlines its general framework of a basic psychophysically neutral reality with its derivative mental and physical aspects and the nature of the correlations that connect these aspects. Some related approaches are discussed to identify key similarities to and deviations from the Pauli–Jung framework that may be useful for cross-fertilization.