Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0007120 · Physics Letters A

Quantum strategies of quantum measurements

Chuan‐Feng Li, Yong-Sheng Zhang, Yun‐Feng Huang, Guang‐Can Guo

Published Mar 1, 2001• 40 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(01)00072-x

Related papers

Quantum State Estimation of a Qubit Using Adaptive Measurements

Nattima Thong-O, T. Angsachon, Atirach Ritboon

Quantum state estimation is one of the most extensively studied topics in the field of quantum theory and quantum information. This process is essential in quantum protocols to ensure that the estimated state matches the true state. Typically, the quantum state of identical systems can be estimated from the statistics of measurement outcomes across different measurement bases. In this research, we study adaptive-measurement strategies for quantum state estimation used to identify a pure state of two-level systems and compare the obtained estimated state to the state obtained when the measurement bases are chosen randomly. The adaptive measurements in this study include the maximum-information-gain strategy, and the confirmation strategy. In this work, we simulate the outcome of the measurement on a system and use the Bayesian estimation method to estimate the obtained state. We then adaptively change the basis of the next measurement in accordance with the estimated state and the used adaptive strategy. We find that the maximum-information-gain strategy provides the fastest convergence and the most accurate state estimation compared to the confirmation strategy and the randomly-chosen-measurement-basis strategy, especially in the presence of measurement noise. Keywords: Quantum state estimation, State tomography, Adaptive measurements

Thai Journal of Physics•Jan 15, 2026•0 citations

Nonclassical traits in multi-copy state discrimination

Tim Achenbach, Leevi Leppäjärvi, Hanwool Lee +1 more

Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental information processing task that serves as a key component in many applications while also carrying foundational significance. In this work, we consider minimum error discrimination of multi-copy states, where instead of preparing a single system we assume that multiple instances of the same state are prepared. Now the discrimination allows for measurements from multiple parties with different measurement strategies varying from global measurement strategy to ones restricted to different forms of local operations and classical communication strategies. By comparing the average success probabilities in quantum and classical cases, we find a qubit strategy that outperforms all the bit strategies. On the other hand, we show that the classical measurement strategy does not give benefit in qubit over bit. However, we find that there are other (qu)bit-like operational theories which can outperform the best qubit strategies even with a classical measurement strategy and we are able to identify instances of different theories where different measurement strategies are optimal. In this way, we are able to find instances of nonlocality without entanglement as well as provide general bounds for bit-like operational theories.

quant-pharXiv:2604.26647•Apr 30, 2026•0 citations

Strategies to measure a quantum state

Franz Embacher, Heide Narnhofer

arXiv:quant-ph/0310180•Annals of Physics•Dec 30, 2003•16 citations

Quantum States and Quantum Measurements

Dan Cristian Marinescu, Gabriela M. Marinescu

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Quantum measurement in action

Michael Hatridge

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 21, 2013•0 citations

Strategies for discriminating between non-orthogonal quantum states

Anthony Chefles, Stephen Mark Barnett

Any measurement strategy designed to discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states will have a finite probability of yielding erroneous or inconclusive results. The lower bounds on these probabilities for conclusive and error-free strategies are given by the Helstrom and Ivanovic–Feres limits respectively. We consider intermediate measurements which interpolate between these extremes and derive a general lower bound on the combination of errors and inconclusive results. We also describe a family of measurement strategies which attains this limit.

Journal of Modern Optics•Jun 1, 1998•112 citations
Quantum state estimation is one of the most extensively studied topics in the field of quantum theory and quantum information. This process is essential in quantum protocols to ensure that the estimated state matches the true state. Typically, the quantum state of identical systems can be estimated from the statistics of measurement outcomes across different measurement bases. In this research, we study adaptive-measurement strategies for quantum state estimation used to identify a pure state of two-level systems and compare the obtained estimated state to the state obtained when the measurement bases are chosen randomly. The adaptive measurements in this study include the maximum-information-gain strategy, and the confirmation strategy. In this work, we simulate the outcome of the measurement on a system and use the Bayesian estimation method to estimate the obtained state. We then adaptively change the basis of the next measurement in accordance with the estimated state and the used adaptive strategy. We find that the maximum-information-gain strategy provides the fastest convergence and the most accurate state estimation compared to the confirmation strategy and the randomly-chosen-measurement-basis strategy, especially in the presence of measurement noise. Keywords: Quantum state estimation, State tomography, Adaptive measurements
Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental information processing task that serves as a key component in many applications while also carrying foundational significance. In this work, we consider minimum error discrimination of multi-copy states, where instead of preparing a single system we assume that multiple instances of the same state are prepared. Now the discrimination allows for measurements from multiple parties with different measurement strategies varying from global measurement strategy to ones restricted to different forms of local operations and classical communication strategies. By comparing the average success probabilities in quantum and classical cases, we find a qubit strategy that outperforms all the bit strategies. On the other hand, we show that the classical measurement strategy does not give benefit in qubit over bit. However, we find that there are other (qu)bit-like operational theories which can outperform the best qubit strategies even with a classical measurement strategy and we are able to identify instances of different theories where different measurement strategies are optimal. In this way, we are able to find instances of nonlocality without entanglement as well as provide general bounds for bit-like operational theories.
Any measurement strategy designed to discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states will have a finite probability of yielding erroneous or inconclusive results. The lower bounds on these probabilities for conclusive and error-free strategies are given by the Helstrom and Ivanovic–Feres limits respectively. We consider intermediate measurements which interpolate between these extremes and derive a general lower bound on the combination of errors and inconclusive results. We also describe a family of measurement strategies which attains this limit.