Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:math-ph/0305006

On an Algebraic Essential of Submanifold Quantum Mechanics

Shigeki Matsutani

Published May 4, 2003• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The submanifold quantum mechanics was opened by Jensen and Koppe (Ann. Phys. {\bf 63} (1971) 586-591) and has been studied for these three decades. This article gives its more algebraic definition and show what is the essential of the submanifold quantum mechanics from an algebraic viewpoint.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.math-ph/0305006

Related papers

A Review of The Algebraic Approaches to Quantum Mechanics. Appraisals on Their Theoretical Relevance

Antonino Drago

I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.

arXiv:2102.00861•Jan 29, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory from Algebraic and Geometric Viewpoints

Albert S. Schwarz

SpringerBriefs in physics•Jan 1, 2024•2 citations

Quantum Tomography twenty years later

M. Asorey, Alberto Ibort, G Marmo +1 more

We show a sample of some relevant developments in classical and quantum tomography that have taken place over the last twenty years. We will present a general conceptual framework that provides a simple unifying mathematical picture for them and, as an effective use of it, three subjects have been chosen that offer a wide panorama of the scope of classical and quantum tomography: tomography along lines and submanifolds, coherent state tomography and tomography in the abstract algebraic setting of quantum systems.

arXiv:1510.08140•Physica Scripta•Jun 1, 2015•56 citations

Algebraic quantum mechanics: I. Basic definitions

В. В. Варламов

An algebraic formulation of a quantum theory with a binary structure is considered.

Matematičeskie struktury i modelirovanie•Oct 5, 2020•0 citations

Comment on ‘Quantum chaos in elementary quantum mechanics’ by Yu Dabaghian and R Jensen

R. Blümel

Algebraic, numerical and conceptual problems in a recently published paper by Dabaghian and Jensen ( 2005 Eur. J. Phys. 26 423–439 ) are discussed. A convergent scheme for summing periodic orbits in the tunnelling regime is suggested.

European Journal of Physics•Dec 22, 2005•7 citations

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Eduardo J. S. Villaseñor, Rui Loja Fernandes, Roger Picken

The purpose of this contribution is to give a very brief introduction to Quantum Mechanics for an audience of mathematicians. I will follow Segal's approach to Quantum Mechanics paying special attention to algebraic issues. The usual representation of Quantum Mechanics on Hilbert spaces is also discussed.

arXiv:0804.3728•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2008•52 citations
I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.
We show a sample of some relevant developments in classical and quantum tomography that have taken place over the last twenty years. We will present a general conceptual framework that provides a simple unifying mathematical picture for them and, as an effective use of it, three subjects have been chosen that offer a wide panorama of the scope of classical and quantum tomography: tomography along lines and submanifolds, coherent state tomography and tomography in the abstract algebraic setting of quantum systems.