Quantum mechanics and the theory of operator algebras have been intertwined since their origin.In the 1930s [20] von Neumann laid the foundations for the theory of (what are now known as) von Neumann algebras with the explicit goal of establishing Heisenberg's matrix mechanics on a rigorous footing (quoting from the preface, in the translation by Beyer: "The object of this book is to present the new quantum mechanics in a unified representation which, so far as it is possible and useful, is mathematically rigorous").Following the initial explorations of Murray and von Neumann, the new theory took on a life of its own, eventually leading to multiple applications unrelated to quantum mechanics, such as to free probability or noncommutative geometry.In his 1976 paper completing the classification of injective von Neumann algebras [6] Connes made a casual
Quantum mechanics and the theory of operator algebras have been intertwined since their origin.In the 1930s [20] von Neumann laid the foundations for the theory of (what are now known as) von Neumann algebras with the explicit goal of establishing Heisenberg's matrix mechanics on a rigorous footing (quoting from the preface, in the translation by Beyer: "The object of this book is to present the new quantum mechanics in a unified representation which, so far as it is possible and useful, is mathematically rigorous").Following the initial explorations of Murray and von Neumann, the new theory took on a life of its own, eventually leading to multiple applications unrelated to quantum mechanics, such as to free probability or noncommutative geometry.In his 1976 paper completing the classification of injective von Neumann algebras [6] Connes made a casual
This book studies the foundations of quantum theory through its relationship to classical physics. This idea goes back to the Copenhagen Interpretation (in the original version due to Bohr and Heisenberg), which the author relates to the mathematical formalism of operator algebras originally created by von Neumann. The book therefore includes comprehensive appendices on functional analysis and C*-algebras, as well as a briefer one on logic, category theory, and topos theory. Matters of foundational as well as mathematical interest that are covered in detail include symmetry (and its "spontaneous" breaking), the measurement problem, the Kochen-Specker, Free Will, and Bell Theorems, the Kadison-Singer conjecture, quantization, indistinguishable particles, the quantum theory of large systems, and quantum logic, the latter in connection with the topos approach to quantum theory.
Quantum theory is the soul of contemporary physics. It was discovered in an adventurous way, under the urge to solve the puzzles posed by atomic spectra and blackbody radiation. But after its invention, it immediately became clear that it was not just a theory of specific physical systems: it was rather a new language of universal applicability. Already in 1928, the theory had received solid mathematical foundations by Hilbert, von Neumann, and Nordheim, and this work was brought to completion in the monumental work of von Neumann, in the form that we still study nowadays. The theory is extraordinarily successful, and its predictions have been confirmed to an astonishing level of precision in a large spectrum of experiments. However, almost 90 years after von Neumann's book, quantum theory remains mysterious. Its mathematical formulation – based on Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators – is far from having an intuitive interpretation. The association of physical systems to Hilbert spaces whose unit vectors represent pure states, the representation of transformations by unitary operators and of observables by self-adjoint operators – all such postulates look artificial and ad hoc . A slightly more operational approach is provided by the C * -algebraic formulation of quantum theory – still, this formulation relies on the assumption that observables form an algebra , where the physical meanings of the multiplication and the sum are far from clear. In short, the postulates of quantum theory impose mathematical structures without providing any simple reason for this choice: the mathematics of Hilbert spaces is adopted as a magic blackbox that “works well” at producing experimental predictions. However, in a satisfactory axiomatization of a physical theory the mathematical structures should emerge as a consequence of postulates that have a direct physical interpretation. By this we mean postulates referring, e.g., to primitive notions like physical system, measurement, or process, rather than notions like, e.g., Hilbert space, C * -algebra, unit vector, or selfadjoint operator. The crucial question thus remains unanswered: why quantum theory? Which are the principles at the basis of the theory? A case that is often invoked in contrast is that of Special Relativity theory, which directly follows from the simple understandable principle of relativity.
After a fairly rigorous mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics based on transformation theory by Dirac in which he cast Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics and Schrodinger’s wave mechanics on a common operator theoretic setting and successfully explained their equivalence, it was John Von Neumann in monumental treatise “Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics” who proved the spectral theorem for all self adjoint operators in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space and thereby cast the masterly work of Dirac “The principles of quantum mechanics“ in a way that even pure mathematicians were able to understand. Dirac in his book had also indicated the work of Jordan and Heisenberg on quantum scattering theory but without the modern method of wave operators. Lippmann and Schwinger gave a more rigorous discussion of scattering theory via the introduction of free particle states and scattered states. Actually, free particle states are not square integrable and hence cannot strictly be termed as states. However by the use of wave operators the equations of Lippmann and Schwinger could be made rigorous using the setting of the continuous spectrum of a self-adjoint opearator introduced by Von Neumann, Crucial to this development is the notion of the domain of definition of an unbounded operator. This leads to the fact that the wave operators that appear in scattering theory are not defined on all vectors but usually on those vectors that belong to the continuous spectrum of the free particle Hamiltonian. Today scattering theory is a well developed subject and the interested reader can get a good grasp of this subject from the books 1 Tosio Kato, “Perturbation theory for linear operators”, Springer. 2 Werner O. Amrein, “Hilbert space methods in quantum mechanics”, CRC press, 2012.
Forty years ago, Haag and Kastler [27] introduced the algebraic approach to Quantum Field Theory, and soon their method was extended to statistical mechanics. The rationale was to free the theory from particular realizations, linked to specific models, and to focus on the basic structure, namely, the algebra of observables and states on it. This more abstract language, exploiting the deep mathematical theories of C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras, soon became the standard approach to the mathematically rigorous description of physical systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom. Textbooks flourished and, among many authors, Gérard Emch argued forcefully for the new approach [6].
I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.