arXiv:cond-mat/9908346 · Physical Review Letters

Braunstein, Buceta, and Giovambattista Reply:

Lidia A. Braunstein, R. C. Buceta, Nicolás Giovambattista

Published Feb 8, 1999• 4 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

Reply to ``Comment on [Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 630 (1998)]''

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.82.1338

Related papers

Jönsson, Yoshino, and Nordblad Reply:

Petra E. Jönsson, Hajime Yoshino, П. Нордблад

Reply to the Comment by L. Berthier and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 059701 (2003), also cond-mat/0209165, on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444

arXiv:cond-mat/0209385Physical Review LettersFeb 6, 200316 citations

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Luming Duan, Guang‐Can Guo

In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710014Oct 3, 19971 citation

Reply to Ballentine’s comment [Am. J. Phys. 54, 947 (1986)]

John G. Loeser

American Journal of PhysicsOct 1, 19861 citation

Comment on “Quantitative Condition is Necessary in Guaranteeing the Validity of the Adiabatic Approximation”

Meisheng Zhao, Jianda Wu

A Comment on the Letter by D. M. Tong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 120401 (2010). Also, see Comment Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 138902 (2011) by Daniel Comparat, on the same Letter by D. M. Tong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 120401 (2010). The author of the Letter offers a Reply to both Comments.

arXiv:1104.0277Physical Review LettersApr 1, 201113 citations

Comment on “Quantitative Condition is Necessary in Guaranteeing the Validity of the Adiabatic Approximation”

D. Comparat

A Comment on the Letter by D. M. Tong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 120401 (2010). Also, see Comment Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 138901 (2011) by Meisheng Zhao and Jianda Wu, on the same Letter by D. M. Tong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 120401 (2010). The author of the Letter offers a Reply to both Comments.

Physical Review LettersApr 1, 201118 citations

Hove and Sudbø Reply:

J. Hove, Asle Sudbø

A short Reply to the Comment of Prokof'ev and Svistunov, cond-mat/0504008, is given.

arXiv:cond-mat/0506023Physical Review LettersJun 1, 20063 citations