Entropy

Quantum Mechanics and Its Evolving Formulations

Jean-Pierre Antoine

Published Jan 19, 2021• 9 citations

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the time evolution of the quantum mechanics formalism. Starting from the heroic beginnings of Heisenberg and Schrödinger, we cover successively the rigorous Hilbert space formulation of von Neumann, the practical bra-ket formalism of Dirac, and the more recent rigged Hilbert space approach.

DOI: 10.3390/e23010124

Related papers

The Various Versions of Quantum Mechanics

F. J. Duarte

The Schrödinger equation is a beautiful wave equation that leads us directly to the widely used Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics. The Schrödinger equation was also there at the very beginning of quantum mechanics. Therefore it should not be surprising that when most people refer to quantum mechanics they do so from the vantage point of the Schrödinger equation. However, there are also several other versions of quantum mechanics. Most notable is the version of quantum mechanics introduced by Heisenberg that was transformed into a matrix formalism via a collaborative effort of Born, Heisenberg, and Jordan. Then around came our favorite, Dirac's bra ket notation. Dirac also inspired Feynman to introduce his path integrals. But there are also others. A brief description follows.

CRC Press eBooksApr 10, 20260 citations

Quantum mechanics

Pieter E. Vermaas

I start by briefly overviewing quantum mechanics as it is standardly formulated and by discussing the question of whether this standard formulation needs to be supplemented by an interpretation. The overview is based mainly on Von Neumann (1932, 1955) and its aim is not to give the reader a crash course in quantum mechanics, but to present those parts of the standard formalism which I use in this book. For a more complete treatment, the reader may consult the standard textbooks on quantum mechanics or, for instance, Sudbery (1986) or Redhead (1987). The standard formulation The standard formulation of quantum mechanics can be introduced in four steps. The first step is that in quantum mechanics one describesthe physics of a system by means of a Hilbert space ℋ. This Hilbert space is a complex linear vector space on which an inner product is defined. Let's adopt the convention (please consult the Glossary at the end of the book for notational conventions) that α refers to a system and that is the Hilbert space that is associated with this system. Let ∣ℋ α 〉 denote a vector in ℋ α and let 〈ψ α ∣φ α 〉 be the inner product between the vectors ∣ψ α 〉 and ∣φ α 〉.

Cambridge University Press eBooksFeb 5, 20100 citations

The role of the rigged Hilbert space in quantum mechanics

Rafael de la Madrid

There is compelling evidence that, when a continuous spectrum is present, the natural mathematical setting for quantum mechanics is the rigged Hilbert space rather than just the Hilbert space. In particular, Dirac's bra-ket formalism is fully implemented by the rigged Hilbert space rather than just by the Hilbert space. In this paper, we provide a pedestrian introduction to the role the rigged Hilbert space plays in quantum mechanics, by way of a simple, exactly solvable example. The procedure will be constructive and based on a recent publication. We also provide a thorough discussion on the physical significance of the rigged Hilbert space.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502053European Journal of PhysicsFeb 17, 2005200 citations

A Review of The Algebraic Approaches to Quantum Mechanics. Appraisals on Their Theoretical Relevance

Antonino Drago

I review the various algebraic foundations of quantum mechanics. They have been suggested since the birth of this theory till up to last year. They are the following ones: Heisenberg-Born-Jordan (1925), Weyl (1928), Dirac (1930), von Neumann (1936), Segal (1947), T.F. Jordan (1986), Morchio and Strocchi (2009) and Buchholz and Fregenhagen (2019). Three cases are stressed: 1) the misinterpretation of Dirac foundation; 2) von Neumann conversion from the analytic approach of Hilbert space to the algebraic approach of the rings of operators; 3) the recent foundation of quantum mechanics upon the algebra of perturbation Lagrangians. Moreover, historical considerations on the go-and-stop path performed by the algebraic approach in the history of QM are offered. The level of formalism has increased from the mere introduction of matrices till up to group theory and C*-algebras. But there was no progress in approaching closer the foundations of physics; therefore the problem of discovering an algebraic formulation of QM organized as a problem-based theory and making use of no more than constructive mathematics is open.

arXiv:2102.00861Jan 29, 20210 citations

Dirac, Von Neumann, and the Derivation of the Quantum Formalism

Jim Baggott

The evolution of quantum mechanics through the 1920s was profoundly messy. Some physicists believed that it was necessary to throw out much of the conceptual baggage that early quantum mechanics tended to carry around with it and re-establish the theory on much firmer ground. It was at this critical stage that the search for deeper insights into the underlying reality was set aside in favour of mathematical expediency. All the conceptual problems appeared to be coming from the wavefunctions. But whatever was to replace them needed to retain all the properties and relationships that had so far been discovered. Dirac and von Neumann chose to derive a new quantum formalism by replacing the wavefunctions with state vectors operating in an abstract Hilbert space, and formally embedding all the most important definitions and relations within a system of axioms.

Oxford University Press eBooksJan 10, 20200 citations

Conventional Quantum Theory: Fundamentals

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

The aim of this chapter is to present (in a compact way) the fundamentals of conventional quantum theory. We select the for- mulation of QM as an axiomatic theory in the complete accordance with the Hilbert’s program on axiomatization of physical theories. We remark that the ﬁrst step toward the present formulation of QM was done in the seminal work of Hilbert, Nordheim, and von Neumann [112]. This work was substantially extended, completed, and clariﬁed in the book of von Neumann [296]. Another version of the rigorous mathematical approach to QM was presented in the book of Dirac [74]. From the mathematical viewpoint, the main diﬀerence between the approaches of von Neumann and Dirac is that the ﬁrst one is based on the theory of self-adjoint operators in complex Hilbert space and the second one is based on the theory of self-adjoint operators acting (by using the modern mathematical terminology) in rigged Hilbert spaces. This theory operates with generalized eigenvectors belonging to the spaces of distributions. Although the von Neumann’s formalization of QM became dominant in quantum mathematical physics, the Dirac’s formalization is widely used in the works on the physical level of rigorousness. Moreover, the Dirac’s terminology, bra-and ket- vectors, became the standard for quantum information theory. However, since quantum information is based on the castrated version of QM, namely, QM in ﬁnite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, the so-called n-qubit spaces, the basic tool of the Dirac’s formalism, usage of generalized eigenvectors, is useless (since in the ﬁnite- dimensional case everything is reduced to manipulation with matrices). During the last 80 years, there were written hundreds of books on QM enlightening its foundational aspects. Unfortunately, the majority of these writings advertise exotic (and some of them really esoteric) views on QM and, in particular, on interpretation of the wave function. They are full of such terms as the collapse of the wave function, quantumnonlocality, manyworlds, thewave function of universe, the preparation of Schro¨dinger cats, inﬂuence of the future on the past, quantum teleportation. Of course, manipulations with such terminology create an atmosphere of mystery and a feeling that something unusual and impossible can happen. And this atmosphere plays a positive role in attracting young people to QM and especially to quantum foundations.

Mar 19, 20140 citations