arXiv:2102.00861

A Review of The Algebraic Approaches to Quantum Mechanics. Appraisals on Their Theoretical Relevance

Antonino Drago

Published Jan 29, 2021• 0 citations

Abstract

I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2102.00861

Related papers

Is the C*-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics an Alternative Formulation to the Dominant One?

Antonino Drago

Since 1947 a foundation of Quantum Mechanics (QM) on functional analysis was suggested by Segal. By defining the C*-algebra of the observables, then the Gelfand-Naimark-Segal theorem faithfully represents this algebra into Hilbert space. In the 70’s Emch has reiterated this formulation and improved it. Recently Strocchi improved it even more. First, he suggested an axiomatization of the paradigmatic Dirac-von Neumann’s formulation of QM to which he addresses two basic criticisms, i.e. a weak linkage with the experimental basis of theoretical physics and the obscurity about the separation mark between classical mechanics and QM. Afterwards, through an analysis of the experimental basis of a physical theory he suggests an explanation of Segal’s restriction of the operators to be bounded. Eventually, he represents this algebra into Hilbert space and at last, by means of Weyl algebra he obtains the symmetries of the dynamics of a particle theory. In fact, several characteristic features of this formulation correspond to those determined by the two choices which are the alternative ones to the choices of the dominant formulation. It is a problem-based theory, since it starts rather from than axioms a problem (i.e. the indeterminacy); then, it argues through both doubly negated propositions and an ad absurdum proof. Moreover, its theoretical development is similar to that of an alternative classical theory since it put, before the geometry, the algebra; the bounded operators are represented by a polynomial algebra; which pertains to constructive mathematics. Eventually, he obtains the symmetries of the theory. The problems to be overcome in order to accurately re-construct his formulation according to the two alternative choices which are listed. It is concluded that rather an alternative role, it plays a complementary role to the paradigmatic formulation.

Advances in Historical StudiesJan 1, 20181 citation

From Operator Algebras to Complexity Theory and Back

Thomas Vidick

Quantum mechanics and the theory of operator algebras have been intertwined since their origin.In the 1930s [20] von Neumann laid the foundations for the theory of (what are now known as) von Neumann algebras with the explicit goal of establishing Heisenberg's matrix mechanics on a rigorous footing (quoting from the preface, in the translation by Beyer: "The object of this book is to present the new quantum mechanics in a unified representation which, so far as it is possible and useful, is mathematically rigorous").Following the initial explorations of Murray and von Neumann, the new theory took on a life of its own, eventually leading to multiple applications unrelated to quantum mechanics, such as to free probability or noncommutative geometry.In his 1976 paper completing the classification of injective von Neumann algebras [6] Connes made a casual

Notices of the American Mathematical SocietyOct 8, 20192 citations

The Historical and Physical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

Robert Golub, S. K. Lamoreaux

Abstract Following the path by which humanity learned quantum mechanics can lead to an improved understanding of the theory and the origins of its perceived limitations. Our goal is to retrace the development by investigating primary sources, including original published papers and letters, with attention to their timing and influence. Quantum mechanics began in 1900 with the introduction of Planck’s constant, which lead to the “old” quantum theory and Bohr’s model of the atom. With the introduction of matter waves in 1924, a second more intense period began. By 1928 the complete fundamental structure of quantum mechanics was established with the introduction of the Schrödinger equation, the proof of its equivalence to Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics, and the introduction of the relativistic Dirac equation. The theory retains the same essential form today, fueling the technological revolution that began in the last century. We culminate with an introduction to quantum information and computing. This completely new physical scientific paradigm was developed largely in Germany during a period of enormous social, economic, and political upheaval—in a hostile intellectual environment—that parallels the overturning of classical physics. It is striking that all the problems debated today were immediately recognized by the founders of the theory and instructive to see how they dealt with the various issues. We emphasize the centrality of the often neglected second quantization form of the theory for questions of interpretation and give a detailed examination of von Neumann’s widely misunderstood hidden variable theorem.

Feb 28, 202310 citations

Quantum Mechanics and Its Evolving Formulations

Jean-Pierre Antoine

In this paper, we discuss the time evolution of the quantum mechanics formalism. Starting from the heroic beginnings of Heisenberg and Schrödinger, we cover successively the rigorous Hilbert space formulation of von Neumann, the practical bra-ket formalism of Dirac, and the more recent rigged Hilbert space approach.

EntropyJan 19, 20219 citations

Poincaré's Electromagnetic Quantum Mechanics

Enrico Giannetto

Compiling a history of quantum mechanics is a very complex undertaking. Many roads have led to quantum theory: Heisenberg with Born and Jordan, Schrodinger, Dirac gave us the most important formulations of quantum mechanics. Another, neglected, historical rise of quantum physics is here considered by outlining the historical context in which different conceptions of Nature (mechanistic, thermodynamic and electromagnetic) were in competition to give a foundation to physics. In particular, the roots of quantum physics within the electromagnetic conception of Nature and Poincare’s quantum electromagnetic mechanics are discussed. This analysis can give a completely new understanding of quantum physics.

Jan 1, 20080 citations

The formalisms and interpretations of quantum mechanics

Kefu Zhu

This chapter, based on the background information of the previous chapter, will review the formalism of quantum mechanics – its fundamental mathematical structure (the basic contents of Hilbert space representation and operator algebra representation) and physical assumptions (kinematics, dynamics, and measurement theory). These are the premise and foundation for discussing the quantum histories interpretation. Then, in combination with the viewpoints of some literature in recent years, we will explore what is the interpretation of quantum mechanics, analyze the relationship between the theory of quantum mechanics and its interpretation, and declare the author’s basic stance on these two issues. These two are the primary issues that all interpretive work in the philosophy of physics will face (not limited to the interpretation of quantum mechanics), and the necessary clarification here is also conducive to the subsequent discussion. Three common terms – theory, formalism, and interpretation – are explicated and differentiated by offering the necessary definitions of their meanings, based on the works of Acuña and Ruetsche. The clarification will help to make the subsequent related discussions more precise.

Routledge eBooksAug 22, 20250 citations