Introduction Most of the lightwave transmission systems operating today benefit fully from extensive deployment of optical amplifiers (OA). These components perform the amplification of optical intensity directly in the optical domain, without resorting to any electrical-domain regeneration. Optical amplifiers increase the average number of output photons per unit time by several orders of magnitude compared with the incoming signal intensity. However, as with every amplifying process, optical amplification cannot be achieved without paying back for the unavoidable noise power added to the signal intensity. As we will see in detail in Chapter 6, the optical amplification process comes with optical noise generated by spontaneous emission inside the active medium. The intensity of the optical signal is represented by the flux of the signal photon population. Conversely, the photons generated by the spontaneous emission process inside the optical cavity represent the noise photon population. The fundamental phenomenon supporting optical amplification is stimulated emission. The basic property of stimulated emission, making the great difference from spontaneous emission and enabling optical amplification, is the coherent nature of the photon generation process. Accordingly, both signal and noise photons go through the same multiplication process by means of stimulated emission. Unless the optical cavity where the stimulated emission takes place (the active cavity) presents selective features for enhancing the signal photon population relative to the spontaneous one, there is no way to avoid noise photons going through stimulated emission, filling most of the cavity population. As a consequence, both photon populations increase, leading respectively to amplified signal intensity and to amplified spontaneous emission intensity. It should be apparent that every noise photon can create a new identical noise photon as a result of stimulated emission, effectively increasing the noise intensity in the active optical cavity. This is the well-known mechanism of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise in optical amplification. Any improvement in the optical amplifier structure devoted to increasing stimulated over spontaneous emission will probably increase the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) at the cavity output. The spectrum of gain characteristic of the optical active medium is usually wide enough to support an efficient amplification of the broadband spontaneous emission spectrum, leading to the broadband ASE noise power spectral density.
Introduction Most of the lightwave transmission systems operating today benefit fully from extensive deployment of optical amplifiers (OA). These components perform the amplification of optical intensity directly in the optical domain, without resorting to any electrical-domain regeneration. Optical amplifiers increase the average number of output photons per unit time by several orders of magnitude compared with the incoming signal intensity. However, as with every amplifying process, optical amplification cannot be achieved without paying back for the unavoidable noise power added to the signal intensity. As we will see in detail in Chapter 6, the optical amplification process comes with optical noise generated by spontaneous emission inside the active medium. The intensity of the optical signal is represented by the flux of the signal photon population. Conversely, the photons generated by the spontaneous emission process inside the optical cavity represent the noise photon population. The fundamental phenomenon supporting optical amplification is stimulated emission. The basic property of stimulated emission, making the great difference from spontaneous emission and enabling optical amplification, is the coherent nature of the photon generation process. Accordingly, both signal and noise photons go through the same multiplication process by means of stimulated emission. Unless the optical cavity where the stimulated emission takes place (the active cavity) presents selective features for enhancing the signal photon population relative to the spontaneous one, there is no way to avoid noise photons going through stimulated emission, filling most of the cavity population. As a consequence, both photon populations increase, leading respectively to amplified signal intensity and to amplified spontaneous emission intensity. It should be apparent that every noise photon can create a new identical noise photon as a result of stimulated emission, effectively increasing the noise intensity in the active optical cavity. This is the well-known mechanism of amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise in optical amplification. Any improvement in the optical amplifier structure devoted to increasing stimulated over spontaneous emission will probably increase the optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) at the cavity output. The spectrum of gain characteristic of the optical active medium is usually wide enough to support an efficient amplification of the broadband spontaneous emission spectrum, leading to the broadband ASE noise power spectral density.
Introduction In this chapter we will present the theory of spectral gain in optical amplifiers and the related optical power distribution. The concepts are general, as they apply to every optical amplifier configuration, independent of the specific architecture and implementation technology. We will configure the optical amplifying medium as a traveling-wave device, where the optical field undergoes optical amplification as it propagates from the input to the output sections. Generally speaking, optical amplification is achieved by a net stimulated emission process. Referring to a generic section z of infinitesimal thickness dz , optical gain is determined by the imbalance between net stimulated emission and cavity losses, including extrinsic absorption, reflection and radiated fields. As we know from the theory of light amplification in the three-level atomic system presented in Chapter 5, stimulated absorption of photons is governed by the same transition rate as stimulated emission, and is included in the net stimulated emission process. With this in mind, we note the identity between stimulated emission and the stimulated absorption rates, Γ 12 = Γ 21 , and the net stimulated photon term Γ[ j 2 ( t ) – j 1 ( t )] p ( t ) in the rate equation. In order to develop the traveling-wave model, the photon density becomes a function of the longitudinal position 0 ≤ z ≤ L along the amplifier medium. Accordingly, we will set p ( t , z ) as the relative density of stimulated photons per unit volume (0 ≤ p ( t , z ) ≤ 1) at time t and section z . When photons with appropriate energy proceed along the amplifying medium, they are amplified by means of net stimulated emission. At some section z = z 0 , the steady-state photon density P ( z ) can approach the saturation density P sat ( z ).
Introduction Previous discussions (see Section 10.4) suggested that stimulated emission can be used to generate optical gain, that is, to amplify radiation. The reader certainly has experience in the amplification of electronic signal. For example, radio receivers capture faint radio waves and turn them into a signal that is powerful enough to drive large speakers. This electronic amplification increases the amplitude of the signal while faithfully preserving its acoustic frequencies and modulation characteristics. Similarly, optical amplification is expected to increase the amplitude of an optical signal while preserving its frequency, its modulation characteristics, and its coherence. The latter requirement is of particular significance for optical radiation, where the coherence of naturally occurring radiation rarely exceeds one micrometer. Lasers are the primary source for coherent radiation. They depend on stimulated emission for amplification and for the generation of coherent radiation (the word laser is the acronym of Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation). For amplification, an atomic system that is part of the laser medium must be prepared with a sufficiently large number of particles in the excited state. (The term atomic system is used here to describe all microscopic systems including molecules and free electrons.) Radiation passing through that excited medium encounters multiple events of stimulated emission, each event contributing one photon that is added coherently to the propagating beam. When the number of events of stimulated emission exceed all losses by absorption or scattering, the incident radiation is amplified.
The effect of optical amplification on the signal-to-noise ratio of autocorrelation measurements has been investigated experimentally. A light signal containing correlation information was amplified by an inverted population (phase-insensitive) optical amplifier. The data clearly show that the amplification may either degrade or enhance a subsequent autocorrelation measurement, depending on the experimental conditions. In particular, enhancement is possible when the detector quantum efficiency is low, or its noise is high. However, when all the signal photons are already being detected with no extra noise, then any optical amplification will inevitably lead to degradation of the data quality, due to addition of amplified spontaneous emission noise (ASE) from the amplifier itself.
The study of optical effects in active media is rich with unexpected consequences. For instance, one may imagine that absorption and amplification in a dielectric medium will exhibit some sort of symmetry because both are related to the same imaginary part of the dielectric constant, except for a sign change. It turns out that such a symmetry does not exist [1]. This issue has also been investigated in detail for random or disordered gain media, with varying viewpoints [2]. Traditionally, much of the research on amplifying media has considered the interaction of light within the entire volume of such a medium. Recent interest in metamaterials and other esoteric structures in which plasmons are used to manipulate optical signals has brought attention to the role of surface waves in active dielectrics [3, 4]. From a fundamental perspective, the main difference between active and passive media is that spontaneous emission cannot be avoided in gain media. As a result, a rigorous analysis of gain media demands a quantum-mechanical treatment. Spontaneous emission in a gain medium depends not only on the material properties of that medium but also on the optical modes supported by the structure containing that material [5]. By a clever design of this structure (e.g., photonic crystals or microdisk resonators with a metallic cladding), it is possible to control the local density of optical modes and the spontaneous emission process itself. In Chapter 4, we discuss how to model a gain medium under such conditions by deploying optical Bloch equations.
The basic equations governing noise phenomena are derived from first principles and applied to examples in optical communications. Quantum noise arises from two sources, the momentum fluctuations of electrons at optical frequencies and the uncertainty-related fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. Shot noise results from the beating of the noise sources with the signal field. In high-gain amplifiers, the spontaneous-emission noise dominates shot noise and results in a noise figure of at least 3 dB. It is shown explicitly how, at high power, both the laser field and the laser noise source become classical. The increase in noise in lasers with open cavities is not due to enhanced spontaneous emission as once thought, but to single-pass amplification. The noise fields and spontaneous currents have Gaussian distributions, while nonlasing modes have exponential photon-number distributions. Low-frequency intensity fluctuations arise from the electric current driving the laser and can be sub-Poissonian, in contrast to shot noise, which has a Poissonian distribution. The calculational tools are a wave equation for the field operator and a rate equation for the carrier-number operator, each containing spontaneous current noise sources. The correlation functions of these sources are determined by the fluctuation-dissipation theorem. [S0034-6861(96)00503-X]
Summary form only given. Papers have evaluated the intensity noise at linear phase-insensitive optical amplifier output and identified it as amplified spontaneous emission (ASE). The contribution of input fluctuations and of the amplifier in output noise are not distinguishable, making impossible a description of squeezed-state amplification. Starting from a corpuscular approach of light and using Rice description of a coherent electromagnetic field, a new classical approach of intensity noise in amplifiers is proposed. It distinguishes the different sources of noise and evaluates their contribution in an intuitive but rigorous way. It also brings to the fore the effects of loss, intrinsic to the amplifier, in the intensity noise generation process. After reminding the corpuscular formalism of intensity noise and Rice representation of noise, the intensity noise at the output of linear, phase-insensitive optical amplifiers is deduced, followed by a reevaluation of the noise figure.