Strategies to measure a quantum state

Nattima Thong-O, T. Angsachon, Atirach Ritboon

Quantum state estimation is one of the most extensively studied topics in the field of quantum theory and quantum information. This process is essential in quantum protocols to ensure that the estimated state matches the true state. Typically, the quantum state of identical systems can be estimated from the statistics of measurement outcomes across different measurement bases. In this research, we study adaptive-measurement strategies for quantum state estimation used to identify a pure state of two-level systems and compare the obtained estimated state to the state obtained when the measurement bases are chosen randomly. The adaptive measurements in this study include the maximum-information-gain strategy, and the confirmation strategy. In this work, we simulate the outcome of the measurement on a system and use the Bayesian estimation method to estimate the obtained state. We then adaptively change the basis of the next measurement in accordance with the estimated state and the used adaptive strategy. We find that the maximum-information-gain strategy provides the fastest convergence and the most accurate state estimation compared to the confirmation strategy and the randomly-chosen-measurement-basis strategy, especially in the presence of measurement noise. Keywords: Quantum state estimation, State tomography, Adaptive measurements

Tim Achenbach, Leevi Leppäjärvi, Hanwool Lee +1 more

Quantum state discrimination is a fundamental information processing task that serves as a key component in many applications while also carrying foundational significance. In this work, we consider minimum error discrimination of multi-copy states, where instead of preparing a single system we assume that multiple instances of the same state are prepared. Now the discrimination allows for measurements from multiple parties with different measurement strategies varying from global measurement strategy to ones restricted to different forms of local operations and classical communication strategies. By comparing the average success probabilities in quantum and classical cases, we find a qubit strategy that outperforms all the bit strategies. On the other hand, we show that the classical measurement strategy does not give benefit in qubit over bit. However, we find that there are other (qu)bit-like operational theories which can outperform the best qubit strategies even with a classical measurement strategy and we are able to identify instances of different theories where different measurement strategies are optimal. In this way, we are able to find instances of nonlocality without entanglement as well as provide general bounds for bit-like operational theories.

Michael G. Raymer

Giacomo Mauro D’Ariano

A. Hayashi, T. Hashimoto, M. Horibe

We investigate the performance of discrimination strategy in the comparison task of known quantum states. In the discrimination strategy, one infers whether or not two quantum systems are in the same state on the basis of the outcomes of separate discrimination measurements on each system. In some cases with more than two possible states, the optimal strategy in minimum-error comparison is that one should infer the two systems are in different states without any measurement, implying that the discrimination strategy performs worse than the trivial ``no-measurement'' strategy. We present a sufficient condition for this phenomenon to happen. For two pure states with equal prior probabilities, we determine the optimal comparison success probability with an error margin, which interpolates the minimum-error and unambiguous comparison. We find that the discrimination strategy is not optimal except for the minimum-error case.

Konrad Banaszek, Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrzański, Ian A. Walmsley