Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0103154

Quantum Theory Cannot Forbid Superluminal Signaling

Li Yang

Published Mar 28, 2001• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This note analyzed the angle-distribution of the probabilities of two-photon states come out of a single-photon's stimulated emission amplification, show that one can exploit EPR photon pairs combined with stimulated emission to realize superluminal signaling.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0103154

Related papers

Four-Photon Stimulated Emission

S. Cigdem Yorulmaz, Martin P. van Exter, M. J. A. de Dood

Parametric down-conversion produces quantum states of photon pairs. We measure the relative importance of stimulated pair emission when all photons are emitted into the same mode and compare this to pair emission into different modes.

Research in Optical Sciences•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Superluminal Signaling Seems Unphysical

Remi Cornwall

The author muses on precursor ideas on a mechanism for superluminal signaling via entanglement correlation and comes to the conclusion that, whatever it is, it would be highly unusual, if superluminal signaling is to be believed. (Date of publication Sept/Oct 2011).

•Apr 1, 2015•0 citations

Principles of light amplification

Stefano Bottacchi

Introduction Most of the lightwave transmission systems operating today benefit fully from extensive deployment of optical amplifiers (OA). These components perform the amplification of optical intensity directly in the optical domain, without resorting to any electrical-domain regeneration. Optical amplifiers increase the average number of output photons per unit time by several orders of magnitude compared with the incoming signal intensity. However, as with every amplifying process, optical amplification cannot be achieved without paying back for the unavoidable noise power added to the signal intensity. As we will see in detail in Chapter 6, the optical amplification process comes with optical noise generated by spontaneous emission inside the active medium. The intensity of the optical signal is represented by the flux of the signal photon population. Conversely, the photons generated by the spontaneous emission process inside the optical cavity represent the noise photon population. The fundamental phenomenon supporting optical amplification is stimulated emission. The basic property of stimulated emission, making the great difference from spontaneous emission and enabling optical amplification, is the coherent nature of the photon generation process. Accordingly, both signal and noise photons go through the same multiplication process by means of stimulated emission. Unless the optical cavity where the stimulated emission takes place (the active cavity) presents selective features for enhancing the signal photon population relative to the spontaneous one, there is no way to avoid noise photons going through stimulated emission, filling most of the cavity population. As a consequence, both photon populations increase, leading respectively to amplified signal intensity and to amplified spontaneous emission intensity. It should be apparent that every noise photon can create a new identical noise photon as a result of stimulated emission, effectively increasing the noise intensity in the active optical cavity. This is the well-known mechanism of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise in optical amplification. Any improvement in the optical amplifier structure devoted to increasing stimulated over spontaneous emission will probably increase the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) at the cavity output. The spectrum of gain characteristic of the optical active medium is usually wide enough to support an efficient amplification of the broadband spontaneous emission spectrum, leading to the broadband ASE noise power spectral density.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 6, 2014•0 citations

Investigation of the role of indistinguishability in photon bunching and stimulated emission

Bi‐Heng Liu, Fang‐Wen Sun, Yan-Xiao Gong +3 more

Photon bunching effect and stimulated emission of single photons is investigated and observed in the parametric amplification process. It is found that the two-photon interference is responsible for the photon bunching effect and stimulated emission, which is discussed in the temporal degree of freedom and in the presence of photon losses. Moreover, the direct measurement of the indistinguishability of two signal photons without any filtering is accomplished via the correlation between the two idler photons from two cascaded parametric down-conversion processes. This result shows that photon indistinguishability plays an essential role in stimulated emission.

Physical Review A•May 26, 2009•10 citations

Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) Correlations and Superluminal Signaling

Luiz Carlos Ryff

The possible connection between EPR correlations and superluminal signaling is discussed using simple and intuitive arguments. We elaborate on ideas that were presented independently in three previous articles (arXiv: 0510101[quant-ph]; arXiv: 0903.1076 [quant-ph]; arXiv: 1005.5092 [quant-ph]), showing how they are interconnected.

•Jun 24, 2015•0 citations

Spectral gain modeling of optical amplifiers

Stefano Bottacchi

Introduction In this chapter we will present the theory of spectral gain in optical amplifiers and the related optical power distribution. The concepts are general, as they apply to every optical amplifier configuration, independent of the specific architecture and implementation technology. We will configure the optical amplifying medium as a traveling-wave device, where the optical field undergoes optical amplification as it propagates from the input to the output sections. Generally speaking, optical amplification is achieved by a net stimulated emission process. Referring to a generic section z of infinitesimal thickness dz , optical gain is determined by the imbalance between net stimulated emission and cavity losses, including extrinsic absorption, reflection and radiated fields. As we know from the theory of light amplification in the three-level atomic system presented in Chapter 5, stimulated absorption of photons is governed by the same transition rate as stimulated emission, and is included in the net stimulated emission process. With this in mind, we note the identity between stimulated emission and the stimulated absorption rates, Γ 12 = Γ 21 , and the net stimulated photon term Γ[ j 2 ( t ) – j 1 ( t )] p ( t ) in the rate equation. In order to develop the traveling-wave model, the photon density becomes a function of the longitudinal position 0 ≤ z ≤ L along the amplifier medium. Accordingly, we will set p ( t , z ) as the relative density of stimulated photons per unit volume (0 ≤ p ( t , z ) ≤ 1) at time t and section z . When photons with appropriate energy proceed along the amplifying medium, they are amplified by means of net stimulated emission. At some section z = z 0 , the steady-state photon density P ( z ) can approach the saturation density P sat ( z ).

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 6, 2014•0 citations
Introduction Most of the lightwave transmission systems operating today benefit fully from extensive deployment of optical amplifiers (OA). These components perform the amplification of optical intensity directly in the optical domain, without resorting to any electrical-domain regeneration. Optical amplifiers increase the average number of output photons per unit time by several orders of magnitude compared with the incoming signal intensity. However, as with every amplifying process, optical amplification cannot be achieved without paying back for the unavoidable noise power added to the signal intensity. As we will see in detail in Chapter 6, the optical amplification process comes with optical noise generated by spontaneous emission inside the active medium. The intensity of the optical signal is represented by the flux of the signal photon population. Conversely, the photons generated by the spontaneous emission process inside the optical cavity represent the noise photon population. The fundamental phenomenon supporting optical amplification is stimulated emission. The basic property of stimulated emission, making the great difference from spontaneous emission and enabling optical amplification, is the coherent nature of the photon generation process. Accordingly, both signal and noise photons go through the same multiplication process by means of stimulated emission. Unless the optical cavity where the stimulated emission takes place (the active cavity) presents selective features for enhancing the signal photon population relative to the spontaneous one, there is no way to avoid noise photons going through stimulated emission, filling most of the cavity population. As a consequence, both photon populations increase, leading respectively to amplified signal intensity and to amplified spontaneous emission intensity. It should be apparent that every noise photon can create a new identical noise photon as a result of stimulated emission, effectively increasing the noise intensity in the active optical cavity. This is the well-known mechanism of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise in optical amplification. Any improvement in the optical amplifier structure devoted to increasing stimulated over spontaneous emission will probably increase the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) at the cavity output. The spectrum of gain characteristic of the optical active medium is usually wide enough to support an efficient amplification of the broadband spontaneous emission spectrum, leading to the broadband ASE noise power spectral density.
Photon bunching effect and stimulated emission of single photons is investigated and observed in the parametric amplification process. It is found that the two-photon interference is responsible for the photon bunching effect and stimulated emission, which is discussed in the temporal degree of freedom and in the presence of photon losses. Moreover, the direct measurement of the indistinguishability of two signal photons without any filtering is accomplished via the correlation between the two idler photons from two cascaded parametric down-conversion processes. This result shows that photon indistinguishability plays an essential role in stimulated emission.
Introduction In this chapter we will present the theory of spectral gain in optical amplifiers and the related optical power distribution. The concepts are general, as they apply to every optical amplifier configuration, independent of the specific architecture and implementation technology. We will configure the optical amplifying medium as a traveling-wave device, where the optical field undergoes optical amplification as it propagates from the input to the output sections. Generally speaking, optical amplification is achieved by a net stimulated emission process. Referring to a generic section z of infinitesimal thickness dz , optical gain is determined by the imbalance between net stimulated emission and cavity losses, including extrinsic absorption, reflection and radiated fields. As we know from the theory of light amplification in the three-level atomic system presented in Chapter 5, stimulated absorption of photons is governed by the same transition rate as stimulated emission, and is included in the net stimulated emission process. With this in mind, we note the identity between stimulated emission and the stimulated absorption rates, Γ 12 = Γ 21 , and the net stimulated photon term Γ[ j 2 ( t ) – j 1 ( t )] p ( t ) in the rate equation. In order to develop the traveling-wave model, the photon density becomes a function of the longitudinal position 0 ≤ z ≤ L along the amplifier medium. Accordingly, we will set p ( t , z ) as the relative density of stimulated photons per unit volume (0 ≤ p ( t , z ) ≤ 1) at time t and section z . When photons with appropriate energy proceed along the amplifying medium, they are amplified by means of net stimulated emission. At some section z = z 0 , the steady-state photon density P ( z ) can approach the saturation density P sat ( z ).