Superluminal Signaling Seems Unphysical

Remi Cornwall

Published Apr 1, 2015• 0 citations

Abstract

The author muses on precursor ideas on a mechanism for superluminal signaling via entanglement correlation and comes to the conclusion that, whatever it is, it would be highly unusual, if superluminal signaling is to be believed. (Date of publication Sept/Oct 2011).

Related papers

A Note on Entanglement, Nonlocality, and Superluminal Signaling

Luiz Carlos Ryff

An alternative approach to "entanglement, nonlocality, and superluminal signaling" is advocated. It is inspired on Faraday's way of viewing physics.

arXiv:1308.5690Aug 26, 20130 citations

A proof-of-principle quantum-optical experiment challenging the import of the 'no-signaling' theorem

Demetrios A. Kalamidas

We present, and mathematically describe, a proof-of-principle quantum-optical experiment that seemingly enables superluminal signaling, contrary to the import of the 'no-signaling' theorem.

arXiv:1312.2888Dec 10, 20130 citations

Quantum Entanglement and the Nonexistence of Superluminal Signals

Michael D. Westmoreland, Benjamin W. Schumacher

This paper shows that ordinary quantum mechanics is not consistent with the superluminal transmission of classical information.

arXiv:quant-ph/9801014Jan 8, 19984 citations

Is Superluminal Signaling Possible in Collapse Theories of Quantum Mechanics?

Shan Gao

Foundations of PhysicsSep 23, 20230 citations

A proposal for a feasible quantum-optical scheme to test for the existence of superluminal signals via quantum mechanical entanglement

Demetrios A. Kalamidas

Motivated by a proposal from Greenberger [Physica Scripta T76, p.57 (1998) ] for superluminal signaling, and inspired by an experiment from Zou, Wang, and Mandel [Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, p.318 (1991) ] showing interference effects within multi-particle entanglement without coincidence detection, we propose a feasible quantum-optical scheme that purports to manifest the capacity for superluminal transfer of information between distant parties

Oct 20, 20110 citations

No-cloning and superluminal signaling

S. J. van Enk

The argument given by M.D. Westmoreland and B. Schumacher in quant-ph/9801014 leading to the purported conclusion that superluminal signaling violates the no-cloning theorem is shown to be incorrect.

Mar 13, 19983 citations