Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:nucl-th/9904019 · Revista Mexicana de Física

IBM: parameter symmetry, hidden symmetries and transformations of boson operators

A. M. Shirokov, N. A. Smirnova, Yu.F. Smirnov, Octavio Castaños, Alejandro Frank

Published Apr 7, 1999• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A symmetry of the parameter space of interacting boson models IBM-1 and IBM-2 is studied. The symmetry is associated with linear canonical transformations of boson operators, or, equivalently, with the existence of different realizations of the symmetry algebras of the models. The relevance of the parameter symmetry to physical observables is discussed.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.nucl-th/9904019

Related papers

Wave-function entropy and dynamical symmetry breaking in the interacting boson model

Pavel Cejnar, Jan Jolie

The degree of chaos in the simplest interacting boson model (IBM-1) is compared with what we call the ``dynamical symmetry content'' of the system. The latter is represented by the information entropy of the eigenfunctions with respect to bases associated with dynamical symmetries of the IBM-1, and expresses thus the localization of actual eigenfunctions in these symmetry bases. The wave-function entropy is shown to be a sensitive tool for monitoring the processes of a single dynamical symmetry breaking or transitions between two and more symmetries. For the IBM-1 Hamiltonians studied here, the known features related to chaos, namely, the dependence of chaotic measures on the Hamiltonian parameters (position in the Casten triangle) and on the angular momentum, turn out to be correlated with the behavior of the wave-function entropy.

arXiv:chao-dyn/9802024•Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics•Jul 1, 1998•43 citations

Parameter symmetries of quantum many-body systems

Pavel Cejnar, H. B. Geyer

We analyze the occurrence of dynamically equivalent Hamiltonians in the parameter space of general many-body interactions for quantum systems, particularly those that conserve the total number of particles. As an illustration of the general framework, the appearance of parameter symmetries in the interacting boson model 1 and their absence in the Ginocchio ${\mathrm{SO}}_{8}$ fermionic model are discussed.

arXiv:nucl-th/0110042•Physical Review C•Aug 14, 2001•4 citations

Symmetry in quantum mechanics

Symmetry in quantum mechanicsRoughly speaking, a symmetry of some mathematical object is an invertible transformation that leaves all relevant structure as it is.Thus a symmetry of a set is just a bijection (as sets have no further structure, whence invertibility is the only demand on a symmetry), a symmetry of a topological space is a homeomorphism, a symmetry of a Banach space is a linear isometric isomorphism, and, crucially important for this chapter, a symmetry of a Hilbert space H is a unitary operator, i.e., a linear map u : H → H satisfying one and hence all of the following equivalent conditions:• u is invertible and preserves the inner product, i.e., uϕ, uψ = ϕ, ψ (ϕ, ψ ∈ H).The discussion of symmetries in quantum physics is based on the above idea, but the mathematically obvious choices need not be the physically relevant ones.Even in elementary quantum mechanics, where A = B(H), i.e., the C*-algebra of all bounded operators on some Hilbert space H, the concept of a symmetry is already diverse.The main structures whose symmetries we shall study in this chapter are:1.The normal pure state space P 1 (H), i.e., the set of one-dimensional projections on H, with transition probability τ : P 1 (H) × P 1 (H) → [0, 1] defined by (2.44).2. The normal state space D(H), i.e. the convex set of density operators ρ on H. The self-adjoint operators B(H)sa on H, seen as a Jordan algebra (see below).4. The effects E (H) = [0, 1] B(H) , seen as a convex partially ordered set (poset). 5.The projections P(H) on H, seen as an orthocomplemented lattice.6.The unital commutative C*-subalgebras C (B(H)) of B(H), seen as a poset.Each of these structures comes with its own notion of a symmetry, but the main point of this chapter will be to show these notions are equivalent, corresponding in all cases to either unitary or-surprisingly-anti-unitary operators, both merely defined up to a phase.The latter subtlety will open the world of projective unitary group representation to quantum mechanics (without which the existence of spin-1 2 particles such as electrons, and therewith also of ourselves, would be impossible).

Institute of Physics eBooks•Nov 26, 2004•0 citations

Contractions of the relativistic quantum LCT group and the emergence of spacetime symmetries

Anjary Feno Hasina Rasamimanana, Ravo Tokiniaina Ranaivoson, Roland Raboanary +3 more

Advances in the study of relativistic quantum phase space have established the set of Linear Canonical Transformations (LCTs) as a candidate for the fundamental symmetry group associated with relativistic quantum physics. In this framework, for a spacetime of signature $(N_+,N_-)$, the symmetry of the relativistic quantum phase space is described by the LCT group, isomorphic to the symplectic Lie group $Sp(2N_+,2N_-)$, which preserves the canonical commutation relations (CCRs) and treats spacetime coordinates and momenta operators on an equal footing. In this work, we investigate the contraction structure of the Lie algebra associated with the LCT group for signature $(1,4)$, clarifying how familiar spacetime symmetry groups emerge from this more fundamental quantum phase space symmetry. Using the Inönü-Wigner group contraction formalism, we examine each limit case corresponding to the possible combinations of asymptotic values of two fundamental length scale parameters associated with the theory, namely a minimum length $\ell$ and a maximum length $L$, which may be identified respectively with the Planck length and the de Sitter radius. We explicitly analyze how contractions of the LCT Lie algebra lead to the physically relevant de Sitter algebra $\mathfrak{so}(1,4)$ and, in the flat-curvature limit, to the Poincaré algebra $\mathfrak{iso}(1,3)$ of four-dimensional spacetime. This provides an explicit mechanism through which relativistic spacetime symmetry can emerge from a deeper symplectic structure of quantum phase space.

quant-pharXiv:2603.21333•Mar 24, 2026

Equivalence ofq-bosons using the exponential phase operator

S U Park

Various forms of the q-boson are explained and their hidden symmetry revealed by transformations using the exponential phase operator. Both the one-component and the multicomponent q-bosons are discussed. As a byproduct, we obtain a new boson algebra having a shifted vacuum structure and define a global operator U(1) gauge transformation.

arXiv:q-alg/9603006•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 7, 1996•3 citations

DYSON'S BOSON EXPANSION AND THE INTERACTING BOSON MODEL

Zhan-Ying Yang, Sen Y

Based on the so-called modified Jancovici-Schiff (MJS) substitution the interacting boson model (IBM) is treated as an approximation to the boson description adopted in the intermediate stage of a fermion description of nuclei. A unitary transformation is introduced to determine microscopically the IBM bosons and the IBM Hamiltonian. A general formula is given to transform the IBM state vectors back into the fermion state space.

Chinese Physics C•Jan 1, 1985•0 citations
A symmetry of the parameter space of interacting boson models IBM-1 and IBM-2 is studied. The symmetry is associated with linear canonical transformations of boson operators, or, equivalently, with the existence of different realizations of the symmetry algebras of the models. The relevance of the parameter symmetry to physical observables is discussed.
The degree of chaos in the simplest interacting boson model (IBM-1) is compared with what we call the ``dynamical symmetry content'' of the system. The latter is represented by the information entropy of the eigenfunctions with respect to bases associated with dynamical symmetries of the IBM-1, and expresses thus the localization of actual eigenfunctions in these symmetry bases. The wave-function entropy is shown to be a sensitive tool for monitoring the processes of a single dynamical symmetry breaking or transitions between two and more symmetries. For the IBM-1 Hamiltonians studied here, the known features related to chaos, namely, the dependence of chaotic measures on the Hamiltonian parameters (position in the Casten triangle) and on the angular momentum, turn out to be correlated with the behavior of the wave-function entropy.
We analyze the occurrence of dynamically equivalent Hamiltonians in the parameter space of general many-body interactions for quantum systems, particularly those that conserve the total number of particles. As an illustration of the general framework, the appearance of parameter symmetries in the interacting boson model 1 and their absence in the Ginocchio SO8{\mathrm{SO}}_{8}SO8​ fermionic model are discussed.
Symmetry in quantum mechanicsRoughly speaking, a symmetry of some mathematical object is an invertible transformation that leaves all relevant structure as it is.Thus a symmetry of a set is just a bijection (as sets have no further structure, whence invertibility is the only demand on a symmetry), a symmetry of a topological space is a homeomorphism, a symmetry of a Banach space is a linear isometric isomorphism, and, crucially important for this chapter, a symmetry of a Hilbert space H is a unitary operator, i.e., a linear map u : H → H satisfying one and hence all of the following equivalent conditions:• u is invertible and preserves the inner product, i.e., uϕ, uψ = ϕ, ψ (ϕ, ψ ∈ H).The discussion of symmetries in quantum physics is based on the above idea, but the mathematically obvious choices need not be the physically relevant ones.Even in elementary quantum mechanics, where A = B(H), i.e., the C*-algebra of all bounded operators on some Hilbert space H, the concept of a symmetry is already diverse.The main structures whose symmetries we shall study in this chapter are:1.The normal pure state space P 1 (H), i.e., the set of one-dimensional projections on H, with transition probability τ : P 1 (H) × P 1 (H) → [0, 1] defined by (2.44).2. The normal state space D(H), i.e. the convex set of density operators ρ on H. The self-adjoint operators B(H)sa on H, seen as a Jordan algebra (see below).4. The effects E (H) = [0, 1] B(H) , seen as a convex partially ordered set (poset). 5.The projections P(H) on H, seen as an orthocomplemented lattice.6.The unital commutative C*-subalgebras C (B(H)) of B(H), seen as a poset.Each of these structures comes with its own notion of a symmetry, but the main point of this chapter will be to show these notions are equivalent, corresponding in all cases to either unitary or-surprisingly-anti-unitary operators, both merely defined up to a phase.The latter subtlety will open the world of projective unitary group representation to quantum mechanics (without which the existence of spin-1 2 particles such as electrons, and therewith also of ourselves, would be impossible).
Advances in the study of relativistic quantum phase space have established the set of Linear Canonical Transformations (LCTs) as a candidate for the fundamental symmetry group associated with relativistic quantum physics. In this framework, for a spacetime of signature (N+,N−)(N_+,N_-)(N+​,N−​), the symmetry of the relativistic quantum phase space is described by the LCT group, isomorphic to the symplectic Lie group Sp(2N+,2N−)Sp(2N_+,2N_-)Sp(2N+​,2N−​), which preserves the canonical commutation relations (CCRs) and treats spacetime coordinates and momenta operators on an equal footing. In this work, we investigate the contraction structure of the Lie algebra associated with the LCT group for signature (1,4)(1,4)(1,4), clarifying how familiar spacetime symmetry groups emerge from this more fundamental quantum phase space symmetry. Using the Inönü-Wigner group contraction formalism, we examine each limit case corresponding to the possible combinations of asymptotic values of two fundamental length scale parameters associated with the theory, namely a minimum length ℓ\ellℓ and a maximum length LLL, which may be identified respectively with the Planck length and the de Sitter radius. We explicitly analyze how contractions of the LCT Lie algebra lead to the physically relevant de Sitter algebra so(1,4)\mathfrak{so}(1,4)so(1,4) and, in the flat-curvature limit, to the Poincaré algebra iso(1,3)\mathfrak{iso}(1,3)iso(1,3) of four-dimensional spacetime. This provides an explicit mechanism through which relativistic spacetime symmetry can emerge from a deeper symplectic structure of quantum phase space.