Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental information processing task that serves as a key component in many applications while also carrying foundational significance. In this work, we consider minimum error discrimination of multi-copy states, where instead of preparing a single system we assume that multiple instances of the same state are prepared. Now the discrimination allows for measurements from multiple parties with different measurement strategies varying from global measurement strategy to ones restricted to different forms of local operations and classical communication strategies. By comparing the average success probabilities in quantum and classical cases, we find a qubit strategy that outperforms all the bit strategies. On the other hand, we show that the classical measurement strategy does not give benefit in qubit over bit. However, we find that there are other (qu)bit-like operational theories which can outperform the best qubit strategies even with a classical measurement strategy and we are able to identify instances of different theories where different measurement strategies are optimal. In this way, we are able to find instances of nonlocality without entanglement as well as provide general bounds for bit-like operational theories.
Comments
Result about local fixed strategies in section 7 and summary of main results in section 2 added as well as minor changes
Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental information processing task that serves as a key component in many applications while also carrying foundational significance. In this work, we consider minimum error discrimination of multi-copy states, where instead of preparing a single system we assume that multiple instances of the same state are prepared. Now the discrimination allows for measurements from multiple parties with different measurement strategies varying from global measurement strategy to ones restricted to different forms of local operations and classical communication strategies. By comparing the average success probabilities in quantum and classical cases, we find a qubit strategy that outperforms all the bit strategies. On the other hand, we show that the classical measurement strategy does not give benefit in qubit over bit. However, we find that there are other (qu)bit-like operational theories which can outperform the best qubit strategies even with a classical measurement strategy and we are able to identify instances of different theories where different measurement strategies are optimal. In this way, we are able to find instances of nonlocality without entanglement as well as provide general bounds for bit-like operational theories.
Quantum measurement and control science provides a toolkit for implementing quantum information protocols, overcoming noisy operation and minimizing the use of costly quantum resources. The importance of finding optimal measurement and control strategies is revealed in the task of quantum state discrimination, a characteristic feature of quantum mechanics and a primitive for quantum information science and technology. When a quantum system is prepared in one of two known nonorthogonal quantum states, no measurement can deterministically tell which state the system is in. Two strategies can be applied to discriminate non-orthogonal states efficiently. Unambiguous state discrimination (USD) is strategy that provides a guess which is either correct, or inconclusive [1]. Alternatively, minimum error discrimination (MED) strategy will always provide a conclusive answer, which can sometimes be incorrect [2]. Perfect nonorthogonal state discrimination is still impossible even when multiple copies of the system are available, although different strategies increase the chance of having conclusive (for USD), or correct (for MED) result. Multiple-copy measurement strategies can be either collective, when a single measurement involves all the copies of the system, or local, when each copy of the system is measured separately. The latter can be further divided into fixed, where the measurement applied to each copy is the same, or adaptive, where the measurement on each subsequent copy depends on the outcomes of the previous measurements [3,4]. A multiple-copy MED strategy is defined by its goal of minimizing the average error for fixed resources, i.e. the number of copies of the system. An alternative approach we consider, is to minimize the average resources required, while keeping errors below a given bound [5]. This approach is central for fault-tolerant quantum computing and has been applied to a number of quantum control strategies [6,7]. We call the corresponding state discrimination task the guaranteed bounded error discrimination (GBED) task. Intuitively, one may assume that the multiple-copy strategies optimal for MED would be also optimal for GBED. We experimentally apply two known local non-adaptive strategies, previously considered for the MED task, to the two-state GBED problem [5]. We then derive and experimentally demonstrate a new local strategy, designed specifically for the GBED task that outperforms other strategies. Moreover, it performs usually better than, and in the regime of small error, scales better than, the theoretical performance of the optimal adaptive strategy for the MED task. The discovered reversal in the performance of schemes when swapping the task definition from performance-maximization to resource-minimization, is similar to that previously observed in state purification [6], suggesting that this phenomenon is a generic one. [1] I. D. Ivanovic, Phys. Lett. A 123, 257 (1987). [2] C. W. Helstrom, Quantum detection and estimation theory (1976). [3] A. Acín, et al., Phys. Rev. A 71, 032338 (2005). [4] B. L. Higgins, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 220503 (2009). [5] S. Slussarenko, et al., PRL 118, 030502 (2017). [6] H. M. Wiseman and J. F. Ralph. New J. Phys. 8, 90 (2006). [7] J. Combes, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 160503 (2008).
Multiple-copy state discrimination is a fundamental task in quantum information processing. If there are two, pure, nonorthogonal states then both local and collective schemes are known to reach the Helstrom bound, the maximum probability of successful discrimination allowed by quantum theory. For mixed states, it is known that only collective schemes can perform optimally, so it might be expected that these schemes are more resilient to preparation noise. We calculate the probability of success for two schemes, a local scheme based on Bayesian updating and quantum data gathering, the simplest possible collective measurement, and consider imperfect preparation fidelity. We find two surprising results. First, both schemes converge upon the same many-copy limit, which is less than unity. Second, the local scheme performs better in all cases. This highlights the point that one should take into account noise when designing state discrimination schemes.
Abstract In the case of a multi-party system, through local operations and classical communication (LOCC), each party may not perform perfect discrimination of quantum states that are separable and orthogonal. This property of quantum ensemble is called “nonlocality without entanglement” since each local party has a limit to full information of given quantum states. When this property is extended to the case of minimum-error discrimination, one can see that it is revealed when a nonlocal measurement provides more information about the unentangled states than LOCC does. One may infer the fact that the property depends on quantum states composing the quantum ensemble. However, an essential but unsettled question about the property is whether an explicit dependence on prior probabilities in terms of minimum-error discrimination could be shown in nonlocality without entanglement. In a simple term, one can ask whether different quantum ensembles made of the same separable quantum states could exhibit explicitly different behavior of the nonlocality. We answer this question in the positive, and we furthermore provide the explicit functional dependence of guessing probability on prior probabilities for the mirror-symmetric ensemble.
Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental task in the field of quantum communication and quantum information theory. Unless the states to be discriminated are mutually orthogonal, there will be some error in any attempt to determine which state was sent. Several strategies to optimally discriminate between quantum states exist, each maximising some figure of merit. In this thesis we mainly investigate the minimum-error strategy, in which the probability of correctly guessing the signal state is maximised. We introduce a method for constructing the optimal Positive-Operator Valued Measure (POVM) for this figure of merit, which is applicable for arbitrary states and arbitrary prior probabilities. We then use this method to solve minimum-error state discrimination for the so-called trine states with arbitrary prior probabilities - the first such general solution for a set of quantum states since the two-state case was solved when the problem of state discrimination was first introduced. We also investigate the difference between local and global measurements for a bipartite ensemble of states, and find that in certain circumstances the local measurement is superior. We conclude by finding a bipartite analogue to the Helstrom conditions, which indicate when a POVM satisfies the minimum-error criteria.
Quantum nonlocality, a form of nonclassicality, serves as a crucial resource in quantum information processing. Nonlocality in quantum systems is exemplified by the perfect discrimination of orthogonal quantum states through single joint measurements, which is unattainable using local operations and classical communication (LOCC). Bandyopadhyay [S. Bandyopadhyay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 210402 (2011)] established that, with LOCC alone, at most $N\ensuremath{-}1$ copies of N orthogonal quantum states are required for perfect discrimination. Here, we present the experimental verification of orthogonal quantum state discrimination employing LOCC. Our results demonstrate that up to three copies suffice for the perfect distinction of four orthogonal two-qubit states via LOCC. The verified method of perfectly distinguishing orthogonal quantum state sets offers potential applications in quantum information processes, including quantum secret sharing and quantum teleportation.
This work investigates which sets of quantum states give rise to the highest achievable success probability in minimum-error state discrimination if multiple copies of the unknown state are given. Specifically, we consider uniformly distributed ensembles of the form {N1,ρi⊗k}i=1N, where N states in dimension d are provided in k identical copies, and derive universal limits in this scenario. For pure state ensembles, we prove that whenever N is large enough to support a state k-design, these designs will exactly give rise to the maximally discriminable sets. We further show that when N exceeds the size required for a k-design, mixed states can outperform all pure state ensembles. We then recognise that the problem of most discriminable classical states in the multi-copy regime is in one-to-one correspondence to the concept of the multiplicative Bayes capacity of independent uses of classical channels, a concept that emerges naturally in the context of classical information leakage. This connection allows us to completely solve the classical analogue of our problem when N≥(kd+k−1), and to prove that quantum systems offer a quadratic advantage (in number of copies k) over classical ones. Then, we prove that this quantum over classical advantage is strongly reduced when one is restricted to real quantum states, more precisely, when N≥k+1, pure real qubits only offer a constant advantage over classical bits. Finally, we introduce computational techniques to find sets of most discriminable ensembles and to obtain rigorous universal upper bounds on the maximal success probability for multi-copy state discrimination in cases that are analytically intractable.